So I was looking for a new monitor to go with my PC, and after realising I've already used up most of the space on my desk I'd have to settle for no bigger than 22 inch.
I know from general reading around and friends that Samsung have a reputation for very good quality at the low to mid price range of LCD TVs and monitors, so I started with them. What I found was...confusing.
3 monitors, with what I see as identical specs except for contrast ratio and a slight difference in viewing angle. And what confuses me is the pricing.
1.
]Samsung SM-2032BW Pebble 20" Widescreen
- Viewable Area: 20†Widescreen (1680x1050 Resolution)
- Interface: Analog / Digital
- Response Time: 2ms
- 16.7M Colours
-
Contrast Ratio: 3000:1
- Viewing Angle (H/V):
170°/ 170°
- Brightness: 300cd/m2
- 3 Years On-Site Warranty with Samsung
2.
Samsung SM-2053BW Aqua 20" Widescreen LCD Monitor
- Viewable Area: 20†Widescreen (1680x1050 Resolution)
- Interface: Analog / Digital
- Response Time: 2ms
- 16.7M Colours
-
Contrast Ratio: 8000:1
- Viewing Angle (H/V):
170°/ 160°
- Brightness: 300cd/m2
- 3 Years On-Site Warranty with Samsung
3.
Samsung SM-T200 20" Widescreen LCD Monitor
- Viewable Area: 20†Widescreen (1680x1050 Resolution)
- Interface: Analog / Digital
- Response Time: 2ms
- 16.7M Colours
-
Contrast Ratio: 20,000:1
- Viewing Angle (H/V):
170°/ 160°
- Brightness: 300cd/m2
- 3 Years On-Site Warranty with Samsung
A CR of 20,000:1 sounds ridiculously good, yet it's the cheapest of the 3, at £147. The 8000:1 monitor is £149 and the 3000:1 is £154. I don't know how much of a difference that 10° of viewing angle makes either.
So what's the deal here? Because it gave me that sense of being too good to be true.
Posts
Just buy whichever one you can afford and has good reviews. They're probably all fine.