The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
The American Presidency: The race goes on
Elki
get busyModerator, ClubPA Mod Emeritus
get busyModerator, ClubPA Mod Emeritus
Words you are unlikely to see me post in the next pages of this thread: "X is off-topic," because I'm just going to warn you here. This thread is a bitch to keep up with and mod when it's on-topic, and impossible when people use it as a dumping ground for any political news story. If it's not directly related to Obama v. McCain don't post it.
Think it's really important, and still want to post it?
AND NO BLUE DOTTING!
OK? Glad we got that cleared up.
The rest of the article isn't needed because FUCK YEAH!
Economist Unite! Dismal science? More like Really Fucking Awesome Science Putting Up Your Ass.
*does the cabbage patch*
Elki on
0
This discussion has been closed.
Posts
Soooo much semen...
All of the independents mirrored the democrats, though, so fuck yeah!
Bolded part is my emphasis.
The harder the rain, honey, the sweeter the sun.
That's the key chart for an O/U. Height of chart is frequency of a particular result, left to right is increasing number of EC votes for Obama. The average is 333 according to 538, but there's a pretty hard cap of like 350, 360 for Obama (because there are blood red states he just can not win) so try to get it below 300 if you can.
QEDMF xbl: PantsB G+
So I guess the financial conservatives have already abandoned ship then? Only other alternative I can think of is that they're crazy paulites
LondonBridge got banned?
Also Famous Person loved Sarah Palin's debate performance.
Yea, I can just eye ball it but numbers would be easier. I didn't know just how much data they release.
She also apparently made up a quote she said was from Jefferson.
Was the post-debate interview where Palin complained about the KC interview today or yesterday?
Today.
How'd he get banned? (just asking out of curiosity)
I think what pushed him over the edge was the post speculating that liberals "produce less testosterone" than conservatives.
Not even kidding.
Well it's a good reason. Had him on ignore for the past few weeks. Comes a point where you just can't stand the crazy coming out of his posts anymore.
Yeah, they don't have much faith in our longterm memory.
I wish someone would actually challenge this comment once in a while.
https://twitter.com/Hooraydiation
Specifically, he was speculating that people are made liberal because of lower testosterone levels.
Guy was clearly a troll, just a lot better than the average basement dweller.
All I'd have to do is post my picture as evidence against the hormone conspiracy.
I obviously have enough testosterone for 2 people.
A hairy baby?
Excess testosterone actually causes you to go bald.
chair to Creation and then suplex the Void.
chair to Creation and then suplex the Void.
I meant chest hair.
The most recent was mentioned previously here, and he's in the "Why they were banned" thread in Tube's Circus. I'm not sad to see LondonBridge go. The other pro-McCainers here may annoy me at times but at least they make an attempt at a civil discussion.
And bringing it back on topic:
538: Since they are predicting how the election will turn out on Nov. 4th, is their model more or less likely to be shifted by changes in polls as we get closer to the big day?
Whoa, what? Seriously?
Tube apparently got tired of him. And now he is gone.