The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Question about mobile vs desktop gaming graphics...

vegas-stevenvegas-steven Registered User regular
hello everyone.

seems as though my loooong look at a new system keeps driving me back to a laptop as i game most of the time on my xbox 360.

so that being said... i have a question.

say i were to get a notebook that had the following chipset:

Geforce 9700M GTS
512 Megs ram

How would that equate to the desktop version in terms of performance. what desktop chip would compare to that sort of mobile card, and will that sort of card play the following on decent settings:

-spore
-call of duty 4
-starcraft 2 (if the specs are even know yet lol)
-universe at war
-command and conquer (the new one coming out)

see, i love the games that are on the 360, and there are very few that are NOT on that platform aside form these sort of strategy games. why did i throw in COD4? because there will always be the odd game like chernobyl or whatnot that will NOT play on the 360, so just added that in.

Thanks... i have yet to see a real world version of these sorts of laptops running games. a shame.

Las Vegas Youtube page with lots of useless videos:
http://www.youtube.com/vegassteven
vegas-steven on

Posts

  • DaedalusDaedalus Registered User regular
    edited October 2008
    Any laptop with a gaming-quality video card is going to be huge, heavy, overheat a lot, and get shit battery life.

    Just an advance warning from someone who's owned one. Most expensive mistake I ever made.

    Daedalus on
  • KhavallKhavall British ColumbiaRegistered User regular
    edited October 2008
    Also note that there are people who will come in here and insist that they have a gaming laptop that weighs half a pound, gets 2 days of battery life on a charge, can be used as an air conditioner, fits in their pocket, and plays Crysis on super-high.


    They are wrong. They are just deluding themselves about how great their system is. I know. I've been there.



    In general, the smartest thing to do is to build a gaming laptop and get an Eee. That way you will have the otherwise-unreachable performance of a gaming desktop and the portability of a Laptop, instead of what you'll get with a "gaming laptop": the portability of a desktop and the performance of a laptop.

    Khavall on
  • taliosfalcontaliosfalcon Registered User regular
    edited October 2008
    It's perfectly possible to get a notebook that can play games now, just don't go for a desktop replacement notebook.
    Take the ASUS G50V, its got a 9700GT-m in it, which can run most games out now at high settings @ its native res. The trade off? its 1-2 pounds heavier than most other 15"ers (6.5 pounds) and it only gets 2 hours of battery life (thats real life mind you, not the manufacturers rated life) A good portion of people will never even need two hours of battery life so it might be a good buy to them. It's also pretty much completely silent when not playing games.

    Just never, ever buy a desktop replacement notebook..that is a dark road to walk down.

    edit: i myself made the mistake of buying a 15 pound, 17" sager notebook at one point, so I am well aware of the folly of a pure gaming notebook
    edit2: and to answer the ops question it looks like a 9700m-gts is roughly equivalent to a desktop 9600gt

    taliosfalcon on
    steam xbox - adeptpenguin
  • bentbent Registered User regular
    edited October 2008
    I'm typing out this post on a 'gaming' laptop now, and it's not worth the fucking hassle. The graphics card constantly fucks up and it's heavy as all hell.

    If you get one it will be shit in a few years and you'll only be able to upgrade the RAM. Not a wise purchase.

    bent on
    sig1.png
  • DixonDixon Screwed...possibly doomed CanadaRegistered User regular
    edited October 2008
    Another vote here for desktop for gaming and getting a cheap laptop such as the Asus Eee or Acer Atom.

    Dixon on
  • vegas-stevenvegas-steven Registered User regular
    edited October 2008
    i dunno. if you have the machine basically in the same place and just want it to play the occasional FPS and mostly RTS type stuff, can it really be that bad?

    i mean, i am not getting this to replace my xbox, but be powerful for everyday stuff and moderate to possibly heavy gaming.

    its in the same place all the time so i dont care about battery life.
    hrm...

    vegas-steven on
    Las Vegas Youtube page with lots of useless videos:
    http://www.youtube.com/vegassteven
  • AzioAzio Registered User regular
    edited October 2008
    These guys are being ridiculous. Sure, in 2001 this wasn't such a great idea, but these days you can get a perfectly reasonable notebook which will run all of those games for like $1300. It won't be super thin and light but Dell's M1530, for example, is a pretty decent size and the battery life isn't terrible. Just don't go in expecting to run these games at max detail because even premium laptop graphics is going to be about equal to a mid-range desktop video card. The best place to go to compare models is www.notebookreview.com.

    If portability isn't important and you just want to play the latest PC games, your best bet is to buy or build a middling desktop, throw in a $100 video card and you'll be able to run everything. Even Crysis. To say all gaming-class laptops are "huge, heavy, overheat a lot, and get shit battery life" is a pretty inaccurate claim, but unless you need the portability you'll save yourself a lot of money by getting a desktop -- or even upgrading one you already have.

    Azio on
  • Baron DirigibleBaron Dirigible Registered User regular
    edited October 2008
    its in the same place all the time so i dont care about battery life.
    wait, hang on

    why are you buying a laptop anyway

    Baron Dirigible on
  • LogicowLogicow Registered User regular
    edited October 2008
    My laptop has a GeForce 8400. It plays Team Fortress 2 and Spore so I'm happy with it. I'd say, depending on the kind of gaming you want to do, either:


    1) get the cheapest dell vostro you can get with a Core 2 Duo and 2GB of ram. It'll handle Peggle, Spore, Solitaire and flash games from websites, cost around $600, light, not too noisy, and not too hot. (You'll never fill up that 120gb hard drive if you've got a desktop to download stuff with)
    Also you can get it with Windows XP, a big plus if you don't want vista.

    2) get a Toshiba with 4gb of ram, a huge hard drive and a GeForce 9600GT for around $1300 on newegg. Toshiba laptops tend to have great speakers, too. It'll run everything at good detail levels.

    3) go to your local stores and see if any of the laptops on sale are any good. They often have laptops with low-end dedicated graphic cards (Radeon 2400, GeForce 8400) for around $800 that can play games if you're willing to lower the details enough.

    4) buy a laptop at your university if they have any program where they provide software for it (I got XP Pro, MS Office 2007, Matlab, Maple, Microsoft Visual Studio 2005 and a bunch of other stuff for really cheap from my university. Sadly their best laptop at the time was a $1400 Thinkpad with only a GeForce 8400. Kind of overpriced, but the 1680x1050 resolution and awesome keyboard make up for it.)

    Logicow on
  • KhavallKhavall British ColumbiaRegistered User regular
    edited October 2008
    i dunno. if you have the machine basically in the same place and just want it to play the occasional FPS and mostly RTS type stuff, can it really be that bad?

    i mean, i am not getting this to replace my xbox, but be powerful for everyday stuff and moderate to possibly heavy gaming.

    its in the same place all the time so i dont care about battery life.
    hrm...

    So you want a laptop to play games that will just be in one place all the time?

    Why do you want a laptop if it's going to be in one place all the time? Taking out portability and battery life from the equation all that gives you is a system that is less powerful, more expensive, and impossible to upgrade.

    Khavall on
  • DaedalusDaedalus Registered User regular
    edited October 2008
    i dunno. if you have the machine basically in the same place and just want it to play the occasional FPS and mostly RTS type stuff, can it really be that bad?

    i mean, i am not getting this to replace my xbox, but be powerful for everyday stuff and moderate to possibly heavy gaming.

    its in the same place all the time so i dont care about battery life.
    hrm...

    If it's in the same place all the time, build a desktop! It'll cost half as much, get better performance, and you'll be able to upgrade it in the future.

    Daedalus on
  • FozwazerusFozwazerus Registered User regular
    edited October 2008
    He could be in the same situation as me, which is travelling to a new job site once every 1-2 months.

    I built a SFF (small form factor) PC for this, but it became such a hassle to bring with me that I replaced it with a gaming laptop.

    I bought a Gateway P-6860 fx which has a 2.0Ghz, 4Gb, 8800GTS. Runs Warhammer Online maxed out. Cost me about $625 new from Bestbuy when it was on clearance. You just have to wait and watch for good deals and not buy things retail (P-6860 is $1200 retail.)

    Fozwazerus on
  • ArtreusArtreus I'm a wizard And that looks fucked upRegistered User regular
    edited October 2008
    yeah I am not sure what most of you guys are talking about. I have a vostro, and it is still pretty good. Slowing down a bit but I think I just need to format it because it has been messed around with a bit too much.

    But I bought it over a year ago for just under $1000.

    Intel core 2 duo 2.0 GHz
    Geforce 8600m GT
    2GB RAM
    120GB HD.

    This thing can play bioshock on full graphics with no problem. It can run CoD4 on a relatively high resolution with little to no lag. Sure it gets a bit hot sometimes, but just put it on a desk or something. It's fans are actually pretty effective. But really, a year ago this thing was a fucking beast.

    Artreus on
    http://atlanticus.tumblr.com/ PSN: Atlanticus 3DS: 1590-4692-3954 Steam: Artreus
  • Lucky CynicLucky Cynic Registered User regular
    edited October 2008
    While gaming in laptops has come a long way, I still think it sure has a long ways to go to beat out problems of A: Heat and poor airflow and B: Totally raping the battery/power supply.

    Lucky Cynic on
  • UncleSporkyUncleSporky Registered User regular
    edited October 2008
    Khavall wrote: »
    i dunno. if you have the machine basically in the same place and just want it to play the occasional FPS and mostly RTS type stuff, can it really be that bad?

    i mean, i am not getting this to replace my xbox, but be powerful for everyday stuff and moderate to possibly heavy gaming.

    its in the same place all the time so i dont care about battery life.
    hrm...

    So you want a laptop to play games that will just be in one place all the time?

    Why do you want a laptop if it's going to be in one place all the time? Taking out portability and battery life from the equation all that gives you is a system that is less powerful, more expensive, and impossible to upgrade.

    I can understand it. My EEE is plugged into the wall most of the time when I'm using it. Same for my DS. It's good enough just to have it portable in case you ever might want to use it that way, you don't have to cart it around constantly to justify having it.

    UncleSporky on
    Switch Friend Code: SW - 5443 - 2358 - 9118 || 3DS Friend Code: 0989 - 1731 - 9504 || NNID: unclesporky
Sign In or Register to comment.