so i went to see what a week of reviews did foe fable 2 over at metacritic and i was real surprised to see it with a score of 9.0 from the media and 6.1 from users.
Who are these people who are rating down the score so much?
Anyhow it brings up a point about these meta based review sites... People get a game like say , spore and decide they dont like the drm that ea put on it.
In matter of a week or so the game is rated 2/10 based on idiots stating "vote this down if you dont like ____"
Which is the problem with all tuese sites. Let zelda fans vote on a game like fable and they wont like it.
Anyhow, i have the game and am less than an hour into it (damn you responsibilities!) but is it that bad?
Does it deserve that D score?
Las Vegas Youtube page with lots of useless videos:
http://www.youtube.com/vegassteven
Posts
http://forums.penny-arcade.com/showthread.php?t=73003
This.
Also, Kotaku ran a story on this subject the other day: Fanboy dorks ruin Metacritic.
Maybe the game is shit.
I dunno, it's a ton of fun with a great emphasis on exploration and treasure hunting. If you just sit back and let yourself have fun with it, you'll probably love it.
Also it looks just plain weird in motion. That goofy lighting that worked in the first Fable makes this game give me a headache.
Other than that though? Not that bad.
I like it when the bar says quircky things depending on how I rate it...the funnier the feedback is from the scroll bar tdetermines the score it gets!
Now, gamers are stupid lifeless dorks again. And I can't call myself a gamer anymore, even though I am one by my own standarts of what makes a gamer a gamer, just because I don't want to be associated with gamers.