The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
I'd like to see some more cast-iron rules for spoilers.
Willeth
Registered User regular
Registered User regular
This is something that's been bugging me for a while, but it's come to light more prominently recently and I think it's especially worth addressing now.
The example in mind is that the thread for the new Metal Gear announcement contains an apparent ending spoiler for MGS4. As someone rightly pointed out in the thread, people could well be interested in this psuedo-announcement because it might be coming to the 360, and so have never played MGS4.
It's since been enclosed in spoiler tags, but it's still visible in quotes that were quoted before it was spoiled, and there's still no context available about it being an ending spoiler or anything other than a joke. I clicked the spoiler, and having just bought the game for my nice new PS3 I'm incredibly pissed off that I now know something about the game that should have been revealed to me in the course of playing it.
We all know there have been a ton of grade-A titles released over the last couple of weeks. It's very feasible for someone not to get around to buying or playing games like Mirror's Edge or Prince of Persia until February, even for an enthusiast crowd like we have here on the forums. In the Mirror's Edge thread, however, barely a week after launch, people were talking openly about plot elements.
It goes further than something like this, though. I don't subscribe to the idea that if a game's been out a while then all bets are off. It took me over a year to finish BioShock, and yet a very late portion of the game was ruined for me because I found out that near the end
If you had a friend who had never seen the Sixth Sense or Fight Club, would you assume he knew its plot and talk about it, or allow him to have that experience? "But those films are old, surely everyone knows it by now! What? You've never seen a Star Wars film? Man, you'll love it in the Empire Strikes Back when-"
The spoiler rule that we have right now is essentially "spoil stuff that warrants it, provide context so no-one gets caught out." It worked well in the GTA IV thread at release, for example, but while I haven't looked in the thread for a while I can pretty much guarantee that there are some pretty major uncovered spoilers in there. People who don't have a console and have waited for the PC release should definitely not read earlier pages. I don't think someone should be exposed to something like that because of their choice of platform or because they can't afford a full-price game.
The main change I'm looking for is a little more thought about what should go into a spoiler and a little more clarification on time. I'm not suggesting every post in a thread be spoilered, but certain games have certain key revelations that shouldn't be revealed to people who have yet to play them.
As an aside, is it possible to have spoiler context be a part of the tag, similar to how quotes work?
[ spoiler=ending spoilers for game X ] content [/ spoiler ]
The example in mind is that the thread for the new Metal Gear announcement contains an apparent ending spoiler for MGS4. As someone rightly pointed out in the thread, people could well be interested in this psuedo-announcement because it might be coming to the 360, and so have never played MGS4.
It's since been enclosed in spoiler tags, but it's still visible in quotes that were quoted before it was spoiled, and there's still no context available about it being an ending spoiler or anything other than a joke. I clicked the spoiler, and having just bought the game for my nice new PS3 I'm incredibly pissed off that I now know something about the game that should have been revealed to me in the course of playing it.
We all know there have been a ton of grade-A titles released over the last couple of weeks. It's very feasible for someone not to get around to buying or playing games like Mirror's Edge or Prince of Persia until February, even for an enthusiast crowd like we have here on the forums. In the Mirror's Edge thread, however, barely a week after launch, people were talking openly about plot elements.
It goes further than something like this, though. I don't subscribe to the idea that if a game's been out a while then all bets are off. It took me over a year to finish BioShock, and yet a very late portion of the game was ruined for me because I found out that near the end
you have to become a Big Daddy.
I'm aware that the longer a game has been out the more likely it is that the plot is more well-known, but when games cost the amount they do and some are exclusive, it's not unreasonable to think that people aren't going to buy them on the week of release.If you had a friend who had never seen the Sixth Sense or Fight Club, would you assume he knew its plot and talk about it, or allow him to have that experience? "But those films are old, surely everyone knows it by now! What? You've never seen a Star Wars film? Man, you'll love it in the Empire Strikes Back when-"
The spoiler rule that we have right now is essentially "spoil stuff that warrants it, provide context so no-one gets caught out." It worked well in the GTA IV thread at release, for example, but while I haven't looked in the thread for a while I can pretty much guarantee that there are some pretty major uncovered spoilers in there. People who don't have a console and have waited for the PC release should definitely not read earlier pages. I don't think someone should be exposed to something like that because of their choice of platform or because they can't afford a full-price game.
The main change I'm looking for is a little more thought about what should go into a spoiler and a little more clarification on time. I'm not suggesting every post in a thread be spoilered, but certain games have certain key revelations that shouldn't be revealed to people who have yet to play them.
As an aside, is it possible to have spoiler context be a part of the tag, similar to how quotes work?
[ spoiler=ending spoilers for game X ] content [/ spoiler ]
@vgreminders - Don't miss out on timed events in gaming!
@gamefacts - Totally and utterly true gaming facts on the regular!
@gamefacts - Totally and utterly true gaming facts on the regular!
Willeth on
0
Posts
However, if you care about spoilers, why are you reading the thread for a game that's been out for so long? I mean, it would be different if someone posted a big spoiler for GTA IV in an unrelated thread, but what, exactly, do you expect to be reading in a thread that's about the game?
At the risk of repeating myself, this MGS thread is a good example. A teaser image related to Metal Gear has appeared, and no-one knows what it's about. Maybe it's coming to the 360. That'd mean that people without PS3s would be able to play it. I'm sure it's a great game.
I think this thread in particular is likely to entice people who have not played MGS4 yet but really want to. Those people deserve an untarnished experience with it if that's the case.
EDIT: I think the assumption in that thread was that 'it's not a spoiler, because it's been out for a while'. I don't think this is true in any sense, and I really think we need a rewrite of the rule to reflect that.
@gamefacts - Totally and utterly true gaming facts on the regular!
@gamefacts - Totally and utterly true gaming facts on the regular!
I'm reasonably sure that I've seen mods say explicitly that spoilers are spoilers, no matter how old. But a quick glance through the G&T rules doesn't mention it, so maybe a clarification is in order?
So we still need to spoil that Aeris
In my opinion, yes. That's really major. It's also got terrible context, as it's pretty obvious what the spoiler contains even if you don't click it.
EDIT: Yeah this is actually exactly what bothers me.
@gamefacts - Totally and utterly true gaming facts on the regular!
This is what I understood the rule to be.
[tiny]I totally see the silliness of spoilering highly publicized events.[/tiny]
chair to Creation and then suplex the Void.
"I was so sad when your mum
Wow, just as well I'm as retarded as you are and can't crack your outstanding code there.
I don't think a set rule in stone is going to be at all helpful, and honestly, I'd say the statute of limitations runs out far more quickly than 11+ years, as in our oft mocked FF7 spoiler. Interested in something a thread is about? Read the original post, those rarely contain spoilers (I'm sure someone will point out where this has happened, but I've yet to see a bad one), post in the thread if you wish to 'mark your place' and participate with hopefully as few spoilers as possible.
Hell, plenty of people seem to duck into new game threads and just ask "hey, is it awesome?"
Maybe we should make that a standard addition to new game/movie thread OP's: is the general consensus Awesome Or Not.
http://www.audioentropy.com/
12 YEAR OLD GAME (FFVII) SPOILERS:
I mean, fuck
but seriously
it's 12 years old and is constantly spoiled by people
I bet if you surveyed everyone here, almost everyone would either have played the game and found it out for themselves, had it spoiled for them by someone else or don't really care at all
I understand that some people just don't care about them, and that's fine, but I agree with the OP that a little more clarity would service each subforum a bit better so people are clearer on what the boundaries are.
I think this would smooth things out for both would-be spoiler posters and those that don't want to be spoiled, so that those that don't want to read untagged spoilers know what threads to avoid, and when, and on the flip side that it is very clear to those that don't care about spoilers where the line is.
Then again I understand why this kind of rule is best when it is breathable. I personally don't even like reporting spoilers, especially for new things, because I know it gets reported to the mod forum which is essentially like spoiling new stuff for the entire mod staff. That would irritate me if I was a mod, especially in G&T.
but there should be exceptions
chair to Creation and then suplex the Void.
In threads where you're talking about something that has a potential for spoilers (say, a new game thread), people tend to use the spoiler tag just for spoilers. But an easy "fix" is just if you're spoilering to trim quote trees, say "spoiler'd for quote trees" or something like that right before. If you're using it for a joke in threads like that, realize that only a few people will be seeing the hysterically witty punchline you have so cleverly hidden.
In threads where actual spoilers aren't expected behind spoiler tags, like the stereotypical SE++ thread, it'd be good to mark it with a little thing like "spoiler for Fallout 3" or whatever.
Those rules are pretty well followed I'd say. The people that aren't considerate enough to mark/tag their spoilers wouldn't do so any more with a realspoiler/hidden tag.
Basically I'd say all the "stuff" necessary to fix the spoiler problem are there. I think generally people know what spoilers are fair game to talk about freely and what aren't without making it a "cast iron rule". The oft-mentioned FFVII thing is fair game I'd say because it's part of gaming culture. It's as widely known as the fact that your princess is in another castle, perhaps more widely known.
When I see people wanting it spoiled, it looks to me as if they're mainly arguing for a no-tolerance policy regarding spoilers. That's a little extreme to me, as it has a potential to get out of hand fast. Yes, it's nice to not have anything spoiled. But seriously, we don't need every twist and/or plot point throughout literary, cinematic and videogame history hidden from our virgin eyes. A concrete rule doesn't help things here. Moderator discretion works pretty well.
I think an announcement/infraction frenzy for those that use spoiler tags unwisely or not at all would be good to solve the current thing. Then again, I could very well be wrong, because I honestly don't see much of a problem at the moment in the first place.
Man, I was reading a thread a day or two ago...must've been Fable or Fallout I guess as that's all I'm playing just now and there was a small discussion going on in spoiler tags. I guess maybe it had started off as spoiler-related but had been trimmed and was just discussing something completely unrelated to spoilers like system performance or something. It wasn't in spoiler tags as a joke, I think everybody had just gotten so used to posting everything in spoilers that they forgot that sometimes you could just not post stuff in spoilers and not totally ruin some ones day. I found it quite amusing, like they'd got so scared of accidentally spoiling something that the whole thread, non-spoilers and all was all hidden behind spoiler tags.
Anyway, my feeling is getting too serious about spoilers and the rules that need to be followed is just silly. Sometimes people spoil something maliciously, sometimes they do it accidentally, sometimes discussions get so complicated it's difficult to tell what should and shouldn't be spoiled and how to alert people what the spoiler is about without still spoiling something. So basically I think people need to just lighten up about it. Nobody needs to get banned unless they intentionally ruin a storyline or are just epically dense.
I think probably more important is getting it through the technically inept skulls of some people that spoiling porn or huge images doesn't make it not load into peoples browsers. I mean, you're not going to loose your job because
But you might because
Example:
[.QUOTE="ENTRYFIELD"]This[/QUOTE]
Results in
So there could be something similar:
[.Spoiler="Super Mario Brothers"]The Princess Is In Another Castle[/spoiler]
Shows up as
Super Mario Brothers Spoiler:
Sans the second spoiler notification obviously. I don't know if something like this is possible or even something Alpha would want to look into, just throwing it out there.
@gamefacts - Totally and utterly true gaming facts on the regular!
I mean, if the context is obvious (spoilers in the Fallout 3 thread, for instance) we don't do anything. However, if you're throwing a Fallout 3 spoiler in a thread about the presidential election with no context, we're going to infract you for that.
The question needs to be why does EVERYONE need to inconvenience themselves for the few people who couldn't be bothered playing the game, lets face it, six months after a game comes out, if people are still talking about it because they have finished the game 10 times and they enjoy it. 95% of the the posters need to change their habits for the 5% that apparently like the game so much they haven't finished it.
I still haven't finished GTA4, if the ending gets ruined for me I should really ask myself shouldn't I have played the game if I didn't want to get spoiled?
Satans..... hints.....
If it gets ruined for you in another, unrelated thread? There is no way in hell you have a point. Not all of us buy games the very moment they come out, and we shouldn't have to expect that those of you who have that kind of money to burn are going to be dickweeds about it. I realize it's ever-so-much trouble to put a goddamn tag on it (takes all of three clicks), but that effort (which is apparently monumental) saves us a lot of grief.
If you want to be able to freely post spoilers about games that have recently been released, there are plenty of forums out there on the internet that will let you do that. This is not one of them, and that fact is an attraction to a lot of the people who post on this forum.
Alrighty.
As regards BioShock, I know it's not the spoiler, but it's definitely a spoiler, and I would have quite liked to have found it out by myself. The fact that it was a secret achievement kind of backs that up.
@gamefacts - Totally and utterly true gaming facts on the regular!
I saw it happen a few times, but people usually got slapped down pretty hard for it.