The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Israel Prepared to move ground forces into Gaza

RecklessReckless Registered User regular
edited January 2009 in Debate and/or Discourse
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7801662.stm

Looks like with the Cease-Fire ending, Israel's making a direct military effort to get something done about Hamas.
The BBC wrote:
Israel set for prolonged Gaza op

Israel says it will widen its attacks on Hamas if necessary to stop the Palestinian militant group firing rockets from the Gaza Strip.

Israeli F-16 bombers hit targets across the Gaza Strip on Saturday, killing at least 225 people, local medics say.

"If what we're doing in the air will not suffice we'll continue on the ground," Israeli Defence Minister Ehud Barak told BBC News.

Israel's air raids were the heaviest on the Gaza Strip for decades.

Most of those killed were policemen in the Hamas militant movement, which controls Gaza, but women and children also died, Gaza officials said.

About 700 others were wounded, as missiles struck security compounds and militant bases, the officials added.

Israel said it was responding to an escalation in rocket attacks from Gaza and would bomb "as long as necessary". Air raids have continued into the night, while Israeli tanks are deployed just outside Gaza.

Israeli PM Ehud Olmert said the operation "may take some time" - but he pledged to avoid a humanitarian crisis.

"It's not going to last a few days,'' he said in a televised statement, flanked by Defence Minister Barak and Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni.

Staff at the main hospital in Gaza said operating rooms were overflowing, it was running out of medicine, and there was not enough surgeons to cope.

'Time for fighting'

The raids came days after a truce with Hamas expired.

Mr Barak said "there is a time for calm and a time for fighting, and now the time has come to fight". He told the BBC it was "not realistic" to call off the operation at this stage.

The exiled leader of Hamas, Khaled Meshaal, called for a new intifada, or uprising, against Israel, in response to the attacks.

The movement's Gaza leader, Ismail Haniyeh, said there would be no white flags and no surrender. "Palestine has never witnessed an uglier massacre," he said.

Israel hit targets across Gaza, striking in the territory's main population centres, including Gaza City in the north and the southern towns of Khan Younis and Rafah.

Mr Olmert said "we tried to avoid, and I think quite successfully, to hit any uninvolved people - we attacked only targets that are part of the Hamas organisations".

Hamas said all of its security compounds in Gaza were destroyed by the air strikes, which Israel said hit some 40 targets.

Hamas vowed to carry out revenge attacks on Israel and fired Qassam rockets into Israeli territory as an immediate reply.

One Israeli was killed by a rocket strike on the town of Netivot, 20 kilometres (12 miles) east of Gaza, doctors said.

Ceasefire urged

The air strikes come amid rumours that an Israeli ground operation is imminent.

Israeli television said on Saturday evening that Israeli troops were massing on the Gaza border "in preparation for a supplementary ground offensive". The report has not been confirmed by independent sources.

US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice accused Hamas of having triggered the new bout of violence.

"The United States is deeply concerned about the escalating violence in Gaza," she said in a statement.

"We strongly condemn the repeated rocket and mortar attacks against Israel and hold Hamas responsible for breaking the ceasefire and for the renewal of violence there. The ceasefire must be restored immediately and fully respected."

UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon also urged an immediate halt to the violence, condemning what he called Israel's "excessive use of force leading to the killing and injuring of civilians" and "the ongoing rocket attacks by Palestinian militants".

Calls for a ceasefire also came from Middle East envoy Tony Blair and the French EU presidency.

Hamas bases destroyed

Palestinian militants frequently fire rockets against Israeli towns from inside the Gaza Strip; large numbers of rocket and mortar shells have been fired at Israel in recent days.

The BBC's Katya Adler in Jerusalem says the timing of Israel's operation is significant, as Israeli politicians are keen to score points ahead of a general election in February.

A Hamas police spokesman, Islam Shahwan, said one of the Israeli raids targeted a police compound in Gaza City where a graduation ceremony for new personnel was taking place.

At least a dozen bodies of men in black uniforms were photographed at the Hamas police headquarters in Gaza City.

Most of the dead and injured were said to be in Gaza City. The head of Gaza's police forces, Tawfik Jaber, was among those killed.

Mr Olmert appealed to Palestinians in Gaza, saying "You - the citizens of Gaza - are not our enemies. Hamas, Jihad and the other terrorist organisations are your enemies, as they are our enemies.

"They have brought disaster on you and they try to bring disaster to the people of Israel. And it is our common goal to make every possible effort to stop them."

It is the worst attack in Gaza since 1967 in terms of the number of Palestinian casualties, a senior analyst told the BBC in Jerusalem.

Although a six-month truce between Hamas and Israel was agreed earlier this year, it was regularly under strain and was allowed to lapse when it expired this month.

Mosques issued urgent appeals for people to donate blood on Saturday and Hamas sources told the BBC's Rushdi Abou Alouf in Gaza that hospitals were soon full.

In the West Bank, Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas - whose Fatah faction was ousted from Gaza by Hamas in 2007 - condemned the attacks and called for restraint.

Egypt opened its border crossing to the Gaza Strip at Rafah to absorb and treat some of those injured in the south of the territory.

Palestinians staged demonstrations in the West Bank cities of Ramallah and Hebron, and there were some scuffles with Israeli troops there.

Hamas blamed Israel for the end of the ceasefire, saying it had not respected its terms, including the lifting of the blockade under which little more than humanitarian aid has been allowed into Gaza.

Israel said it initially began easing the blockade, but this was halted when Hamas failed to fulfil what Israel says were agreed conditions, including ending all rocket fire and halting weapons smuggling.

Reckless on
«13456776

Posts

  • edited December 2008
    This content has been removed.

  • CouscousCouscous Registered User regular
    edited December 2008
    What are the chances of a bunch of young or female people getting killed and only further pissing off the people in Gaza?

    Couscous on
  • RecklessReckless Registered User regular
    edited December 2008
    Eh. This happens about once a year doesn't it? I mean bombing the Gaza strip and killing a bunch of people is pretty much standard faire and everyone seems committed to maintaining the status quo on both sides.

    Thing is, there seems to be a fairly serious willingness on Israel's part to move soldiers into Gaza, which would make things a little more interesting than previous skirmishes in the recent past.

    Reckless on
  • edited December 2008
    This content has been removed.

  • RecklessReckless Registered User regular
    edited December 2008
    Reckless wrote: »
    Eh. This happens about once a year doesn't it? I mean bombing the Gaza strip and killing a bunch of people is pretty much standard faire and everyone seems committed to maintaining the status quo on both sides.

    Thing is, there seems to be a fairly serious willingness on Israel's part to move soldiers into Gaza, which would make things a little more interesting than previous skirmishes in the recent past.
    That's the sad thing really - nothing will be resolved as a result. They can kill a bunch of Hamas fighters and at the end of the day there will be a larger number of Hamas fighters. Hamas will get a couple of Israeli soldiers and feel vindicated and the net losers will be Palestinians who could give a damn about either side but who's survival will be predicated on looking like they seriously truly hate Israel in public.

    Do you think Palestinian support of Hamas comes from fear of that organization or actual hatred for Israeli, who's blockades have been making daily life a struggle?

    I'm not saying I back Hamas, just making a point.

    Reckless on
  • edited December 2008
    This content has been removed.

  • AntimatterAntimatter Devo Was Right Gates of SteelRegistered User regular
    edited December 2008
    Couscous wrote: »
    What are the chances of a bunch of young or female people getting killed and only further pissing off the people in Gaza?

    Already happened.

    Antimatter on
  • DarkCrawlerDarkCrawler Registered User regular
    edited December 2008
    Okay...I'm generally not pro- or anti- Israel or anything. I believe that the country has right to be there, and it's really too late to change it's existance now. It's there. Despite all, it still stands far above rest of Middle East in plenty of good things as well...but this is just fucked up. Seriously. They honestly don't have any better way of dealing with the situation then bomb the living crap out of everything, no matter if there are civilians or not? Shit like this makes it much harder to support their cause.
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7800985.stm

    DarkCrawler on
  • CouscousCouscous Registered User regular
    edited December 2008
    Antimatter wrote: »
    Couscous wrote: »
    What are the chances of a bunch of young or female people getting killed and only further pissing off the people in Gaza?

    Already happened.

    Do something that anybody can see the results coming from a mile away, shame on you. Do it a million times, Jesus Christ, you actually think you are going to magically solve the fucking problem in any way this time?

    Couscous on
  • PicardathonPicardathon Registered User regular
    edited December 2008
    Couscous wrote: »
    Antimatter wrote: »
    Couscous wrote: »
    What are the chances of a bunch of young or female people getting killed and only further pissing off the people in Gaza?

    Already happened.

    Do something that anybody can see the results coming from a mile away, shame on you. Do it a million times, Jesus Christ, you actually think you are going to magically solve the fucking problem in any way this time?

    I think that they're just going to destroy everything of military value in the Gaza strip.
    That's the only thing that the Israelis could do that would actually accomplish their stated objectives.

    Picardathon on
  • Dr Mario KartDr Mario Kart Games Dealer Austin, TXRegistered User regular
    edited December 2008
    Hamas built schools, they fed folks. Thats the way you get support from a people. We've done the same thing in some parts of Pakistan, less than 100 miles where we are bombing the same people with different results.

    Dr Mario Kart on
  • DarkCrawlerDarkCrawler Registered User regular
    edited December 2008
    So, I need an expert on this to put it clearly for me.

    Palestinians hate Israelis. They don't want to be any part of the country.

    The Palestinian Territories are a constant source of problem for Israel. All the time.

    Yet, it's not possible for Palestinian Territories to be their own country. Why? Is it because even if they were, the attacks on Israel wouldn't stop anyway because they want Jerusalem or something? Because Israel wants to keep every piece of territory it has (despite showing no interest in making life there better)? Is it because if it was it's own country it would be ruled by Hamas and U.S./Israel wouldn't like that?

    I don't really see this alternative being worse then the current situation, so can someone tell me why this isn't happening?

    DarkCrawler on
  • hawkboxhawkbox Registered User regular
    edited December 2008
    Ask Isreal. They are in what is officially Isreali territory. Personally I think the 2 state solution is dead as its only a matter of time before the Palestinians outnumber the Jews and this aparthied they have going on now is unsustainable.

    hawkbox on
  • edited December 2008
    This content has been removed.

  • ProPatriaMoriProPatriaMori Registered User regular
    edited December 2008
    Aren't the Palestinians one of those groups that, like the Jews, have been systematically herded out of every homeland they've ever had? I seem to recall even the surrounding Arab states hating them.

    ProPatriaMori on
  • RecklessReckless Registered User regular
    edited December 2008
    Okay...I'm generally not pro- or anti- Israel or anything. I believe that the country has right to be there, and it's really too late to change it's existance now. It's there. Despite all, it still stands far above rest of Middle East in plenty of good things as well...but this is just fucked up. Seriously. They honestly don't have any better way of dealing with the situation then bomb the living crap out of everything, no matter if there are civilians or not? Shit like this makes it much harder to support their cause.
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7800985.stm

    Israel is betting pretty strategic about their bombing. There's going to be civilians killed undoubtedly, but if the Israeli Air Force wanted to "bomb the living crap out of everything," we wouldn't be seeing the very low numbers of civilian casualties that have been reported thus far.

    Reckless on
  • RecklessReckless Registered User regular
    edited December 2008
    Aren't the Palestinians one of those groups that, like the Jews, have been systematically herded out of every homeland they've ever had? I seem to recall even the surrounding Arab states hating them.

    Yeah, they've had their own diaspora. As corny as it is, the episode of the West Wing where they basically do their own version of the Camp David Accords had a really great way of pointing out how similar the Jews and Palestinians really are.

    Reckless on
  • DarkCrawlerDarkCrawler Registered User regular
    edited December 2008
    So, I need an expert on this to put it clearly for me.

    Palestinians hate Israelis. They don't want to be any part of the country.

    The Palestinian Territories are a constant source of problem for Israel. All the time.

    Yet, it's not possible for Palestinian Territories to be their own country. Why? Is it because even if they were, the attacks on Israel wouldn't stop anyway because they want Jerusalem or something? Because Israel wants to keep every piece of territory it has (despite showing no interest in making life there better)? Is it because if it was it's own country it would be ruled by Hamas and U.S./Israel wouldn't like that?

    I don't really see this alternative being worse then the current situation, so can someone tell me why this isn't happening?
    Border disputes are essentially the reason. Both sides want various territories and especially Jerusalem for themselves, and there are obvious strategic considerations in who gets what. It is of concern to Israel how far for example, they can expect the inevitable militant rockets to fly into their country.

    Which I suppose underlines the point - Israel essentially see's very little reason to really do anything, since no matter what happens nothing really looks like it's going to change for anyone.

    :(

    Man, why can't a huge country like Russia just sell stretches of land to all these displaced people wanting their own country? It's not like they need half of their territory anyway. "Here, take a nice piece of Siberia. 20 times the size of Israel. Aren't you happy? Pay in cash and we throw in couple of extra square miles. Sure, Siberia isn't all that great, but it probably beats the hellish desert with no food, water or electricity anyway. The couple of coat-herding villagers that live there won't mind where they live, they are probably happy that the place is a bit more populated. Oh, we are used to having cut down in size a little, nothing compared to the fall of the Soviet Union."



    yes, it is a joke

    DarkCrawler on
  • OrganichuOrganichu poops peesRegistered User regular
    edited December 2008
    As an Israeli I hope for a swift and decisive resolution to this conflict. I think a few of the posts in this thread have been incisive (and a few have been dumb, to be honest), so I won't bother pointing out the difficulties posed to Israel in engaging in a 'clean' conflict this upcoming year.

    My thoughts go out to any innocent parties harmed.

    Organichu on
  • RecklessReckless Registered User regular
    edited December 2008
    First of all, I wish you safety in the coming weeks.

    Secondly, as an Israeli, you're bound to have a more educated and more personal stance on the issue. Please, if you can, let us know what the dealio is.

    Reckless on
  • OrganichuOrganichu poops peesRegistered User regular
    edited December 2008
    Reckless wrote: »
    First of all, I wish you safety in the coming weeks.

    I'm an Israeli-American, and currently I'm a few thousand miles from Israel, safe. Thanks, though. :) I have enough friends and family to worry me that I'll probably be flying back soon.
    Secondly, as an Israeli, you're bound to have a more educated and more personal stance on the issue. Please, if you can, let us know what the dealio is.

    With what, specifically?

    Organichu on
  • Dis'Dis' Registered User regular
    edited December 2008
    So, I need an expert on this to put it clearly for me.

    Palestinians hate Israelis. They don't want to be any part of the country.

    The Palestinian Territories are a constant source of problem for Israel. All the time.

    Yet, it's not possible for Palestinian Territories to be their own country. Why? Is it because even if they were, the attacks on Israel wouldn't stop anyway because they want Jerusalem or something? Because Israel wants to keep every piece of territory it has (despite showing no interest in making life there better)? Is it because if it was it's own country it would be ruled by Hamas and U.S./Israel wouldn't like that?

    I don't really see this alternative being worse then the current situation, so can someone tell me why this isn't happening?
    Border disputes are essentially the reason. Both sides want various territories and especially Jerusalem for themselves, and there are obvious strategic considerations in who gets what. It is of concern to Israel how far for example, they can expect the inevitable militant rockets to fly into their country.

    Which I suppose underlines the point - Israel essentially see's very little reason to really do anything, since no matter what happens nothing really looks like it's going to change for anyone.

    :(

    Man, why can't a huge country like Russia just sell stretches of land to all these displaced people wanting their own country? It's not like they need half of their territory anyway. "Here, take a nice piece of Siberia. 20 times the size of Israel. Aren't you happy? Pay in cash and we throw in couple of extra square miles. Sure, Siberia isn't all that great, but it probably beats the hellish desert with no food, water or electricity anyway. The couple of coat-herding villagers that live there won't mind where they live, they are probably happy that the place is a bit more populated. Oh, we are used to having cut down in size a little, nothing compared to the fall of the Soviet Union."

    They kinda tried something like that that, it didn't work out well at all

    Dis' on
  • Premier kakosPremier kakos Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited December 2008
    I still think they should have stuck the Jewish state in Europe, specifically the Rhineland. At the time Israel was founded, the vast majority of Jews were Ashkenazi Jews which were primarily centred around *drumroll* the Rhineland! BTW, the vast majority means, if I recall correctly, upwards of 90% of all Jews. With the exception of the Nazis, who were just defeated, anti-semitism was on the way out. It is much nicer land and there wouldn't be a perpetual conflict! Yay!

    Premier kakos on
  • DarkCrawlerDarkCrawler Registered User regular
    edited December 2008
    Dis' wrote: »
    So, I need an expert on this to put it clearly for me.

    Palestinians hate Israelis. They don't want to be any part of the country.

    The Palestinian Territories are a constant source of problem for Israel. All the time.

    Yet, it's not possible for Palestinian Territories to be their own country. Why? Is it because even if they were, the attacks on Israel wouldn't stop anyway because they want Jerusalem or something? Because Israel wants to keep every piece of territory it has (despite showing no interest in making life there better)? Is it because if it was it's own country it would be ruled by Hamas and U.S./Israel wouldn't like that?

    I don't really see this alternative being worse then the current situation, so can someone tell me why this isn't happening?
    Border disputes are essentially the reason. Both sides want various territories and especially Jerusalem for themselves, and there are obvious strategic considerations in who gets what. It is of concern to Israel how far for example, they can expect the inevitable militant rockets to fly into their country.

    Which I suppose underlines the point - Israel essentially see's very little reason to really do anything, since no matter what happens nothing really looks like it's going to change for anyone.

    :(

    Man, why can't a huge country like Russia just sell stretches of land to all these displaced people wanting their own country? It's not like they need half of their territory anyway. "Here, take a nice piece of Siberia. 20 times the size of Israel. Aren't you happy? Pay in cash and we throw in couple of extra square miles. Sure, Siberia isn't all that great, but it probably beats the hellish desert with no food, water or electricity anyway. The couple of coat-herding villagers that live there won't mind where they live, they are probably happy that the place is a bit more populated. Oh, we are used to having cut down in size a little, nothing compared to the fall of the Soviet Union."

    They kinda tried something like that that, it didn't work out well at all

    Well...at least there are no constant bombings and a horribly opressed minority.

    And it's bigger then Israel too.

    DarkCrawler on
  • RecklessReckless Registered User regular
    edited December 2008
    I still think they should have stuck the Jewish state in Europe, specifically the Rhineland. At the time Israel was founded, the vast majority of Jews were Ashkenazi Jews which were primarily centred around *drumroll* the Rhineland! BTW, the vast majority means, if I recall correctly, upwards of 90% of all Jews. With the exception of the Nazis, who were just defeated, anti-semitism was on the way out. It is much nicer land and there wouldn't be a perpetual conflict! Yay!

    That's quite the brazen statement. Do you really think antisemitism in Germany went to nil once the Russians raised their flag over Berlin?

    Reckless on
  • Premier kakosPremier kakos Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited December 2008
    Reckless wrote: »
    I still think they should have stuck the Jewish state in Europe, specifically the Rhineland. At the time Israel was founded, the vast majority of Jews were Ashkenazi Jews which were primarily centred around *drumroll* the Rhineland! BTW, the vast majority means, if I recall correctly, upwards of 90% of all Jews. With the exception of the Nazis, who were just defeated, anti-semitism was on the way out. It is much nicer land and there wouldn't be a perpetual conflict! Yay!

    That's quite the brazen statement. Do you really think antisemitism in Germany went to nil once the Russians raised their flag over Berlin?

    Oh, I didn't say nil, but it was on the way out across Europe. Nazism was the last hurrah of anti-semitism in Europe; now, it was a big fucking last hurrah and it was a really fucking nasty last hurrah. And, yes, I know anti-semitism persisted in Germany for a while afterwards, but it was nowhere near as violent as the Palestinian/Israeli sentiments.

    Premier kakos on
  • OrganichuOrganichu poops peesRegistered User regular
    edited December 2008
    I know people will disagree with me, I know people will post pictures of Israeli children drawing smiley faces on missiles meant for Nasrallah, I know people will reference hate graffiti- but drawing a direct comparison between the racial vitriol of Nazism and the mainstream Israeli sentiment towards Palestinians is... inaccurate, at best. Disingenuous at worst. People like to call it apartheid, too, but I think that's also a cheap characterization given the connotations and stark differences.

    Organichu on
  • DarkCrawlerDarkCrawler Registered User regular
    edited December 2008
    Organichu wrote: »
    I know people will disagree with me, I know people will post pictures of Israeli children drawing smiley faces on missiles meant for Nasrallah, I know people will reference hate graffiti- but drawing a direct comparison between the racial vitriol of Nazism and the mainstream Israeli sentiment towards Palestinians is... inaccurate, at best. Disingenuous at worst. People like to call it apartheid, too, but I think that's also a cheap characterization given the connotations and stark differences.

    I don't think anyone is comparing them to Nazis.

    Still, what is being done to Palestinians is horrible. I don't think anyone has a valid argument to that either. There isn't really another first world country where a minority is being opressed in such a way.

    DarkCrawler on
  • edited December 2008
    This content has been removed.

  • Premier kakosPremier kakos Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited December 2008
    Well, all I'm trying to say is that anti-semitic sentiments in Germany post-WW2 were there, but they were fragile. Jews were a scapegoat of the Nazi government and a convenient villain to rally around, but they were a scapegoat and that's it. It was a hate propped up on a shaky foundation breathed to life by a charismatic leader. When that leader died and those speeches stopped, well, that foundation was gone. The structure built on top of that foundation may persist, but it had nothing to keep it strong. It would erode quickly.

    Premier kakos on
  • OrganichuOrganichu poops peesRegistered User regular
    edited December 2008
    Organichu wrote: »
    I know people will disagree with me, I know people will post pictures of Israeli children drawing smiley faces on missiles meant for Nasrallah, I know people will reference hate graffiti- but drawing a direct comparison between the racial vitriol of Nazism and the mainstream Israeli sentiment towards Palestinians is... inaccurate, at best. Disingenuous at worst. People like to call it apartheid, too, but I think that's also a cheap characterization given the connotations and stark differences.

    I don't think anyone is comparing them to Nazis.

    The comparisons are being made, some more flagrant than others.
    Still, what is being done to Palestinians is horrible. I don't think anyone has a valid argument to that either. There isn't really another first world country where a minority is being opressed in such a way.

    I won't speak for other conflicts of the sort (I don't feel comfortable discussing things about which I find myself ignorant), but I'll certainly agree that what is being done to the Palestinians is horrible.

    Organichu on
  • Premier kakosPremier kakos Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited December 2008
    Reckless wrote: »
    I still think they should have stuck the Jewish state in Europe, specifically the Rhineland. At the time Israel was founded, the vast majority of Jews were Ashkenazi Jews which were primarily centred around *drumroll* the Rhineland! BTW, the vast majority means, if I recall correctly, upwards of 90% of all Jews. With the exception of the Nazis, who were just defeated, anti-semitism was on the way out. It is much nicer land and there wouldn't be a perpetual conflict! Yay!

    That's quite the brazen statement. Do you really think antisemitism in Germany went to nil once the Russians raised their flag over Berlin?

    Oh, I didn't say nil, but it was on the way out across Europe. Nazism was the last hurrah of anti-semitism in Europe; now, it was a big fucking last hurrah and it was a really fucking nasty last hurrah. And, yes, I know anti-semitism persisted in Germany for a while afterwards, but it was nowhere near as violent as the Palestinian/Israeli sentiments.
    I thought the reason Israel ended up where it was was partially because the Jews still weren't particularly well-liked in Europe even after WW2 and the idea was basically to give them somewhere out of everyone else's way.

    Of course I have to agree that carving off a chunk of Germany for them would've made a hell of a lot more sense given how Germany was being carved up by America, France, England and Russia at the time.

    Yeah, you're right. It's sort of a hindsight is 20/20 type of thing. There were a handful of people who were saying that a Jewish state in Palestine was a really bad idea, but it was mostly ignored. In hindsight, I think it would have made a LOT more sense to put them in Germany.

    Premier kakos on
  • Premier kakosPremier kakos Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited December 2008
    Organichu wrote: »
    Organichu wrote: »
    I know people will disagree with me, I know people will post pictures of Israeli children drawing smiley faces on missiles meant for Nasrallah, I know people will reference hate graffiti- but drawing a direct comparison between the racial vitriol of Nazism and the mainstream Israeli sentiment towards Palestinians is... inaccurate, at best. Disingenuous at worst. People like to call it apartheid, too, but I think that's also a cheap characterization given the connotations and stark differences.

    I don't think anyone is comparing them to Nazis.

    The comparisons are being made, some more flagrant than others.

    I really hope you don't think I'm making that comparison, because, well, I'm not.

    Premier kakos on
  • OrganichuOrganichu poops peesRegistered User regular
    edited December 2008
    Organichu wrote: »
    Organichu wrote: »
    I know people will disagree with me, I know people will post pictures of Israeli children drawing smiley faces on missiles meant for Nasrallah, I know people will reference hate graffiti- but drawing a direct comparison between the racial vitriol of Nazism and the mainstream Israeli sentiment towards Palestinians is... inaccurate, at best. Disingenuous at worst. People like to call it apartheid, too, but I think that's also a cheap characterization given the connotations and stark differences.

    I don't think anyone is comparing them to Nazis.

    The comparisons are being made, some more flagrant than others.

    I really hope you don't think I'm making that comparison, because, well, I'm not.

    You didn't, directly- but what you said (that the antisemitic vestiges in Germany after WW2 "weren't as violent as the I-P sentiments" (paraphrase)) is the exact sort of segue employed by people who walk that line. I don't think you meant it that way, but I was referencing your post to say "there are people who extrapolate this". I hear all the time:

    "The situation is so ironic, given the fact that they have the power to do what they're doing because of Nazi persecution..."

    Organichu on
  • PicardathonPicardathon Registered User regular
    edited December 2008
    Reckless wrote: »
    I still think they should have stuck the Jewish state in Europe, specifically the Rhineland. At the time Israel was founded, the vast majority of Jews were Ashkenazi Jews which were primarily centred around *drumroll* the Rhineland! BTW, the vast majority means, if I recall correctly, upwards of 90% of all Jews. With the exception of the Nazis, who were just defeated, anti-semitism was on the way out. It is much nicer land and there wouldn't be a perpetual conflict! Yay!

    That's quite the brazen statement. Do you really think antisemitism in Germany went to nil once the Russians raised their flag over Berlin?

    Oh, I didn't say nil, but it was on the way out across Europe. Nazism was the last hurrah of anti-semitism in Europe; now, it was a big fucking last hurrah and it was a really fucking nasty last hurrah. And, yes, I know anti-semitism persisted in Germany for a while afterwards, but it was nowhere near as violent as the Palestinian/Israeli sentiments.
    I thought the reason Israel ended up where it was was partially because the Jews still weren't particularly well-liked in Europe even after WW2 and the idea was basically to give them somewhere out of everyone else's way.

    Of course I have to agree that carving off a chunk of Germany for them would've made a hell of a lot more sense given how Germany was being carved up by America, France, England and Russia at the time.

    Yeah, you're right. It's sort of a hindsight is 20/20 type of thing. There were a handful of people who were saying that a Jewish state in Palestine was a really bad idea, but it was mostly ignored. In hindsight, I think it would have made a LOT more sense to put them in Germany.

    Put yourself into the shoes of a jew who just made it out of a concentration camp.
    At this point you are most likely in an internment camp set up by the allied forces because nobody knows what to do with you.
    Then you here the news.
    "Hey, you know those guys who killed your loved ones and brought you to the brink of death? You're going to have a country where you live right next to them! It'll be great!"
    Nobody wanted to be in Germany, or Poland, or anywhere. Anyone who could get out got out. It had something to do with fear, but they just wanted to clear out.

    I know that you're just going to think I'm hitting you over the head with this, but the Nazis killed two thirds of the European Jewish population. If I'm in an internment camp I'm taking whatever boat goes somewhere else. Israel, America, whatever. Staying would not have worked out.

    And hell, this isn't an exageration when the time period is considered.

    Picardathon on
  • Premier kakosPremier kakos Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited December 2008
    Organichu wrote: »
    You didn't, directly- but what you said (that the antisemitic vestiges in Germany after WW2 "weren't as violent as the I-P sentiments" (paraphrase)) is the exact sort of segue employed by people who walk that line. I don't think you meant it that way, but I was referencing your post to say "there are people who extrapolate this". I hear all the time:

    "The situation is so ironic, given the fact that they have the power to do what they're doing because of Nazi persecution..."

    I suppose, but I definitely didn't mean it that way. All I'm saying is that I think a European Jewish state would have had tension to start off with, but it would have been a lot less violent and heated than the situation in Israel. And I do know that the mainstream sentiment in Israel is definitely not one of universal hate between Jews and Palestinians, but you can't ignore that the conflict there is heated and it is motivated by the hatred of some people. All I'm saying is that I don't think any prevailing hatred in Europe would be expressed quite so violently.

    Premier kakos on
  • PicardathonPicardathon Registered User regular
    edited December 2008
    As well as the war that is about to occur, I don't think this is going to be quick. Hamas is armed, willing to fight to the death and has the support of the surrounding population. As far as I'm concerned this is going to be a slow, bloody urban brawl until Israel pulls out or the Gaza Strip is turned to rubble.

    Picardathon on
  • edited December 2008
    This content has been removed.

  • PicardathonPicardathon Registered User regular
    edited December 2008
    Sounds like a rerun of the Lebanon fiasco really.

    Israel has a few extra advantages here. They have a full blockade already operational and Hamas is hurting for everything other than guns. It just depends on how ugly Israel is willing to make this look.

    Picardathon on
  • Jealous DevaJealous Deva Registered User regular
    edited December 2008
    Reckless wrote: »
    Reckless wrote: »
    Eh. This happens about once a year doesn't it? I mean bombing the Gaza strip and killing a bunch of people is pretty much standard faire and everyone seems committed to maintaining the status quo on both sides.

    Thing is, there seems to be a fairly serious willingness on Israel's part to move soldiers into Gaza, which would make things a little more interesting than previous skirmishes in the recent past.
    That's the sad thing really - nothing will be resolved as a result. They can kill a bunch of Hamas fighters and at the end of the day there will be a larger number of Hamas fighters. Hamas will get a couple of Israeli soldiers and feel vindicated and the net losers will be Palestinians who could give a damn about either side but who's survival will be predicated on looking like they seriously truly hate Israel in public.

    Do you think Palestinian support of Hamas comes from fear of that organization or actual hatred for Israeli, who's blockades have been making daily life a struggle?

    I'm not saying I back Hamas, just making a point.
    It's twofold. Of course there's a bunch of angry young men who probably genuinely end up hating Israel.

    But if you're a pragmatist, if it's obvious to you that perhaps perma-war on a massive modernized state with a hi-tech military is a self-defeating enterprise, then you still have to look like you hate Israel because damn it if you don't you're probably an Israeli spy or something.

    There was a fantastic documentary on suicide bombers from Palestine, which showed at the first the "hero's funeral" for the son of a women who went off and suicide bombed Israel and naturally she and her husband are outside yelling how he's a great warrior attacking the devil state and all that. Inside? Both adamant it was a complete waste that will accomplish nothing, and he's dead for no reason.

    I mean it's all kind of irrelevant anyway I guess - if the Palestinians genuinely truly hate Israel well then they're kind of fucked because that's signing their own death warrants more or less and nothing on Israel's part will dissuade them from the notion. It just turns out that's not the case, and everything we see publically is via the lens of how does one survive in an area run by a violent militant group.

    According to one of my palestian friends (grew up there, in the US for school), Gaza is fairly well known among the community to be a ticking time bomb and has since Hamas took over, and a lot of the people with the means to leave have left.

    It's one of those places that you just Don't Go, and the people still there are the people that are hardcore Hamas, or the people too poor to leave and have no choice.

    Jealous Deva on
This discussion has been closed.