The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

The Oscars: No Dark Knight for you! [Use Spoiler Tags!]

13468946

Posts

  • UnbreakableVowUnbreakableVow Registered User regular
    edited January 2009
    cj iwakura wrote: »
    The lack of appreciation for Eckhart's performance makes me sad.

    I appreciated it! Kind of. It was overdone at moments. The "I WON'T?!?!" and "SAY IT!!!" scenes in particular. But the last scene with him is just fantastic.

    UnbreakableVow on
  • edited January 2009
    This content has been removed.

  • KalTorakKalTorak One way or another, they all end up in the Undercity.Registered User regular
    edited January 2009
    Kagera wrote: »
    You know now that I think about it, that whole boat thing at the end reeked of over-the-top ridiculousness.

    It was quite unbelievable how the people acted through that whole thing, from the soldier letting people vote over pushing the button to the warden and the soldier not leaving the cargo hold to secure the device, to neither inmates or civilians breaking out in a riot over the whole thing.

    Bad example there- I think it's pretty safe to assume that the only reason the people in charge of the civilian boat agreed to the voting was that they knew there'd be a riot if they just flat-out refused to do anything.

    KalTorak on
  • DarkWarriorDarkWarrior __BANNED USERS regular
    edited January 2009
    Kagera wrote: »
    You know now that I think about it, that whole boat thing at the end reeked of over-the-top ridiculousness.

    It was quite unbelievable how the people acted through that whole thing, from the soldier letting people vote over pushing the button to the warden and the soldier not leaving the cargo hold to secure the device, to neither inmates or civilians breaking out in a riot over the whole thing.

    They all rationalised it. Each wanted the others dead but none of the convicts wanted to kill a boat load of innocent people, even the officer gave the prisoner the button because he didn't want to die but couldn't bring himself to do it. The civs said that the prisoners had made their choice and should be the ones to die but none of them had the guts to do it either and be responsible for a hundred+ deaths. So rioting to push the button wouldn't be something I'd imagine in any decent civilisation.

    And thats the point, it is a decent civilisation because of Batman.

    I have a hard time believing that none, not even one, of the convicts wouldn't want to take out a boatload of innocent people. Not even just because his life was threatened, but rather just for funsies.


    They weren't from Arkham, they're just regular prisoners. That kind of criminal would have certainly been in Arkham.

    DarkWarrior on
  • Hi I'm Vee!Hi I'm Vee! Formerly VH; She/Her; Is an E X P E R I E N C E Registered User regular
    edited January 2009
    I'm going to have two sets of picks, the set of what I want to win each category, and the set of what I believe will actually win each category. I've avoided some categories in which I a) don't know enough about it to make a good judgment (i.e. sound editing), or b) have only seen one or two of the movies. I hit most of the major ones, though.

    My favorites:
    BEST PICTURE
    The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
    Frost/Nixon
    Milk
    The Reader
    Slumdog Millionaire

    BEST DIRECTOR
    Danny Boyle, Slumdog Millionaire
    David Fincher, The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
    Ron Howard, Frost/Nixon
    Stephen Daldry, The Reader
    Gus Van Sant, Milk

    BEST ACTOR
    Richard Jenkins, The Visitor
    Frank Langella, Frost/Nixon
    Sean Penn, Milk
    Brad Pitt, The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
    Mickey Rourke, The Wrestler

    BEST ACTRESS
    Anne Hathaway, Rachel Getting Married
    Angelina Jolie, Changeling
    Melissa Leo, Frozen River
    Meryl Streep, Doubt
    Kate Winslet, The Reader

    BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR
    Josh Brolin, Milk
    Heath Ledger, The Dark Knight
    Robert Downey Jr., Tropic Thunder
    Philip Seymour Hoffman, Doubt
    Michael Shannon, Revolutionary Road

    BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS
    Amy Adams, Doubt
    Penelope Cruz, Vicky Cristina Barcelona
    Viola Davis, Doubt
    Taraji P. Henson, The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
    Marisa Tomei, The Wrestler

    BEST ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY
    Frozen River , Courtney Hunt
    Happy-Go-Lucky, Mike Leigh
    In Bruges, Martin McDonagh
    Milk, Dustin Lance Black
    WALL-E, Andrew Stanton, Jim Reardon, Pete Docter

    (I've only seen Milk and WALL-E, and I know Milk doesn't deserve it, not so sure if WALL-E does.)

    BEST ADAPTED SCREENPLAY
    The Curious Case of Benjamin Button, Eric Roth
    Doubt, John Patrick Shanley
    Frost/Nixon, Peter Morgan
    The Reader, David Hare
    Slumdog Millionaire, Simon Beaufoy

    (I've only seen Doubt and Slumdog Millionaire, but I'll be surprised if one of the other movies makes a better case for this category, with perhaps the exception of Frost/Nixon.)

    BEST ANIMATED FEATURE
    Bolt
    Kung Fu Panda
    WALL-E

    (Yeah that's right, I liked Bolt better than WALL-E.)

    For the ones in the spoiler, they're categories I don't know enough about or haven't seen enough of the movies in them.
    BEST ART DIRECTION
    Changeling
    The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
    The Dark Knight
    The Duchess
    Revolutionary Road

    BEST CINEMATOGRAPHY
    Changeling
    The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
    The Dark Knight
    The Reader
    Slumdog Millionaire

    BEST COSTUME DESIGN
    Australia
    The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
    The Duchess
    Milk
    Revolutionary Road

    BEST DOCUMENTARY FEATURE
    The Betrayal (Nerakhoon)
    Encounters at the End of the World
    The Garden
    Man on Wire
    Trouble the Water

    BEST DOCUMENTARY SHORT
    The Conscience of Nhem En
    The Final Inch
    Smile Pinki
    The Witness — From the Balcony of Room 306

    BEST EDITING
    The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
    The Dark Knight
    Frost/Nixon
    Milk
    Slumdog Millionaire

    BEST FOREIGN LANGUAGE FILM
    The Baader Meinhof Complex (Germany)
    The Class (France)
    Departures (Japan)
    Revanche (Austria)
    Waltz with Bashir (Israel)

    BEST LIVE ACTION SHORT
    Auf der Strecke (On the Line)
    Manon on the Asphalt
    New Boy
    The Pig
    Spielzeugland (Toyland)
    BEST MAKEUP
    The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
    The Dark Knight
    Hellboy II: The Golden Army

    (Hellboy was an okay movie, but the visuals were stunning.)

    BEST ORIGINAL SCORE
    The Curious Case of Benjamin Button, Alexandre Desplat
    Defiance, James Newton Howard
    Milk, Danny Elfman
    Slumdog Millionaire, A.R. Rahman
    WALL-E, Thomas Newman

    BEST ORIGINAL SONG
    ''Down to Earth,'' (WALL-E)
    ''Jai Ho,'' (Slumdog Millionaire)
    ''O Saya,'' (Slumdog Millionaire)

    More categories I don't know enough about under the spoiler.
    BEST SOUND EDITING
    The Dark Knight
    Iron Man
    Slumdog Millionaire
    WALL-E
    Wanted

    BEST SOUND MIXING
    The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
    The Dark Knight
    Slumdog Millionaire
    WALL-E
    Wanted

    BEST VISUAL EFFECTS
    The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
    The Dark Knight
    Iron Man

    As you can see, I was a big fan of Doubt and Slumdog Millionaire. I think it's a crime that Doubt didn't make it to the Best Picture list, much more so than Dark Knight.

    I think I'm going to be the only one who has Viola Davis from Doubt as their favorite Supporting Actress. She was the black woman, the mother of the kid who the priest (supposedly) molested. She only had a few scenes in the movie, but the one where Meryl Streep confronts her about what she thinks the priest is doing, and the Viola Davis says "It's only for a few months" with tears streaming down her face...I was like "I doubt she'll get one, but she deserves a nomination for that." I'm really glad she got one.

    I'll put up my picks for what I think will actually win once I've seen more of the movies.

    Hi I'm Vee! on
    vRyue2p.png
  • EddEdd Registered User regular
    edited January 2009
    mcdermott wrote: »
    cj iwakura wrote: »
    The lack of appreciation for Eckhart's performance makes me sad.

    Don't worry, I'm with you. Easily as good as Oldman's, though I still put it below Ledger's.

    I love that not a single supporting actor, all the way down to Eric Roberts, is less interesting than Christian Bale.

    Edd on
  • KalTorakKalTorak One way or another, they all end up in the Undercity.Registered User regular
    edited January 2009
    cj iwakura wrote: »
    The lack of appreciation for Eckhart's performance makes me sad.

    I appreciated it! Kind of. It was overdone at moments. The "I WON'T?!?!" and "SAY IT!!!" scenes in particular. But the last scene with him is just fantastic.

    God, that last scene was indeed brilliant. That was one spot where the writing was absolutely stellar, and the acting met the challenge.

    KalTorak on
  • cj iwakuracj iwakura The Rhythm Regent Bears The Name FreedomRegistered User regular
    edited January 2009
    cj iwakura wrote: »
    The lack of appreciation for Eckhart's performance makes me sad.

    I appreciated it! Kind of. It was overdone at moments. The "I WON'T?!?!" and "SAY IT!!!" scenes in particular. But the last scene with him is just fantastic.

    I thought his delivery was appropriately intense, as opposed to Bale's Batman growling. :P

    cj iwakura on
    z48g7weaopj2.png
  • edited January 2009
    This content has been removed.

  • UnbreakableVowUnbreakableVow Registered User regular
    edited January 2009
    Holy shit. I just realized.

    Why was Bruce Springsteen's "The Wrestler" not nominated for Best Original Song? It won the goddamn Golden Globe but is completely snubbed in a category that only has three nominees?

    UnbreakableVow on
  • wasted pixelswasted pixels Registered User regular
    edited January 2009
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    Yeah, did you actually see Frost/Nixon, ElJeffe?

    Nope, I was going based off A) the trailer, in which Nixon comes off as a Big Fat Jerk, and B) just about every movie with Nixon in it, in which Nixon comes off as a Big Fat Jerk. If the film is actually nuanced, then awesomesauce, and I look forward to seeing it.

    In that case, get out and see it as soon as you can. Seriously, given the premise of the movie -- the David Frost interviews in which Nixon is caught in a lie red-handed and ultimately confesses to a conspiracy -- it would have been incredibly easy to justify portraying Nixon as the villain and mean-spirited bully he's so often dismissed as. Instead, he's portrayed as a man who's struggling with feelings of guilt and remorse. A guy who lost everything, but who's dead-set on trying to clear his name and get back into the political fray "out east".

    Certainly, there's no getting around the fact that he was guilty as sin, and the film doesn't shy away from the fact that he could be a bully, a blowhard, and worst of all a politician at times. But in spite of all of that... man... I felt bad for Nixon at the end of the movie, and if he were alive today, I'd buy him a cheeseburger.

    wasted pixels on
  • edited January 2009
    This content has been removed.

  • KageraKagera Imitating the worst people. Since 2004Registered User regular
    edited January 2009
    Kagera wrote: »
    You know now that I think about it, that whole boat thing at the end reeked of over-the-top ridiculousness.

    It was quite unbelievable how the people acted through that whole thing, from the soldier letting people vote over pushing the button to the warden and the soldier not leaving the cargo hold to secure the device, to neither inmates or civilians breaking out in a riot over the whole thing.

    They all rationalised it. Each wanted the others dead but none of the convicts wanted to kill a boat load of innocent people, even the officer gave the prisoner the button because he didn't want to die but couldn't bring himself to do it. The civs said that the prisoners had made their choice and should be the ones to die but none of them had the guts to do it either and be responsible for a hundred+ deaths. So rioting to push the button wouldn't be something I'd imagine in any decent civilisation.

    And thats the point, it is a decent civilisation because of Batman.

    Yeah I don't know how many inmates you've been around but I doubt NONE of the inmates there would have been so hard pressed to push the button.

    Hell forget the inmates, I'm pretty sure any civilian on that boat with children on board would find it impossible to push the button.

    Thing is NOT ONE PERSON EVEN TRIED TO GRAB THE DEVICES.

    That's knock down drag out implausible to me. Not one person had to be restrained? Not one group of people tried to band together to save their own asses?

    Kagera on
    My neck, my back, my FUPA and my crack.
  • noir_bloodnoir_blood Registered User regular
    edited January 2009
    BEST ANIMATED FEATURE
    Bolt
    Kung Fu Panda
    WALL-E

    This invalidates every opinion you had and will ever have.

    noir_blood on
  • AngelHedgieAngelHedgie Registered User regular
    edited January 2009
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    Yeah, did you actually see Frost/Nixon, ElJeffe?

    Nope, I was going based off A) the trailer, in which Nixon comes off as a Big Fat Jerk, and B) just about every movie with Nixon in it, in which Nixon comes off as a Big Fat Jerk. If the film is actually nuanced, then awesomesauce, and I look forward to seeing it.

    In that case, get out and see it as soon as you can. Seriously, given the premise of the movie -- the David Frost interviews in which Nixon is caught in a lie red-handed and ultimately confesses to a conspiracy -- it would have been incredibly easy to justify portraying Nixon as the villain and bully he's so often dismissed as. Instead, he's portrayed as a man who's struggling with feelings of guilt and remorse. A guy who lost everything, but who's dead-set on trying to clear his name and get back into the political fray "out east".

    Certainly, there's no getting around the fact that he was guilty as sin, and the film doesn't shy away from the fact that he could be a bully, a blowhard, and worst of all a politician. But in spite of all of that... man... I felt bad for Nixon at the end of the movie, and if he were alive today, I'd buy him a cheeseburger.
    I've heard that the movie covers up one key fact - that Nixon was involved financially with the interview - which weakens it.

    AngelHedgie on
    XBL: Nox Aeternum / PSN: NoxAeternum / NN:NoxAeternum / Steam: noxaeternum
  • lazegamerlazegamer The magnanimous cyberspaceRegistered User regular
    edited January 2009
    cj iwakura wrote: »
    The lack of appreciation for Eckhart's performance makes me sad.

    I thought the character was interesting, but Eckhart's portrayal was pretty bland. He was plain jane before he flipped, and he was unconvincing after.

    lazegamer on
    I would download a car.
  • KalTorakKalTorak One way or another, they all end up in the Undercity.Registered User regular
    edited January 2009
    Someone mentioned it on the first page, but it's extremely gratifying to see Richard Jenkins nominated for The Visitor. I wish it'd gotten more recognition, that movie was heartbreaking and sincere and expertly done. Jenkins himself pulls off an amazingly nuanced performance, and I still tear up thinking about the final shot. I don't think the movie has enough press to pull out a win, but hopefully the nomination will encourage more people to check out the DVD.

    KalTorak on
  • KageraKagera Imitating the worst people. Since 2004Registered User regular
    edited January 2009
    KalTorak wrote: »
    Kagera wrote: »
    You know now that I think about it, that whole boat thing at the end reeked of over-the-top ridiculousness.

    It was quite unbelievable how the people acted through that whole thing, from the soldier letting people vote over pushing the button to the warden and the soldier not leaving the cargo hold to secure the device, to neither inmates or civilians breaking out in a riot over the whole thing.

    Bad example there- I think it's pretty safe to assume that the only reason the people in charge of the civilian boat agreed to the voting was that they knew there'd be a riot if they just flat-out refused to do anything.

    You know how the military handles a possible riot situation? It's not by voting.

    Kagera on
    My neck, my back, my FUPA and my crack.
  • DarkWarriorDarkWarrior __BANNED USERS regular
    edited January 2009
    Kagera wrote: »
    Kagera wrote: »
    You know now that I think about it, that whole boat thing at the end reeked of over-the-top ridiculousness.

    It was quite unbelievable how the people acted through that whole thing, from the soldier letting people vote over pushing the button to the warden and the soldier not leaving the cargo hold to secure the device, to neither inmates or civilians breaking out in a riot over the whole thing.

    They all rationalised it. Each wanted the others dead but none of the convicts wanted to kill a boat load of innocent people, even the officer gave the prisoner the button because he didn't want to die but couldn't bring himself to do it. The civs said that the prisoners had made their choice and should be the ones to die but none of them had the guts to do it either and be responsible for a hundred+ deaths. So rioting to push the button wouldn't be something I'd imagine in any decent civilisation.

    And thats the point, it is a decent civilisation because of Batman.

    Yeah I don't know how many inmates you've been around but I doubt NONE of the inmates there would have been so hard pressed to push the button.

    Hell forget the inmates, I'm pretty sure any civilian on that boat with children on board would find it impossible to push the button.

    Thing is NOT ONE PERSON EVEN TRIED TO GRAB THE DEVICES.

    That's knock down drag out implausible to me. Not one person had to be restrained? Not one group of people tried to band together to save their own asses?


    Good god. BECAUSE THEY HADN'T HAD THEIR HUMANITY BROKEN. The Joker failed in part of his plan. People were better because of people like Harvey Dent, Gordon and Batman. Whereas our government sucks, people here suck and I'd push that button without thinking.

    People were going out dressed as Batman because of the type of symbol of justice he'd become, he and Dent inspired people and gave them hope and stopped them from being the dregs of society who would do that.

    And even criminals will turn on paedophiles, just because theyre scum doesn't mean they're mass murdering scum.

    DarkWarrior on
  • noir_bloodnoir_blood Registered User regular
    edited January 2009
    Holy shit. I just realized.

    Why was Bruce Springsteen's "The Wrestler" not nominated for Best Original Song? It won the goddamn Golden Globe but is completely snubbed in a category that only has three nominees?

    Because the Ocars are fucking stupid.

    Seriously, did we really need TWO Slumdog Millionaire songs?

    noir_blood on
  • Hi I'm Vee!Hi I'm Vee! Formerly VH; She/Her; Is an E X P E R I E N C E Registered User regular
    edited January 2009
    I love how many people are arguing "The Oscars did [wrong thing] in the past, this justifies them doing [wrong thing] now."

    Hi I'm Vee! on
    vRyue2p.png
  • wasted pixelswasted pixels Registered User regular
    edited January 2009
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    Yeah, did you actually see Frost/Nixon, ElJeffe?

    Nope, I was going based off A) the trailer, in which Nixon comes off as a Big Fat Jerk, and B) just about every movie with Nixon in it, in which Nixon comes off as a Big Fat Jerk. If the film is actually nuanced, then awesomesauce, and I look forward to seeing it.

    In that case, get out and see it as soon as you can. Seriously, given the premise of the movie -- the David Frost interviews in which Nixon is caught in a lie red-handed and ultimately confesses to a conspiracy -- it would have been incredibly easy to justify portraying Nixon as the villain and bully he's so often dismissed as. Instead, he's portrayed as a man who's struggling with feelings of guilt and remorse. A guy who lost everything, but who's dead-set on trying to clear his name and get back into the political fray "out east".

    Certainly, there's no getting around the fact that he was guilty as sin, and the film doesn't shy away from the fact that he could be a bully, a blowhard, and worst of all a politician. But in spite of all of that... man... I felt bad for Nixon at the end of the movie, and if he were alive today, I'd buy him a cheeseburger.
    I've heard that the movie covers up one key fact - that Nixon was involved financially with the interview - which weakens it.

    The movie begins with Nixon haggling for a bigger payday. >_>

    wasted pixels on
  • UnbreakableVowUnbreakableVow Registered User regular
    edited January 2009
    Kagera wrote: »
    KalTorak wrote: »
    Kagera wrote: »
    You know now that I think about it, that whole boat thing at the end reeked of over-the-top ridiculousness.

    It was quite unbelievable how the people acted through that whole thing, from the soldier letting people vote over pushing the button to the warden and the soldier not leaving the cargo hold to secure the device, to neither inmates or civilians breaking out in a riot over the whole thing.

    Bad example there- I think it's pretty safe to assume that the only reason the people in charge of the civilian boat agreed to the voting was that they knew there'd be a riot if they just flat-out refused to do anything.

    You know how the military handles a possible riot situation? It's not by voting.

    I chuckled.

    UnbreakableVow on
  • KalTorakKalTorak One way or another, they all end up in the Undercity.Registered User regular
    edited January 2009
    Kagera wrote: »
    KalTorak wrote: »
    Kagera wrote: »
    You know now that I think about it, that whole boat thing at the end reeked of over-the-top ridiculousness.

    It was quite unbelievable how the people acted through that whole thing, from the soldier letting people vote over pushing the button to the warden and the soldier not leaving the cargo hold to secure the device, to neither inmates or civilians breaking out in a riot over the whole thing.

    Bad example there- I think it's pretty safe to assume that the only reason the people in charge of the civilian boat agreed to the voting was that they knew there'd be a riot if they just flat-out refused to do anything.

    You know how the military handles a possible riot situation? It's not by voting.

    Most of the military was on the convict ship; the civilian ship had minimal security. You think the guards that were there didn't know that the mob wouldn't have a tough time overpowering them if given a reason to start acting irrationally?

    The voting thing was a stall - a ridiculous one at that, but what else are the guards going to do? It was all "we're civilized people, we have to act rationally... let's do a vote! that'll justify mass-murder!" It gave the civilians an illusion of control.

    KalTorak on
  • ScalfinScalfin __BANNED USERS regular
    edited January 2009
    Kagera wrote: »
    Kagera wrote: »
    You know now that I think about it, that whole boat thing at the end reeked of over-the-top ridiculousness.

    It was quite unbelievable how the people acted through that whole thing, from the soldier letting people vote over pushing the button to the warden and the soldier not leaving the cargo hold to secure the device, to neither inmates or civilians breaking out in a riot over the whole thing.

    They all rationalised it. Each wanted the others dead but none of the convicts wanted to kill a boat load of innocent people, even the officer gave the prisoner the button because he didn't want to die but couldn't bring himself to do it. The civs said that the prisoners had made their choice and should be the ones to die but none of them had the guts to do it either and be responsible for a hundred+ deaths. So rioting to push the button wouldn't be something I'd imagine in any decent civilisation.

    And thats the point, it is a decent civilisation because of Batman.

    Yeah I don't know how many inmates you've been around but I doubt NONE of the inmates there would have been so hard pressed to push the button.

    Hell forget the inmates, I'm pretty sure any civilian on that boat with children on board would find it impossible to push the button.

    Thing is NOT ONE PERSON EVEN TRIED TO GRAB THE DEVICES.

    That's knock down drag out implausible to me. Not one person had to be restrained? Not one group of people tried to band together to save their own asses?

    You seem to be forgetting that people are less likely to act in large groups. If it had only been a couple people, it would have been realistic to grab. In a group that large, everybody was waiting for someone else to do the deed.

    Scalfin on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    The rest of you, I fucking hate you for the fact that I now have a blue dot on this god awful thread.
  • KageraKagera Imitating the worst people. Since 2004Registered User regular
    edited January 2009
    Scalfin wrote: »
    Kagera wrote: »
    Variable wrote: »
    Kagera wrote: »
    You know now that I think about it, that whole boat thing at the end reeked of over-the-top ridiculousness.

    It was quite unbelievable how the people acted through that whole thing, from the soldier letting people vote over pushing the button to the warden and the soldier not leaving the cargo hold to secure the device, to neither inmates or civilians breaking out in a riot over the whole thing.

    yess, the whole thing is rather unbelievable from the word go, with the batman and all.

    not saying your argument isn't valid at all, just saying it doesn't bother me for that reason.

    Well we're talking about how TDK is a study in the good and evil in men and all that BS but the people in the film don't even act like people.

    I thought the guards didn't leave because they would have been ripped to shreds had they even moved. Notice how terrified they were when a prisoner stepped forward.

    Yeah that's another thing, COs aren't really like that. I mean to be a prison guard you kind of HAVE to be resistant to intimidation.

    Kagera on
    My neck, my back, my FUPA and my crack.
  • cj iwakuracj iwakura The Rhythm Regent Bears The Name FreedomRegistered User regular
    edited January 2009
    I think the Academy gained a lifetime reprieve from ever being called close-minded after giving Three Six Mafia an Oscar.

    cj iwakura on
    z48g7weaopj2.png
  • edited January 2009
    This content has been removed.

  • lazegamerlazegamer The magnanimous cyberspaceRegistered User regular
    edited January 2009
    mcdermott wrote: »
    Do we need another Dark Knight thread? :P

    To be fair, it's kinda in the title :)

    lazegamer on
    I would download a car.
  • KageraKagera Imitating the worst people. Since 2004Registered User regular
    edited January 2009
    Scalfin wrote: »
    Kagera wrote: »
    Kagera wrote: »
    You know now that I think about it, that whole boat thing at the end reeked of over-the-top ridiculousness.

    It was quite unbelievable how the people acted through that whole thing, from the soldier letting people vote over pushing the button to the warden and the soldier not leaving the cargo hold to secure the device, to neither inmates or civilians breaking out in a riot over the whole thing.

    They all rationalised it. Each wanted the others dead but none of the convicts wanted to kill a boat load of innocent people, even the officer gave the prisoner the button because he didn't want to die but couldn't bring himself to do it. The civs said that the prisoners had made their choice and should be the ones to die but none of them had the guts to do it either and be responsible for a hundred+ deaths. So rioting to push the button wouldn't be something I'd imagine in any decent civilisation.

    And thats the point, it is a decent civilisation because of Batman.

    Yeah I don't know how many inmates you've been around but I doubt NONE of the inmates there would have been so hard pressed to push the button.

    Hell forget the inmates, I'm pretty sure any civilian on that boat with children on board would find it impossible to push the button.

    Thing is NOT ONE PERSON EVEN TRIED TO GRAB THE DEVICES.

    That's knock down drag out implausible to me. Not one person had to be restrained? Not one group of people tried to band together to save their own asses?

    You seem to be forgetting that people are less likely to act in large groups. If it had only been a couple people, it would have been realistic to grab. In a group that large, everybody was waiting for someone else to do the deed.

    Type A personalities are exactly the kinds of people who would have tried something in that situation. You're telling me there were no Type A people on either ship?

    Kagera on
    My neck, my back, my FUPA and my crack.
  • wasted pixelswasted pixels Registered User regular
    edited January 2009
    lazegamer wrote: »
    mcdermott wrote: »
    Do we need another Dark Knight thread? :P

    To be fair, it's kinda in the title :)

    That's the only reason I'm not bitching about the constant barrage of spoilers the last few pages. :P

    wasted pixels on
  • UnbreakableVowUnbreakableVow Registered User regular
    edited January 2009
    Kagera wrote: »
    Kagera wrote: »
    You know now that I think about it, that whole boat thing at the end reeked of over-the-top ridiculousness.

    It was quite unbelievable how the people acted through that whole thing, from the soldier letting people vote over pushing the button to the warden and the soldier not leaving the cargo hold to secure the device, to neither inmates or civilians breaking out in a riot over the whole thing.

    They all rationalised it. Each wanted the others dead but none of the convicts wanted to kill a boat load of innocent people, even the officer gave the prisoner the button because he didn't want to die but couldn't bring himself to do it. The civs said that the prisoners had made their choice and should be the ones to die but none of them had the guts to do it either and be responsible for a hundred+ deaths. So rioting to push the button wouldn't be something I'd imagine in any decent civilisation.

    And thats the point, it is a decent civilisation because of Batman.

    Yeah I don't know how many inmates you've been around but I doubt NONE of the inmates there would have been so hard pressed to push the button.

    Hell forget the inmates, I'm pretty sure any civilian on that boat with children on board would find it impossible to push the button.

    Thing is NOT ONE PERSON EVEN TRIED TO GRAB THE DEVICES.

    That's knock down drag out implausible to me. Not one person had to be restrained? Not one group of people tried to band together to save their own asses?


    Good god. BECAUSE THEY HADN'T HAD THEIR HUMANITY BROKEN. The Joker failed in part of his plan. People were better because of people like Harvey Dent, Gordon and Batman. Whereas our government sucks, people here suck and I'd push that button without thinking.

    People were going out dressed as Batman because of the type of symbol of justice he'd become, he and Dent inspired people and gave them hope and stopped them from being the dregs of society who would do that.

    And even criminals will turn on paedophiles, just because theyre scum doesn't mean they're mass murdering scum.

    You basically just killed your ridiculous argument that The Dark Knight is some kind of human character study by saying that you'd easily press the button in the actual world.

    You're making an argument that says "Hey, this shows the darkness and limits of human civilization!...if we had a goddamn bat-themed vigilante running around."

    UnbreakableVow on
  • KilroyKilroy timaeusTestified Registered User regular
    edited January 2009
    The Academy lost all credibility when it gave Shakespeare in Love best picture.

    To be fair, that was a bad year for movies, but still.

    Kilroy on
  • EgosEgos Registered User regular
    edited January 2009
    Kagera wrote: »
    Kagera wrote: »
    You know now that I think about it, that whole boat thing at the end reeked of over-the-top ridiculousness.

    It was quite unbelievable how the people acted through that whole thing, from the soldier letting people vote over pushing the button to the warden and the soldier not leaving the cargo hold to secure the device, to neither inmates or civilians breaking out in a riot over the whole thing.

    They all rationalised it. Each wanted the others dead but none of the convicts wanted to kill a boat load of innocent people, even the officer gave the prisoner the button because he didn't want to die but couldn't bring himself to do it. The civs said that the prisoners had made their choice and should be the ones to die but none of them had the guts to do it either and be responsible for a hundred+ deaths. So rioting to push the button wouldn't be something I'd imagine in any decent civilisation.

    And thats the point, it is a decent civilisation because of Batman.

    Yeah I don't know how many inmates you've been around but I doubt NONE of the inmates there would have been so hard pressed to push the button.

    Hell forget the inmates, I'm pretty sure any civilian on that boat with children on board would find it impossible to push the button.

    Thing is NOT ONE PERSON EVEN TRIED TO GRAB THE DEVICES.

    That's knock down drag out implausible to me. Not one person had to be restrained? Not one group of people tried to band together to save their own asses?


    Good god. BECAUSE THEY HADN'T HAD THEIR HUMANITY BROKEN. The Joker failed in part of his plan. People were better because of people like Harvey Dent, Gordon and Batman. Whereas our government sucks, people here suck and I'd push that button without thinking.

    People were going out dressed as Batman because of the type of symbol of justice he'd become, he and Dent inspired people and gave them hope and stopped them from being the dregs of society who would do that.

    And even criminals will turn on paedophiles, just because theyre scum doesn't mean they're mass murdering scum.

    I don't disagree with you, but I didn't like the whole melodrama in that scene. It seemed like it was just put in there to counter all the "Crowd turning on Batman" and the masses not seeming that great on a whole ....

    Egos on
  • ScalfinScalfin __BANNED USERS regular
    edited January 2009
    Kagera wrote: »
    Scalfin wrote: »
    Kagera wrote: »
    Variable wrote: »
    Kagera wrote: »
    You know now that I think about it, that whole boat thing at the end reeked of over-the-top ridiculousness.

    It was quite unbelievable how the people acted through that whole thing, from the soldier letting people vote over pushing the button to the warden and the soldier not leaving the cargo hold to secure the device, to neither inmates or civilians breaking out in a riot over the whole thing.

    yess, the whole thing is rather unbelievable from the word go, with the batman and all.

    not saying your argument isn't valid at all, just saying it doesn't bother me for that reason.

    Well we're talking about how TDK is a study in the good and evil in men and all that BS but the people in the film don't even act like people.

    I thought the guards didn't leave because they would have been ripped to shreds had they even moved. Notice how terrified they were when a prisoner stepped forward.

    Yeah that's another thing, COs aren't really like that. I mean to be a prison guard you kind of HAVE to be resistant to intimidation.

    Yes, but are they trained to incite a riot over the privilege to blow up a ship of civilians? If that's true, I think our prison system is in need of reform.

    Scalfin on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    The rest of you, I fucking hate you for the fact that I now have a blue dot on this god awful thread.
  • Hi I'm Vee!Hi I'm Vee! Formerly VH; She/Her; Is an E X P E R I E N C E Registered User regular
    edited January 2009
    We should definitely define an entire organization's credibility based on a few specific cases where we disagree with their choices.

    Hi I'm Vee! on
    vRyue2p.png
  • KageraKagera Imitating the worst people. Since 2004Registered User regular
    edited January 2009
    So apparently now that Obama is elected people won't be self-centered and hasty in decision making according to DarkWarrior.

    Whew, glad THAT'S over with.

    Kagera on
    My neck, my back, my FUPA and my crack.
  • DarkWarriorDarkWarrior __BANNED USERS regular
    edited January 2009
    Kagera wrote: »
    Kagera wrote: »
    You know now that I think about it, that whole boat thing at the end reeked of over-the-top ridiculousness.

    It was quite unbelievable how the people acted through that whole thing, from the soldier letting people vote over pushing the button to the warden and the soldier not leaving the cargo hold to secure the device, to neither inmates or civilians breaking out in a riot over the whole thing.

    They all rationalised it. Each wanted the others dead but none of the convicts wanted to kill a boat load of innocent people, even the officer gave the prisoner the button because he didn't want to die but couldn't bring himself to do it. The civs said that the prisoners had made their choice and should be the ones to die but none of them had the guts to do it either and be responsible for a hundred+ deaths. So rioting to push the button wouldn't be something I'd imagine in any decent civilisation.

    And thats the point, it is a decent civilisation because of Batman.

    Yeah I don't know how many inmates you've been around but I doubt NONE of the inmates there would have been so hard pressed to push the button.

    Hell forget the inmates, I'm pretty sure any civilian on that boat with children on board would find it impossible to push the button.

    Thing is NOT ONE PERSON EVEN TRIED TO GRAB THE DEVICES.

    That's knock down drag out implausible to me. Not one person had to be restrained? Not one group of people tried to band together to save their own asses?


    Good god. BECAUSE THEY HADN'T HAD THEIR HUMANITY BROKEN. The Joker failed in part of his plan. People were better because of people like Harvey Dent, Gordon and Batman. Whereas our government sucks, people here suck and I'd push that button without thinking.

    People were going out dressed as Batman because of the type of symbol of justice he'd become, he and Dent inspired people and gave them hope and stopped them from being the dregs of society who would do that.

    And even criminals will turn on paedophiles, just because theyre scum doesn't mean they're mass murdering scum.

    You basically just killed your ridiculous argument that The Dark Knight is some kind of human character study by saying that you'd easily press the button in the actual world.

    You're making an argument that says "Hey, this shows the darkness and limits of human civilization!...if we had a goddamn bat-themed vigilante running around."


    We don't have hope. But look how much happier Americans have become just in the two days of Obamas presidency. He inspires hope and by association people believe they can be better.

    All the people on the boat wanted to do it, none of them wanted to die and every last one of them was thinking what the Joker expected them to think, that they should blow up the other boat. But noone could act and one of the criminals is the one who ends up acting selflessly.
    Kagera wrote: »
    So apparently now that Obama is elected people won't be self-centered and hasty in decision making according to DarkWarrior.

    Whew, glad THAT'S over with.

    Indeed.

    Obviously not every jerk will change but what would the world be without Kagera. People give their lives to serve a flag and people in another country. Because of belief in an ideal.

    DarkWarrior on
  • cj iwakuracj iwakura The Rhythm Regent Bears The Name FreedomRegistered User regular
    edited January 2009
    Isn't it the filmmakers themselves who decide the nominees(i.e. editors for editing, screenwriters for screenplay), or is that just the winners?

    cj iwakura on
    z48g7weaopj2.png
  • ScalfinScalfin __BANNED USERS regular
    edited January 2009
    Kagera wrote: »
    Scalfin wrote: »
    Kagera wrote: »
    Kagera wrote: »
    You know now that I think about it, that whole boat thing at the end reeked of over-the-top ridiculousness.

    It was quite unbelievable how the people acted through that whole thing, from the soldier letting people vote over pushing the button to the warden and the soldier not leaving the cargo hold to secure the device, to neither inmates or civilians breaking out in a riot over the whole thing.

    They all rationalised it. Each wanted the others dead but none of the convicts wanted to kill a boat load of innocent people, even the officer gave the prisoner the button because he didn't want to die but couldn't bring himself to do it. The civs said that the prisoners had made their choice and should be the ones to die but none of them had the guts to do it either and be responsible for a hundred+ deaths. So rioting to push the button wouldn't be something I'd imagine in any decent civilisation.

    And thats the point, it is a decent civilisation because of Batman.

    Yeah I don't know how many inmates you've been around but I doubt NONE of the inmates there would have been so hard pressed to push the button.

    Hell forget the inmates, I'm pretty sure any civilian on that boat with children on board would find it impossible to push the button.

    Thing is NOT ONE PERSON EVEN TRIED TO GRAB THE DEVICES.

    That's knock down drag out implausible to me. Not one person had to be restrained? Not one group of people tried to band together to save their own asses?

    You seem to be forgetting that people are less likely to act in large groups. If it had only been a couple people, it would have been realistic to grab. In a group that large, everybody was waiting for someone else to do the deed.

    Type A personalities are exactly the kinds of people who would have tried something in that situation. You're telling me there were no Type A people on either ship?

    Do you think there were no type A personalities in those crowds that did nothing when people collapsed on New York sidewalks or heard a woman being stabbed in Central Park?

    Scalfin on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    The rest of you, I fucking hate you for the fact that I now have a blue dot on this god awful thread.
Sign In or Register to comment.