As was foretold, we've added advertisements to the forums! If you have questions, or if you encounter any bugs, please visit this thread: https://forums.penny-arcade.com/discussion/240191/forum-advertisement-faq-and-reports-thread/
Options

Mormons are fucking prompt

1161719212262

Posts

  • Options
    FaricazyFaricazy Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    as i said

    modern Judaism is strictly non-missionary

    Faricazy on
  • Options
    FaricazyFaricazy Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    i will agree to being baptized post-mortem only if my body is dipped into a vat of blue label

    Faricazy on
  • Options
    QuothQuoth the Raven Miami, FL FOR REALRegistered User regular
    edited February 2009
    MrMonroe wrote: »
    Jews don't perform posthumous ceremonies for Mormons apologizing to god in the name of the dead for following a false prophet.

    And the abortion thing isn't really comparable.

    so my question to you is, at what point do religious views become so unacceptable as to warrant alteration or abandonment

    at what point is tolerance for a view no longer appropriate

    Quoth on
  • Options
    ButtersButters A glass of some milks Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Faricazy wrote: »
    i will agree to being baptized post-mortem only if my body is dipped into a vat of blue label

    Make it a single malt and I am with you.

    Butters on
    PSN: idontworkhere582 | CFN: idontworkhere | Steam: lordbutters | Amazon Wishlist
  • Options
    Run Run RunRun Run Run __BANNED USERS regular
    edited February 2009
    MrMonroe wrote: »
    Look I'm not saying it should be illegal,.

    But it should.

    Run Run Run on
    kissing.jpg
  • Options
    EtelmikEtelmik Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    MrMonroe didn't read that Mormon leaders agreed not to baptize Holocaust victims, I see.

    Etelmik on
  • Options
    QuothQuoth the Raven Miami, FL FOR REALRegistered User regular
    edited February 2009
    MrMonroe wrote: »
    Look I'm not saying it should be illegal,.

    But it should.

    Why?

    Quoth on
  • Options
    FaricazyFaricazy Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Butters wrote: »
    Faricazy wrote: »
    i will agree to being baptized post-mortem only if my body is dipped into a vat of blue label

    Make it a single malt and I am with you.
    For Relaxing Times

    Make It Suntory Time

    Faricazy on
  • Options
    PhonehandPhonehand Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Etelmik wrote: »
    MrMonroe didn't read that Mormon leaders agreed not to baptize Holocaust victims, I see.

    Whoa hey man don't force a guy to read now
    that is just intolerant

    Phonehand on
    pmdunk.jpg
  • Options
    PhonehandPhonehand Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Phonehand wrote: »
    Butters wrote: »
    Phonehand wrote: »
    Man, this is like if a witch curses your soul or something. If you don't believe in curses and magic then why do you even care. Your just being a fag with a stick up your ass.

    Yeah says the guy that grew up a witch and is casting all the curses!
    My Lebron James voodoo doll has been less than successful.

    Hahaha <3

    you ever gonna come back and hang out with me

    i am so alone

    Phonehand on
    pmdunk.jpg
  • Options
    Fire TruckFire Truck I love my SELFRegistered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Fire Truck wrote: »
    Fire Truck wrote: »
    Faricazy wrote: »
    Fire Truck wrote: »
    Faricazy wrote: »
    here's what mormons can do for me: have enough self restraint and respect for fellow human beings to deem MY choices and MY decisions as my final word.

    Here are a couple of ways you can look at it:

    You could say that, hey, this dude is dead anyway. The ceremony has no actual effect on the dude, and is mostly to make the mormons themselves feel better.

    You could also say that it might be equivalent to mormon missionaries, but in the afterlife. The "baptism" is essentially the mormon spirits coming up to the dead dude's spirit-house and knocking on his spirit-door. The spirit-dude can then say "not interested," and the mormon spirits will go on their merry spirit-way.

    You are bringing your own definitions of what baptism is into a ritual which a bunch of mormons who might know better than you are telling you is not the same thing as a baptism as you understand it.
    I said absolutely nothing about my interpretation of baptism. It's irrelevant. What the baptism causes is also irrelevant.

    If it's all irrelevant then I don't understand what the problem is?

    do you not see how the first explanation you posited is kind of disrespectful towards the dead

    From certain points of view, maybe.
    And I do get why some people are offended by the post-mortem baptism. But this thread has mostly devolved into people brow-beating a couple of mormons. They think it's a good-ish thing to do, and really we don't have the moral authority to tell them they're wrong. Also yelling at them won't get the mormon church to change things.

    Neither will being complicit with it.

    I don't really know why I'm white-knighting on this particular point. I don't find it particularly offensive, but like I said I understand why people do.

    Mostly I just jumped to the last page after getting to the point of the thread where GRMike jumped in with, "Hey you Mormons check out all this ridiculous shit I found on some website that tells me what mormons believe! I don't care that you say you interpret it differently, this is what you guys believe and u r a cult."

    I saw the topic had moved to the post-mortem baptisms and decided to get my rhetoric on.

    I just don't think it's my responsibility to advise the mormon church on how they should listen to the many, many people who have already complained directly to them about the ritual.

    Also it seems a pretty quibbling thing to be accusing people of being complicit in.

    Fire Truck on
  • Options
    Run Run RunRun Run Run __BANNED USERS regular
    edited February 2009
    Quoth wrote: »
    MrMonroe wrote: »
    Look I'm not saying it should be illegal,.

    But it should.

    Why?

    Freedom of religion should also mean freedom from religion.

    Faith is a private matter. My persona or likeness should not be allowed to be used by other people in religious ceremony without my direct consent.

    Run Run Run on
    kissing.jpg
  • Options
    ButtersButters A glass of some milks Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Phonehand wrote: »
    Butters wrote: »
    Phonehand wrote: »
    Man, this is like if a witch curses your soul or something. If you don't believe in curses and magic then why do you even care. Your just being a fag with a stick up your ass.

    Yeah says the guy that grew up a witch and is casting all the curses!

    I'm starting to lose faith. My Lebron James voodoo doll has been less than successful.

    It does when they play the Lakers apparently. Ugh...

    Butters on
    PSN: idontworkhere582 | CFN: idontworkhere | Steam: lordbutters | Amazon Wishlist
  • Options
    EtelmikEtelmik Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Whoa hey man don't force a guy to read now
    that is just intolerant

    Wow, I'm intolerant x 2 now.

    My persona or likeness should not be allowed to be used by other people in religious ceremony without my direct consent.

    Oh ho ho. Complex and important legal issues! You have a right to make sure people don't practice their religion by using my name a time or two.

    Quick, get the ACLU on the line! They love this shit. Let's make this a national issue that the politicians will never touch. In 70 years, you'll get what you want. But by then you'll be dead and bitter, wondering if they ever used your name when they almost definitely will not have.

    Etelmik on
  • Options
    SithDrummerSithDrummer Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    wherever the discussion is now, it must be said baptism is/was a really dumb fucking word to use



    if all it is is a prayer that some dead guy gets one last shot at heaven then realize that 'baptism' doesn't convey that notion in the slightest

    SithDrummer on
  • Options
    PhonehandPhonehand Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Butters wrote: »
    Phonehand wrote: »
    Butters wrote: »
    Phonehand wrote: »
    Man, this is like if a witch curses your soul or something. If you don't believe in curses and magic then why do you even care. Your just being a fag with a stick up your ass.

    Yeah says the guy that grew up a witch and is casting all the curses!

    I'm starting to lose faith. My Lebron James voodoo doll has been less than successful.

    It does when they play the Lakers apparently. Ugh...

    Or the Bulls. The fuckin Bulls!

    Phonehand on
    pmdunk.jpg
  • Options
    QuothQuoth the Raven Miami, FL FOR REALRegistered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Quoth wrote: »
    MrMonroe wrote: »
    Look I'm not saying it should be illegal,.

    But it should.

    Why?

    Freedom of religion should also mean freedom from religion.

    this, i can dig

    Quoth on
  • Options
    MrMonroeMrMonroe passed out on the floor nowRegistered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Phonehand wrote: »
    Etelmik wrote: »
    MrMonroe didn't read that Mormon leaders agreed not to baptize Holocaust victims, I see.

    Whoa hey man don't force a guy to read now
    that is just intolerant

    /golf clap

    Yeah, I heard. And I applaud them for agreeing to not insult one particular group of people. Any instance of it is an insult to the dead, and the survivors of the people in question being unaware of it isn't an excuse. At that point you're just talking smack about people behind their backs.

    And @Quoth: I am not compelled to be accepting any religious practice which insults me or my beliefs. I must tolerate it, (like I said before) and I don't have any legal recourse to stop them or anything, but if I'm going to tolerate them insulting me, then they can tolerate me informing them that they are being callous shitbags for continuing to do it anyway.

    MrMonroe on
  • Options
    QuothQuoth the Raven Miami, FL FOR REALRegistered User regular
    edited February 2009
    MrMonroe wrote: »
    I am not compelled to be accepting any religious practice which insults me or my beliefs. I must tolerate it, (like I said before) and I don't have any legal recourse to stop them or anything, but if I'm going to tolerate them insulting me, then they can tolerate me informing them that they are being callous shitbags for continuing to do it anyway.

    right on

    i am pleased that this conversation has come to a satisfactory conclusion

    Quoth on
  • Options
    MrMonroeMrMonroe passed out on the floor nowRegistered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Faricazy wrote: »
    i will agree to being baptized post-mortem only if my body is dipped into a vat of blue label

    Ok, yeah.

    If this is insulting then bring on the ad hominems.

    MrMonroe on
  • Options
    MrMonroeMrMonroe passed out on the floor nowRegistered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Quoth wrote: »
    MrMonroe wrote: »
    I am not compelled to be accepting any religious practice which insults me or my beliefs. I must tolerate it, (like I said before) and I don't have any legal recourse to stop them or anything, but if I'm going to tolerate them insulting me, then they can tolerate me informing them that they are being callous shitbags for continuing to do it anyway.

    right on

    i am pleased that this conversation has come to a satisfactory conclusion

    now we wait for someone who hasn't read the entire thread to come in and just poop on everyone's face.

    pleasedon'tbedeaconpleasedon'tbedeaconpleasedon'tbedeaconpleasedon'tbedeacon

    MrMonroe on
  • Options
    Fire TruckFire Truck I love my SELFRegistered User regular
    edited February 2009
    MrMonroe wrote: »
    Phonehand wrote: »
    Etelmik wrote: »
    MrMonroe didn't read that Mormon leaders agreed not to baptize Holocaust victims, I see.

    Whoa hey man don't force a guy to read now
    that is just intolerant

    /golf clap

    Yeah, I heard. And I applaud them for agreeing to not insult one particular group of people. Any instance of it is an insult to the dead, and the survivors of the people in question being unaware of it isn't an excuse. At that point you're just talking smack about people behind their backs.

    And @Quoth: I am not compelled to be accepting any religious practice which insults me or my beliefs. I must tolerate it, (like I said before) and I don't have any legal recourse to stop them or anything, but if I'm going to tolerate them insulting me, then they can tolerate me informing them that they are being callous shitbags for continuing to do it anyway.

    I would argue that it's not actually an insult unless the group in question actually feels insulted. Which quite a few of them have, and been vocal about it.

    You have a good point that about tolerance being different from acceptance, but by yelling at a couple mormons on a message board you start to seem like a shitbag too.

    Not actually calling you a shitbag, just saying.

    Edit: Monroe and Run^3 have made some very good points and I just want to say I don't disagree with them.

    Fire Truck on
  • Options
    potatoepotatoe Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    can i toke up on dank nugs as a mormon?
    can i jerk it 24/7?
    can i play violent video games while making homoerotic gestures towards friends?

    potatoe on
  • Options
    DoobhDoobh She/Her, Ace Pan/Bisexual 8-) What's up, bootlickers?Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    potatoe wrote: »
    can i toke up on dank nugs as a mormon?
    can i jerk it 24/7?
    can i play violent video games while making homoerotic gestures towards friends?

    I think you know the answer to that.

    Edit: Dammit, Potato, your avatar is making me break #2.

    Doobh on
    Miss me? Find me on:

    Twitch (I stream most days of the week)
    Twitter (mean leftist discourse)
  • Options
    PhonehandPhonehand Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Fire Truck wrote: »
    MrMonroe wrote: »
    Phonehand wrote: »
    Etelmik wrote: »
    MrMonroe didn't read that Mormon leaders agreed not to baptize Holocaust victims, I see.

    Whoa hey man don't force a guy to read now
    that is just intolerant

    /golf clap

    Yeah, I heard. And I applaud them for agreeing to not insult one particular group of people. Any instance of it is an insult to the dead, and the survivors of the people in question being unaware of it isn't an excuse. At that point you're just talking smack about people behind their backs.

    And @Quoth: I am not compelled to be accepting any religious practice which insults me or my beliefs. I must tolerate it, (like I said before) and I don't have any legal recourse to stop them or anything, but if I'm going to tolerate them insulting me, then they can tolerate me informing them that they are being callous shitbags for continuing to do it anyway.

    I would argue that it's not actually an insult unless the group in question actually feels insulted. Which quite a few of them have, and been vocal about it.

    You have a good point that about tolerance being different from acceptance, but by yelling at a couple mormons on a message board you start to seem like a shitbag too.

    Not actually calling you a shitbag, just saying.

    Edit: Monroe and Run^3 have made some very good points and I just want to say I don't disagree with them.

    Why not? Just let him have it.

    Phonehand on
    pmdunk.jpg
  • Options
    potatoepotatoe Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Dubh wrote: »
    potatoe wrote: »
    can i toke up on dank nugs as a mormon?
    can i jerk it 24/7?
    can i play violent video games while making homoerotic gestures towards friends?

    I think you know the answer to that.

    is it a yes?
    it better be a yes

    potatoe on
  • Options
    PhonehandPhonehand Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    potatoe wrote: »
    can i toke up on dank nugs as a mormon?
    can i jerk it 24/7?
    can i play violent video games while making homoerotic gestures towards friends?

    Why not? Everyone else does.

    Phonehand on
    pmdunk.jpg
  • Options
    babyeatingjesusbabyeatingjesus Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    MrMonroe wrote: »
    Phonehand wrote: »
    Etelmik wrote: »
    MrMonroe didn't read that Mormon leaders agreed not to baptize Holocaust victims, I see.

    Whoa hey man don't force a guy to read now
    that is just intolerant

    /golf clap

    Yeah, I heard. And I applaud them for agreeing to not insult one particular group of people. Any instance of it is an insult to the dead, and the survivors of the people in question being unaware of it isn't an excuse. At that point you're just talking smack about people behind their backs.

    And @Quoth: I am not compelled to be accepting any religious practice which insults me or my beliefs. I must tolerate it, (like I said before) and I don't have any legal recourse to stop them or anything, but if I'm going to tolerate them insulting me, then they can tolerate me informing them that they are being callous shitbags for continuing to do it anyway.
    Would you be offended if it were, I don't know, pick a loved one,

    Okay you have a friend who is mormon, let's assume recently converted because I don't think that with your posts you're going to be making friends with any current mormons in good standing, and your loved one dies and they come up to you and say "Hey Monroe, I was really sorry to hear about your loved one, I always liked and respected him. I got my church together and we had a baptism ceremony for him as a show of this admiration and respect."

    Now you can get all pissy with this friend of yours, but they would explain that this is just what they do at his church when someone passes that a member cares about a lot like your friend did for your loved one. It's just how they reconcile their grief for that death.

    You can't possibly still be thinking that they should not be allowed to do that under law, can you? Nobody is being hurt or disturbed, and if you don't believe what they believe then you wouldn't think it would do any harm or good to the deceased's spirit, right?

    Now that's assuming a lot, but no more than when you assume that they do it to try and overthrow the heathen beliefs they felt your loved one had.

    babyeatingjesus on
    hitthatcheeseburgerfatty.gif
  • Options
    Fire TruckFire Truck I love my SELFRegistered User regular
    edited February 2009
    MrMonroe wrote: »
    Phonehand wrote: »
    Etelmik wrote: »
    MrMonroe didn't read that Mormon leaders agreed not to baptize Holocaust victims, I see.

    Whoa hey man don't force a guy to read now
    that is just intolerant

    /golf clap

    Yeah, I heard. And I applaud them for agreeing to not insult one particular group of people. Any instance of it is an insult to the dead, and the survivors of the people in question being unaware of it isn't an excuse. At that point you're just talking smack about people behind their backs.

    And @Quoth: I am not compelled to be accepting any religious practice which insults me or my beliefs. I must tolerate it, (like I said before) and I don't have any legal recourse to stop them or anything, but if I'm going to tolerate them insulting me, then they can tolerate me informing them that they are being callous shitbags for continuing to do it anyway.
    Would you be offended if it were, I don't know, pick a loved one,

    Okay you have a friend who is mormon, let's assume recently converted because I don't think that with your posts you're going to be making friends with any current mormons in good standing, and your loved one dies and they come up to you and say "Hey Monroe, I was really sorry to hear about your loved one, I always liked and respected him. I got my church together and we had a baptism ceremony for him as a show of this admiration and respect."

    Now you can get all pissy with this friend of yours, but they would explain that this is just what they do at his church when someone passes that a member cares about a lot like your friend did for your loved one. It's just how they reconcile their grief for that death.

    You can't possibly still be thinking that they should not be allowed to do that under law, can you? Nobody is being hurt or disturbed, and if you don't believe what they believe then you wouldn't think it would do any harm or good to the deceased's spirit, right?

    Now that's assuming a lot, but no more than when you assume that they do it to try and overthrow the heathen beliefs they felt your loved one had.

    This.

    Fire Truck on
  • Options
    potatoepotatoe Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    my religion honors the dead by gutting them, storing all of their organs in jars, and then wrapping up the dead in toilet paper

    potatoe on
  • Options
    MrMonroeMrMonroe passed out on the floor nowRegistered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Yeah, I can be a real jerk sometimes. I ain't frontin.

    But I can't say I agree that people have to actually feel insulted for it to count as an insult.

    Like, if I sent you a pm saying that Phonehand is a fat, smelly turdburgler that would be an insult even if he never finds out.

    Now, if I say that to his face and he's all "yeah, yeah, I know. I totally am a fat, smelly turdburgler and I'm damn proud of it," then it ceases to be an insult.

    Maybe that's what you meant to begin with, I'm not sure.

    MrMonroe on
  • Options
    babyeatingjesusbabyeatingjesus Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    I think the real insult is assuming that an act is done out of some negative feeling.

    Like the mormons try and exalt a person that has died, maybe even in spite of the fact that they weren't a part of the mormon church or faith, and someone else assumes that they do it to belittle that person's beliefs.

    babyeatingjesus on
    hitthatcheeseburgerfatty.gif
  • Options
    Fire TruckFire Truck I love my SELFRegistered User regular
    edited February 2009
    MrMonroe wrote: »
    Yeah, I can be a real jerk sometimes. I ain't frontin.

    But I can't say I agree that people have to actually feel insulted for it to count as an insult.

    Like, if I sent you a pm saying that Phonehand is a fat, smelly turdburgler that would be an insult even if he never finds out.

    Now, if I say that to his face and he's all "yeah, yeah, I know. I totally am a fat, smelly turdburgler and I'm damn proud of it," then it ceases to be an insult.

    Maybe that's what you meant to begin with, I'm not sure.

    Yeah, that is what I intended.

    Fire Truck on
  • Options
    DoobhDoobh She/Her, Ace Pan/Bisexual 8-) What's up, bootlickers?Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    MrMonroe wrote: »
    Phonehand wrote: »
    Etelmik wrote: »
    MrMonroe didn't read that Mormon leaders agreed not to baptize Holocaust victims, I see.

    Whoa hey man don't force a guy to read now
    that is just intolerant

    /golf clap

    Yeah, I heard. And I applaud them for agreeing to not insult one particular group of people. Any instance of it is an insult to the dead, and the survivors of the people in question being unaware of it isn't an excuse. At that point you're just talking smack about people behind their backs.

    And @Quoth: I am not compelled to be accepting any religious practice which insults me or my beliefs. I must tolerate it, (like I said before) and I don't have any legal recourse to stop them or anything, but if I'm going to tolerate them insulting me, then they can tolerate me informing them that they are being callous shitbags for continuing to do it anyway.
    Would you be offended if it were, I don't know, pick a loved one,

    Okay you have a friend who is mormon, let's assume recently converted because I don't think that with your posts you're going to be making friends with any current mormons in good standing, and your loved one dies and they come up to you and say "Hey Monroe, I was really sorry to hear about your loved one, I always liked and respected him. I got my church together and we had a baptism ceremony for him as a show of this admiration and respect."

    Now you can get all pissy with this friend of yours, but they would explain that this is just what they do at his church when someone passes that a member cares about a lot like your friend did for your loved one. It's just how they reconcile their grief for that death.

    You can't possibly still be thinking that they should not be allowed to do that under law, can you? Nobody is being hurt or disturbed, and if you don't believe what they believe then you wouldn't think it would do any harm or good to the deceased's spirit, right?

    Now that's assuming a lot, but no more than when you assume that they do it to try and overthrow the heathen beliefs they felt your loved one had.

    Hold it. They're allowed to perform a baptism now just because somebody has died? Without this dead person's permission? That's what this 'ceremony' is.

    Doobh on
    Miss me? Find me on:

    Twitch (I stream most days of the week)
    Twitter (mean leftist discourse)
  • Options
    PhonehandPhonehand Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    MrMonroe wrote: »
    Yeah, I can be a real jerk sometimes. I ain't frontin.

    But I can't say I agree that people have to actually feel insulted for it to count as an insult.

    Like, if I sent you a pm saying that Phonehand is a fat, smelly turdburgler that would be an insult even if he never finds out.

    Now, if I say that to his face and he's all "yeah, yeah, I know. I totally am a fat, smelly turdburgler and I'm damn proud of it," then it ceases to be an insult.

    Maybe that's what you meant to begin with, I'm not sure.

    Erroneous because I have better hair than you

    Phonehand on
    pmdunk.jpg
  • Options
    babyeatingjesusbabyeatingjesus Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Dubh wrote: »
    MrMonroe wrote: »
    Phonehand wrote: »
    Etelmik wrote: »
    MrMonroe didn't read that Mormon leaders agreed not to baptize Holocaust victims, I see.

    Whoa hey man don't force a guy to read now
    that is just intolerant

    /golf clap

    Yeah, I heard. And I applaud them for agreeing to not insult one particular group of people. Any instance of it is an insult to the dead, and the survivors of the people in question being unaware of it isn't an excuse. At that point you're just talking smack about people behind their backs.

    And @Quoth: I am not compelled to be accepting any religious practice which insults me or my beliefs. I must tolerate it, (like I said before) and I don't have any legal recourse to stop them or anything, but if I'm going to tolerate them insulting me, then they can tolerate me informing them that they are being callous shitbags for continuing to do it anyway.
    Would you be offended if it were, I don't know, pick a loved one,

    Okay you have a friend who is mormon, let's assume recently converted because I don't think that with your posts you're going to be making friends with any current mormons in good standing, and your loved one dies and they come up to you and say "Hey Monroe, I was really sorry to hear about your loved one, I always liked and respected him. I got my church together and we had a baptism ceremony for him as a show of this admiration and respect."

    Now you can get all pissy with this friend of yours, but they would explain that this is just what they do at his church when someone passes that a member cares about a lot like your friend did for your loved one. It's just how they reconcile their grief for that death.

    You can't possibly still be thinking that they should not be allowed to do that under law, can you? Nobody is being hurt or disturbed, and if you don't believe what they believe then you wouldn't think it would do any harm or good to the deceased's spirit, right?

    Now that's assuming a lot, but no more than when you assume that they do it to try and overthrow the heathen beliefs they felt your loved one had.

    Hold it. They're allowed to perform a baptism now just because somebody has died? Without this dead person's permission? That's what this 'ceremony' is.
    Well in this case 'baptism' refers to, as I understand it, a prayer or series of prayers and ceremony done in that person's honour or name, not to their body, so yeah, they can do it for Nelson Mandela if they want to. They don't have to fly to Africa.

    babyeatingjesus on
    hitthatcheeseburgerfatty.gif
  • Options
    SithDrummerSithDrummer Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Seems to me that the goal of this sort of 'baptism' isn't admiration and respect for the dead, even if the people doing it do feel that way about the dead person - it's giving them one last chance to Do The Right Thing™ and become a Mormon.

    Are you asking if we would act differently in a real life situation than on the internet? Hmm, I wonder. But the sentiments, whether shared or not, would remain the same.

    And speaking of sentiments, if it's such a private thing between you, God, and that person's soul, why would you bring it up to anyone else? Seems like you'd be looking for approval for some reason. Now, I don't want to project any intentions upon your proposed actions, so why don't you correct me here.

    SithDrummer on
  • Options
    DoobhDoobh She/Her, Ace Pan/Bisexual 8-) What's up, bootlickers?Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Dubh wrote: »
    MrMonroe wrote: »
    Phonehand wrote: »
    Etelmik wrote: »
    MrMonroe didn't read that Mormon leaders agreed not to baptize Holocaust victims, I see.

    Whoa hey man don't force a guy to read now
    that is just intolerant

    /golf clap

    Yeah, I heard. And I applaud them for agreeing to not insult one particular group of people. Any instance of it is an insult to the dead, and the survivors of the people in question being unaware of it isn't an excuse. At that point you're just talking smack about people behind their backs.

    And @Quoth: I am not compelled to be accepting any religious practice which insults me or my beliefs. I must tolerate it, (like I said before) and I don't have any legal recourse to stop them or anything, but if I'm going to tolerate them insulting me, then they can tolerate me informing them that they are being callous shitbags for continuing to do it anyway.
    Would you be offended if it were, I don't know, pick a loved one,

    Okay you have a friend who is mormon, let's assume recently converted because I don't think that with your posts you're going to be making friends with any current mormons in good standing, and your loved one dies and they come up to you and say "Hey Monroe, I was really sorry to hear about your loved one, I always liked and respected him. I got my church together and we had a baptism ceremony for him as a show of this admiration and respect."

    Now you can get all pissy with this friend of yours, but they would explain that this is just what they do at his church when someone passes that a member cares about a lot like your friend did for your loved one. It's just how they reconcile their grief for that death.

    You can't possibly still be thinking that they should not be allowed to do that under law, can you? Nobody is being hurt or disturbed, and if you don't believe what they believe then you wouldn't think it would do any harm or good to the deceased's spirit, right?

    Now that's assuming a lot, but no more than when you assume that they do it to try and overthrow the heathen beliefs they felt your loved one had.

    Hold it. They're allowed to perform a baptism now just because somebody has died? Without this dead person's permission? That's what this 'ceremony' is.
    Well in this case 'baptism' refers to, as I understand it, a prayer or series of prayers and ceremony done in that person's honour or name, not to their body, so yeah, they can do it for Nelson Mandela if they want to. They don't have to fly to Africa.

    Doesn't matter if the body is present or not. There is no honoring here, and it's disrespectful to people that died under a different belief system.

    Doobh on
    Miss me? Find me on:

    Twitch (I stream most days of the week)
    Twitter (mean leftist discourse)
  • Options
    Fire TruckFire Truck I love my SELFRegistered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Seems to me that the goal of this sort of 'baptism' isn't admiration and respect for the dead, even if the people doing it do feel that way about the dead person - it's giving them one last chance to Do The Right Thingâ„¢ and become a Mormon.

    Are you asking if we would act differently in a real life situation than on the internet? Hmm, I wonder. But the sentiments, whether shared or not, would remain the same.

    And speaking of sentiments, if it's such a private thing between you, God, and that person's soul, why would you bring it up to anyone else? Seems like you'd be looking for approval for some reason. Now, I don't want to project any intentions upon your proposed actions, so why don't you correct me here.

    Because you were talking about the mutual loved one, and it seemed an appropriate thing to bring up in conversation?

    Fire Truck on
  • Options
    SithDrummerSithDrummer Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    I like to talk about all of the wonderful things I try to do for people, too.

    SithDrummer on
This discussion has been closed.