The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
Physics problem, might just be a calculator problem?
Calculate the energy of the transitions from the n = 4,5,6 energy levels to the n = 3 level for the hydrogen atom using the Bohr formula.
I'm assuming he means this equation (sorry, I'll just write this phonetically because I don't have any idea how to write the symbols):
Delta E = ((e^2)(m sub e) / 8 Epsilon^2 h^2))((1/n sub f ^2) - (1/n sub i^2))
The problem is, the numerator of the first part of the equation, e^2(m sub e) , is so small that on the three calculators I've tried, it just works out to zero, and the whole equation becomes zero.
Am I doing this right? It's pretty frustrating because this is the first problem in a long list of problems and if I can't get this answer I can't do the rest of the problems, but I can't figure out what I should be doing.
I'm not sure what you mean. I mean, I know what scientific notation is, I just don't know what you're asking. What I'm saying is that when I put in that equation of numbers, I get a zero. When I put it in in pieces, the numerator is coming out to be zero when I know that it isn't. I think the number is just so small that the calculator is rounding.
Do I just need to buy one of those expensive TI calculators? I am using a scientific calculator I borrowed from my roommate and even that is giving me zeros.
I am also having the same problem for this question now. I am trying to find the uncertainty of momentum for something using this equation:
(Delta x)(Delta p) = h/2
Except that when I put h/2 into either of the three calculators I'm using:
(6.63 x 10^-34)/2
I get zero.
What the fuck.
Do I just need to buy one of those expensive TI calculators? I am using a scientific calculator I borrowed from my roommate and even that is giving me zeros.
I'm not sure what you mean. I mean, I know what scientific notation is, I just don't know what you're asking. What I'm saying is that when I put in that equation of numbers, I get a zero. When I put it in in pieces, the numerator is coming out to be zero when I know that it isn't. I think the number is just so small that the calculator is rounding.
Do I just need to buy one of those expensive TI calculators? I am using a scientific calculator I borrowed from my roommate and even that is giving me zeros.
whats the actual value of the very small number?
also, what is the value of the other part as well.
In doing the first question I explained above, if I put it in all together, I get zero.
So I'm putting it in in pieces.
The first part, (e^4)(m sub e) , is:
(1.6 x 10^-19)^4 (9.11 x 10^-31)
When I put it into the calculator, I keep getting zero as an answer. I think it's because the number is so small that the calculator is rounding it down to zero, but even the scientific calculator is doing that. What should I do?
Edit: I changed the mode on the scientific calculator, and now it's giving me 0 x 10^00 . Awesome.
and you want to find x. y = 5 and z = 1x10^-100. when you put this into a calculator it will give you a zero. the most accurate answer though is (5x1)x10^-100 or 5x10^-100.
if y = 5x10^50, then it would be (5x1)x10^(50-100) or 5x10^-50
Dunadan019 on
0
physi_marcPositron TrackerIn a nutshellRegistered Userregular
edited February 2009
I think you just need to figure out a way for your calculator to display scientific notation. No, you don't need to buy an expensive TI one. All cheap scientific calculator should have an option to display the answers in scientific notation (e.g. 6.63E-34).
Also, yes, the answer will be quite small indeed. I think your formula gives you someting in Joules. In this case, it would probably be better to convert it so you get the answer in eV. But if I just lost you, don't worry about it.
physi_marc on
Switch Friend Code: 3102-5341-0358
Nintendo Network ID: PhysiMarc
In doing the first question I explained above, if I put it in all together, I get zero.
So I'm putting it in in pieces.
The first part, (e^4)(m sub e) , is:
(1.6 x 10^-19)^4 (9.11 x 10^-31)
When I put it into the calculator, I keep getting zero as an answer. I think it's because the number is so small that the calculator is rounding it down to zero, but even the scientific calculator is doing that. What should I do?
the answer is (1.6x9.11)x10^(-31-19) or 14.576x10^-50
Google Calculator can handle numbers up to at least 1.0E300, and it can parse scientific notation as well. Just type your equation (with constants inserted) into Google.
Google Calculator can handle numbers up to at least 1.0E300, and it can parse scientific notation as well. Just type your equation (with constants inserted) into Google.
In doing the first question I explained above, if I put it in all together, I get zero.
So I'm putting it in in pieces.
The first part, (e^4)(m sub e) , is:
(1.6 x 10^-19)^4 (9.11 x 10^-31)
When I put it into the calculator, I keep getting zero as an answer. I think it's because the number is so small that the calculator is rounding it down to zero, but even the scientific calculator is doing that. What should I do?
Edit: I changed the mode on the scientific calculator, and now it's giving me 0 x 10^00 . Awesome.
You can also do some algebra:
(1.6 x 10^-19)^4 (9.11 x 10^-31)
=
(1.6^4) x (10^-19)^4 x (9.11 x 10^-31)
=
(1.6^4x9.11) x (10^-19)^4 x (10^-31)
and go from there. The problem you were having with your scientific calculator is clear - once you multiply that out, your exponent on the 10 is less than -100. Most calculators can only handle exponents on the 10 in scientific notation between -100 and 100.
In doing the first question I explained above, if I put it in all together, I get zero.
So I'm putting it in in pieces.
The first part, (e^4)(m sub e) , is:
(1.6 x 10^-19)^4 (9.11 x 10^-31)
When I put it into the calculator, I keep getting zero as an answer. I think it's because the number is so small that the calculator is rounding it down to zero, but even the scientific calculator is doing that. What should I do?
Edit: I changed the mode on the scientific calculator, and now it's giving me 0 x 10^00 . Awesome.
You can also do some algebra:
(1.6 x 10^-19)^4 (9.11 x 10^-31)
=
(1.6^4) x (10^-19)^4 x (9.11 x 10^-31)
=
(1.6^4x9.11) x (10^-19)^4 x (10^-31)
and go from there. The problem you were having with your scientific calculator is clear - once you multiply that out, your exponent on the 10 is less than -100. Most calculators can only handle exponents on the 10 in scientific notation between -100 and 100.
just so you know, when you multiply numbers with exponents that have the same base, you add the exponents and keep the base
10^3 x 10^3 (which is 1000x1000) does not equal 10^9 (1,000,000,000) but 10^6 (1,000,000)
In doing the first question I explained above, if I put it in all together, I get zero.
So I'm putting it in in pieces.
The first part, (e^4)(m sub e) , is:
(1.6 x 10^-19)^4 (9.11 x 10^-31)
When I put it into the calculator, I keep getting zero as an answer. I think it's because the number is so small that the calculator is rounding it down to zero, but even the scientific calculator is doing that. What should I do?
Edit: I changed the mode on the scientific calculator, and now it's giving me 0 x 10^00 . Awesome.
You can also do some algebra:
(1.6 x 10^-19)^4 (9.11 x 10^-31)
=
(1.6^4) x (10^-19)^4 x (9.11 x 10^-31)
=
(1.6^4x9.11) x (10^-19)^4 x (10^-31)
and go from there. The problem you were having with your scientific calculator is clear - once you multiply that out, your exponent on the 10 is less than -100. Most calculators can only handle exponents on the 10 in scientific notation between -100 and 100.
just so you know, when you multiply numbers with exponents that have the same base, you add the exponents and keep the base
10^3 x 10^3 (which is 1000x1000) does not equal 10^9 (1,000,000,000) but 10^6 (1,000,000)
Right, so the result would be
59.703296x10^-107
=
5.9703296x10^-106
The trick is to break it down into parts, and alternate entering a part from the numerator and from the denominator. Breaking it into parts doesn't work if you enter all of the denominator parts consecutively.
Posts
Do I just need to buy one of those expensive TI calculators? I am using a scientific calculator I borrowed from my roommate and even that is giving me zeros.
take that 10^-34 and multiply it in at the end.
whats the actual value of the very small number?
also, what is the value of the other part as well.
Edit: One second, I will write out a more accurate description of what is happening.
So I'm putting it in in pieces.
The first part, (e^4)(m sub e) , is:
(1.6 x 10^-19)^4 (9.11 x 10^-31)
When I put it into the calculator, I keep getting zero as an answer. I think it's because the number is so small that the calculator is rounding it down to zero, but even the scientific calculator is doing that. What should I do?
Edit: I changed the mode on the scientific calculator, and now it's giving me 0 x 10^00 . Awesome.
and you want to find x. y = 5 and z = 1x10^-100. when you put this into a calculator it will give you a zero. the most accurate answer though is (5x1)x10^-100 or 5x10^-100.
if y = 5x10^50, then it would be (5x1)x10^(50-100) or 5x10^-50
Also, yes, the answer will be quite small indeed. I think your formula gives you someting in Joules. In this case, it would probably be better to convert it so you get the answer in eV. But if I just lost you, don't worry about it.
Nintendo Network ID: PhysiMarc
the answer is (1.6x9.11)x10^(-31-19) or 14.576x10^-50
I also found a setting to change all answers into scientific notation, and now it's giving me 0 ^ 0.
give the numbers.
YES. This worked.
Thanks a lot everyone for helping me out.
You can also do some algebra:
(1.6 x 10^-19)^4 (9.11 x 10^-31)
=
(1.6^4) x (10^-19)^4 x (9.11 x 10^-31)
=
(1.6^4x9.11) x (10^-19)^4 x (10^-31)
and go from there. The problem you were having with your scientific calculator is clear - once you multiply that out, your exponent on the 10 is less than -100. Most calculators can only handle exponents on the 10 in scientific notation between -100 and 100.
just so you know, when you multiply numbers with exponents that have the same base, you add the exponents and keep the base
10^3 x 10^3 (which is 1000x1000) does not equal 10^9 (1,000,000,000) but 10^6 (1,000,000)
Right, so the result would be
59.703296x10^-107
=
5.9703296x10^-106
The trick is to break it down into parts, and alternate entering a part from the numerator and from the denominator. Breaking it into parts doesn't work if you enter all of the denominator parts consecutively.