As was foretold, we've added advertisements to the forums! If you have questions, or if you encounter any bugs, please visit this thread: https://forums.penny-arcade.com/discussion/240191/forum-advertisement-faq-and-reports-thread/
Options

New artist here [NSFW]

bhunt17bhunt17 Registered User regular
edited February 2009 in Artist's Corner
Hello All. I was hoping to get some crits on my website and its content. I haven't put up anything new in a while due to my master's program, but was hoping to get some advice or comments.

Thanks All!

http://www.benjaminjhunt.com/

bhunt17 on

Posts

  • Options
    surrealitychecksurrealitycheck lonely, but not unloved dreaming of faulty keys and latchesRegistered User regular
    edited February 2009
    I don't think the links on your website work :P

    They just take me to jpegs!

    surrealitycheck on
    obF2Wuw.png
  • Options
    bhunt17bhunt17 Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    It's light box, If you move the mouse to the right you will get a next tab that pops up, or just use the arrow keys when the splash image comes up.

    bhunt17 on
  • Options
    ProspicienceProspicience The Raven King DenvemoloradoRegistered User regular
    edited February 2009
    7 ) No Site-Whoring
    Site-whoring, plugging, or advertising of your personal website, product, or webcomic any kind will not be tolerated.

    However, asking for help on website design/layout is acceptable as long as users are not required to navigate out of the forum to see your site (take a screenshot). We are not programmers.

    Thread might get locked if you don't post some actual layout Screenshots or somesuch.

    Prospicience on
  • Options
    bhunt17bhunt17 Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    7 ) No Site-Whoring
    Site-whoring, plugging, or advertising of your personal website, product, or webcomic any kind will not be tolerated.

    However, asking for help on website design/layout is acceptable as long as users are not required to navigate out of the forum to see your site (take a screenshot). We are not programmers.

    Thread might get locked if you don't post some actual layout Screenshots or somesuch.

    ahh good call, will be posting images shortly

    bhunt17 on
  • Options
    bhunt17bhunt17 Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Here are some images;

    Chains.jpg

    Mermaid.jpg

    Hero.jpg

    Girl_on_hand.jpg

    and a WIP

    Illustration_1.jpg

    bhunt17 on
  • Options
    surrealitychecksurrealitycheck lonely, but not unloved dreaming of faulty keys and latchesRegistered User regular
    edited February 2009
    It's light box, If you move the mouse to the right you will get a next tab that pops up, or just use the arrow keys when the splash image comes up.

    My apologies, it was NoScript devilry!

    surrealitycheck on
    obF2Wuw.png
  • Options
    Napalm DonkeyNapalm Donkey Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    this is probably just me and my dirty mind, but the logo on your website looks a little like a dick.

    Napalm Donkey on
    4cgipuI.jpg
  • Options
    crawdaddiocrawdaddio Tacoma, WARegistered User, ClubPA regular
    edited February 2009
    I'm not gonna lie here, that's a pretty sparse site; I mean I suppose that's kind of the idea behind going for simplicity, but you've only got two real pages. Nevertheless. Man, there are so many artists these days using that Lightbox image viewer, which is fine, I guess, but I'm not sure it jives well with your design, and I don't think it's a particularly good choice to have them only appear sequentially, without thumbnails or an index gallery; is there any particular reason you're using Lightbox over a traditional thumbnail gallery?

    About the rest of the site itself, it kind of depends what kind of feedback you're looking for. From a design standpoint, I'm not gonna lie, it seems kind of lacking. Also, your résumé page layout is a bit broken in Safari on XP--the list overlaps and covers the heading. I'd help you fix it (not that that's something you ought to expect) except that your stylesheet is a giant solid block of text, and there's no way in hell I'm digging through that. If you do want advice on technical aspects of your pages, fix that. I will, however, say that typographically, you may want to look into "’" (’) for the main title's "Hunt's," and "—" (—) or "&ndash" (–) for the closing of your note.

    crawdaddio on
  • Options
    bhunt17bhunt17 Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    this is probably just me and my dirty mind, but the logo on your website looks a little like a dick.

    Yeah for some reason I get that a lot. I did a few animations with him back in college and just kept him around, doing things every now and then.

    bhunt17 on
  • Options
    bhunt17bhunt17 Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    crawdaddio wrote: »
    I'm not gonna lie here, that's a pretty sparse site; I mean I suppose that's kind of the idea behind going for simplicity, but you've only got two real pages. Nevertheless. Man, there are so many artists these days using that Lightbox image viewer, which is fine, I guess, but I'm not sure it jives well with your design, and I don't think it's a particularly good choice to have them only appear sequentially, without thumbnails or an index gallery; is there any particular reason you're using Lightbox over a traditional thumbnail gallery?

    Back when I first included lightbox I wanted a real simple site. I hate having peoples portfolios open me up to a new window or tab just to look at a bigger version, which is a personal preference. When I have some time I was thinking of trying some other viewers and including thumbnails this next time around.

    bhunt17 on
  • Options
    LeggraphicsLeggraphics Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    I have to say mate someone who is looking through your work to hire you isnt going to sit there and flick through/ wait for every image you have drawn to load up. I think maybe some form of thumbnail gallery is the way. Im trying to develop my portfolio in flash at the moment and am really struggling with some script that I want.

    Having said that I really like your home-navigation page as well as your logo with the eyes blinking at the top. Also. some of your pencil drawings are good. Think you could do a better job colouring them in photoshop though.

    Leggraphics on
  • Options
    MustangMustang Arbiter of Unpopular Opinions Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Personally I don't think it really matters how glorious your website is or isn't, at this stage your content is lacking the desired level of experience to get you hired. I don't say that to be a dick, but I'd personally reccomend you focus your time on improving your art, rather than worrying about how to best present it.

    Mustang on
  • Options
    Napalm DonkeyNapalm Donkey Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Agree on putting up a thumbnail gallery right now its too much work to have to go through every pic.
    bhunt17 wrote: »
    this is probably just me and my dirty mind, but the logo on your website looks a little like a dick.

    Yeah for some reason I get that a lot. I did a few animations with him back in college and just kept him around, doing things every now and then.

    I think that the eyebrows are making it look dongish because they overlap with the body outline and make it look more like the tip.

    Napalm Donkey on
    4cgipuI.jpg
  • Options
    RankenphileRankenphile Passersby were amazed by the unusually large amounts of blood.Registered User, Moderator mod
    edited February 2009
    the reason a lot of people say your logo looks like a dick is because what the fuck man it looks like a fucking dick

    Rankenphile on
    8406wWN.png
  • Options
    TamTam Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    You've got a fairly good start on art, but I'm going to have to agree that your logo looks like a cartoon caricature of a phallus.

    Tam on
  • Options
    bhunt17bhunt17 Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    here is a less "dickish" version of him in a walk cycle

    http://www.benjaminjhunt.com/gooby_test.swf

    sorry for the link, I wasn't sure if I could embed the flash file.

    I use to be concerned with being hired to do art but I'm not really anymore. I did graphic design for a start up t-shirt company and after it went under, I greatly prefer doing things on my terms and working on projects I want to work on.

    bhunt17 on
  • Options
    bhunt17bhunt17 Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    I have to say mate someone who is looking through your work to hire you isnt going to sit there and flick through/ wait for every image you have drawn to load up. I think maybe some form of thumbnail gallery is the way. Im trying to develop my portfolio in flash at the moment and am really struggling with some script that I want.

    Having said that I really like your home-navigation page as well as your logo with the eyes blinking at the top. Also. some of your pencil drawings are good. Think you could do a better job colouring them in photoshop though.

    Yeah I'm still trying to figure out my style. Flash can be a bitch your best friend is tutorials. My last job was flash heavy at times, but once you get it to work the way you want, then your in business.

    bhunt17 on
  • Options
    AutoballaAutoballa Registered User new member
    edited February 2009
    Might just be my stupidity. I got used to clicking the picture to go to the next and did not realize at some point I began clicking on the wrong half. I ended up going to the previous picture and thinking i was cycling back around so i clicked close. Thumbs would obviously eliminate this. If not that I would suggest a static next and previous button, or cater to a smarter audience than me :P

    Autoballa on
  • Options
    ManonvonSuperockManonvonSuperock Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    yeah, your logo looks like a dick. on top of that your drawings and illustrations are at an embarrassingly unprofessional level to have on a site, especially considering you got your BA three years ago.

    Your Bachelor's says its in 3d modeling and animation, yet on your site you only have 3 rendered 3d images, one is a rounded rectangle and the other two show no real purpose behind the design -and you have no animation.

    What you have on your site is all stuff that would be expected as early highschool level stuff at best. Right now, all your website is doing -other than ensuring that no one that would find it woud you hire you for an art-related job- is give a really bad name to the cogswell something school you graduated from.

    ManonvonSuperock on
  • Options
    winter_combat_knightwinter_combat_knight Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Your website is confusing. Are you promoting yourself as an Illustrator, artist, photographer or graphic designer? It's good to have a range of skills, but it would be very confusing for clients looking through your website. They would be wondering, "what does this guy specialise in?"
    Where do you see yourself getting a job? Once you know that, work on a portfolio which will show off the best of your abilities.
    As for the artwork, your drawings arent bad, but they arent finished. Incoorporate them into something which is more finished.

    winter_combat_knight on
  • Options
    bhunt17bhunt17 Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    yeah, your logo looks like a dick. on top of that your drawings and illustrations are at an embarrassingly unprofessional level to have on a site, especially considering you got your BA three years ago.

    Your Bachelor's says its in 3d modeling and animation, yet on your site you only have 3 rendered 3d images, one is a rounded rectangle and the other two show no real purpose behind the design -and you have no animation.

    What you have on your site is all stuff that would be expected as early highschool level stuff at best. Right now, all your website is doing -other than ensuring that no one that would find it woud you hire you for an art-related job- is give a really bad name to the cogswell something school you graduated from.

    I'm sorry that you and others see a dick. He is not a dick but if you want to see dick see dick. Obviously you feel my art is sub-par, that's your choice, and yes I did get my BA 3 years ago and 3 years ago my drawing were worse.

    As far as what my BA was titled, the school titled it that, then required on 2D and one 3D animation class, not really enough to get anything stellar. The rounded rectangle is actually called an iPod, maybe you've heard of them? Now the purpose behind the other designs, he is a samurai elephant man, and the other is a reject experiment. What more purpose do you need?

    I don't think I'm giving my college which was Cogswell Polytechnical, a bad name. I'm not trying to be the next Ian McCaig, maybe I should have more of a blog set up, cause as of right now I'm not trying to get an art job.

    bhunt17 on
  • Options
    bhunt17bhunt17 Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Your website is confusing. Are you promoting yourself as an Illustrator, artist, photographer or graphic designer? It's good to have a range of skills, but it would be very confusing for clients looking through your website. They would be wondering, "what does this guy specialise in?"
    Where do you see yourself getting a job? Once you know that, work on a portfolio which will show off the best of your abilities.
    As for the artwork, your drawings arent bad, but they arent finished. Incoorporate them into something which is more finished.

    I'm not really trying to promote myself as anything. I tend to focus more on my own projects and the site has turned into more of a way of showing my friends what I've been working on.

    I agree that my drawings need to be developed more. The majority tend to be in static white space. Sadly all my time is taken up by my master's program, but I'm hoping to have some time to work on some techniques before my student teacher starts in the summer.

    bhunt17 on
  • Options
    ManonvonSuperockManonvonSuperock Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    bhunt17 wrote: »
    I'm sorry that you and others see a dick. He is not a dick but if you want to see dick see dick. Obviously you feel my art is sub-par, that's your choice, and yes I did get my BA 3 years ago and 3 years ago my drawing were worse.

    As far as what my BA was titled, the school titled it that, then required on 2D and one 3D animation class, not really enough to get anything stellar. The rounded rectangle is actually called an iPod, maybe you've heard of them? Now the purpose behind the other designs, he is a samurai elephant man, and the other is a reject experiment. What more purpose do you need?

    I don't think I'm giving my college which was Cogswell Polytechnical, a bad name. I'm not trying to be the next Ian McCaig, maybe I should have more of a blog set up, cause as of right now I'm not trying to get an art job.

    You're using your phallic-buddy as a graphic design element on your website. What the viewer sees is more important in commercial art than what the artist intended. You intended to have a mascot that doesn't look like a penis, we're telling you you have a mascot that looks like a penis. Seems like a good reason to try to improve it.

    What I meant about your 3d models is that they show no marketable skill that would appeal to an employer.

    If you got a BA in Animation and 3D something another and only took intro animation courses, then your college deserves the reputation it'll inevitably get from its alumni showing off their work.


    And if you're not trying to get an art job, why would you have a personal website only displaying artwork with public contact information and a resume?

    ManonvonSuperock on
  • Options
    bhunt17bhunt17 Registered User regular
    edited February 2009

    You're using your phallic-buddy as a graphic design element on your website. What the viewer sees is more important in commercial art than what the artist intended. You intended to have a mascot that doesn't look like a penis, we're telling you you have a mascot that looks like a penis. Seems like a good reason to try to improve it.

    What I meant about your 3d models is that they show no marketable skill that would appeal to an employer.

    If you got a BA in Animation and 3D something another and only took intro animation courses, then your college deserves the reputation it'll inevitably get from its alumni showing off their work.


    And if you're not trying to get an art job, why would you have a personal website only displaying artwork with public contact information and a resume?

    I would have to agree that he is particularly penis looking in the logo, I don't think thats the case in the walk test. He has more of a bean shape to him.

    That comment about the 3d models is more constructive, yes they are lacking the wire frame shots giving nothing but the final render and no construction.

    I still think the school has a great reputation. Ian McCaig freaking taught there, which was incredible to learn from him.

    I had an art job with a start up and by the end of it all, I wanted to work on my own projects, which was close to the last time I updated my site. I've been doing more occasional web stuff more than anything, and went back to school for my Masters in Teaching at The University of San Francisco. I found that I enjoyed teaching more than working for someone that didn't know what they wanted and where they wanted the shirt designs to go. Out of laziness I haven't updated my site in a while.

    bhunt17 on
  • Options
    ManonvonSuperockManonvonSuperock Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    what do you plan on teaching?

    ManonvonSuperock on
  • Options
    ScosglenScosglen Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    I can't comment much on the 3D, but the point of mentioning the Ipod is a rectangle with subdivided edges is that, as a portfolio piece meant to show your MODELING abilities, it's about the same as having drawn a very nice circle to demonstrate your drawing abilities. As for the other two models, they don't look very good and the designs are kind of awkward and unappealing. I would almost rather see just a gray render of them than the textures that are on them now.

    Also, it's REALLY obnoxious to have to click through your logo at the beginning every time I want to see a new section of your gallery.

    Why is there a separate "Drawing" and "Illustrations" category? None of your "illustrations" are really illustrations in the traditional sense, where we should ideally see some kind of narrative, action, setting, or purpose that the image can communicate. They're all mostly just characters posed in a void, the same as everything in the "Drawings" category. What's more, sorry to shit in your cereal, but I think you should probably just remove both of those categories from your website and not market those skills.

    On your resume you say your areas of "particular interest and talent" are in Graphic Design (penis logo D:), Concept Design, Story boarding, and Video Editing, the last 3 of which are not represented in your portfolio at all.

    Scosglen on
  • Options
    bhunt17bhunt17 Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    what do you plan on teaching?

    Well I already have my art credential, but I'm trying to jump through the rest of the states requirements like taking the other test requirements to teach social science. Once I finish my program I have met all the states requirements to teach art right out the door but I want to be dual credentialed :)

    bhunt17 on
  • Options
    bhunt17bhunt17 Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Scosglen wrote: »
    I can't comment much on the 3D, but the point of mentioning the Ipod is a rectangle with subdivided edges is that, as a portfolio piece meant to show your MODELING abilities, it's about the same as having drawn a very nice circle to demonstrate your drawing abilities. As for the other two models, they don't look very good and the designs are kind of awkward and unappealing. I would almost rather see just a gray render of them than the textures that are on them now.

    Yeah Manonvon brought up the fact that there is nothing representing the structure of the models. I should have included wire-frame shots of it, showing the mesh. The ipod is a bit more than just a rectangle. I modeled it with the jacks and everything which I was originally going to animate it being docked. The screen is also a separate component as well. Its there as an example of hard surfacing modeling.

    bhunt17 on
  • Options
    ManonvonSuperockManonvonSuperock Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    EDIT: Off topic and taken to PM.

    ManonvonSuperock on
Sign In or Register to comment.