The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
When I try to watch videos in HD on YouTube, they're choppy and laggy, and my CPU utilization is around 90%. However, HD videos on Vimeo run perfectly (at 70% CPU) and if I download a HD YouTube video and watch it with Media Player Classic, it works fine and the CPU util. is around 50%. Any clue as to what could be wrong?
Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read.
-Groucho Marx
I have the same problem. I find that if I pause it and let the video buffer completely it goes away.
Macro9 on
0
KalTorakOne way or another, they all end up inthe Undercity.Registered Userregular
edited March 2009
You can try adding "&fmt=22" to the end of the URL of HD videos - I've had HD youtubes play choppily, i think someone told me it was because of youtube strangling the bandwidth allowance or something. Adding "&fmt=22" to the URL forces youtube to play it at 22fps, and it should be smoother (assuming the buffer isn't what's causing you trouble - when it was doing it to me the video had buffed completely and was still choppy).
try resuming the video in HD from the very beginning. if i'm watching something and switch to HD, it almost always glitches somehow. if i put the slider at the front and let it start from the beginning, it's usually fine.
Thanks... I tried all of your suggestions but none of them helped... This must be a pretty isolated case. I couldn't find anything on the Internet besides what you guys said. Oh well.
andkore on
Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read.
-Groucho Marx
Your problem is that Flash video is garbage. Your CPU will spend some time decoding the H.264 video stream, and that should be constant across sites. However since Flash is crap on a plate, it uses the CPU to render to the screen rather than the GPU. This means the more space a video takes up on the screen, the higher the CPU requirements, on top of the H.264 decoding requirements. By default, Youtube has a bigger display area than Vimeo, therefore you're going to hit your CPU bottleneck and start dropping frames. On top of looking like pixellated ass.
It plays fine when you download it because your media player uses the GPU to render video like a sane program, meaning it incurs no CPU penalty, so no dropped frames.
This post has been brought to you by the RandomEngy Hates Flash Video Foundation.
RandomEngy on
Profile -> Signature Settings -> Hide signatures always. Then you don't have to read this worthless text anymore.
That would explain perfectly why Vimeo's CPU util. is between the CPU util. of my media player and YouTube. Thanks a ton RandomEngy, that was really informative. So hopefully when I build my new computer soon the processor will be able to handle the HD vids. The only question I still have is why I seem to be the only one having this problem. I mean I know that my processor is old, but it shouldn't be so old that nobody else bothers trying to figure this out...
andkore on
Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read.
-Groucho Marx
This happens to everyone. I myself have spent much time pondering why so few people care that the defacto standard for video on the internet is so awful.
RandomEngy on
Profile -> Signature Settings -> Hide signatures always. Then you don't have to read this worthless text anymore.
This happens to everyone. I myself have spent much time pondering why so few people care that the defacto standard for video on the internet is so awful.
Mac people care a lot about it, because Flash is even more poop on OS X. Really, why does a shitty low-res Flash movie chew more CPU than watching a 1080p movie?
Yeah when I saw the benchmarks on that I could hardly believe it.
Someone needs to make a real silverlight video sharing site.
Stage6 was pretty good (It was DivX based), but they didn't have Google $$$ like YouTube and their videos were ALL high-quality and 640x480 at the least so they crashed and burned. Still, while it was around it made a great host for video Let's Plays.
I need help . i have put toogeather an old pc for a friend. Amd 2500+ Ati Redeon 9600gt 128mb. the youtube videos are laggy in 1080p and 720p. At times in 720p it is unlaggy. It is unwatchable. my brother has a old laptop that is about 6 years old, Latitude D500 which has can play 720p and 1080p youtube and bbciplayer hd with no lagg at all. Plz Help me!
Posts
-Groucho Marx
It plays fine when you download it because your media player uses the GPU to render video like a sane program, meaning it incurs no CPU penalty, so no dropped frames.
This post has been brought to you by the RandomEngy Hates Flash Video Foundation.
-Groucho Marx
Mac people care a lot about it, because Flash is even more poop on OS X. Really, why does a shitty low-res Flash movie chew more CPU than watching a 1080p movie?
Someone needs to make a real silverlight video sharing site.
Stage6 was pretty good (It was DivX based), but they didn't have Google $$$ like YouTube and their videos were ALL high-quality and 640x480 at the least so they crashed and burned. Still, while it was around it made a great host for video Let's Plays.
It's just sad that it takes that kind of change to make Youtube. "I got a CPU! I can now play Crysis on high or watch 720p Youtube videos!"
"Read twice, post once. It's almost like 'measure twice, cut once' only with reading." - MetaverseNomad