The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
So, I'm not really a 14 year old girl, and yet, I thought the movie was surprisingly enjoyable. Which is weird considering I was bored out of my skull by Harry Potter. Anyone else read these books or watch the movie. The best thing about the movie, regardless of the story, was that it looked absolutely beautiful. Just an amazingly well shot film considering the target audience.
Haven't seen it yet, but I suspect strongly that I will hate it, especially having recently watch Let the Right One In, which was a fucking incredible vampire movie (and also centered around young characters)
Vincent Grayson on
0
Apothe0sisHave you ever questioned the nature of your reality?Registered Userregular
edited March 2009
The best part of the movie was Alice and the baseball scene.
Everything else in it was bland as rice. Just like the goddamn books. Though, I think that the movie was probably better than the book, as in the book Bella only talks to about 3 people and spends the rest of her time inside her head. All of her "dialogue" with Edward is "Try not to die." "OK, I won't", "You are infuriating", "No, you are", "I love you", "Don't ever leave me", "OK, I won't" repeated 49 times.
I laughed my arse off at hearing the opening line about "I never really thought about how I would die" - my brother said "Whatever, emo" and then the people behind us asked each other "Wait, is this a comedy?"
Yeah, I think part of it, it wasn't a brilliant movie, but I can overlook a lot when my mind is looking at pretty images. I gotta go to IMDB and find out that cinematographer.
GuerillaDust on
0
Apothe0sisHave you ever questioned the nature of your reality?Registered Userregular
edited March 2009
I don't know about that. Other than leaning heavily on the bloom and the baseball scene being well done, it's been pretty universally panned as being blandly shot. And "bloom" is not a great technique anyway. I do not really disagree with the general consensus.
Also, the special effects with Edward jumping on trees was not great.
Perhaps my favourite plotpoint in the movie (which was changed from the book) is when Bella looks up the myths of the Indian tribe in the area and finds a website which documents them. Nice work, Indians, if you never told anyone how the hell did they make a website about it? Can't trust them, I tell you.
Apothe0sis on
0
FencingsaxIt is difficult to get a man to understand, when his salary depends upon his not understandingGNU Terry PratchettRegistered Userregular
Who panned it as being blandly shot. Haha, most reviewers don't even mention cinematography because most people don't care. Maybe it wasn't the cinemtography as much as the locations but I thought it looked better than most movies. For me I'm a sucker for color. The blues and greens throughout this movie were amazing to look at. I'm not saying it deserves an oscar nomination or is up there with movies with better framing, but it looked good to my eyes. period.
I will agree, the flying looked terrible. He was like some kind of moon gravity squirrel.
GuerillaDust on
0
Apothe0sisHave you ever questioned the nature of your reality?Registered Userregular
Add into that that it's a controlling emo obsessive stalker and we're talking some serious nonsense.
The book is hilarious though, they really play up the fact that what sets her apart is how much she smells llike she'll taste nice. The SPECIAL thing about her which sets her apart which they allude to so much throughout the book is ultimately nothing but she makes him really hungry. It's just fucking terrible.
Apparently it's also a gentle introduction to Mormon theology, but I haven't really seen that. Of course, I could only really stomach the first book out of morbid curiosity.
I went to this movie with an open mind, and thought it fell on it's face the entire way through.
I thought it really was that bad, and would have probably walked out if it wasn't for the fact that my sisters bought the ticket for me.
EDIT: The only real redeeming factor was the soundtrack. It was so good I might actually pick up the soundtrack. And the main male lead has quite a nice voice.
The best part of the movie was Alice and the baseball scene.
Everything else in it was bland as rice. Just like the goddamn books. Though, I think that the movie was probably better than the book, as in the book Bella only talks to about 3 people and spends the rest of her time inside her head. All of her "dialogue" with Edward is "Try not to die." "OK, I won't", "You are infuriating", "No, you are", "I love you", "Don't ever leave me", "OK, I won't" repeated 49 times.
I laughed my arse off at hearing the opening line about "I never really thought about how I would die" - my brother said "Whatever, emo" and then the people behind us asked each other "Wait, is this a comedy?"
Beautiful.
A dig at Anne Rice in a Twilight thread by Dan Brown.
eh, 'you've got mail' was way creepier with the manipulative stalkerifficness.
wait... you're saying the way to a woman's heart isn't to destroy her financially then manipulate her emotionally until you introduce her broken shell to your golden retriever?
Hmm... that actually might explain a lot..
Sentry on
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
wrote:
When I was a little kid, I always pretended I was the hero,' Skip said.
'Fuck yeah, me too. What little kid ever pretended to be part of the lynch-mob?'
Are the movies/books bad in a funny enough way that they're worth reading for laughs? Or, as I've also heard, are they just creepy and kind of disturbing in the stories they present (and not in the right way for a horror novel)?
wait... you're saying the way to a woman's heart isn't to destroy her financially then manipulate her emotionally until you introduce her broken shell to your golden retriever?
Hmm... that actually might explain a lot..
Too late, huh?
Duffel on
0
KalTorakOne way or another, they all end up inthe Undercity.Registered Userregular
edited March 2009
Having read about as many excerpts as I can stomach, the writing is "so bad it's funny" if you have a high tolerance for prose more purple than Barney holding his breath in an eggplant patch.
Much more enjoyable if you replace 'vampires' with 'heroin addicts'
I really feel bad for the actor who had to play Edward. I'm surprised he didn't puke, having to choke out some of those lines.
Really, the whole thing reminds me of some shit written by a 14 year old in some fantasy roleplaying game. All fucking Mary Sue/Gary Stu bullshit. I despise how much attention Twilight gets. It does not deserve it.
So, I'm not really a 14 year old girl, and yet, I thought the movie was surprisingly enjoyable. Which is weird considering I was bored out of my skull by Harry Potter. Anyone else read these books or watch the movie. The best thing about the movie, regardless of the story, was that it looked absolutely beautiful. Just an amazingly well shot film considering the target audience.
I hated this book
Not only because it was terrible derivative LCD muck (which it was)
But because it's possibly the most anti-feminist thng I've ever read ever and Edward is a controlling stalker, not an "ideal man"
Also, I'd get compared to him by my female friends and I should have been more like him
More like a controlling asshole? Got it, guys *rollseyes*
Also, comparing me to a fictional character? Bitch, they're fucking fictional for a reason. Goddamn. They don't fucking exist you harpies. Stop telling me to be more like him.
During the Dark Times (also known as high school when this shit was popular) I was strongly tempted to bring a Playboy to school and wonder aloud why my female friends weren't more like the centerfolds (thinner, prettier, nicer, better-looking, and completely non-existent on personality besides delusional stereotypes)
Rent on
0
KalTorakOne way or another, they all end up inthe Undercity.Registered Userregular
I really feel bad for the actor who had to play Edward. I'm surprised he didn't puke, having to choke out some of those lines.
Really, the whole thing reminds me of some shit written by a 14 year old in some fantasy roleplaying game. All fucking Mary Sue/Gary Stu bullshit. I despise how much attention Twilight gets. It does not deserve it.
Funny you should say that - in an interview about the role, the actor (Robert Patkinson, i think?) said pretty much the same thing you did about the writing. How it sounded like Stephanie Meyer just wrote down some of her crazy fantasies and went back and replaced "I" with "she" and "Stephanie" with "Bella."
Much more enjoyable if you replace 'vampires' with 'heroin addicts'
I really feel bad for the actor who had to play Edward. I'm surprised he didn't puke, having to choke out some of those lines.
Really, the whole thing reminds me of some shit written by a 14 year old in some fantasy roleplaying game. All fucking Mary Sue/Gary Stu bullshit. I despise how much attention Twilight gets. It does not deserve it.
This is why they are paying attention to it. It speaks to a simple poorly written time in a somewhat reclusive girls life.
I really feel bad for the actor who had to play Edward. I'm surprised he didn't puke, having to choke out some of those lines.
Really, the whole thing reminds me of some shit written by a 14 year old in some fantasy roleplaying game. All fucking Mary Sue/Gary Stu bullshit. I despise how much attention Twilight gets. It does not deserve it.
Funny you should say that - in an interview about the role, the actor (Robert Patkinson, i think?) said pretty much the same thing you did about the writing. How it sounded like Stephanie Meyer just wrote down some of her crazy fantasies and went back and replaced "I" with "she" and "Stephanie" with "Bella."
haha, yeah I've been wondering about the writing. I've been yet to see the books, but Steven King who usually isn't a big dick, said her writing pretty much sucked hard.
GuerillaDust on
0
RentI'm always rightFuckin' deal with itRegistered Userregular
edited March 2009
I'm going to assert something
Book 5 of Harry Potter was the shittiest
Why?
Because all Harry does is bitch about his whole life and everything that happens and is generally a cuntbucket
Maybe it was true-to-puberty, but it was irritating to read and repetitive
Now, if you took all the annoying parts of book 5 (every time Harry opens his mouth) and made a 4 book series out of those annoying parts and added a dash of creepy Mormon indoctrination, Voila you got Twilight
uh, can someone post an excerpt so i can get an idea? i'm actually too poor to buy and check it out myself. plus i'm not sure i should be financially support the series by purchasing it anywho.
I really feel bad for the actor who had to play Edward. I'm surprised he didn't puke, having to choke out some of those lines.
Really, the whole thing reminds me of some shit written by a 14 year old in some fantasy roleplaying game. All fucking Mary Sue/Gary Stu bullshit. I despise how much attention Twilight gets. It does not deserve it.
Funny you should say that - in an interview about the role, the actor (Robert Patkinson, i think?) said pretty much the same thing you did about the writing. How it sounded like Stephanie Meyer just wrote down some of her crazy fantasies and went back and replaced "I" with "she" and "Stephanie" with "Bella."
haha, yeah I've been wondering about the writing. I've been yet to see the books, but Steven King who usually isn't a big dick, said her writing pretty much sucked hard.
Olivawgood name, isn't it?the foot of mt fujiRegistered Userregular
edited March 2009
Fuck Twilight
Fuck in it's stupid sparkly ass
God
The baseball scene was hilarious in that it was completely ridiculous, but it was still retarded. They have to play in a thunderstorm because their hits sound like thunder? Really? Really?Fuck you
Though it made me realize I would watch a movie about vampires playing various sports
Vampire Football
Vampire Soccer
Vampire Volleyball
Vampire Golf
Vampire Table Tennis (Paint the Line 3: Transylvania Tournament)
The baseball scene was hilarious in that it was completely ridiculous, but it was still retarded. They have to play in a thunderstorm because their hits sound like thunder? Really? Really?Fuck you
Though it made me realize I would watch a movie about vampires playing various sports
Vampire Football Vampire Soccer
Vampire Volleyball
Vampire Golf
Vampire Table Tennis (Paint the Line 3: Transylvania Tournament)
Just go watch this hilariously awesome movie instead:
In fact, everyone should watch that movie, right now. It's fantastic like all Stephen Chow movies, but I think it's his best one.
Oh and as for Twilight...the movie made me grin a few times and even laugh because of how awful it is, so if you're a bit like me who can watch a movie if it's bad enough just for the kicks then maybe I could recommend it (not really, there are "better" bad movies). It still leaves a bad taste in my mouth to do so, though.
Just don't read the books, my girlfriend read some of them and when I told her about the movie I wasn't sure if she was laughing or crying.
This was a shittastically bad movie, and yet it was far, far better than the book (mostly because there's less of everything in the movie. Even the fucking sparkling scene manages to be even more horrible in the book.).
The book has no redeeming qualities whatsoever. The writing never gets so bad it'd actually be funny. It's just... bad. The kind of writing that leaves you with no other feelings than a vague sense of having been cheated. Then you feel confused upon remembering that this shit is popular. Then comes the rage: you want to go on a rampage, viciously paper-cutting 14-year old girls while shouting "WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU?!"
And while you're being taken away by the police, the girls will stare at their paper cuts, dreamy-eyed, imagining a sparkling vampire adonis valiantly struggling to control his lust for their exposed blood. Then they'll go preorder the next book in the series.
Posts
Everything else in it was bland as rice. Just like the goddamn books. Though, I think that the movie was probably better than the book, as in the book Bella only talks to about 3 people and spends the rest of her time inside her head. All of her "dialogue" with Edward is "Try not to die." "OK, I won't", "You are infuriating", "No, you are", "I love you", "Don't ever leave me", "OK, I won't" repeated 49 times.
I laughed my arse off at hearing the opening line about "I never really thought about how I would die" - my brother said "Whatever, emo" and then the people behind us asked each other "Wait, is this a comedy?"
Also, the special effects with Edward jumping on trees was not great.
Perhaps my favourite plotpoint in the movie (which was changed from the book) is when Bella looks up the myths of the Indian tribe in the area and finds a website which documents them. Nice work, Indians, if you never told anyone how the hell did they make a website about it? Can't trust them, I tell you.
I will agree, the flying looked terrible. He was like some kind of moon gravity squirrel.
The whole emo obsessive stalker thing?
Yeah, it is creepy.
Add into that that it's a controlling emo obsessive stalker and we're talking some serious nonsense.
The book is hilarious though, they really play up the fact that what sets her apart is how much she smells llike she'll taste nice. The SPECIAL thing about her which sets her apart which they allude to so much throughout the book is ultimately nothing but she makes him really hungry. It's just fucking terrible.
Apparently it's also a gentle introduction to Mormon theology, but I haven't really seen that. Of course, I could only really stomach the first book out of morbid curiosity.
I thought it really was that bad, and would have probably walked out if it wasn't for the fact that my sisters bought the ticket for me.
EDIT: The only real redeeming factor was the soundtrack. It was so good I might actually pick up the soundtrack. And the main male lead has quite a nice voice.
This is true.
But that's fairly faint praise.
Beautiful.
A dig at Anne Rice in a Twilight thread by Dan Brown.
wait... you're saying the way to a woman's heart isn't to destroy her financially then manipulate her emotionally until you introduce her broken shell to your golden retriever?
Hmm... that actually might explain a lot..
Too late, huh?
Much more enjoyable if you replace 'vampires' with 'heroin addicts'
I really feel bad for the actor who had to play Edward. I'm surprised he didn't puke, having to choke out some of those lines.
Really, the whole thing reminds me of some shit written by a 14 year old in some fantasy roleplaying game. All fucking Mary Sue/Gary Stu bullshit. I despise how much attention Twilight gets. It does not deserve it.
Do... Re... Mi... So... Fa.... Do... Re.... Do...
Forget it...
I hated this book
Not only because it was terrible derivative LCD muck (which it was)
But because it's possibly the most anti-feminist thng I've ever read ever and Edward is a controlling stalker, not an "ideal man"
Also, I'd get compared to him by my female friends and I should have been more like him
More like a controlling asshole? Got it, guys *rollseyes*
Also, comparing me to a fictional character? Bitch, they're fucking fictional for a reason. Goddamn. They don't fucking exist you harpies. Stop telling me to be more like him.
During the Dark Times (also known as high school when this shit was popular) I was strongly tempted to bring a Playboy to school and wonder aloud why my female friends weren't more like the centerfolds (thinner, prettier, nicer, better-looking, and completely non-existent on personality besides delusional stereotypes)
Funny you should say that - in an interview about the role, the actor (Robert Patkinson, i think?) said pretty much the same thing you did about the writing. How it sounded like Stephanie Meyer just wrote down some of her crazy fantasies and went back and replaced "I" with "she" and "Stephanie" with "Bella."
This is why they are paying attention to it. It speaks to a simple poorly written time in a somewhat reclusive girls life.
haha, yeah I've been wondering about the writing. I've been yet to see the books, but Steven King who usually isn't a big dick, said her writing pretty much sucked hard.
Book 5 of Harry Potter was the shittiest
Why?
Because all Harry does is bitch about his whole life and everything that happens and is generally a cuntbucket
Maybe it was true-to-puberty, but it was irritating to read and repetitive
Now, if you took all the annoying parts of book 5 (every time Harry opens his mouth) and made a 4 book series out of those annoying parts and added a dash of creepy Mormon indoctrination, Voila you got Twilight
Ugh.
Fuck in it's stupid sparkly ass
God
The baseball scene was hilarious in that it was completely ridiculous, but it was still retarded. They have to play in a thunderstorm because their hits sound like thunder? Really? Really? Fuck you
Though it made me realize I would watch a movie about vampires playing various sports
Vampire Football
Vampire Soccer
Vampire Volleyball
Vampire Golf
Vampire Table Tennis (Paint the Line 3: Transylvania Tournament)
PSN ID : DetectiveOlivaw | TWITTER | STEAM ID | NEVER FORGET
It makes him sparkle.
EDIT: WTF
It makes him sparkle.
Riced with glitter.
Now, if it had been Solar Flares, we wouldn't be having this conversation right now.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NX-wvioPiGg&feature=related
Does anyone have a video of this? I got so curious I braved YouTube search, but OH GOD THE FAN-MADE MUSIC VIDEOS!
Just go watch this hilariously awesome movie instead:
In fact, everyone should watch that movie, right now. It's fantastic like all Stephen Chow movies, but I think it's his best one.
Oh and as for Twilight...the movie made me grin a few times and even laugh because of how awful it is, so if you're a bit like me who can watch a movie if it's bad enough just for the kicks then maybe I could recommend it (not really, there are "better" bad movies). It still leaves a bad taste in my mouth to do so, though.
Just don't read the books, my girlfriend read some of them and when I told her about the movie I wasn't sure if she was laughing or crying.
The book has no redeeming qualities whatsoever. The writing never gets so bad it'd actually be funny. It's just... bad. The kind of writing that leaves you with no other feelings than a vague sense of having been cheated. Then you feel confused upon remembering that this shit is popular. Then comes the rage: you want to go on a rampage, viciously paper-cutting 14-year old girls while shouting "WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU?!"
And while you're being taken away by the police, the girls will stare at their paper cuts, dreamy-eyed, imagining a sparkling vampire adonis valiantly struggling to control his lust for their exposed blood. Then they'll go preorder the next book in the series.