As was foretold, we've added advertisements to the forums! If you have questions, or if you encounter any bugs, please visit this thread: https://forums.penny-arcade.com/discussion/240191/forum-advertisement-faq-and-reports-thread/

Policies & Procedures Brainstorming Thread

145791028

Posts

  • AroducAroduc regular
    edited December 2006
    Aroduc wrote:
    pheezer FD wrote:
    Honestly, I see the merit in moving away from jailing and towards temp banning. I think it would be interesting to poll where forumers stood on the matter, as to which they felt better served the forums as a whole. I'm not saying that's what any decision on the matter would be based on, but I think it'd be an interesting and probably important point in any discussion related to such a decision.
    Broken bbcode is just as annoying to the rest of us as it is to the offender.

    I support scrapping it as long as it doesn't lead to a rash of bans for extremely minor offenses.

    The inability to quote is also irritating to all involved and not just the punished person. As is the weird formatting imposed. I'd suggest just disabling certain tags (stuff like images and the like) if that's possible and leaving the default formatting, quotes, and spoilers be. Of course, I don't know how it's implemented so don't know if that'd require code-reworking or just deleting a couple of variables.
    Wait, why should a punishment be more convenient?

    Inconveient for other people to read and understand.

    Aroduc on
  • Just_Bri_ThanksJust_Bri_Thanks Seething with rage from a handbasket.Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited December 2006
    mtvcdm wrote:
    Echo wrote:
    Many mods have expressed feelings that the jail system doesn't really work the way we're intended.

    Sometimes I use it just because it's there and, well, a jailing is less serious than a ban, mirite?

    That's what needs a good rethinking.
    I'd suggest tweaking exactly what a jailing entails.

    *Keep spoiler bbcode intact (for everyone's sake), break all other bbcode. (Would require some recoding, but man would it be worth it.)
    *Can't start new topics.
    *May only post once per thread page (just off the top of my head, would probably be a bitch and a half to actually code).

    I'd think that would be effective enough.

    As stated elsewhere, BBcode is all or nothing in this iteration of the forums.

    Just_Bri_Thanks on
    ...and when you are done with that; take a folding
    chair to Creation and then suplex the Void.
  • The Far SideThe Far Side __BANNED USERS regular
    edited December 2006
    Neofly wrote:
    madsimon wrote:
    pheezer FD wrote:
    madsimon wrote:
    Echo wrote:
    madsimon wrote:
    Sounds to me like we need a fresh administration.

    State your reasoning. You have 20 seconds to comply.

    I can't say much in 20 seconds, but there's obviously some unrest here.

    Oh, well if there's obviously unrest then yeah, scrap the whole thing.

    How about you start erring on the side of explaining yourself and providing constructive contributions

    Again, I can't say much in 20 seconds.

    forget the 20 second thing, just make with the typing.

    I'd say that mod rotation would be a good thing. When people stay too much time in power, they become arrogant.

    A whole new mod team? Nah, too drastic. One or two old mods stepping down and new people coming in every six or twelve months? Much better.

    Of course, the people in power jumped at me when I first suggested it. This is only proof.
    Why would you want the mods to switch? The forum isn't in total anarchy, and bad threads are locked rather promptly

    seems to me the mods are doing their job rather well

    The Far Side on
  • Munkus BeaverMunkus Beaver You don't have to attend every argument you are invited to. Philosophy: Stoicism. Politics: Democratic SocialistRegistered User, ClubPA regular
    edited December 2006
    Um

    I really think ya'll suggesting 'roations' have no real grasp on any reasoning to support it.

    Most positions of responsibility do not have a frequent turnover/rollover rate.

    Honestly.

    If we were to use terms, there are a good many of us that have been here for less than four years at any rate.

    Munkus Beaver on
    Humor can be dissected as a frog can, but dies in the process.
  • SarksusSarksus ATTACK AND DETHRONE GODRegistered User regular
    edited December 2006
    Echo wrote:
    Neofly wrote:
    Of course, the people in power jumped at me when I first suggested it. This is only proof.

    Are you not at all open to the possibility that it's simply a bad idea?

    Where would we get all of these mods?

    Sarksus on
  • NeoflyNeofly Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    Echo wrote:
    Neofly wrote:
    Of course, the people in power jumped at me when I first suggested it. This is only proof.

    Are you not at all open to the possibility that it's simply a bad idea?

    Well, someone (Thanatos?) made a good point, about that mods in training are bad mods.

    But then, it is the only downside I see.

    Aren't you open to the possibility that it may be a good idea?

    Neofly on
  • stigweardstigweard Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    Once post per thread page shouldn't be hard just make it once per 25 posts in the post count. That does seem a little excessive though as sometimes people are making genuine contributions even though they are jailed and might not be able to keep the conversation flowing. It'd be a pain to have one person always a page back, especially in the faster moving threads.

    Personally, I'd like to see some standardization in sig size and rules between the sub forums. People unintentionally disrupt the flow by breaking rules or being called out on having a giant sig. Myabe that has already happened and I just haven't noticed...

    stigweard on
  • JinniganJinnigan Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    this question is so answered

    What about creating seperate forums for the consoles? I think it'll just lead to more fanboyism, but it's a thought.

    Jinnigan on
    whatifihadnofriendsshortenedsiggy2.jpg
  • _J__J_ Pedant Registered User, __BANNED USERS regular
    edited December 2006
    I would like to see the rules consistently enfoced and for situations such as the one seen here to be avoided:
    http://www.penny-arcade.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1073840627

    On Page 2 a mod makes a comment that sends the thread off track. And then the same mod locks the thread a page later because it went off track. That seems problematic and belies a greater problem on the forums.

    I would like to see the rules clearly stated. It doesn't seem fair to write the rules in a relaxed "dont' be a jackass and we're cool" sort of way and then hand out non-relaxed "you're banned for a week" punishment for breaking them. That makes for an uncomfortable forum environment. Either clearly state, enforce, and manage the rules or have a relaxed statement and enforcement of the rules.

    I think clearly saying: "This is what you cannot do" in a manner that is not open to personal interpretation could enable the forums to have a much cleaner feel to them. When the mods jump between joking around and locking accounts it's hard to know what the rules are other than: "Don't do things the mods don't like...and we're not going to really tell you what those things are."

    I'd also like to see bans and jailings restricted to the forums in which the offense occured, but I assume that is a coding issue.

    _J_ on
  • EchoEcho ski-bap ba-dapModerator mod
    edited December 2006
    Neofly wrote:
    Aren't you open to the possibility that it may be a good idea?

    Oh yes. I just haven't seen a whole lot of arguments in favor of that theory.

    Echo on
  • Munkus BeaverMunkus Beaver You don't have to attend every argument you are invited to. Philosophy: Stoicism. Politics: Democratic SocialistRegistered User, ClubPA regular
    edited December 2006
    I'm going to be frank, it comes off to me as if you are suggesting this purely because there are people on the mod staff that you disagree with or just plain don't like, and you think a rotation would be a quick and easy way to get rid of them and install someone you're buddy buddy with.

    Munkus Beaver on
    Humor can be dissected as a frog can, but dies in the process.
  • Non-Existent FreezerNon-Existent Freezer Registered User
    edited December 2006
    I've never seen a forum with regular moderator rotation. I think that mods should only be booted/replaced when:

    A. They resign.
    B. They're doing an incredibly shitty job.

    Switching every given period of time just seems like a recipe for disaster. On other large forums, I've seen different subforums with many, many many moderators. From what I've seen, every one interprets and enforces rules differently, even if it is the same ruleset.

    Non-Existent Freezer on
    g2kc7.png
  • GoslingGosling Looking Up Soccer In Mongolia Right Now, Probably Watertown, WIRegistered User regular
    edited December 2006
    mtvcdm wrote:
    Echo wrote:
    Many mods have expressed feelings that the jail system doesn't really work the way we're intended.

    Sometimes I use it just because it's there and, well, a jailing is less serious than a ban, mirite?

    That's what needs a good rethinking.
    I'd suggest tweaking exactly what a jailing entails.

    *Keep spoiler bbcode intact (for everyone's sake), break all other bbcode. (Would require some recoding, but man would it be worth it.)
    *Can't start new topics.
    *May only post once per thread page (just off the top of my head, would probably be a bitch and a half to actually code).

    I'd think that would be effective enough.

    As stated elsewhere, BBcode is all or nothing in this iteration of the forums.
    Would it then be possible to change, upon jailing, any text found in spoiler tags to a preset message, like "I've been jailed" or "spoiler deleted" or something embarrassing like "I like to pork donkeys"?

    Gosling on
    I have a new soccer blog The Minnow Tank. Reading it psychically kicks Sepp Blatter in the bean bag.
  • Raijin QuickfootRaijin Quickfoot I'm your Huckleberry YOU'RE NO DAISYRegistered User, ClubPA regular
    edited December 2006
    I cannot think of a single circumstance where rotating mods would be a good idea.

    Raijin Quickfoot on
    HEY SATAN! HERE'S MY WISHLIST! GO NUTS YOU DEVIL!

    https://www.amazon.com/gp/registry/wishlist/1JI9WWSRW1YJI
  • EchoEcho ski-bap ba-dapModerator mod
    edited December 2006
    _J_ wrote:
    I'd also like to see bans and jailings restricted to the forums in which the offense occured, but I assume that is a coding issue.

    Back when SE++ was split from the on-topic side bans didn't carry over.

    So people felt free to be asses on the other side without getting banned on the "home" side. It wasn't pretty at times.

    Echo on
  • NeoflyNeofly Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    Sarksus wrote:
    Echo wrote:
    Neofly wrote:
    Of course, the people in power jumped at me when I first suggested it. This is only proof.

    Are you not at all open to the possibility that it's simply a bad idea?

    Where would we get all of these mods?

    Do you really think that there are not two persons around the forums that are mod material?

    Neofly on
  • AneurhythmiaAneurhythmia Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    Aroduc wrote:
    Aroduc wrote:
    pheezer FD wrote:
    Honestly, I see the merit in moving away from jailing and towards temp banning. I think it would be interesting to poll where forumers stood on the matter, as to which they felt better served the forums as a whole. I'm not saying that's what any decision on the matter would be based on, but I think it'd be an interesting and probably important point in any discussion related to such a decision.
    Broken bbcode is just as annoying to the rest of us as it is to the offender.

    I support scrapping it as long as it doesn't lead to a rash of bans for extremely minor offenses.

    The inability to quote is also irritating to all involved and not just the punished person. As is the weird formatting imposed. I'd suggest just disabling certain tags (stuff like images and the like) if that's possible and leaving the default formatting, quotes, and spoilers be. Of course, I don't know how it's implemented so don't know if that'd require code-reworking or just deleting a couple of variables.
    Wait, why should a punishment be more convenient?

    Inconveient for other people to read and understand.
    Then the poster can either tailor his posting while jailed for the options available, or people can acknowledge his posting as inconvenient and avoid it.

    Aneurhythmia on
  • NeoflyNeofly Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    I've never seen a forum with regular moderator rotation. I think that mods should only be booted/replaced when:

    A. They resign.
    B. They're doing an incredibly shitty job.

    Switching every given period of time just seems like a recipe for disaster. On other large forums, I've seen different subforums with many, many many moderators. From what I've seen, every one interprets and enforces rules differently, even if it is the same ruleset.

    If is about the different interpretation, we wouldn't be worse than we are now.

    Neofly on
  • Eliot DuboisEliot Dubois Registered User
    edited December 2006
    I cannot think of a single circumstance where rotating mods would be a good idea.

    Pure Hilarity? No, I agree that it would be a bad idea. More mods would be nice however, you can never have too many people banning and locking junk threads.

    Eliot Dubois on
    laliban.jpg
  • SlungsolowSlungsolow Registered User, ClubPA
    edited December 2006
    Neofly wrote:
    Echo wrote:
    Neofly wrote:
    Of course, the people in power jumped at me when I first suggested it. This is only proof.

    Are you not at all open to the possibility that it's simply a bad idea?

    Well, someone (Thanatos?) made a good point, about that mods in training are bad mods.

    But then, it is the only downside I see.

    Aren't you open to the possibility that it may be a good idea?

    I'm not in power, and I realize that it's a bad idea.

    Slungsolow on
    fuck your forums, fuck your administrator and fuck dynagrip for getting away with the long troll.
  • EchoEcho ski-bap ba-dapModerator mod
    edited December 2006
    Neofly wrote:
    Do you really think that there are not two persons around the forums that are mod material?

    I do. They're called Neo Rasa and Accualt and just got modded.

    Echo on
  • PheezerPheezer Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited December 2006
    That said, certain community aspect threads, like XBOX Live and Wii code threads should stay live indefinitely, imo.

    I can't imagine anyone seriously disagreeing with you here.

    Pheezer on
    IT'S GOT ME REACHING IN MY POCKET IT'S GOT ME FORKING OVER CASH
    CUZ THERE'S SOMETHING IN THE MIDDLE AND IT'S GIVING ME A RASH
  • Just_Bri_ThanksJust_Bri_Thanks Seething with rage from a handbasket.Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited December 2006
    _J_ wrote:
    I'd also like to see bans and jailings restricted to the forums in which the offense occured, but I assume that is a coding issue.

    this would encourage cliquishness and division in the forums, which I just don't see as a good idea. Also, banning someone only from SE++ for shock imagry doesn;t help G&T much.

    Just_Bri_Thanks on
    ...and when you are done with that; take a folding
    chair to Creation and then suplex the Void.
  • JinniganJinnigan Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    mtvcdm wrote:
    mtvcdm wrote:
    Echo wrote:
    Many mods have expressed feelings that the jail system doesn't really work the way we're intended.

    Sometimes I use it just because it's there and, well, a jailing is less serious than a ban, mirite?

    That's what needs a good rethinking.
    I'd suggest tweaking exactly what a jailing entails.

    *Keep spoiler bbcode intact (for everyone's sake), break all other bbcode. (Would require some recoding, but man would it be worth it.)
    *Can't start new topics.
    *May only post once per thread page (just off the top of my head, would probably be a bitch and a half to actually code).

    I'd think that would be effective enough.

    As stated elsewhere, BBcode is all or nothing in this iteration of the forums.
    Would it then be possible to change, upon jailing, any text found in spoiler tags to a preset message, like "I've been jailed" or "spoiler deleted" or something embarrassing like "I like to pork donkeys"?
    what happens when you unjail them?

    also

    mod rotation would encourage campaign-type bandwagons - "NADS FOR MOD," et all.

    Jinnigan on
    whatifihadnofriendsshortenedsiggy2.jpg
  • A duck!A duck! Moderator, ClubPA mod
    edited December 2006
    Neofly wrote:
    I've never seen a forum with regular moderator rotation. I think that mods should only be booted/replaced when:

    A. They resign.
    B. They're doing an incredibly shitty job.

    Switching every given period of time just seems like a recipe for disaster. On other large forums, I've seen different subforums with many, many many moderators. From what I've seen, every one interprets and enforces rules differently, even if it is the same ruleset.

    If is about the different interpretation, we wouldn't be worse than we are now.

    Not really. Mods usually keep each other in check, and I think the last thing you need is a bunch of people coming in with their axes to grind taking chops off every 3 months with fewer and fewer people to say "Hey, wait, that's retarded."

    A duck! on
  • Raijin QuickfootRaijin Quickfoot I'm your Huckleberry YOU'RE NO DAISYRegistered User, ClubPA regular
    edited December 2006
    I cannot think of a single circumstance where rotating mods would be a good idea.

    Pure Hilarity? No, I agree that it would be a bad idea. More mods would be nice however, you can never have too many people banning and locking junk threads.

    More mods has never been the answer. More coverage would be nice, but throwing a mod badge on 20 people in each subforum would only cause problems...not to mention the fact that I could not name 5 people right now I think should be a mod.

    Raijin Quickfoot on
    HEY SATAN! HERE'S MY WISHLIST! GO NUTS YOU DEVIL!

    https://www.amazon.com/gp/registry/wishlist/1JI9WWSRW1YJI
  • PheezerPheezer Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited December 2006
    mtvcdm wrote:
    mtvcdm wrote:
    Echo wrote:
    Many mods have expressed feelings that the jail system doesn't really work the way we're intended.

    Sometimes I use it just because it's there and, well, a jailing is less serious than a ban, mirite?

    That's what needs a good rethinking.
    I'd suggest tweaking exactly what a jailing entails.

    *Keep spoiler bbcode intact (for everyone's sake), break all other bbcode. (Would require some recoding, but man would it be worth it.)
    *Can't start new topics.
    *May only post once per thread page (just off the top of my head, would probably be a bitch and a half to actually code).

    I'd think that would be effective enough.

    As stated elsewhere, BBcode is all or nothing in this iteration of the forums.
    Would it then be possible to change, upon jailing, any text found in spoiler tags to a preset message, like "I've been jailed" or "spoiler deleted" or something embarrassing like "I like to pork donkeys"?
    That would require a lot of coding and likely entail a pretty large hit to the database any time someone with a particularly long post history was jailed. It's not really going to be an option.

    Jailed users are going to be a pain in the ass. There's no way around that.

    Pheezer on
    IT'S GOT ME REACHING IN MY POCKET IT'S GOT ME FORKING OVER CASH
    CUZ THERE'S SOMETHING IN THE MIDDLE AND IT'S GIVING ME A RASH
  • Munkus BeaverMunkus Beaver You don't have to attend every argument you are invited to. Philosophy: Stoicism. Politics: Democratic SocialistRegistered User, ClubPA regular
    edited December 2006
    Neofly wrote:
    I've never seen a forum with regular moderator rotation. I think that mods should only be booted/replaced when:

    A. They resign.
    B. They're doing an incredibly shitty job.

    Switching every given period of time just seems like a recipe for disaster. On other large forums, I've seen different subforums with many, many many moderators. From what I've seen, every one interprets and enforces rules differently, even if it is the same ruleset.

    If is about the different interpretation, we wouldn't be worse than we are now.

    So I was correct with my assumption then? Alright, we can move on.

    Munkus Beaver on
    Humor can be dissected as a frog can, but dies in the process.
  • EchoEcho ski-bap ba-dapModerator mod
    edited December 2006
    It's already been said, but let me repeat it: the mod crew isn't all buddy-buddy and watching each others' backs all the time. We respect each other, but noone on the crew is afraid to go "wtf did you do that for?" in the mod forum if they think something was stupidly handled.

    Echo on
  • SarksusSarksus ATTACK AND DETHRONE GODRegistered User regular
    edited December 2006
    Neofly wrote:
    Sarksus wrote:
    Echo wrote:
    Neofly wrote:
    Of course, the people in power jumped at me when I first suggested it. This is only proof.

    Are you not at all open to the possibility that it's simply a bad idea?

    Where would we get all of these mods?

    Do you really think that there are not two persons around the forums that are mod material?

    Two people? Maybe. But how long would these 'terms' last? You need more than just two people. You need at least a dozen for one year's worth of administration.

    And if new mods do have these growing pains, where they are hard on people, you're willing to go through that every time a term starts again? Say it takes two months for a mod to get used to being a mod and he cools down. If a term is six months, one third of his time as a moderator is spent potentially doing harm to the forum.

    Sarksus on
  • DeaconKnowledgeDeaconKnowledge Registered User
    edited December 2006
    Echo wrote:
    Neofly wrote:
    Do you really think that there are not two persons around the forums that are mod material?

    I do. They're called Neo Rasa and Accualt and just got modded.

    Is there a set number of G and T mods at any time? Because by my count two were added, but another one left and/or got demodded.

    If so, should we not get two more G and T mods, or is my math off?

    DeaconKnowledge on
    My NEW Wii code - 5227 1968 3982 4139. My Wii needs your Miis! Please give generously!
    Animal Crossing - 3566 5318 4585/2492 7891 0383 Deacon/Akisha in Crayon
  • GoslingGosling Looking Up Soccer In Mongolia Right Now, Probably Watertown, WIRegistered User regular
    edited December 2006
    Jinnigan wrote:
    mtvcdm wrote:
    Would it then be possible to change, upon jailing, any text found in spoiler tags to a preset message, like "I've been jailed" or "spoiler deleted" or something embarrassing like "I like to pork donkeys"?
    what happens when you unjail them?
    By the time the jailing ends, the spoilers in question will likely have been relegated deep enough into the thread that nobody cares anymore, but I can't see any possible way to code the original message back in, so it's almost going to have to come back with the changed phrase still in place.

    Gosling on
    I have a new soccer blog The Minnow Tank. Reading it psychically kicks Sepp Blatter in the bean bag.
  • _J__J_ Pedant Registered User, __BANNED USERS regular
    edited December 2006
    Um

    I really think ya'll suggesting 'roations' have no real grasp on any reasoning to support it.

    Most positions of responsibility do not have a frequent turnover/rollover rate.

    Honestly.

    If we were to use terms, there are a good many of us that have been here for less than four years at any rate.

    I think the idea of mod rotations is good for the same reason term limits are a good idea. And I think mods would be against the idea for a reason that the idea is supposed to fix: Clinging to their mod status as some sort of exalted title.

    I think a rotation amid a pool of mods for a while would be a good idea to sort of shake things up and keep rule enforcement to a "by the books" approach rather than an "I'm a mod and I've been a mod for a while so what I say goes" approach. It would keep the role of mod as something it is supposed to be: an enforcer of the rules.

    I think it is probably just human nature for people to cling to titles such as "mod" as some sort of commentary on their social value to the forum. And that's problematic. Having a rotating group of mods would solve that problem and instead allow mods to be enforcers of rules rather than "the cool kids" on the forum.

    _J_ on
  • stigweardstigweard Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    Jinnigan wrote:
    mtvcdm wrote:
    mtvcdm wrote:
    Echo wrote:
    Many mods have expressed feelings that the jail system doesn't really work the way we're intended.

    Sometimes I use it just because it's there and, well, a jailing is less serious than a ban, mirite?

    That's what needs a good rethinking.
    I'd suggest tweaking exactly what a jailing entails.

    *Keep spoiler bbcode intact (for everyone's sake), break all other bbcode. (Would require some recoding, but man would it be worth it.)
    *Can't start new topics.
    *May only post once per thread page (just off the top of my head, would probably be a bitch and a half to actually code).

    I'd think that would be effective enough.

    As stated elsewhere, BBcode is all or nothing in this iteration of the forums.
    Would it then be possible to change, upon jailing, any text found in spoiler tags to a preset message, like "I've been jailed" or "spoiler deleted" or something embarrassing like "I like to pork donkeys"?
    what happens when you unjail them?

    also

    mod rotation would encourage campaign-type bandwagons - "NADS FOR MOD," et all.
    Instead of trying to filter the content of each post (too intensive for a forum this big I bet), they could filter based on the jailed flag. When the thread is processed, just swap out the text for all those kailed to say *jailed*. You still run into the problem that jailed people usually smarten up pretty quickly once they've been jailed and start contributing normally again.

    stigweard on
  • PheezerPheezer Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited December 2006
    _J_ wrote:
    I'd also like to see bans and jailings restricted to the forums in which the offense occured, but I assume that is a coding issue.

    this would encourage cliquishness and division in the forums, which I just don't see as a good idea. Also, banning someone only from SE++ for shock imagry doesn;t help G&T much.

    Between this, and Echo's observation about what happened when SE was split off, we have some really good social reasons not to do this, in addition to the technical problems it entails. Alpha can, in theory, block users from accessing specific forums at will, but it's permissions editing work and putting together a solution that moderators could access would take likely a significant amount of work, and giving moderators the ability to do it manually might not be possible with the permissions structure, and even if it is, it might open up a new way for us to fuck up the database and nobody really wants that.

    Pheezer on
    IT'S GOT ME REACHING IN MY POCKET IT'S GOT ME FORKING OVER CASH
    CUZ THERE'S SOMETHING IN THE MIDDLE AND IT'S GIVING ME A RASH
  • The Far SideThe Far Side __BANNED USERS regular
    edited December 2006
    _J_ wrote:
    Um

    I really think ya'll suggesting 'roations' have no real grasp on any reasoning to support it.

    Most positions of responsibility do not have a frequent turnover/rollover rate.

    Honestly.

    If we were to use terms, there are a good many of us that have been here for less than four years at any rate.

    I think the idea of mod rotations is good for the same reason term limits are a good idea. And I think mods would be against the idea for a reason that the idea is supposed to fix: Clinging to their mod status as some sort of exalted title.

    I think a rotation amid a pool of mods for a while would be a good idea to sort of shake things up and keep rule enforcement to a "by the books" approach rather than an "I'm a mod and I've been a mod for a while so what I say goes" approach. It would keep the role of mod as something it is supposed to be: an enforcer of the rules.

    I think it is probably just human nature for people to cling to titles such as "mod" as some sort of commentary on their social value to the forum. And that's problematic. Having a rotating group of mods would solve that problem and instead allow mods to be enforcers of rules rather than "the cool kids" on the forum.
    Uh

    I've never seen a mod (at least in SE++) say "hey I am a mod so you can't sass me at all because I am superior to you"

    Fuck, I (and pretty much everybody else) makes fun of Munkus for having no colon

    The Far Side on
  • NeoflyNeofly Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    Echo wrote:
    Neofly wrote:
    Do you really think that there are not two persons around the forums that are mod material?

    I do. They're called Neo Rasa and Accualt and just got modded.

    They were old mods, I think. That is no rotation.

    Anyway, that is the last I'm saying about it.

    Neofly on
  • EchoEcho ski-bap ba-dapModerator mod
    edited December 2006
    Is there a set number of G and T mods at any time? Because by my count two were added, but another one left and/or got demodded.

    Not really. If we feel we need more mods, we recruit more mods. And I think there's no such thing as "too many mods" until we're talking 15+ people. As of right now there are seven of us on the roster.
    If so, should we not get two more G and T mods, or is my math off?

    We start talking about new mods every time someone leaves the roster. Most of the time we conclude that we can manage with the current amount of mods.

    Echo on
  • madsimonmadsimon Registered User
    edited December 2006
    I wasn't ever suggesting canning every moderator. I simply think there needs to be some new leadership.

    Obviously this isn't a democracy, and PA can do whatever they please.

    (This isn't a personal axe, either. Just an observation.)

    madsimon on
    allMad.png
  • JinniganJinnigan Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    There is no Senate or House for mods to receive modding training in.

    Jinnigan on
    whatifihadnofriendsshortenedsiggy2.jpg
Sign In or Register to comment.