The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Pokémon RPG on the Wii?

NativityInBlackNativityInBlack Registered User regular
edited April 2009 in Games and Technology
Hail PA!

A couple years ago we had rumors on an upcoming Pokémon RPG for the Wii, I mean it's quite obvious even wondering why we don't have more info on it (this is from 2007):

http://www.wiinintendo.net/2007/10/20/rumor-nintendo-developing-pokemon-rpg-for-the-wii/

A full 3D rendered world with the curtsies sorta playing like a WoW hunter with wiggle (or RTS gameplay even would be fine) would be an instant hit, and could resurrect the franchise.

Why Nintendo is fully force-feeding poke RPG to be DS only for so many years?

I would make it online with stadiums being the guilds, and we would have to defeat players from another stadiums to get badges and _X badges would mean some progression, tradeskills could be like cooking, outfit design, medicine. The economy would be driven on Pokémon trading. The resistances would have to be fully out so players would need a good selection Pokémon's. Evolving the pets could be special quest lines.

How would you guys design the game?

Oh well just rambling. ;-) Any news would rock!

NativityInBlack on
«13

Posts

  • Dr Mario KartDr Mario Kart Games Dealer Austin, TXRegistered User regular
    edited April 2009
    The franchise doesnt need a boost or resurrection. Some franchises that are successful on handhelds just arent on home consoles. For instance, the PS2 iterations of Monster Hunter in Japan have all been flops. Likewise, mobility is one of Pokemon's strengths.

    Dr Mario Kart on
  • LucascraftLucascraft Registered User regular
    edited April 2009
    I think a Pokemon RPG on a current gen console could be quite awesome. I don't think Pokemon is necessarily tied to portability. The biggest issue is that so far, most Pokemon games that have tried to do something like this, such as Colosseum and Gale of Darkness were both based on bad ideas.

    I think a full blown world, with 3D graphics and all 492 pokemon (plus maybe some new ones) would be the greatest thing ever. Heck, they could even stick with the same formula of gym badges and all that and it would probably still be good.

    But they just need to invest the proper amount of time and resources into the project to make it good.

    Lucascraft on
  • DeaconKnowledgeDeaconKnowledge Registered User regular
    edited April 2009
    If they made a Full fledged Pokémon for the Wii I would want it to be an ARPG.

    Or better yet, just make a Pokémon Ranger Wii game.

    DeaconKnowledge on
    My NEW Wii code - 5227 1968 3982 4139. My Wii needs your Miis! Please give generously!
    Animal Crossing - 3566 5318 4585/2492 7891 0383 Deacon/Akisha in Crayon
  • Bryse EayoBryse Eayo Registered User regular
    edited April 2009
    The main mind behind Pokemon has come out and said a full 3D RPG on a console will never ever happen. The 3D versions of the games will only be ancillary to the main hand held games.

    Bryse Eayo on
  • GuekGuek Registered User regular
    edited April 2009
    Very recently (I believe it was shortly before or after GDC), the guys at Game Freak came forward and answered why there hasn't been a full fledged console pokemon game. Apparently it would be in contradiction with their philosophy on how the players should interact. They seem to put a lot of weight behind having trading and battles involve real life interactions. Supposedly that's why no pokemon game has been made for a console. They also stated that there aren't any plans to make one in the near future.

    edit: damnit :x beaten

    Guek on
  • UncleSporkyUncleSporky Registered User regular
    edited April 2009
    The franchise doesnt need a boost or resurrection. Some franchises that are successful on handhelds just arent on home consoles. For instance, the PS2 iterations of Monster Hunter in Japan have all been flops. Likewise, mobility is one of Pokemon's strengths.

    I thought Monster Hunter had always been quite popular in Japan, it's just that the PSP one has been orders of magnitude more popular such that the prior ones pale. Of course that does show that portability is a major point.

    One of Pokemon's biggest draws in the past has been the trading and battling in person. I think the world is ready for this all to take place online (probably prearranged at forums like this) but Nintendo isn't quite sold on it.

    Everyone agrees that a well realized fully 3D console Pokemon would be pretty great. If nothing else it would sell awesomely. Most people are clamoring for it to be a WoW-like MMO which is simply not going to happen for at least a decade, but I could see a nice single player RPG with online connections.

    However I am pretty sick of hearing about rumors and seeing posts about it to the point where when it's announced I'm just going to say "finally" and do my best to ignore all the bitching over why it's not good enough in one respect or another.

    UncleSporky on
    Switch Friend Code: SW - 5443 - 2358 - 9118 || 3DS Friend Code: 0989 - 1731 - 9504 || NNID: unclesporky
  • LucascraftLucascraft Registered User regular
    edited April 2009
    Yes, I would sell my soul many times over for a good Pokemon MMO. Emphasis on good.

    A persistent online world in which I can freely roam and explore, battle and challenge, and farm berries. Oh, and some of the other, newer concepts such as secret bases and the underground would be fun too. Just imagine how awesome the underground would be if it actually had more than 2 or 3 people in it at a time.

    Lucascraft on
  • GuekGuek Registered User regular
    edited April 2009
    a pokemon mmo, if done correctly, would rival WoW.

    Guek on
  • commathecommathe Registered User regular
    edited April 2009
    I think it would have been better if they had actually spent more time on battle revolution. It had some cool ideas and did a few things right, but it felt really stale and lacked any kind of meaningful polish.

    I never had any of the stadium games, but I remember playing them for a bit on demo kiosks and they never felt as generic as battle revolution did.

    commathe on
  • LucascraftLucascraft Registered User regular
    edited April 2009
    I have the original Pokemon Stadium cartridge still for my N64, although I haven't touched it in years. I always rather liked the first Stadium game. Back then, it was my first real glimpse at pokemon in a non sprite environment. I thought it was pretty cool to see my favorite pokemon performing combat animations in ful 3D.

    I also really liked Pokemon Snap on the N64. It was another glimpse into the world, from a completely different perspective and I really enjoyed it.

    Lucascraft on
  • chasehatesbearschasehatesbears Registered User regular
    edited April 2009
    I would like this idea except that I stopped playing Pokemon after R/B/Y versions.

    So I don't acknowledge the existence of these new pokemon.

    chasehatesbears on
  • VoroVoro Registered User regular
    edited April 2009
    Guek wrote: »
    They seem to put a lot of weight behind having trading and battles involve real life interactions.

    Which flies in the face of everything in P/D/Pl involving the GTS and WiFi in general. :| Really, I'd put as much stock in Game Freak's statements as I would in Hideo Kojima's. Inconsistent, and they're not calling the shots anyway (Nintendo/Konami are).

    Voro on
    XBL GamerTag: Comrade Nexus
  • AshtonDragonAshtonDragon AKA The Nix Registered User regular
    edited April 2009
    I don't care if it's a full-fledged story or not, but I want the next console Pokemon game to use cel-shaded graphics for the pokemon, instead of reusing those awful 3D models they've been using since Stadium.

    AshtonDragon on
  • SageinaRageSageinaRage Registered User regular
    edited April 2009
    Pokemon? Resurrection? One of the largest and most successful game franchises ever? It needs a resurrection like Half-life needs a resurrection. Or WoW.

    What could an mmo offer that pokemon needs? I fail to see a problem with the games right now.

    SageinaRage on
    sig.gif
  • UnbreakableVowUnbreakableVow Registered User regular
    edited April 2009
    Voro wrote: »
    Guek wrote: »
    They seem to put a lot of weight behind having trading and battles involve real life interactions.

    Which flies in the face of everything in P/D/Pl involving the GTS and WiFi in general. :| Really, I'd put as much stock in Game Freak's statements as I would in Hideo Kojima's. Inconsistent, and they're not calling the shots anyway (Nintendo/Konami are).

    Nintendo has a family-friendly image. Now sure, they can't stop you or me from getting online, exchanging friend codes, and trading that way. But I guarantee the way they are thinking is that little Billy is friends with young Sarah down the street, they exchange friend codes that way, and then they are able to trade Pokemon from the comfort of their own homes when it's way past their bedtime.

    EDIT: Also what Sageina said. Pokemon is doing much better than fine. Play Platinum and you'll see that these games are still fun as hell.

    UnbreakableVow on
  • KorKor Known to detonate from time to time Registered User regular
    edited April 2009
    What the OP is talking about is basically WoW with a Pokemon skin over it.

    Pokemon doesn't need tradeskills, and it doesn't need quests.

    I've gone on a daydream or two about this myself, and as far as I'm concerned, the entire PvP system is already in place.

    What you would want is:

    A 3rd person view in an entirely 3d rendered world. Pokemon Trainer from SSBB would look great as an example. Make the world to scale with him. Then, just let people pick their "faction" and by faction, I mean starting territory. Think Dark Age of Camelot, but with 4 home worlds instead of 3. So you've got the people from Kanto, Johto, Hoenn and Sinnoh all competing against each other for your "end game"

    Leave everything from the original games, but make them larger. Viridian forest, Mt. Moon, Cycling roads, and all 8 gym leaders. Basically, just make a 3d pokemon game containing all of the 4 regions.

    Finally, put actual wandering pokemon in the tall grass and such. No more random encounters, rather, you see a pidgey in the grass, would you like to engage combat? Yes/No

    Then, once engaged in combat, you just combat it, and no one else gets in your way, they can't interfear. They can watch you battle from an outside perspective, and that's it. This will help make the world feel much more alive.

    Just import the existing Pokemon PvP stuff, like Natures, EVs and held items, and all that shit, and you've got yourself an MMO.

    Hell, Nintendo could charge 5 dollars a month for it, and it would probably sell better than WoW.

    Kor on
    DS Code: 3050-7671-2707
    Pokemon Safari - Sneasel, Pawniard, ????
  • LucascraftLucascraft Registered User regular
    edited April 2009
    The biggest thing a MMO would offer is a persistent world in which players can meet and battle new people much more easily. The friend code thing is an annoying, archaic fail-safe to protect kiddies from the big bad world of the internet. But it is so inconvenient that it prohibits a lot of social interaction. I think an MMO world in which players are able to establish themselves, battle and train together, would provide exactly the kind of social interaction that many people want.

    Also, for many people it would give them a chance to branch outside of their small network of real life friends. In my situation, my buddies enjoy pokemon in small doses, but none of them care enough to put time into breeding and raising and training a good team of pokemon. To them, the game ends when the elite 4 are beaten. There is no meta game for my friends.

    Lucascraft on
  • DarlanDarlan Registered User regular
    edited April 2009
    After having not played a Pokemon since the original Blue, I recently borrowed a friend's copy of Diamond. I'm completely shocked at how little has changed, it really is amazing to see how many sales such minute, incremental changes can garner in. I gave it back to guy after two days or so and told him I'd already played it on the Game Boy.

    A full blown Wii RPG would certainly get people like me interested in the series, but I think the question is whether or not it's worth Nintendo's trouble to invest in such an expensive project when they're already selling so well. No way an MMO is happening though, and a good thing too: that would be child predator central. I know stuff like that Animal Crossing report is a joke, but something as popular and kid-centric as Pokemon combined with the social networking of an MMO...well, it shouldn't take too much imagination to see why that would be different.

    Darlan on
  • KorKor Known to detonate from time to time Registered User regular
    edited April 2009
    Darlan wrote: »
    After having not played a Pokemon since the original Blue, I recently borrowed a friend's copy of Diamond. I'm completely shocked at how little has changed, it really is amazing to see how many sales such minute, incremental changes can garner in. I gave it back to guy after two days or so and told him I'd already played it on the Game By.

    A full blown Wii RPG would certainly get people like me interested in the series, but I think the question is whether or not it's worth Nintendo's trouble to invest in such an expensive project when they're already selling so well. No way an MMO is happening though, and a good thing too: that would be child predator central.

    This is such a common misconception. It really is, and I'm not even that big of a pokemon player.

    Gen II
    - Introduced steel and dark types
    - Introduced breeding
    - Split the Special stat from Gen I into Spec. Attack and Spec. Def. Reblancing a lot of the game.
    - Pokemon can now hold items like equipment, that have a wide variety of effects.

    Gen III
    - Introduced Abilities, innate passive affects that all pokemon have.
    - Introduced Natures, which determine stat growth
    - Introduced 2v2 battles
    - Introduced contests

    Gen IV
    - Introduced a 3D world
    - Attacks are now independant to be either Physical or Special. not all elec is special, and not all fighting physical
    - Introduced a Global Trading System

    I mean, the gameplay feels very similar, but there is a lot more going on behind the scenes.

    I mean, you could make the same argument for Madden '09, or Devil May Cry 4, or Halo 3. They all play the same as their originals, but a lot was changed behind the scenes.

    Kor on
    DS Code: 3050-7671-2707
    Pokemon Safari - Sneasel, Pawniard, ????
  • LucascraftLucascraft Registered User regular
    edited April 2009
    Another thing I was thinking about that would be awesome in a persistent pokemon world, would be that if there were "real" gyms in which regular tournaments were hosted, with different rules. For example, maybe a reoccuring event would be that on Sunday afternoons, a certain gym might hold a Rock-Type-Only tournament. Registration for the event would open like an hour before hand and would be managed by a simple in-game interface. A bracket would be drawn up, and a series of battles would commence.

    Or imagine being able to load into a pre-battle interface and set a list of conditions or rules. Since something like this would be built right into the game, it would be totally enforceable. Rules like no legendaries, or only first evolution pokes, or grass only, or whatever.

    Lucascraft on
  • UncleSporkyUncleSporky Registered User regular
    edited April 2009
    As he said, incremental. Madden plays the same despite having behind-the-scenes changes, and that's what we call incremental.

    However since I went from Blue to Diamond I noticed a lot more change and it was enough to tide me over. I'm not wild about the "huge advancements" of new types, nightfall, abilities, natures, whatever...just give me a fun RPG.

    UncleSporky on
    Switch Friend Code: SW - 5443 - 2358 - 9118 || 3DS Friend Code: 0989 - 1731 - 9504 || NNID: unclesporky
  • AshtonDragonAshtonDragon AKA The Nix Registered User regular
    edited April 2009
    Gen III also introduced move tutors, and the battle frontier.

    The most recent generation was easily the least significant, but the physical/special move split was still an extremely big deal.

    AshtonDragon on
  • xeviqxeviq Registered User regular
    edited April 2009
    I thought one of the complaints of PBR was that it didn't have a stand alone RPG like the previous 2 console games.

    xeviq on
  • NativityInBlackNativityInBlack Registered User regular
    edited April 2009
    Bryse Eayo wrote: »
    The main mind behind Pokemon has come out and said a full 3D RPG on a console will never ever happen. The 3D versions of the games will only be ancillary to the main hand held games.

    Well.. that's terrible news :( been dreaming about a Pokemon RPG since I got my Gamecube 6 years ago.

    NativityInBlack on
  • Hockey JohnstonHockey Johnston Registered User regular
    edited April 2009
    I know no one cares, but here's how a console Pokemon should work.

    Phantom Dust + Pokemon Skin.

    Think about it!!

    Hockey Johnston on
  • NativityInBlackNativityInBlack Registered User regular
    edited April 2009
    Hehe some great ideas here, also had a lot of fun on Snap!

    NativityInBlack on
  • bakatrinhbakatrinh Registered User regular
    edited April 2009
    I don't want any Pokemon MMO or reboot until Nintendo pull the stick out their ass and make a real online system. Not these friends code crap, communication only by pre defined macros. No way to tell if your friends are on playing and no way to join their game unless you're invited. I don't care about protecting the kids. Fuck the kids.

    bakatrinh on
    bakatrinh.png
  • LucascraftLucascraft Registered User regular
    edited April 2009
    bakatrinh wrote: »
    I don't want any Pokemon MMO or reboot until Nintendo pull the stick out their ass and make a real online system. Not these friends code crap, communication only by pre defined macros. No way to tell if your friends are on playing and no way to join their game unless you're invited. I don't care about protecting the kids. Fuck the kids.

    Exactly. Nintendo needs to get with the fucking times and abandon their friend code bullshit.

    Lucascraft on
  • MinionOfCthulhuMinionOfCthulhu Registered User regular
    edited April 2009
    I saw these a while ago and saved them. It's a shame they're not real. :(
    pokemonrpg1.jpg
    pokemonrpg2.jpg
    pokemonrpg3.jpg
    pokemonrpg4.jpg
    pokemonrpg5.jpg
    pokemonrpg6.jpg

    I'm enjoying Platinum, just like I've enjoyed the series since Red/Blue, but I do wish they'd do something more with it.

    MinionOfCthulhu on
    mgssig.jpg1152dt.gif
  • Ragnar DragonfyreRagnar Dragonfyre Registered User regular
    edited April 2009
    Yeah, as another poster said, they recently asked why Pokemon hadn't yet gone MMO. The director Junichi Masuda responded with the below quote:

    "At this point, we're not thinking of going in that direction," says Masuda. "Trading is a core concept of Pokémon. So when you're trading, you meet with a friend and decide which one you want and which one they want. I would like to emphasize real-world communication. You don't see each other online."

    I guess this basically means they make enough money with Pokemon as is and don't want to bother with the amount of development time/money an MMO would take.

    Nintendo is rather dumb when it comes to the online front. They still seem to think it's a fad. A Pokemon MMO would indeed rival WoW, if not best it.

    Hell, I'd play a Pokemon MMO and I'm 26.

    Ragnar Dragonfyre on
    steam_sig.png
  • DeathPrawnDeathPrawn Registered User regular
    edited April 2009
    I saw these a while ago and saved them. It's a shame they're not real. :(
    pokemonrpg1.jpg
    pokemonrpg2.jpg
    pokemonrpg3.jpg
    pokemonrpg4.jpg
    pokemonrpg5.jpg
    pokemonrpg6.jpg

    I'm enjoying Platinum, just like I've enjoyed the series since Red/Blue, but I do wish they'd do something more with it.

    Pokemon designs need moar buckles.

    DeathPrawn on
    Signature not found.
  • SageinaRageSageinaRage Registered User regular
    edited April 2009
    Ugh, I don't want to play pokemon as a final fantasy knockoff. People in pokemon dress like real people.

    And there's a difference between thinking that online is a fad and thinking that online doesn't really add much to the game, and is not worth the considerable expense.

    SageinaRage on
    sig.gif
  • truck-a-saurastruck-a-sauras Registered User regular
    edited April 2009
    Hell, I'd play a Pokemon MMO and I'm 26.

    that is the problem. All of us posting are adults/teens at least. As stated earlier in the thread the designers are focusing on children and getting them together in person to trade and play. They don't care about us or the money in our wallets.

    Pokemon MMO would destroy my life anyway. I'd lose my job/family/everything due to playing too much.

    maybe that is why they won't make it. Maybe they know the horrible consequences of releasing such a monster. The world will end!

    truck-a-sauras on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    Steam
    XBOX
  • Lucky CynicLucky Cynic Registered User regular
    edited April 2009
    I would love one 3D port of a pokemon game, but on the wii with better graphics and better online support... Sprites are awesome and all but for me, Pokemon Stadium on the N64 was hot shit. If they could improve on that formula and not have to nerf everything down because they need to make an 'E' rating, then awesome.

    Lucky Cynic on
  • Alfred J. KwakAlfred J. Kwak is it because you were insulted when I insulted your hair?Registered User regular
    edited April 2009
    Oh my god.

    Think about the possibilities! With the Wiimote, you could emulate the feeling of throwing the Pokéballs into the arena yourself!

    Alfred J. Kwak on
  • Ragnar DragonfyreRagnar Dragonfyre Registered User regular
    edited April 2009
    Hell, I'd play a Pokemon MMO and I'm 26.

    that is the problem. All of us posting are adults/teens at least. As stated earlier in the thread the designers are focusing on children and getting them together in person to trade and play. They don't care about us or the money in our wallets.

    Pokemon MMO would destroy my life anyway. I'd lose my job/family/everything due to playing too much.

    maybe that is why they won't make it. Maybe they know the horrible consequences of releasing such a monster. The world will end!

    Yeah, true enough. It's sad enough to hear about people's lives ruined over Final Fantasy XI, WoW and EQ... but the shame of being an adult, addicted to Pokemon, losing ones lively-hood would be impossible to live down.

    Ragnar Dragonfyre on
    steam_sig.png
  • RainbowDespairRainbowDespair Registered User regular
    edited April 2009
    I want to enjoy Pokemon games, but until they increase the battle speed, it's just not going to happen for me.

    RainbowDespair on
  • UncleSporkyUncleSporky Registered User regular
    edited April 2009
    I want to enjoy Pokemon games, but until they increase the battle speed, it's just not going to happen for me.
    POKEROB attacks!
    <6 second animation>
    It's super effective!
    POKEROB takes damage from poison!
    <3 second animation>
    There is a wind storm on the field!
    <5 second animation>
    POKEROB is buffeted by the wind storm!
    <3 second animation>
    Also it is raining!
    <4 second animation>
    POKEROB feels mildly nauseated for some reason!
    <10 second animation>

    UncleSporky on
    Switch Friend Code: SW - 5443 - 2358 - 9118 || 3DS Friend Code: 0989 - 1731 - 9504 || NNID: unclesporky
  • DukiDuki Registered User regular
    edited April 2009
    As he said, incremental. Madden plays the same despite having behind-the-scenes changes, and that's what we call incremental.

    However since I went from Blue to Diamond I noticed a lot more change and it was enough to tide me over. I'm not wild about the "huge advancements" of new types, nightfall, abilities, natures, whatever...just give me a fun RPG.

    Well actually, the whole battle system has been utterly changed by the latest iterations.

    I think it depends on what your definition of what Pokemon is. Do you actually give a shit about collecting badges and stuff, or are you playing it simply to get to the ridiculously complex endgame.

    I mean yeah, the single player has remained little changed. Still running around pressing Fight, Item, Pokemon or Run. But that's not really Pokemon to many people.

    edit:Oh God, 3D pokemon was even worse with the battle speeds. The N64 games would take fucking forever.

    Duki on
  • RavenpoeRavenpoe Registered User regular
    edited April 2009
    Duki wrote: »
    As he said, incremental. Madden plays the same despite having behind-the-scenes changes, and that's what we call incremental.

    However since I went from Blue to Diamond I noticed a lot more change and it was enough to tide me over. I'm not wild about the "huge advancements" of new types, nightfall, abilities, natures, whatever...just give me a fun RPG.

    Well actually, the whole battle system has been utterly changed by the latest iterations.

    I think it depends on what your definition of what Pokemon is. Do you actually give a shit about collecting badges and stuff, or are you playing it simply to get to the ridiculously complex endgame.

    I mean yeah, the single player has remained little changed. Still running around pressing Fight, Item, Pokemon or Run. But that's not really Pokemon to many people.

    edit:Oh God, 3D pokemon was even worse with the battle speeds. The N64 games would take fucking forever.

    Pokemon Stadium also gave you the ability to play R/B/Y on the N64 at DOUBLE SPEED.

    And really, that was the single best thing it had. That was just awesome.

    Ravenpoe on
Sign In or Register to comment.