and I'm saying that's the whole reason to have friends. You both get something out of the deal, whether it be emotionally, or you know subway and fake id's.
I find the idea of becoming friends with someone purely for material benefits to be pretty shallow and exploitative
call me a straight edge if you will but I don't really fly that route
That works just fine until you get into the business world.
You don't have friends in business you have contacts. You made it sound like you make friends with people specifically based on what they can get you. That's kind of not really a friend, thats a parasite.
Preacher on
I would like some money because these are artisanal nuggets of wisdom philistine.
You people have sick minds. I wasn't talking about sex between Elendil and Elldren at all. I was thinking simply about fusing them into a single individual. Something like this:
Nothing as sick and perverted as sex. Just a simple abomination against nature.
I know for a fact that merging is a kink.
I really wish I didn't.
I know some people that are into it.
None of them are me.
Elldren on
fuck gendered marketing
0
Options
CindersWhose sails were black when it was windyRegistered Userregular
You people have sick minds. I wasn't talking about sex between Elendil and Elldren at all. I was thinking simply about fusing them into a single individual. Something like this:
Nothing as sick and perverted as sex. Just a simple abomination against nature.
I know for a fact that merging is a kink.
I really wish I didn't.
I know some people that are into it.
None of them are me.
Sex, or merging?
Feral on
every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.
the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
0
Options
LudiousI just wanted a sandwich A temporally dislocated QuiznosRegistered Userregular
and I'm saying that's the whole reason to have friends. You both get something out of the deal, whether it be emotionally, or you know subway and fake id's.
I find the idea of becoming friends with someone purely for material benefits to be pretty shallow and exploitative
call me a straight edge if you will but I don't really fly that route
That works just fine until you get into the business world.
You don't have friends in business you have contacts. You made it sound like you make friends with people specifically based on what they can get you. That's kind of not really a friend, thats a parasite.
Yeah I know, I learned that the hard way. But you CALL them friends.
Arguing against gay marriage is functionally indistinguishable from being a dick
Because arguing against gay marriage makes you a dick
I'll accept this, but remark that it is worthwhile to make certain kinds of dickery infractable and other kinds not infractable.
It is useful to infract people for calling other people a shitcock, and waxing poetic about their failure's, their mother's failures in choice of species wrt to sexual partners, etc.
It is not so useful to infract people for expressing their genuine opinion on a serious issue, dickish and wrong though it may be. It may be more useful to endure their offensive and absurd argument as a necessary part of changing their worldview.
You people have sick minds. I wasn't talking about sex between Elendil and Elldren at all. I was thinking simply about fusing them into a single individual. Something like this:
Nothing as sick and perverted as sex. Just a simple abomination against nature.
Arguing against gay marriage is functionally indistinguishable from being a dick
Because arguing against gay marriage makes you a dick
I'll accept this, but remark that it is worthwhile to make certain kinds of dickery infractable and other kinds not infractable.
It is useful to infract people for calling other people a shitcock, and waxing poetic about their failure's, their mother's failures in choice of species wrt to sexual partners, etc.
It is not so useful to infract people for expressing their genuine opinion on a serious issue, dickish and wrong though it may be. It may be more useful to endure their offensive and absurd argument as a necessary part of changing their worldview.
Yes but nobody changes their worldview based on internet arguments.
Arguing against gay marriage is functionally indistinguishable from being a dick
Because arguing against gay marriage makes you a dick
I'll accept this, but remark that it is worthwhile to make certain kinds of dickery infractable and other kinds not infractable.
It is useful to infract people for calling other people a shitcock, and waxing poetic about their failure's, their mother's failures in choice of species wrt to sexual partners, etc.
It is not so useful to infract people for expressing their genuine opinion on a serious issue, dickish and wrong though it may be. It may be more useful to endure their offensive and absurd argument as a necessary part of changing their worldview.
The problem is Obs doesn't change.
He continues posting these absurd arguments despite knowing that they will be shot down and rejected just like the last time for whatever reason.
I am becoming increasingly convinced that that reason is to simply incite an emotional response which is a) trolling and b) infractable.
Arguing against gay marriage is functionally indistinguishable from being a dick
Because arguing against gay marriage makes you a dick
I'll accept this, but remark that it is worthwhile to make certain kinds of dickery infractable and other kinds not infractable.
It is useful to infract people for calling other people a shitcock, and waxing poetic about their failure's, their mother's failures in choice of species wrt to sexual partners, etc.
It is not so useful to infract people for expressing their genuine opinion on a serious issue, dickish and wrong though it may be. It may be more useful to endure their offensive and absurd argument as a necessary part of changing their worldview.
The problem is Obs doesn't change.
He continues posting these absurd arguments despite knowing that they will be shot down and rejected just like the last time for whatever reason.
I am becoming increasingly convinced that that reason is to simply incite an emotional response which is a) trolling and b) infractable.
Obs was banned a while ago before he came back.
He's always acted like this. Just ignore him, it's not worth bothering.
Elendil on
0
Options
ElldrenIs a woman dammitceterum censeoRegistered Userregular
This isn't sour grapes or anything here. I haven't posted in (let alone got infracted in) the thread in question. But when someone with Obs history busts in with such an obvious series of trolls - like he always does - and gets away with it for the Nth time it is a bit frustrating to watch.
This is all he does in D&D. Pick a thread and post an inflammatory 1 liner. Usually it is only tangentially related to the topic at hand. If he gets ignored the first time he keeps coming back with these non-sequiturs until someone bites. Then the thread is pretty much off topic and pointless for at least 3-4 pages.
Aha. I missed your point, and it has far more validity than I thought. I do find it tiresome when he goes into a thread and posts silly one-liners. I commented in chat how amazing it was in a recent thread when he did it three times and nobody bites.
However, I don't think he is trolling in the gay marriage thread. It may be the only thread about which I hold this opinion. I sort of enjoy talking to him there because I see him as a misguided individual who continuously confronts uncomfortable truths about his views, and is close to seeing the light, to realizing that the next step after admitting his opinion is just an opinion and has no validity is to change it.
Posts
You don't have friends in business you have contacts. You made it sound like you make friends with people specifically based on what they can get you. That's kind of not really a friend, thats a parasite.
pleasepaypreacher.net
I know some people that are into it.
None of them are me.
Is it some kind of variation of vore?
Sex, or merging?
the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
Yeah I know, I learned that the hard way. But you CALL them friends.
I'll accept this, but remark that it is worthwhile to make certain kinds of dickery infractable and other kinds not infractable.
It is useful to infract people for calling other people a shitcock, and waxing poetic about their failure's, their mother's failures in choice of species wrt to sexual partners, etc.
It is not so useful to infract people for expressing their genuine opinion on a serious issue, dickish and wrong though it may be. It may be more useful to endure their offensive and absurd argument as a necessary part of changing their worldview.
FU-SION!!!
Sometimes.
Oh god, I bet some people get off on that one Ghost Busters cartoon episode with the giant ghost-eating ghost that turns things into deserts.
Yes but nobody changes their worldview based on internet arguments.
Eh.
I used to be adamantly anti-BDSM and used to have huge arguments about it.
I bet the whole Kirby series is just a dream come true for people with that type of fetish.
I used to hate jews, and then I met Hakkes and knew hating jews was right.
pleasepaypreacher.net
The problem is Obs doesn't change.
He continues posting these absurd arguments despite knowing that they will be shot down and rejected just like the last time for whatever reason.
I am becoming increasingly convinced that that reason is to simply incite an emotional response which is a) trolling and b) infractable.
Also yoshi, and I'm pretty sure I've seen pirahna plant porn.
wait what
nooooo
He's always acted like this. Just ignore him, it's not worth bothering.
it is an edgy joke based on Hakks's Persianity.
Aha. I missed your point, and it has far more validity than I thought. I do find it tiresome when he goes into a thread and posts silly one-liners. I commented in chat how amazing it was in a recent thread when he did it three times and nobody bites.
However, I don't think he is trolling in the gay marriage thread. It may be the only thread about which I hold this opinion. I sort of enjoy talking to him there because I see him as a misguided individual who continuously confronts uncomfortable truths about his views, and is close to seeing the light, to realizing that the next step after admitting his opinion is just an opinion and has no validity is to change it.
My world view is based largely on cocks.
And of course, the transformative nature of the powers in the Mario 'verse is ripe for pornographic use.
NNID: Hakkekage
like major opinions?
Even though it was a funny joke... I'll leave it be.
pleasepaypreacher.net
(Aegri or whatever his name was - crazy biology guy)
Some of are waiting patiently to mock Hakks
The Path? Isn't that that Red Riding Hood type game? I'd heard it was pretty awful.
Mario is probably the most prominant fursuiter around.
pleasepaypreacher.net
Seriously?
Hakke
do you like fishsticks
yes
This forum is where I picked up a lot of views about stuff I hadn't really thought about before. And it got me out of my teenage libertarian phase.
This forum could not exist in a unvierse with a loving god.