As was foretold, we've added advertisements to the forums! If you have questions, or if you encounter any bugs, please visit this thread: https://forums.penny-arcade.com/discussion/240191/forum-advertisement-faq-and-reports-thread/
We're funding a new Acquisitions Incorporated series on Kickstarter right now! Check it out at https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/pennyarcade/acquisitions-incorporated-the-series-2

[WAR] Land of the Dead Beckons Us! (Resubscribe NOW!)

1434446484963

Posts

  • MalkorMalkor Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    It would be cool if the Skaven were their own faction. Maybe a faction that had their own endgame independent of Altdorf and the IC...

    Malkor on
    14271f3c-c765-4e74-92b1-49d7612675f2.jpg
  • vonPoonBurGervonPoonBurGer Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    hazywater wrote: »
    3 faction system
    I can't imagine how a 3-faction system could work with the current city siege implementation. I'd love to see a third faction, because right now it feels like endgame is either one side continually dominating another, or a stalemate with some back-'n-forth. But I think they'd need to scrap the current endgame design and start from scratch if they wanted to accommodate three factions.

    Any DAoC players in this thread? What sort of stuff used to go on with DAoC relic sieges? If Altdorf was besieging a Midgard relic fort, what did max-level Hib players do?

    vonPoonBurGer on
    Xbox Live:vonPoon | PSN: vonPoon | Steam: vonPoonBurGer
  • darkmayodarkmayo Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    hazywater wrote: »
    3 faction system
    I can't imagine how a 3-faction system could work with the current city siege implementation. I'd love to see a third faction, because right now it feels like endgame is either one side continually dominating another, or a stalemate with some back-'n-forth. But I think they'd need to scrap the current endgame design and start from scratch if they wanted to accommodate three factions.

    Any DAoC players in this thread? What sort of stuff used to go on with DAoC relic sieges? If Altdorf was besieging a Midgard relic fort, what did max-level Hib players do?

    They would PBAOE everyone

    darkmayo on
    Switch SW-6182-1526-0041
  • Lucky CynicLucky Cynic Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    hazywater wrote: »
    3 faction system
    I can't imagine how a 3-faction system could work with the current city siege implementation. I'd love to see a third faction, because right now it feels like endgame is either one side continually dominating another, or a stalemate with some back-'n-forth. But I think they'd need to scrap the current endgame design and start from scratch if they wanted to accommodate three factions.

    Any DAoC players in this thread? What sort of stuff used to go on with DAoC relic sieges? If Altdorf was besieging a Midgard relic fort, what did max-level Hib players do?

    Mez.

    Lucky Cynic on
  • StericaSterica Yes Registered User, Moderator mod
    edited May 2009
    They could just redraw up the current maps to accommodate three sides. It'd take some effort, and you'd have to up quest experience for Destro and Order since they'd lose some chapters.

    Sterica on
    YL9WnCY.png
  • HavelockHavelock Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    If Mythic's going to implement a 3rd faction, I think they'd create a new landmass rather than dick around with the current stuff. If it ain't broke don't fix it, you know.

    Havelock on
  • Lucky CynicLucky Cynic Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    3 factions would be the stupidest fucking thing in WAR. Like seriously, it is the most retarded suggestion in the suggestion forums that I see. Just because you are reminiscent of DAoC, or if something worked well in DAoC doesn't mean that it will work well or fit right in WAR.

    Lucky Cynic on
  • HavelockHavelock Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Yeah, the fight is between Order and Chaos. Not Order, Chaos, and Those Assholes Over There.

    Havelock on
  • Lucky CynicLucky Cynic Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Havelock wrote: »
    Yeah, the fight is between Order and Chaos. Not Order, Chaos, and Those Assholes Over There.

    Order vs Destruction vs Space Marines.

    Lucky Cynic on
  • JunpeiJunpei Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Order vs Destruction vs Skaven, it's win win win.

    Junpei on
  • StericaSterica Yes Registered User, Moderator mod
    edited May 2009
    Havelock wrote: »
    If Mythic's going to implement a 3rd faction, I think they'd create a new landmass rather than dick around with the current stuff. If it ain't broke don't fix it, you know.
    Except...it is broke. There aren't a ton of servers where it's really back-and-forth. One side is pounding on the doors multiple times each week, and the other might manage to weakly retaliate one early morning. And it's a slippery slope, as the losing side will quit from discouragement before the other from boredom.

    Chaos is an army. This is about Order vs. Destruction. It can also involve a third, sneaky side that sees the war as an opportunity to greatly weaken six occupied foes.

    Sterica on
    YL9WnCY.png
  • hazywaterhazywater Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    3 factions would be the stupidest fucking thing in WAR. Like seriously, it is the most retarded suggestion in the suggestion forums that I see. Just because you are reminiscent of DAoC, or if something worked well in DAoC doesn't mean that it will work well or fit right in WAR.

    There will never be 3 factions in WAR. The discussion was about number advantages, and the best way to nulify that is with 3 factions, but 3 factions have to go in from the beginning. With a 2 factions system like WAR, numbers snowball. One side gets zerged, goes F this and logs off. The other side is winning and feeling good and stays logged on.

    WAR can't have 3 factions because the whole thing would have to be redesigned. Maybe an expansion.

    hazywater on
    Hrin - Eve Online
  • StericaSterica Yes Registered User, Moderator mod
    edited May 2009
    Three factions would simply require an expansion pack. The newness of the races would help balance the numbers.

    Sterica on
    YL9WnCY.png
  • tyrannustyrannus i am not fat Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    I wonder what'd get more people to stay or come to WAR, more races or more cities?

    tyrannus on
  • StericaSterica Yes Registered User, Moderator mod
    edited May 2009
    Races, as that would mean more classes. City sieges are not that popular and would require more improvements to get people pumped about attacking new ones.

    Sterica on
    YL9WnCY.png
  • SoaLSoaL fantastic Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    tyrannus wrote: »
    I wonder what'd get more people to stay or come to WAR, more races or more cities?

    MAYBE AN ACTIVE GUILD

    SoaL on
    DKFA7.gif
  • Panda4YouPanda4You Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    So I'm sitting at a successfully defended fort, where the timer has been at 00:00 for 15 mins now, maeking poast. :|

    Panda4You on
  • eelektrikeelektrik Southern CaliforniaRegistered User regular
    edited May 2009
    So Patch 1.3 is apparently on the test server now, but you can't actually log in and play yet. Still, you can go ahead and download the 958mb patch so its ready whenever they do open it up for testing. Sadly, no patch notes on the patcher for it yet.

    eelektrik on
    (She/Her)
  • StericaSterica Yes Registered User, Moderator mod
    edited May 2009
    That is surprising. I expected maybe a patch preview from Jacobs or event details...but not the actual server up.

    Sterica on
    YL9WnCY.png
  • eelektrikeelektrik Southern CaliforniaRegistered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Well its not open to the public yet, I imagine its only accessibly by their Core Testers at the moment.

    eelektrik on
    (She/Her)
  • Lucky CynicLucky Cynic Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Man what the fuck is with the lag today... -_-;

    Lucky Cynic on
  • RedThornRedThorn Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Man what the fuck is with the lag today... -_-;

    It seems that all the servers were crashing at the same time, which is pretty bizarre.

    RedThorn on
    League of Legends: Drokmir
    Steam: Drokmir
  • AvynteAvynte Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    I think the sky is falling.

    At least on Badlands.

    Mad crashes all over :|

    Avynte on
    ECOED.jpg
  • CharaChara Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Between the crashes and the stupid keep bugs, I give up for today. :x

    Chara on
  • Lucky CynicLucky Cynic Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    They did mention some maintenance with their ISP for the 13th... Thing is, it is still the 12th here in Chicago, but I guess everything is down. Their main website and account shit and even the patcher. =/


    Oh well, at least their test patcher is up. Time to download that shit.

    Lucky Cynic on
  • StericaSterica Yes Registered User, Moderator mod
    edited May 2009
    Herald said just about everything is down but the forums for emergency maintenance.

    Sterica on
    YL9WnCY.png
  • Lucky CynicLucky Cynic Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    They need to put shit like this on twitter. :|

    Lucky Cynic on
  • AvynteAvynte Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Yeah, things weren't supposed to go down until the early AM of the 13th, but word has it that Mythic's ISP is notorious for starting things really early.

    Hopefully that's a good thing then?

    Avynte on
    ECOED.jpg
  • Lucky CynicLucky Cynic Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Finally got through to their forums. Here is what they had up.
    Announcement: Mythic Network Maintenance - 5/13/09
    At 9:00AM EDT all servers and Mythic web services will be brought offline for necessary maintenance by our internet service provider. We anticipate the maintenance to be completed before 1:00PM EDT. During this time, however, no game services (including the patcher and account center), or websites hosted by Mythic, will be available. The Forums will continue to operate, but if you are not logged in prior to the downtime you will be unable to post (those already logged in will be able to participate normally.)

    We apologize for this interruption in services and will work to have it resolved as quickly as possible. Please follow the thread linked below for updates and information throughout the downtime. Thank you for your patience!

    Lucky Cynic on
  • HappylilElfHappylilElf Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    hazywater wrote: »
    3 factions would be the stupidest fucking thing in WAR. Like seriously, it is the most retarded suggestion in the suggestion forums that I see. Just because you are reminiscent of DAoC, or if something worked well in DAoC doesn't mean that it will work well or fit right in WAR.

    There will never be 3 factions in WAR. The discussion was about number advantages, and the best way to nulify that is with 3 factions, but 3 factions have to go in from the beginning. With a 2 factions system like WAR, numbers snowball. One side gets zerged, goes F this and logs off. The other side is winning and feeling good and stays logged on.

    WAR can't have 3 factions because the whole thing would have to be redesigned. Maybe an expansion.

    I'm not sure I agree with the 3 faction system being the best way to eliminate number advantages. Planetside was three factions and it seemed like there was usually one side getting it's ass kicked. This of course ended once the other two zergs ran into each other but that could take upwards of 8-10 hours depending on whether they avoided eachother or not. That may not seem like a long time but imagine logging in right after getting off work or something then having your ass handed to you until you went to bed. It could be... frustrating at times.

    Poor Vanu. I blame you for sitting at the end of hallways and using lashers. You were just so much fun to use the thumper on.

    I'm not sure this is an issue that's really fixable in a persistant multiplayer setting. As the tide turns against one side or the other people get frustrated and quit, leading to that side getting their asses kicked even harder. You can improve this problem but I don't think you'll ever be able to actually control it.

    The bonus to exp that you got from your side being underpopulated seemed to help a little, at least that's the impression I got from base/continent chat in Panetside, but I think WAR's system for it is kind of flawed. It almost needs to be teir based. Having roughly equal server populations but one side is primarily in T2/3 and the other is in T4 means that while total number of people on is roughly the same the RvR fights are anything but.

    HappylilElf on
  • Lucky CynicLucky Cynic Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    See, the fuckers who complain about overwhelming numbers never really played Camelot. I played on a server that was Albion vs. Everyone else. Okay? There would be Hib and Mid zergs attacking Albion constantly and even when all 3 of us would collide, they wouldn't attack each other. Midgard would take the Albion Melee relic and hold onto theirs forever and Hibs would do the same thing but with our magic relic.

    Now that was some bullshit and it was very difficult to break out of that nitch.

    Lucky Cynic on
  • GruffGruff Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Annnnddd we're back.

    Gruff on
    naxxramas.jpg
  • MoistMoist Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    So I decided to give this another shot today before my subscription runs out, not played since slayer was released. I was once able to play on pretty much max setting even in large'ish rvr battles. Today i poped on, got in one t1 scenario and got myself a healthy half a frame a second, on minimum settings, my compter has not changed, so I must assume this game has gone through a major graphics update since i have been away.


    Not impressed.

    Moist on
  • MalkorMalkor Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Moist wrote: »
    I was once able to play on pretty much max setting even in large'ish rvr battles. Today i poped on, got in one t1 scenario and got myself a healthy half a frame a second, on minimum settings, my compter has not changed, so I must assume this game has gone through a major graphics update since i have been away.


    Not impressed.

    Did you log in before or after their ISP decided to do the network changes?

    Malkor on
    14271f3c-c765-4e74-92b1-49d7612675f2.jpg
  • FeldornFeldorn Mediocre Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    See, the fuckers who complain about overwhelming numbers never really played Camelot. I played on a server that was Albion vs. Everyone else. Okay? There would be Hib and Mid zergs attacking Albion constantly and even when all 3 of us would collide, they wouldn't attack each other. Midgard would take the Albion Melee relic and hold onto theirs forever and Hibs would do the same thing but with our magic relic.

    Now that was some bullshit and it was very difficult to break out of that nitch.

    This was because Albion was Mythic's favorite child. everyone else hated them. thats why Mid/Hib would work together to say EFF YOU ALB GOATRAPERS!

    Feldorn on
  • vonPoonBurGervonPoonBurGer Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Feldorn wrote: »
    EFF YOU ALB GOATRAPERS!
    Pfft, that goat was totally asking for it.

    vonPoonBurGer on
    Xbox Live:vonPoon | PSN: vonPoon | Steam: vonPoonBurGer
  • AvynteAvynte Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Malkor wrote: »
    Moist wrote: »
    I was once able to play on pretty much max setting even in large'ish rvr battles. Today i poped on, got in one t1 scenario and got myself a healthy half a frame a second, on minimum settings, my compter has not changed, so I must assume this game has gone through a major graphics update since i have been away.


    Not impressed.

    Did you log in before or after their ISP decided to do the network changes?

    Definitely this.

    If you logged in at all yesterday afternoon / evening, that was some of the worst server performance we've had thanks to Mythic's ISP messing around, causing horrible crashing and lag.

    Avynte on
    ECOED.jpg
  • Lucky CynicLucky Cynic Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    I think one thing we can agree on, ISPs grief everyone. Mythic and us one by one. :P

    Lucky Cynic on
  • Gnome-InterruptusGnome-Interruptus Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    So, I thought I'd post a bit of a recruitment blurb in here:

    Server: Iron Rock
    Guild: <Rush>
    Guild_Rank: 30.4
    Alliance: Raven Host
    Play_Time: 10pm EST is when we schedule things, though many players are on much earlier/later than that.

    Strengths: Core group of dedicated players, that organize for T4 scenario premades, and content progression.

    Recruits: We are looking for people that want to advance a favorite character as far as they can go. We are willing to put in the time to help you get your character some of the best gear in the game. And we want you to play that character to help win T4 scenarios, and push zone locks.

    Brags:
    1) Fought <Blacklisted> and <Crucible> T4 premades at the same time to a TIE in the Praag scenario.
    2) Cleared Lost Vale
    3) Regular dungeon runs to help gear members, can take people with as little as 2 wards.

    Future Goals: If we get enough people, we want to be able to field a warband for ORvR and push zone locks, and eventually cities.

    EDIT: PM if you are interested in hearing more, or go to our website <Rush> and use the Forum link on the left.

    Gnome-Interruptus on
    steam_sig.png
    MWO: Adamski
  • DetharinDetharin Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Anyone able to explain to me why when i fought an engineer solo my 40% block rate ended up being about 3 blocks over a 4 minute fight. Just curious. Until i figure it out fuck shields outside of PVE.

    Detharin on
This discussion has been closed.