I watched Prof Moriarty, and blinked, so he may not be an Angel. Otoh, they could have withheld their kills in order to set this up. Regardless, I've got no information with which to make a vote at this point in time.
Kime and Oats are both suspect at the moment. Kime more so.
I'm willing to bet that one of those missed kills was due to someone forgetting to send orders in. the other 2 (and i'm assuming 3 baddies) were probably blocked.
moriarty, the network has declared that kime must die. he is the most suspicious person in this thread so far being extremely active despite there not being much to do. there is a reason i was watching him last night.
I agree that kime is acting suspicious, but there was more than one kill missing and kime is always acting suspicious.
Hell, has anyone watched Dunadan yet?
Kime, probably some others. Are you saying i'm suspicious? i revealed on day 1....
There's nothing especially suspicious about you, Duna. I'm just saying that maybe we're taking too much at face value. Besides, if Kime *were* a weeping angel, how could we trust his watching you anyway?
generally it is a good assumption to assume that the mafia are masoned. especially in a game where all the mafia have a kill ability that could potentially target each other.
Fair enough. I guess I'm kind of naively going against the spirit of phalla by seeking clarification, but yes, in the meantime we should assume the worst.
generally it is a good assumption to assume that the mafia are masoned. especially in a game where all the mafia have a kill ability that could potentially target each other.
generally it is a good assumption to assume that the mafia are masoned. especially in a game where all the mafia have a kill ability that could potentially target each other.
Even if you take the assumption that they aren't masoned, and that they can kill each other, they still shouldn't be watching anyone if they have any sense. Watching does not protect yourself, it only prevents their kill from going through. So if you are an Angel, and you successfully watch an Angel... congratulations, you just had a 10% chance of saving your life, and a 90% chance of screwing the other Angel over. (Only considering yourself and the other Angel, of course, no third-party Angels. There the situation still stands, just not quite as extreme so I don't like it as much :P.)
Anyways, before we bandwagon me, how about we check the people who were blinked at Day 1, and watched Days 2 and 3. Because we know both of those days were missing kills.
And I'm lazy, so does someone else wanna do it? Or should I go back... ?
I'll save you some of the trouble. I've been successfully watched for two days now, and was blinked at Day 1. I'm apparently the runner-up on the suspicio-meter.
However, and this is getting irksome, Whod has been successfully watched for the past two nights. No one else seems to recognize this.
I'll save you some of the trouble. I've been successfully watched for two days now, and was blinked at Day 1. I'm apparently the runner-up on the suspicio-meter.
However, and this is getting irksome, Whod has been successfully watched for the past two nights. No one else seems to recognize this.
I just compiled all the info that has been given. Gimme a second to format and post.
So, I'm assuming no vig kills. Sorry, but we don't have enough info otherwise.
There were 3 Angel kills the first night, 2 the second, and 0 the third. We're going to assume overlapping kills and guards did not play into that change, since we can't predict those so it's useless to work with them. That means an extra Angel was watched Night 2 compared to Night 1, and two extra Angels were watched Night 3 compared to Night 2. (Looking at the discrepancy between Nights 2 and 3 is thus more likely to yield results than between Nights 1 and 2.)
ProfMoriarity was watched Nights 2 and 3, possibly accounting for the lack of kills.
kime was watched Nights 2 and 3, possibly accounting for the lack of kills.
Whod was watched Nights 2 and 3, possibly accounting for the lack of kills.
Oats was watched Nights 2 and 3, possibly accounting for the lack of kills.
Rainfall was watched Night 3, but not on Night 2, possibly accounting for the lack of kills.
I didn't include whether dead people were watched or not. But those are all the results we have. Really, people? 10 targets, and we are only watching half of them?
I don't have today's results from Nocturne or ProfMoriarity. I don't have yesterday's result from Rainfall.
However, given what we know, I'm going to vote Rainfall. The evidence points to her most strongly, then Oats, me, and Whod equally. I don't know if I expect that to save me, since I have a tendency for garnering votes :P, but if you are just looking at the evidence then it should...
I say we start with Kime, since he is the most likely to be evil. if he's good we can then think about his reasoning knowing that it came from someone good and not an evil guy trying to avoid the vote.
I say we start with Kime, since he is the most likely to be evil. if he's good we can then think about his reasoning knowing that it came from someone good and not an evil guy trying to avoid the vote.
Ummm...
You realize you just looked at my logic and reasoning and said "nuh uh you're bad!", right :P?
Not that I'm denying being eviiiil (but remember, the village has never voted me out to their benefit), but can you at least refute my logic? Like, it should all be objective conclusions based on the facts that are made public. Can you point out anything that is not an objective fact?
Posts
3DS Friend Code: 3110-5393-4113
Steam profile
P.s. I watched Rainfall and didn't blink, again! I'm on a roll!
Kime is gonna Die! based on circumstantial evidence
I did the same thing
I'm willing to bet that one of those missed kills was due to someone forgetting to send orders in. the other 2 (and i'm assuming 3 baddies) were probably blocked.
Kime today Oats tomorrow.
Has there even been one special kill so far? I guess it could just be that special kills are not announced.
Hell, has anyone watched Dunadan yet?
Kime, probably some others. Are you saying i'm suspicious? i revealed on day 1....
There's nothing especially suspicious about you, Duna. I'm just saying that maybe we're taking too much at face value. Besides, if Kime *were* a weeping angel, how could we trust his watching you anyway?
Can Weeping Angels watch other players, or just kill them?
I'm calling it now, he won't answer this. :P
Yeah, it's kind of a desperate grab for information, but I'm feeling pretty lost here.
Hell, they might not even need to watch someone.
That depends on how much information they start with, which is currently an unknown unless there's something I missed.
what more information is needed....
I'm interested in finding out if the Weeping Angels already know who the others are or not.
Which gives me an idea for tomorrow. :P
Anyways, before we bandwagon me, how about we check the people who were blinked at Day 1, and watched Days 2 and 3. Because we know both of those days were missing kills.
And I'm lazy, so does someone else wanna do it? Or should I go back...
3DS Friend Code: 3110-5393-4113
Steam profile
3DS Friend Code: 3110-5393-4113
Steam profile
oh! well, since you have been admitting to being evil, you are obviously not! it was a good plan Kime :P
Noooooo!
Also, you guys do know that if you vote me out, I cannot be evil, right? I mean... It's scientifically proven.
Anyways, I guess I'll sift through the evidence and try to find another likely suspect since it seems I'm a favorite choice at the moment :P.
Prof, confusion happens. Don't fight it, embrace it!
3DS Friend Code: 3110-5393-4113
Steam profile
I'll save you some of the trouble. I've been successfully watched for two days now, and was blinked at Day 1. I'm apparently the runner-up on the suspicio-meter.
However, and this is getting irksome, Whod has been successfully watched for the past two nights. No one else seems to recognize this.
3DS Friend Code: 3110-5393-4113
Steam profile
If, for example, I were a Weeping Angel, wouldn't it be in my favor to say I watched, for example, kime for the last two days?
Edit -- This would be a lot easier to find patterns if you didn't all watch the same people. Come on, I'm only so suspicious, there has to be others!
3DS Friend Code: 3110-5393-4113
Steam profile
There were 3 Angel kills the first night, 2 the second, and 0 the third. We're going to assume overlapping kills and guards did not play into that change, since we can't predict those so it's useless to work with them. That means an extra Angel was watched Night 2 compared to Night 1, and two extra Angels were watched Night 3 compared to Night 2. (Looking at the discrepancy between Nights 2 and 3 is thus more likely to yield results than between Nights 1 and 2.)
ProfMoriarity was watched Nights 2 and 3, possibly accounting for the lack of kills.
kime was watched Nights 2 and 3, possibly accounting for the lack of kills.
Whod was watched Nights 2 and 3, possibly accounting for the lack of kills.
Oats was watched Nights 2 and 3, possibly accounting for the lack of kills.
Rainfall was watched Night 3, but not on Night 2, possibly accounting for the lack of kills.
I didn't include whether dead people were watched or not. But those are all the results we have. Really, people? 10 targets, and we are only watching half of them?
I don't have today's results from Nocturne or ProfMoriarity. I don't have yesterday's result from Rainfall.
However, given what we know, I'm going to vote Rainfall. The evidence points to her most strongly, then Oats, me, and Whod equally. I don't know if I expect that to save me, since I have a tendency for garnering votes :P, but if you are just looking at the evidence then it should...
Questions/comments/concerns?
3DS Friend Code: 3110-5393-4113
Steam profile
You realize you just looked at my logic and reasoning and said "nuh uh you're bad!", right :P?
Not that I'm denying being eviiiil (but remember, the village has never voted me out to their benefit), but can you at least refute my logic? Like, it should all be objective conclusions based on the facts that are made public. Can you point out anything that is not an objective fact?
3DS Friend Code: 3110-5393-4113
Steam profile