The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Complex home network

Captain VashCaptain Vash Registered User regular
edited May 2009 in Help / Advice Forum
Okay.

I have 4 computers, two 360s, and 1 PS3, and I'd like to get them all online with my single cable internet connection.
I need the DHCP ability of a router, and I'm thinking at least 8 ports.
What should I do and how should I do this?

The obvious answer; wifi is no good, for our purposes just assume my walls are made of lead shielding stolen from nuclear reactor cores.

twitterforweb.Stuckens.1,1,500,f4f4f4,0,c4c4c4,000000.png
Captain Vash on
«1

Posts

  • DaenrisDaenris Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Well, you could get a router with enough ports, or get a router along with a switch to add additional ports.

    Most consumer level routers come with 4 ports, though you can find them with 8.

    I'd recommend getting a standard router (wireless or wired) that has 4 ports on it, then getting a separate 8 port switch. You should be able to get an okay 8 port 10/100/1000 switch for under $60.

    Edit: Something like this or this for the switch. Maybe something like this for the router. Of course shop around for good deals. If you don't need/want gigabit speeds on the local network you can definitely get away even cheaper with just 10/100 switches and routers.

    Daenris on
  • Captain VashCaptain Vash Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    ok.

    So in a Router -> Switch setup the router is still going to assign an I.P. to each of my devices behind the switch?

    Captain Vash on
    twitterforweb.Stuckens.1,1,500,f4f4f4,0,c4c4c4,000000.png
  • ErandusErandus Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    In your situation, I would probably buy this router and appropriate lengths of Cat5 to make the runs to any given room where they're needed.

    Put the router near your cable modem and run Cat5 to the devices as necessary. Take advantage of things like heating/air conditioning ducting where possible. A wire fish can help run wire horizontally through ducting in places gravity can't assist you. For verticle runs, take the grates off two vents that are vertically aligned, tie some weight to one end of the cat5 and drop it in the top vent. Not much else to it.

    If money is no object, you can hire people to wire up your house with ethernet wall jacks and a patch panel in a central location where the router & modem will sit.

    EDIT: There's really no reason to buy a router and then plug it directly into an 8 port switch and plug all your devices into that switch. You're just adding a bottleneck at the switch, and 8 port residential class routers are really not that expensive.

    If many of your devices are all in the same place (bunch of computers in 1 room, xbox & PS3 in one room), you could buy a 4 port router, and run a single cable out to the room where multiple devices sit, and put a switch by them. The cheapest option will (probably) be an 8 port router and a bunch of cable to run singly to each device, rather than buying a router and multiple switches. That solution will also have the most cable running around your house though, so it depends how much work you're willing to go through on cable management.
    ok.

    So in a Router -> Switch setup the router is still going to assign an I.P. to each of my devices behind the switch?

    Yes, you're just investing money in 2 networking devices instead of 1 and some cable.

    Erandus on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • necroSYSnecroSYS Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited May 2009
    Buy this.
    The Router can be configured via SNMP to filter internal users' access to the Internet and serve as an Internet firewall against unwanted outside intruders.
    The Cable/DSL Router features such advanced functions as dynamic and static port routing, DMZ hosting, filtering and forwarding, and Quality of Service capabilities. And all of these functions can be easily configured through any net-worked computer's web browser.

    Package Contents:

    One Instant Broadband Cable/DSL Router
    One AC Adapter and Power Cord
    User Guide and Registration Card
    Features:
    SNMP Provides Port Security, Packet Filtering, IP Multicast, and Filters Internal User's Access
    Identify Up to Four Ports for High or Low Port-Based Prioritization
    QoS Capabilities Based on 802.1p and IP TOS/DS Greatly Reduces the Chance of Data Loss Based on Weight Round-Robin (WRR)
    Dramatically Speed Up Your Gaming and Multimedia Connections
    Full Wirespeed Layer Two Switching on All LAN Ports
    1K MAC Address Table Means Both Auto Address Learning and Aging
    Configurable Through Any Networked PC's Web Browser
    Acts as a DHCP Server
    Administrators Can Block Specific Internal Users' Internet Access
    Supports WinSock 2.0 and Windows 2000 Smart Applications
    Technical Support - 24 Hours a Day, 7 Days a Week in North America
    1-Year Limited Warranty
    Specifications:
    Standards: IEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3u
    Protocol: CSMA/CD
    Ports:
    LAN: Eight 10/100 RJ-45 Port
    WAN: One 10BaseT Uplink Port
    Cabling Type:
    10BaseT: UTP Category 3 or Better
    100BaseTX: UTP Category 5 or Better
    Topology: Star
    Speed:
    LAN: 10Mbps (10BaseT Ethernet) or 100Mbps (100BaseTX Fast Ethernet)
    WAN: 10Mbps (10BaseT Ethernet)
    LEDs Power:
    LAN: QoS, Link/Act, Full/Col, 100
    WAN: Diag, Act, Link
    Dimensions: 7.31" x 6.16" x 1.88" (186mm x 154mm x 48mm)
    Power:
    Output: External, 5V DC, 3A
    Input: 100-240VAC 1A 50/60HZ
    Certifications:
    FCC Class B
    CE Mark Commercial
    Operating Temp.: 0ºC to 40ºC (32ºF to 104ºF)
    Storage Temp.: -20ºC to 70ºC (-4ºF to 158ºF)
    Operating Hum.: 10% to 85% Non-Condensing
    Storage Hum.: 5% to 90% Non-Condensing

    necroSYS on
  • necroSYSnecroSYS Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited May 2009
    Erandus wrote: »
    In your situation, I would probably buy this router

    I like the way you think, stranger.

    necroSYS on
  • ErandusErandus Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    necroSYS wrote: »
    Erandus wrote: »
    In your situation, I would probably buy this router

    I like the way you think, stranger.

    Only 65 bucks through Newegg too. :winky:

    Great minds, great minds.

    Erandus on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • tsmvengytsmvengy Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Erandus wrote: »
    necroSYS wrote: »
    Erandus wrote: »
    In your situation, I would probably buy this router

    I like the way you think, stranger.

    Only 65 bucks through Newegg too. :winky:

    Great minds, great minds.

    I can't get super excited about that 10Mb WAN port. I mean, we're getting into the realm of people having faster internet connections than 10Mbps.

    tsmvengy on
    steam_sig.png
  • ErandusErandus Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    tsmvengy wrote: »
    I can't get super excited about that 10Mb WAN port. I mean, we're getting into the realm of people having faster internet connections than 10Mbps.

    I agree, but it's hard to find a reasonably priced 8+ port router with a 100mbit WAN port. It depends on the OP's ISP really, if he requires over 10 mbit for his WAN interface.

    Vash, would you happen to know what speed you get from your ISP?

    Erandus on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • DocDoc Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited May 2009
    The downside of getting an 8 port router is that if there is a large number of machines in one location distant from the modem/router, you are going to have to run multiple cables. If you do a router/switch combo, you just run one cable and put the switch near all the other gear.

    I don't know if this applies to you.

    Doc on
  • ErandusErandus Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Doc wrote: »
    The downside of getting an 8 port router is that if there is a large number of machines in one location distant from the modem/router, you are going to have to run multiple cables. If you do a router/switch combo, you just run one cable and put the switch near all the other gear.

    I don't know if this applies to you.

    Yeah, I touched on that briefly. It somewhat depends on if cost is an issue as well. It's generally cheaper to make multiple cable runs than to buy a switch and run a single cable to it, but then you have a lot more cables to run and hide. It all very much depends on the OP's particular situation.

    Erandus on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • Captain VashCaptain Vash Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Actually I pull down 32mb/s consistently.
    making multiple cable runs is no problem.

    I've got 1000ft of cat5 and all the ends I could need. and a crimper.

    Captain Vash on
    twitterforweb.Stuckens.1,1,500,f4f4f4,0,c4c4c4,000000.png
  • EclecticGrooveEclecticGroove Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    I don't know what kind of traffic you run on your local network, but there is a sizable advantage to having a good gigabit capable switch handling all your internal traffic and leaving the 10/100 ports on the router for nothing more than internet traffic.

    Of course, if you rarely push large amounts of traffic (or just very very large files) through your local LAN then it really won't be an issue.

    EclecticGroove on
  • DarkewolfeDarkewolfe Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Whoever suggested hiring someone to run cable through your walls didn't have a terrible idea, except that you can do it yourself. If you can scrounge up a single person who understands what a stud is and how to find wires in the walls you can knock that project out in a weekend.

    You'll still need to evaluate router suggestions, obviously.

    Darkewolfe on
    What is this I don't even.
  • Captain VashCaptain Vash Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Yeah I'm totally solid on the running the wires on my own no problems there.

    I'm really just looking for a good suggestion on an 8 port router that's at least 10/100 on all ports, 10/100/1000 would be far better.

    Captain Vash on
    twitterforweb.Stuckens.1,1,500,f4f4f4,0,c4c4c4,000000.png
  • lunchbox12682lunchbox12682 MinnesotaRegistered User regular
    edited May 2009
    If you end up wiring up your whole place, I recommend a couple 10/100/1000 switches with one being the top of the tree and plugging that into the router. If you ever do a media server, you'll have 1000 to every device in the place. And you are unlikely to max that out unless doing multiple massive file transfers. As always the outside world bottleneck relies on the router.
    I've done this and I love it. I also did the wiring and jacks myself (well my dad helped). I have a smallish condo but it only took a day and half.

    lunchbox12682 on
  • necroSYSnecroSYS Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited May 2009
    Actually I pull down 32mb/s consistently.

    Yeah, you're definitely going to be looking at more expensive gear if you want a router that's got a 100 Mb WAN interface.

    necroSYS on
  • tsmvengytsmvengy Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Daenris wrote: »
    Well, you could get a router with enough ports, or get a router along with a switch to add additional ports.

    Most consumer level routers come with 4 ports, though you can find them with 8.

    I'd recommend getting a standard router (wireless or wired) that has 4 ports on it, then getting a separate 8 port switch. You should be able to get an okay 8 port 10/100/1000 switch for under $60.

    Edit: Something like this or this for the switch. Maybe something like this for the router. Of course shop around for good deals. If you don't need/want gigabit speeds on the local network you can definitely get away even cheaper with just 10/100 switches and routers.

    This is what you should do. You will get gigabit LAN and WAN. You will have draft N wireless. The "performance hit" from using switches is next to nothing when you're comparing it to the cost of getting EXACTLY what you want.

    You will not find an 8 port router with 10/100/1000 ports that doesn't cost $Texas.

    tsmvengy on
    steam_sig.png
  • ErandusErandus Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Agree, if his internet is that fast, he'll need a router with a faster WAN. I also didn't want to assume anything on his ability to wire his own house, hence the suggestion of having someone to do it.

    Erandus on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • necroSYSnecroSYS Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited May 2009
    tsmvengy wrote: »
    Daenris wrote: »
    Well, you could get a router with enough ports, or get a router along with a switch to add additional ports.

    Most consumer level routers come with 4 ports, though you can find them with 8.

    I'd recommend getting a standard router (wireless or wired) that has 4 ports on it, then getting a separate 8 port switch. You should be able to get an okay 8 port 10/100/1000 switch for under $60.

    Edit: Something like this or this for the switch. Maybe something like this for the router. Of course shop around for good deals. If you don't need/want gigabit speeds on the local network you can definitely get away even cheaper with just 10/100 switches and routers.

    This is what you should do. You will get gigabit LAN and WAN. You will have draft N wireless. The "performance hit" from using switches is next to nothing when you're comparing it to the cost of getting EXACTLY what you want.

    You will not find an 8 port router with 10/100/1000 ports that doesn't cost $Texas.

    If he's going to go that route, he should buy this, instead. Since he said in the OP that wireless won't work in his place, Wireless N DRAFT 2!!! is as useless to him as tits on a bull.

    necroSYS on
  • DaenrisDaenris Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    necroSYS wrote: »
    If he's going to go that route, he should buy this, instead. Since he said in the OP that wireless won't work in his place, Wireless N DRAFT 2!!! is as useless to him as tits on a bull.

    Yes, if he doesn't want gigabit on his local network he should get something like that.

    The one I linked was a reasonably cheap gigabit router that just happened to be wireless. Wired routers are becoming less common because it's pretty cheap for the manufacturer to just include wireless as well. If he can find a cheaper, non-wireless, gigabit router than I would certainly recommend it since he doesn't need the wireless functionality.

    Daenris on
  • rfaliasrfalias Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Don't forget to keep your Cat5(e) segments under 100m

    rfalias on
  • necroSYSnecroSYS Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited May 2009
    Daenris wrote: »
    necroSYS wrote: »
    If he's going to go that route, he should buy this, instead. Since he said in the OP that wireless won't work in his place, Wireless N DRAFT 2!!! is as useless to him as tits on a bull.

    Yes, if he doesn't want gigabit on his local network he should get something like that.

    The one I linked was a reasonably cheap gigabit router that just happened to be wireless. Wired routers are becoming less common because it's pretty cheap for the manufacturer to just include wireless as well. If he can find a cheaper, non-wireless, gigabit router than I would certainly recommend it since he doesn't need the wireless functionality.

    Uh, no. His LAN will be running on the switch, which will be capable of Gigabit speeds. The Router's handling the WAN/LAN transmission, which won't be exceeding 32 Mbps.

    A Gigabit router is a waste of money, because the WAN port will never negotiate that fast.

    necroSYS on
  • tsmvengytsmvengy Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    necroSYS wrote: »
    Daenris wrote: »
    necroSYS wrote: »
    If he's going to go that route, he should buy this, instead. Since he said in the OP that wireless won't work in his place, Wireless N DRAFT 2!!! is as useless to him as tits on a bull.

    Yes, if he doesn't want gigabit on his local network he should get something like that.

    The one I linked was a reasonably cheap gigabit router that just happened to be wireless. Wired routers are becoming less common because it's pretty cheap for the manufacturer to just include wireless as well. If he can find a cheaper, non-wireless, gigabit router than I would certainly recommend it since he doesn't need the wireless functionality.

    Uh, no. His LAN will be running on the switch, which will be capable of Gigabit speeds. The Router's handling the WAN/LAN transmission, which won't be exceeding 32 Mbps.

    A Gigabit router is a waste of money, because the WAN port will never negotiate that fast.

    Unless he also wanted to use some of the LAN ports on the router for devices that are close together and may be close to his internet connection (like the PS3 and Xbox.)

    tsmvengy on
    steam_sig.png
  • necroSYSnecroSYS Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited May 2009
    I guess it's up to him to weigh the cost of the gear vs. the cabling work to the switch and the router vs. the likelihood that his Xbox and PS3 will be talking to their networks at greater than 10Mbps.

    necroSYS on
  • Nakatomi2010Nakatomi2010 Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    This thread just made me have a "Could have had a V8" moment suddenly realizing that networking my entertainment center simply requires a switch under the TV.... Damn...

    In other news I know how I'm going to cable things when I move out of this apartment...

    Nakatomi2010 on
    Check out me building my HTPC (NSF56K) (Updated 1-10-08)
    Movie Collection
    Foody Things
    Holy shit! Sony's new techno toy!
    Wii Friend code: 1445 3205 3057 5295
  • Captain VashCaptain Vash Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    I'm thinking I'll go with the 10/100 router and an 8 port 10/100/1000 switch. that does seem like the way to go these days.

    and I don't think my house is more than 600ft from end to end so no real problem there. the switch'll be centralized.

    Captain Vash on
    twitterforweb.Stuckens.1,1,500,f4f4f4,0,c4c4c4,000000.png
  • Nakatomi2010Nakatomi2010 Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Just remmeber only the devices connected to the switch will operate at gigabit speeds... Might be worth getting a router with gigabit just for consistancy...

    Nakatomi2010 on
    Check out me building my HTPC (NSF56K) (Updated 1-10-08)
    Movie Collection
    Foody Things
    Holy shit! Sony's new techno toy!
    Wii Friend code: 1445 3205 3057 5295
  • Captain VashCaptain Vash Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Just remmeber only the devices connected to the switch will operate at gigabit speeds... Might be worth getting a router with gigabit just for consistancy...

    Just for consistancy?
    Everything will be behind the switch except the internet which caps out at well below 100mb/s

    This a "..." moment for me.

    Captain Vash on
    twitterforweb.Stuckens.1,1,500,f4f4f4,0,c4c4c4,000000.png
  • necroSYSnecroSYS Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited May 2009
    He means if you plug devices into the LAN ports of the router, they will only get 100 Mbps.

    But given that you're getting an 8-port switch, I don't know why you would do that, unless you wanted to DMZ one of your devices and wanted to exclude the switch.

    necroSYS on
  • KrikeeKrikee Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Someone mentioned having a performance hit using switches earlier... ya, no. Don't buy shit gear and you won't have a problem.

    Krikee on
  • Captain VashCaptain Vash Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    in this set up,

    will I want cat6 for my gigafast connections? or will that matter?

    Captain Vash on
    twitterforweb.Stuckens.1,1,500,f4f4f4,0,c4c4c4,000000.png
  • KrikeeKrikee Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    in this set up,

    will I want cat6 for my gigafast connections? or will that matter?
    If you have full Cat5e wiring at the moment I wouldn't bother unless you aren't getting the speeds you think you should be getting (network drivers, the actual NIC, the OS, what media you are transferring from/to can also be limiting factors); not to mention, although crimping Cat5/e is a cakewalk, Cat6 is a pain; plus, you will need different cable tips.

    Krikee on
  • TL DRTL DR Not at all confident in his reflexive opinions of thingsRegistered User regular
    edited May 2009
    As for running the cables:
    -I've heard that putting PVC pipe in the wall and running cable through that is a good way to go, especially if you have to pull it back out.
    -Going under the carpet is surprisingly easy, and shouldn't really be noticeable unless you have a lot of wire in one spot or unusually thin carpet.

    TL DR on
  • Captain VashCaptain Vash Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Maybe you guys can help me with this one.

    I have dual Ethernet ports on my PC, and if I connect to 2 routers at the same time it seems like one of them takes control of my internet connection and the computer refuses to talk to the other router.

    Captain Vash on
    twitterforweb.Stuckens.1,1,500,f4f4f4,0,c4c4c4,000000.png
  • necroSYSnecroSYS Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited May 2009
    Maybe you guys can help me with this one.

    I have dual Ethernet ports on my PC, and if I connect to 2 routers at the same time it seems like one of them takes control of my internet connection and the computer refuses to talk to the other router.

    How do you have the router networks configured?

    necroSYS on
  • ErandusErandus Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    in this set up,

    will I want cat6 for my gigafast connections? or will that matter?
    In 99.999% of residential situations, there will be no noticable difference between Cat5e and Cat6.
    Krikee wrote: »
    Cat6 is a pain; plus, you will need different cable tips.
    Can I get a 'lol wut'?

    Erandus on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • Fort1tudeFort1tude Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    are you sure the routers arnt both trying to use the same IP?

    Fort1tude on
    Steam ID - Fort1tude
  • Captain VashCaptain Vash Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Fort1tude wrote: »
    are you sure the routers arnt both trying to use the same IP?

    I believe this is exactly what the problem is.
    Thank you.

    is making one 192.168.1.1 and the other 192.168.0.1 enough?
    or should i go for a completely different ip like 176.168.1.1 for the second?
    Erandus wrote: »
    Krikee wrote: »
    Cat6 is a pain; plus, you will need different cable tips.
    Can I get a 'lol wut'?

    Yeah. wut lol.

    don't they use the exact same wiring diagram even?

    Captain Vash on
    twitterforweb.Stuckens.1,1,500,f4f4f4,0,c4c4c4,000000.png
  • ErandusErandus Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    is making one 192.168.1.1 and the other 192.168.0.1 enough?
    or should i go for a completely different ip like 176.168.1.1 for the second?
    Assuming they're both handing out class C address ranges, or a pool smaller than 254 addresses (would be standard for residential routers like a Linksys to hand out 50 addresses), simply changing the 3rd octet as you have should be sufficient, but it can't hurt to go radically different just so there's no chance for any confusion in the future.
    Yeah. wut lol.

    don't they use the exact same wiring diagram even?
    The standard wiring for cat6 is identical to cat5e, though technically you can pin out your RJ45's any way you please, as long as it's the same on both ends.

    Erandus on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • KrikeeKrikee Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    The standard pin outs are still used but you need to get Cat6 8p8c (the name of the RJ45 tips) connectors as Cat6 wires are bigger gauge and thus will not fit in a Cat5 8p8c connector.

    Krikee on
Sign In or Register to comment.