The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Round 3: Qorzm vs Robcham

245

Posts

  • Tommy2HandsTommy2Hands what is this where am i Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    Hey Qorgasm, I see you haven't changed your title/location to relfect the new battle

    Tsk Tsk

    Tommy2Hands on
    8j12qx8ma5j5.jpg
  • AMP'dAMP'd Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    I'm really hoping to see Qorzm's name changed to "The Pink Pussy"

    AMP'd on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • The Otaku SuppositoryThe Otaku Suppository Bawstan New EnglandRegistered User regular
    edited June 2009
    Vivixenne wrote: »
    If a forum battle entry is going to be one dude vs. one dude and his entire film crew and thirty friends, I'm gonna vote for the dude by his lonesome everytime because he don't need nobody but a tablet or a number 2 pencil to get shit done.

    that is a silly reason for voting and I hope you realize that

    Perhaps.

    I voted for Rob because I liked his entry better anyway.

    The Otaku Suppository on
  • VixxVixx Valkyrie: prepared! Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    Fishman is a hot dude

    there I said it

    Vixx on
    6cd6kllpmhb0.jpeg
  • QorzmQorzm Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    Hey Qorgasm, I see you haven't changed your title/location to relfect the new battle

    Tsk Tsk
    I completely forgot -- Thanks!

    Qorzm on
  • MonkeyfeetMonkeyfeet Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    I have an entire factory of underpaid children in China working on my entry

    Monkeyfeet on
    sig1.jpg
  • RaneadosRaneados police apologist you shouldn't have been there, obviouslyRegistered User regular
    edited June 2009
    Monkeyfeet wrote: »
    I have an entire factory of underpaid children in China working on my entry

    excellent

    Raneados on
  • VixxVixx Valkyrie: prepared! Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    Monkeyfeet wrote: »
    I have an entire factory of underpaid children in China working on my entry

    you got my vote

    Vixx on
    6cd6kllpmhb0.jpeg
  • Synthetic OrangeSynthetic Orange Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    All these cameos! :O

    Synthetic Orange on
  • Blake TBlake T Do you have enemies then? Good. That means you’ve stood up for something, sometime in your life.Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    If a forum battle entry is going to be one dude vs. one dude and his entire film crew and thirty friends, I'm gonna vote for the dude by his lonesome everytime because he don't need nobody but a tablet or a number 2 pencil to get shit done.

    Because you know, coming to the battle with original ideas and organsational skills to make something that is close to a production is a bad thing.

    Blake T on
  • Synthetic OrangeSynthetic Orange Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    Look at this guy, showing off all his friends, thinking he's better'n us.

    (so lonely)

    Synthetic Orange on
  • nateknatek unh unh Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    Blaket wrote: »
    If a forum battle entry is going to be one dude vs. one dude and his entire film crew and thirty friends, I'm gonna vote for the dude by his lonesome everytime because he don't need nobody but a tablet or a number 2 pencil to get shit done.

    Because you know, coming to the battle with original ideas and organsational skills to make something that is close to a production is a bad thing.

    devil's avocado here
    but someone could also go to their more talented friends and get them to do a majority of the work

    natek on
  • sarukunsarukun RIESLING OCEANRegistered User regular
    edited June 2009
    Qorzm's videos make me uncomfortable.

    sarukun on
  • The Otaku SuppositoryThe Otaku Suppository Bawstan New EnglandRegistered User regular
    edited June 2009
    Blaket wrote: »
    If a forum battle entry is going to be one dude vs. one dude and his entire film crew and thirty friends, I'm gonna vote for the dude by his lonesome everytime because he don't need nobody but a tablet or a number 2 pencil to get shit done.

    Because you know, coming to the battle with original ideas and organsational skills to make something that is close to a production is a bad thing.

    I didn't say it was a bad thing. But it can also be a case of too many cooks ruining the soup.

    And when you have a film crew vs one dude. That still smacks of David v. Goliath a bit.

    The Otaku Suppository on
  • YaYaYaYa Decent. Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    sorry Qorzm, if it was just part one and the Wombat ending you would have won me

    the tube stuff just didn't have any real point to the story and it wasn't that funny

    however, there was no perning, so I thank you for that

    Rob, spectacular as always

    YaYa on
  • VixxVixx Valkyrie: prepared! Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    Blaket wrote: »
    If a forum battle entry is going to be one dude vs. one dude and his entire film crew and thirty friends, I'm gonna vote for the dude by his lonesome everytime because he don't need nobody but a tablet or a number 2 pencil to get shit done.

    Because you know, coming to the battle with original ideas and organsational skills to make something that is close to a production is a bad thing.

    I didn't say it was a bad thing. But it can also be a case of too many cooks ruining the soup.

    And when you have a film crew vs one dude. That still smacks of David v. Goliath a bit.

    we could say the reverse is true for a well-known and talented artist in SE++

    busting out all you've got is probably the only way someone who cannot draw or animate well can win in that kind of situation

    that's a David v. Goliath too

    Vixx on
    6cd6kllpmhb0.jpeg
  • Blake TBlake T Do you have enemies then? Good. That means you’ve stood up for something, sometime in your life.Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    Blaket wrote: »
    If a forum battle entry is going to be one dude vs. one dude and his entire film crew and thirty friends, I'm gonna vote for the dude by his lonesome everytime because he don't need nobody but a tablet or a number 2 pencil to get shit done.

    Because you know, coming to the battle with original ideas and organsational skills to make something that is close to a production is a bad thing.

    I didn't say it was a bad thing. But it can also be a case of too many cooks ruining the soup.

    Yes you did.

    You said you were going to vote for one person because he did it by himself.

    You did not say that the multiple people in his Video dragged the quality down, you said it did not deserve your vote because it had multiple participants.

    Blake T on
  • Tommy2HandsTommy2Hands what is this where am i Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    Qorzm wrote: »
    Hey Qorgasm, I see you haven't changed your title/location to relfect the new battle

    Tsk Tsk
    I completely forgot -- Thanks!

    TSK TSK

    Tommy2Hands on
    8j12qx8ma5j5.jpg
  • nateknatek unh unh Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    voting for one person because they worked alone with no help is still better than voting because "I GOT A CAMEO!"

    natek on
  • Blake TBlake T Do you have enemies then? Good. That means you’ve stood up for something, sometime in your life.Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    natek wrote: »
    Blaket wrote: »
    If a forum battle entry is going to be one dude vs. one dude and his entire film crew and thirty friends, I'm gonna vote for the dude by his lonesome everytime because he don't need nobody but a tablet or a number 2 pencil to get shit done.

    Because you know, coming to the battle with original ideas and organsational skills to make something that is close to a production is a bad thing.

    devil's avocado here
    but someone could also go to their more talented friends and get them to do a majority of the work

    Well yes, but I don't think people really do that here do they?

    I mean shit, I got Viv to help me, she drew the punch marks and the health bars and a few of the cameos and no one complained about that.

    Blake T on
  • Randall_FlaggRandall_Flagg Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    hey qorzm

    hey hey

    hey qorzm

    cut your fucking hair

    Randall_Flagg on
  • Blake TBlake T Do you have enemies then? Good. That means you’ve stood up for something, sometime in your life.Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    natek wrote: »
    voting for one person because they worked alone with no help is still better than voting because "I GOT A CAMEO!"

    I liked the cameos.

    Wiggin's in Vargas' in particular was awesome.

    Blake T on
  • Tommy2HandsTommy2Hands what is this where am i Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    That was pretty great

    Tommy2Hands on
    8j12qx8ma5j5.jpg
  • The Otaku SuppositoryThe Otaku Suppository Bawstan New EnglandRegistered User regular
    edited June 2009
    Blaket wrote: »
    Blaket wrote: »
    If a forum battle entry is going to be one dude vs. one dude and his entire film crew and thirty friends, I'm gonna vote for the dude by his lonesome everytime because he don't need nobody but a tablet or a number 2 pencil to get shit done.

    Because you know, coming to the battle with original ideas and organsational skills to make something that is close to a production is a bad thing.

    I didn't say it was a bad thing. But it can also be a case of too many cooks ruining the soup.

    Yes you did.

    You said you were going to vote for one person because he did it by himself.

    You did not say that the multiple people in his Video dragged the quality down, you said it did not deserve your vote because it had multiple participants.

    So do you get anything out of this or what's your angle here? Because it's seems like you're really invested in this.

    I'm sorry I and the majority of the voters liked Robcham's. I'm sorry I didn't produce a treatise on why and why not I voted for an entry. I voted for Rob because I liked his more. Qorzm's first part was good but then it got uneccesary and confusing. I posted how I would vote for the one dude vs the other after I voted so I suppose this makes it all moot. Or would you like to lay me out on a pysch's couch and talk about how the post I made after I voted had already colored my opinions and created a bias on which I voted. Or can we just move the fuck on?

    The Otaku Suppository on
  • TheySlashThemTheySlashThem Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    >freak the fuck out

    TheySlashThem on
  • sarukunsarukun RIESLING OCEANRegistered User regular
    edited June 2009
    Qorzm needs to learn the important lesson that "less is more".


    Like watching a live action version of CAD.

    sarukun on
  • nateknatek unh unh Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    I don't think blaket is nearly as invested in this argument as you are

    natek on
  • The Otaku SuppositoryThe Otaku Suppository Bawstan New EnglandRegistered User regular
    edited June 2009
    excellent timing tdot

    The Otaku Suppository on
  • VixxVixx Valkyrie: prepared! Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    Blaket wrote: »
    Blaket wrote: »
    If a forum battle entry is going to be one dude vs. one dude and his entire film crew and thirty friends, I'm gonna vote for the dude by his lonesome everytime because he don't need nobody but a tablet or a number 2 pencil to get shit done.

    Because you know, coming to the battle with original ideas and organsational skills to make something that is close to a production is a bad thing.

    I didn't say it was a bad thing. But it can also be a case of too many cooks ruining the soup.

    Yes you did.

    You said you were going to vote for one person because he did it by himself.

    You did not say that the multiple people in his Video dragged the quality down, you said it did not deserve your vote because it had multiple participants.

    So do you get anything out of this or what's your angle here? Because it's seems like you're really invested in this.

    I'm sorry I and the majority of the voters liked Robcham's. I'm sorry I didn't produce a treatise on why and why not I voted for an entry. I voted for Rob because I liked his more. Qorzm's first part was good but then it got uneccesary and confusing. I posted how I would vote for the one dude vs the other after I voted so I suppose this makes it all moot. Or would you like to lay me out on a pysch's couch and talk about how the post I made after I voted had already colored my opinions and created a bias on which I voted. Or can we just move the fuck on?

    what is the matter with you

    we're commenting on your post because in it you appear to explain why you voted for Rob

    DUH you vote for the one you liked

    but by your post it didn't seem that way, it gave off the impression that you were voting for David just because he was David

    so RELAX

    you're the one basically flipping out here

    Vixx on
    6cd6kllpmhb0.jpeg
  • nateknatek unh unh Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    viv, his name is rob

    roooooob

    natek on
  • YaYaYaYa Decent. Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    sarukun wrote: »
    Qorzm needs to learn the important lesson that "less is more".


    Like watching a live action version of CAD.

    yeah this is basically my issue

    now that I'm over the whole "holy shit he made a sitcom" thing

    YaYa on
  • Tommy2HandsTommy2Hands what is this where am i Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    Wait, who's David?

    I do not remember a David choice when I was voting

    Tommy2Hands on
    8j12qx8ma5j5.jpg
  • sarukunsarukun RIESLING OCEANRegistered User regular
    edited June 2009
    I would totally vote for Goliath

    sarukun on
  • nateknatek unh unh Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    Wait, who's David?

    I do not remember a David choice when I was voting

    David v. Goliath

    david is rob because he worked alone, qorzm is goliath because he had others in the video

    come on tommy

    i mean...

    FUCK

    natek on
  • Tommy2HandsTommy2Hands what is this where am i Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    Goliath's a bitch

    EDIT: When was David v Goliath ever mentioned?

    I mean, it makes sense, but you can't blame me for not catching the reference if it's not mentioned beforehand

    Tommy2Hands on
    8j12qx8ma5j5.jpg
  • sarukunsarukun RIESLING OCEANRegistered User regular
    edited June 2009
    YaYa wrote: »
    sarukun wrote: »
    Qorzm needs to learn the important lesson that "less is more".


    Like watching a live action version of CAD.

    yeah this is basically my issue

    now that I'm over the whole "holy shit he made a sitcom" thing

    I don't need these things to fill up 15 minutes of my day. Hook me in 15 seconds or I'm gone.

    sarukun on
  • Blake TBlake T Do you have enemies then? Good. That means you’ve stood up for something, sometime in your life.Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    Blaket wrote: »
    Blaket wrote: »
    If a forum battle entry is going to be one dude vs. one dude and his entire film crew and thirty friends, I'm gonna vote for the dude by his lonesome everytime because he don't need nobody but a tablet or a number 2 pencil to get shit done.

    Because you know, coming to the battle with original ideas and organsational skills to make something that is close to a production is a bad thing.

    I didn't say it was a bad thing. But it can also be a case of too many cooks ruining the soup.

    Yes you did.

    You said you were going to vote for one person because he did it by himself.

    You did not say that the multiple people in his Video dragged the quality down, you said it did not deserve your vote because it had multiple participants.

    So do you get anything out of this or what's your angle here? Because it's seems like you're really invested in this.

    I'm sorry I and the majority of the voters liked Robcham's. I'm sorry I didn't produce a treatise on why and why not I voted for an entry. I voted for Rob because I liked his more. Qorzm's first part was good but then it got uneccesary and confusing. I posted how I would vote for the one dude vs the other after I voted so I suppose this makes it all moot. Or would you like to lay me out on a pysch's couch and talk about how the post I made after I voted had already colored my opinions and created a bias on which I voted. Or can we just move the fuck on?

    Oh, that's ok.

    You are totally backpedalling on what you say then.

    Continue, please.

    Blake T on
  • Blake TBlake T Do you have enemies then? Good. That means you’ve stood up for something, sometime in your life.Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    natek wrote: »
    I don't think blaket is nearly as invested in this argument as you are
    Man what I am currently invested in is how much over the counter medication can fuck you up.

    Blake T on
  • DarkPrimusDarkPrimus Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    Your vessel of improv kind of ran out of steam here unfortunately, Qorzm.

    But you had a good run.

    DarkPrimus on
  • The Otaku SuppositoryThe Otaku Suppository Bawstan New EnglandRegistered User regular
    edited June 2009
    Vivixenne wrote: »
    Blaket wrote: »
    Blaket wrote: »
    If a forum battle entry is going to be one dude vs. one dude and his entire film crew and thirty friends, I'm gonna vote for the dude by his lonesome everytime because he don't need nobody but a tablet or a number 2 pencil to get shit done.

    Because you know, coming to the battle with original ideas and organsational skills to make something that is close to a production is a bad thing.

    I didn't say it was a bad thing. But it can also be a case of too many cooks ruining the soup.

    Yes you did.

    You said you were going to vote for one person because he did it by himself.

    You did not say that the multiple people in his Video dragged the quality down, you said it did not deserve your vote because it had multiple participants.

    So do you get anything out of this or what's your angle here? Because it's seems like you're really invested in this.

    I'm sorry I and the majority of the voters liked Robcham's. I'm sorry I didn't produce a treatise on why and why not I voted for an entry. I voted for Rob because I liked his more. Qorzm's first part was good but then it got uneccesary and confusing. I posted how I would vote for the one dude vs the other after I voted so I suppose this makes it all moot. Or would you like to lay me out on a pysch's couch and talk about how the post I made after I voted had already colored my opinions and created a bias on which I voted. Or can we just move the fuck on?

    what is the matter with you

    we're commenting on your post because in it you appear to explain why you voted for Rob

    DUH you vote for the one you liked

    but by your post it didn't seem that way, it gave off the impression that you were voting for David just because he was David

    so RELAX

    I said two pages back I voted for Rob's because I liked it better and Blaket continues to dwell on the post like a trial lawyer

    Even if I voted one over the other because of something trivial whoop-dee doo

    I don't understand why you people care so much.

    The Otaku Suppository on
This discussion has been closed.