I kind of hope we're the Klingons of the galaxy. That humans are the crazy war like savage beastmen and the rest of the aliens are all hippy fucking pussies who will look at us like we're insane savages. They'll kiss our ass though because nobody will want to fuck with us, because we'll kill you and rape your corpse.
hunter we should be the scouts for the colony ships
All smacking ET around and stealing his lunch money.
I kind of hope we're the Klingons of the galaxy. That humans are the crazy war like savage beastmen and the rest of the aliens are all hippy fucking pussies who will look at us like we're insane savages. They'll kiss our ass though because nobody will want to fuck with us, because we'll kill you and rape your corpse.
romulans bro
Same basic thing. Or like the Krogan from Mass Effect. Like we breed faster and reach maturity quicker then alien species, plus fighting and aggression are just basic to us where the aliens are all liberal pansy asses who have feelings and discuss things.
So just I'm clear, the plan is to ram a rocket into the moon to create a hole and this LRO goes flying in after it, 10 minutes later?
NASA doesn't exactly have the best record when it's strategy involves crashing machines into static objects at high velocities and then expecting said machines to survive said crash and send back data.
Maybe we should just spend the money to send a human being back to the moon and give him a shovel or digging device. Or a divining rod. Unless they can't because....we didn't actually land on the moon. The dark truth is revealed!!!!!
heavenly bodies are not static
yes mars may be rotating on its axis, but the ground wasn't moving when the probe smacked into it
you don't seem to understand
planets whip through space at thousands of miles
perfectly guessing the trajectory and accurately hitting it are not easy
No one is saying anything about it being easy. I'm just saying there needs to be a better strategy than trying to ram something into something else
So just I'm clear, the plan is to ram a rocket into the moon to create a hole and this LRO goes flying in after it, 10 minutes later?
NASA doesn't exactly have the best record when it's strategy involves crashing machines into static objects at high velocities and then expecting said machines to survive said crash and send back data.
Maybe we should just spend the money to send a human being back to the moon and give him a shovel or digging device. Or a divining rod. Unless they can't because....we didn't actually land on the moon. The dark truth is revealed!!!!!
heavenly bodies are not static
yes mars may be rotating on its axis, but the ground wasn't moving when the probe smacked into it
you don't seem to understand
planets whip through space at thousands of miles
perfectly guessing the trajectory and accurately hitting it are not easy
To be fair though, NASA could do this if they could properly convert inches to centimeters.
So just I'm clear, the plan is to ram a rocket into the moon to create a hole and this LRO goes flying in after it, 10 minutes later?
NASA doesn't exactly have the best record when it's strategy involves crashing machines into static objects at high velocities and then expecting said machines to survive said crash and send back data.
Maybe we should just spend the money to send a human being back to the moon and give him a shovel or digging device. Or a divining rod. Unless they can't because....we didn't actually land on the moon. The dark truth is revealed!!!!!
heavenly bodies are not static
yes mars may be rotating on its axis, but the ground wasn't moving when the probe smacked into it
you don't seem to understand
planets whip through space at thousands of miles
perfectly guessing the trajectory and accurately hitting it are not easy
No one is saying anything about it being easy. I'm just saying there needs to be a better strategy than trying to ram something into something else
that is how we also make things
PiptheFair on
0
HunterChemist with a heart of AuRegistered Userregular
the Solarians were crazy, and all voiced by fucking Whacko
The Krogan would ass rape the Solarians. In fact the Krogan were kicking the ass of all the Citadel species until the Turians came out of nowhere and held them to a stalemate. Even then it took a genetic weapon beyond belief to stop them.
So just I'm clear, the plan is to ram a rocket into the moon to create a hole and this LRO goes flying in after it, 10 minutes later?
NASA doesn't exactly have the best record when it's strategy involves crashing machines into static objects at high velocities and then expecting said machines to survive said crash and send back data.
Maybe we should just spend the money to send a human being back to the moon and give him a shovel or digging device. Or a divining rod. Unless they can't because....we didn't actually land on the moon. The dark truth is revealed!!!!!
heavenly bodies are not static
yes mars may be rotating on its axis, but the ground wasn't moving when the probe smacked into it
you don't seem to understand
planets whip through space at thousands of miles
perfectly guessing the trajectory and accurately hitting it are not easy
No one is saying anything about it being easy. I'm just saying there needs to be a better strategy than trying to ram something into something else
if it's a good enough strategy for procreation, it's good enough for lunar exploration
Mysst on
0
HunterChemist with a heart of AuRegistered Userregular
So just I'm clear, the plan is to ram a rocket into the moon to create a hole and this LRO goes flying in after it, 10 minutes later?
NASA doesn't exactly have the best record when it's strategy involves crashing machines into static objects at high velocities and then expecting said machines to survive said crash and send back data.
Maybe we should just spend the money to send a human being back to the moon and give him a shovel or digging device. Or a divining rod. Unless they can't because....we didn't actually land on the moon. The dark truth is revealed!!!!!
heavenly bodies are not static
yes mars may be rotating on its axis, but the ground wasn't moving when the probe smacked into it
you don't seem to understand
planets whip through space at thousands of miles
perfectly guessing the trajectory and accurately hitting it are not easy
No one is saying anything about it being easy. I'm just saying there needs to be a better strategy than trying to ram something into something else
if it's a good enough strategy for procreation, it's good enough for lunar exploration
So just I'm clear, the plan is to ram a rocket into the moon to create a hole and this LRO goes flying in after it, 10 minutes later?
NASA doesn't exactly have the best record when it's strategy involves crashing machines into static objects at high velocities and then expecting said machines to survive said crash and send back data.
Maybe we should just spend the money to send a human being back to the moon and give him a shovel or digging device. Or a divining rod. Unless they can't because....we didn't actually land on the moon. The dark truth is revealed!!!!!
heavenly bodies are not static
yes mars may be rotating on its axis, but the ground wasn't moving when the probe smacked into it
you don't seem to understand
planets whip through space at thousands of miles
perfectly guessing the trajectory and accurately hitting it are not easy
No one is saying anything about it being easy. I'm just saying there needs to be a better strategy than trying to ram something into something else
that is how we also make things
and you are living proof of what a horrible strategy this has turned out to be
The Otaku Suppository on
0
cadmunkyOne hand on the bottle,The other a shaking fist.Registered Userregular
So just I'm clear, the plan is to ram a rocket into the moon to create a hole and this LRO goes flying in after it, 10 minutes later?
NASA doesn't exactly have the best record when it's strategy involves crashing machines into static objects at high velocities and then expecting said machines to survive said crash and send back data.
Maybe we should just spend the money to send a human being back to the moon and give him a shovel or digging device. Or a divining rod. Unless they can't because....we didn't actually land on the moon. The dark truth is revealed!!!!!
Actually, NASA has a track record of crashing shit pretty well instead of lightly bouncing it off the surface in a huge balloon, all because they failed to convert from metric to standard units like big boys and girls.
After a journey of more than two billion miles, NEAR Shoemaker gently landed on the tips of two solar panels and its bottom edge on February 12, 2001, at 3:01 p.m. (EST). The spacecraft snapped 69 detailed pictures during the final three miles (five km) of its descent, the highest resolution images ever obtained of an asteroid, showing features as small as one centimeter across.
So just I'm clear, the plan is to ram a rocket into the moon to create a hole and this LRO goes flying in after it, 10 minutes later?
NASA doesn't exactly have the best record when it's strategy involves crashing machines into static objects at high velocities and then expecting said machines to survive said crash and send back data.
Maybe we should just spend the money to send a human being back to the moon and give him a shovel or digging device. Or a divining rod. Unless they can't because....we didn't actually land on the moon. The dark truth is revealed!!!!!
Actually, NASA has a track record of crashing shit pretty well instead of lightly bouncing it off the surface in a huge balloon, all because they failed to convert from metric to standard units like big boys and girls.
After a journey of more than two billion miles, NEAR Shoemaker gently landed on the tips of two solar panels and its bottom edge on February 12, 2001, at 3:01 p.m. (EST). The spacecraft snapped 69 detailed pictures during the final three miles (five km) of its descent, the highest resolution images ever obtained of an asteroid, showing features as small as one centimeter across.
So just I'm clear, the plan is to ram a rocket into the moon to create a hole and this LRO goes flying in after it, 10 minutes later?
NASA doesn't exactly have the best record when it's strategy involves crashing machines into static objects at high velocities and then expecting said machines to survive said crash and send back data.
Maybe we should just spend the money to send a human being back to the moon and give him a shovel or digging device. Or a divining rod. Unless they can't because....we didn't actually land on the moon. The dark truth is revealed!!!!!
Actually, NASA has a track record of crashing shit pretty well instead of lightly bouncing it off the surface in a huge balloon, all because they failed to convert from metric to standard units like big boys and girls.
After a journey of more than two billion miles, NEAR Shoemaker gently landed on the tips of two solar panels and its bottom edge on February 12, 2001, at 3:01 p.m. (EST). The spacecraft snapped 69 detailed pictures during the final three miles (five km) of its descent, the highest resolution images ever obtained of an asteroid, showing features as small as one centimeter across.
So just I'm clear, the plan is to ram a rocket into the moon to create a hole and this LRO goes flying in after it, 10 minutes later?
NASA doesn't exactly have the best record when it's strategy involves crashing machines into static objects at high velocities and then expecting said machines to survive said crash and send back data.
Maybe we should just spend the money to send a human being back to the moon and give him a shovel or digging device. Or a divining rod. Unless they can't because....we didn't actually land on the moon. The dark truth is revealed!!!!!
Actually, NASA has a track record of crashing shit pretty well instead of lightly bouncing it off the surface in a huge balloon, all because they failed to convert from metric to standard units like big boys and girls.
After a journey of more than two billion miles, NEAR Shoemaker gently landed on the tips of two solar panels and its bottom edge on February 12, 2001, at 3:01 p.m. (EST). The spacecraft snapped 69 detailed pictures during the final three miles (five km) of its descent, the highest resolution images ever obtained of an asteroid, showing features as small as one centimeter across.
So just I'm clear, the plan is to ram a rocket into the moon to create a hole and this LRO goes flying in after it, 10 minutes later?
NASA doesn't exactly have the best record when it's strategy involves crashing machines into static objects at high velocities and then expecting said machines to survive said crash and send back data.
Maybe we should just spend the money to send a human being back to the moon and give him a shovel or digging device. Or a divining rod. Unless they can't because....we didn't actually land on the moon. The dark truth is revealed!!!!!
heavenly bodies are not static
yes mars may be rotating on its axis, but the ground wasn't moving when the probe smacked into it
you don't seem to understand
planets whip through space at thousands of miles
perfectly guessing the trajectory and accurately hitting it are not easy
No one is saying anything about it being easy. I'm just saying there needs to be a better strategy than trying to ram something into something else
if it's a good enough strategy for procreation, it's good enough for lunar exploration
So we get the moon drunk and see what happens?
no, we get the moon drunk and make things happen
bro
Mysst on
0
JimothyNot in front of the foxhe's with the owlRegistered Userregular
I kind of hope we're the Klingons of the galaxy. That humans are the crazy war like savage beastmen and the rest of the aliens are all hippy fucking pussies who will look at us like we're insane savages. They'll kiss our ass though because nobody will want to fuck with us, because we'll kill you and rape your corpse.
I hope Americans are remembered as a really warlike people. Then high school sports teams in the future will call themselves the Americans.
So just I'm clear, the plan is to ram a rocket into the moon to create a hole and this LRO goes flying in after it, 10 minutes later?
NASA doesn't exactly have the best record when it's strategy involves crashing machines into static objects at high velocities and then expecting said machines to survive said crash and send back data.
Maybe we should just spend the money to send a human being back to the moon and give him a shovel or digging device. Or a divining rod. Unless they can't because....we didn't actually land on the moon. The dark truth is revealed!!!!!
heavenly bodies are not static
yes mars may be rotating on its axis, but the ground wasn't moving when the probe smacked into it
you don't seem to understand
planets whip through space at thousands of miles
perfectly guessing the trajectory and accurately hitting it are not easy
No one is saying anything about it being easy. I'm just saying there needs to be a better strategy than trying to ram something into something else
if it's a good enough strategy for procreation, it's good enough for lunar exploration
So we get the moon drunk and see what happens?
no, we get the moon drunk and make things happen
bro
sometimes you've got to make some love
and fucking give her some smoochies too
So just I'm clear, the plan is to ram a rocket into the moon to create a hole and this LRO goes flying in after it, 10 minutes later?
NASA doesn't exactly have the best record when it's strategy involves crashing machines into static objects at high velocities and then expecting said machines to survive said crash and send back data.
Maybe we should just spend the money to send a human being back to the moon and give him a shovel or digging device. Or a divining rod. Unless they can't because....we didn't actually land on the moon. The dark truth is revealed!!!!!
heavenly bodies are not static
yes mars may be rotating on its axis, but the ground wasn't moving when the probe smacked into it
you don't seem to understand
planets whip through space at thousands of miles
perfectly guessing the trajectory and accurately hitting it are not easy
No one is saying anything about it being easy. I'm just saying there needs to be a better strategy than trying to ram something into something else
if it's a good enough strategy for procreation, it's good enough for lunar exploration
So we get the moon drunk and see what happens?
no, we get the moon drunk and make things happen
bro
sometimes you've got to make some love
and fucking give her some smoochies too
if you're not careful that's gonna be your ringtone!
Posts
the davey crocket from MGS3 is a real thing
That's what wikipedia says, it's a pretty big island but the video still might be mislabeled.
EDIT: Or apparently it's not real at all.
All smacking ET around and stealing his lunch money.
Secret Satan 2013 Wishlist
I know, but it's not as whimsical
Same basic thing. Or like the Krogan from Mass Effect. Like we breed faster and reach maturity quicker then alien species, plus fighting and aggression are just basic to us where the aliens are all liberal pansy asses who have feelings and discuss things.
Secret Satan 2013 Wishlist
No one is saying anything about it being easy. I'm just saying there needs to be a better strategy than trying to ram something into something else
To be fair though, NASA could do this if they could properly convert inches to centimeters.
Secret Satan 2013 Wishlist
The Krogan would ass rape the Solarians. In fact the Krogan were kicking the ass of all the Citadel species until the Turians came out of nowhere and held them to a stalemate. Even then it took a genetic weapon beyond belief to stop them.
Secret Satan 2013 Wishlist
Secret Satan 2013 Wishlist
but mushroom clouds are pretty damn sexy
and you are living proof of what a horrible strategy this has turned out to be
actually...
NEAR
LANDING ON EROS
After a journey of more than two billion miles, NEAR Shoemaker gently landed on the tips of two solar panels and its bottom edge on February 12, 2001, at 3:01 p.m. (EST). The spacecraft snapped 69 detailed pictures during the final three miles (five km) of its descent, the highest resolution images ever obtained of an asteroid, showing features as small as one centimeter across.
"Think of it as Evolution in Action"
Actually
NASA = NEED ANOTHER SEVEN ASTRONAUTS who can convert to metric
Secret Satan 2013 Wishlist
reason for the original fuck up with the Hubble
yes, i remember that. that's JPL for you. i was just pointing out that we can do it only if we don't really mean to.
"Think of it as Evolution in Action"
bro
I hope Americans are remembered as a really warlike people. Then high school sports teams in the future will call themselves the Americans.
sometimes you've got to make some love
and fucking give her some smoochies too
We've always been at war with Eurasia.
I mean The Moon.
The Moon Portal
No you can't. You can't do any worse than Tenacious D for a ringtone.