The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Blood Bowl Serials controversy!

1356710

Posts

  • Gnome-InterruptusGnome-Interruptus Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    kedinik wrote: »
    Cyanide's own post does not even claim the copies to be illegal, it only states that they're blacklisting every single instance of all such sales from any website; I guarantee you that legit customers and companies will lose money over this blanket knee-jerk reaction.

    Cyanide made a rookie mistake in neglecting to region lock their keys, and now they're forcing customers to eat the damages on account of it.

    If the product that G2Play is selling you doesnt live up to its expectations, then I'm sure being a model and legit business they would have no problem providing you with an exchange or refund right?

    Hey, that guy selling computer and stereo parts out of his van has some great deals. What right does the Police have in taking it all away again from me.

    Gnome-Interruptus on
    steam_sig.png
    MWO: Adamski
  • OrogogusOrogogus San DiegoRegistered User regular
    edited July 2009
    kedinik wrote: »
    Cyanide made a rookie mistake in neglecting to region lock their keys.

    What, on the PC? I don't think you see much region locking of computer software unless it's purchased through a content delivery system like Steam.

    EDIT: If I had to guess, I would say that the way most companies avoid this is simply not selling into territories that can't bear a comparably high price point.

    Orogogus on
  • AddaAdda LondonRegistered User regular
    edited July 2009
    All depends on how they got the keys.

    I said no to the game as soon as I saw they wanted to charge £40 for it against $50 anyway.

    Adda on
    steam_sig.png
    I want to know more PA people on Twitter.
  • kedinikkedinik Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    If the product that G2Play is selling you doesnt live up to its expectations, then I'm sure being a model and legit business they would have no problem providing you with an exchange or refund right?

    Anecdotally, they do a lot of business selling CD keys for Valve games and Valve has not gone after them in any way; I'm inclined to think they're honestly run.

    kedinik on
  • ZephosZephos Climbin in yo ski lifts, snatchin your people up. MichiganRegistered User regular
    edited July 2009
    I must admit this is the first i've heard of the G2play site and of any sort of serial controversy such as this...

    but if G2play obtained their keys legally (including buying them en masse from say an asian country offering substantially lower priced games) I dont see why in any shape or form that cyanide should ban the keys. as the first sale doctrine, from my understanding of it, clearly allows them to be sold.

    Zephos on
    Xbox One/360: Penguin McCool
  • slurpeepoopslurpeepoop Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    The reason most companies stagger their game releases is to get as much money as possible from Western "civilized' regions (NA, EU, JPN, AUS) first, and as sales drop to a trickle, they THEN release the game in the piracy-heavy/poor countries is to avoid this exact situation. The "rich" regions easily subsidize the game, allowing the game companies to charge much less in the poorer regions.

    It is absolutely retarded in this day and age to release something digital like this in vastly different markets at vastly different prices, then get all butthurt when people buy the cheaper version.

    The company selling the cd-keys is as legal as people selling Collector's Editions of WoW on eBay and Amazon, if the stories that they bought a ton of Chinese copies are true. They bought the game (and the legit cd key), and they are well within their rights to sell the key at any price they want. If they bought 20,000 copies legitimately, and decided to sell the keys for a buck fiddy, there's not a law in the world that can stop them.

    Yes, it potentially costs the game developer/manufactuer money, but just about every company does the exact same thing when they manufacture their discs, boxes, etc. in China or Taiwan. They can get the same product, materials, and so on in Europe or the USA, but it costs 5 times as much.

    The fact that this company (and Sony with their shenanigans with the PSP, as well as many others) get mad when common sense doesn't allow them to milk their customer base is absolutely asinine.

    Now, having said all that, since it's their game (and potentially servers, matchmaking software, etc.), they are within their rights to ban everyone if their EULA states that they can close the game down at any time (like EA). It's a dickhole move, but it's not any more dickholish than people, in a global economy like ours, wanting to save money by buying from someone who follows the same business plan as every company ever, potentially even the company throwing a hissy fit right now.

    It's not the customer's fault that they didn't realize that someone, whether it was an importer of these other guys, would make the cheap versions available to people who would normally be forced to pay 4 times the amount for the exact same product.

    slurpeepoop on
  • Gnome-InterruptusGnome-Interruptus Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    kedinik wrote: »
    If the product that G2Play is selling you doesnt live up to its expectations, then I'm sure being a model and legit business they would have no problem providing you with an exchange or refund right?

    Anecdotally, they do a lot of business selling CD keys for Valve games and Valve has not gone after them in any way; I'm inclined to think they're honestly run.

    Or Valve is a large enough publisher that they can survive an unlicensed/unauthorized dealer undercutting them in some markets.

    Lack of legal action doesnt necessitate that the actions taken were legal. And from what I can find G2Play head office is listed as being in Singapore, but if you actually try to find them as a listed business in Singapore, they dont exist, and all payments are done through Paypal...

    Gnome-Interruptus on
    steam_sig.png
    MWO: Adamski
  • DiannaoChongDiannaoChong Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    So why isnt it legal to sell a serial straight out of the box if the box was purchased legitimately? Or is the thought that these wernt purchased legitimately? I dont get the issue from the devs unless these serials were generated. For all we know they already have their money from those sales. It honestly sounds like they fucked up on distribution and want their cake/eat it too.

    DiannaoChong on
    steam_sig.png
  • ZephosZephos Climbin in yo ski lifts, snatchin your people up. MichiganRegistered User regular
    edited July 2009
    So why isnt it legal to sell a serial straight out of the box if the box was purchased legitimately? Or is the thought that these wernt purchased legitimately? I dont get the issue from the devs unless these serials were generated. For all we know they already have their money from those sales. It honestly sounds like they fucked up on distribution and want their cake/eat it too.

    Since its Digitally distributed the idea here is that G2play may have bought them for 10 bucks a pop, is selling them for 15.... to people around the world including the US and Europe where they are charging at least double.

    Edit: Therefore cyanide is missing out on an opportunity for more dollas.

    Zephos on
    Xbox One/360: Penguin McCool
  • DiannaoChongDiannaoChong Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    kedinik wrote: »
    If the product that G2Play is selling you doesnt live up to its expectations, then I'm sure being a model and legit business they would have no problem providing you with an exchange or refund right?

    Anecdotally, they do a lot of business selling CD keys for Valve games and Valve has not gone after them in any way; I'm inclined to think they're honestly run.

    Anecdotally as well I have bought blizzard game keys and know several others who have as well, and bound them to bnet accounts and they havent failed yet. I think we would get news of blizzard "warning against" and taking the company out not so silently in the middle of the night.

    DiannaoChong on
    steam_sig.png
  • DiannaoChongDiannaoChong Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Zephos wrote: »
    So why isnt it legal to sell a serial straight out of the box if the box was purchased legitimately? Or is the thought that these wernt purchased legitimately? I dont get the issue from the devs unless these serials were generated. For all we know they already have their money from those sales. It honestly sounds like they fucked up on distribution and want their cake/eat it too.

    Since its Digitally distributed the idea here is that G2play may have bought them for 10 bucks a pop, is selling them for 15.... to people around the world including the US and Europe where they are charging at least double.

    And this is against their distribution agreement? I mean if there isnt any and they just bought them to push, thats about it. It still sounds like "sucks to be us" syndrome. It sucks for other distributors so I understand them laying the smack down on the devs/publisher(who in turn lay another smack, legit or not), but thats the game.

    DiannaoChong on
    steam_sig.png
  • LeitnerLeitner Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    So this isn't a GW IP related controversy. I am shocked, shocked. Really I didn't see it coming.

    Leitner on
  • ZephosZephos Climbin in yo ski lifts, snatchin your people up. MichiganRegistered User regular
    edited July 2009
    GW gave Cyanide the IP after there was a lawsuit for their previous game. Chaos League which was a clear blood bowl ripoff.

    Zephos on
    Xbox One/360: Penguin McCool
  • Gnome-InterruptusGnome-Interruptus Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    kedinik wrote: »
    If the product that G2Play is selling you doesnt live up to its expectations, then I'm sure being a model and legit business they would have no problem providing you with an exchange or refund right?

    Anecdotally, they do a lot of business selling CD keys for Valve games and Valve has not gone after them in any way; I'm inclined to think they're honestly run.

    Anecdotally as well I have bought blizzard game keys and know several others who have as well, and bound them to bnet accounts and they havent failed yet. I think we would get news of blizzard "warning against" and taking the company out not so silently in the middle of the night.

    2 Things:

    1.) If it is a shell corporation that has no physical address and cannot be pinned down, then other companies are going to have a hell of a time trying to bring legal action against them in order to shut down their website.

    2.) If they cant bring down the website to prevent further orders, then any public statements they make are just going to raise awareness of the G2Play and act as advertising. No sane company is going to loudly and publicly cry about someone else selling the same thing for less, unless it has a way to distinguish themselves as being the better option. Cyanide is the developer, but Focus Interactive is the publisher. And in this case, Cyanide/Focus is able to distinguish the out of region keys and black list them (allegedly).

    Gnome-Interruptus on
    steam_sig.png
    MWO: Adamski
  • KelorKelor Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    LewieP wrote: »
    So hang on. If all games publishers decided that the USA was rich enough to pay $300 for games, but other countries could only afford $10, would you say that was ok, and not want to import games?

    Ask an Australian.

    oh no he di'int

    :cry:

    As an Aussie I import a lot of my titles as of late. Particularly from Europe when it comes to PC or Playstation titles.

    Given the choice of paying 20 pounds ($40 Australian) or $90-120 retail the choice is fairly easy.

    Kelor on
  • DracilDracil Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Shadowfire wrote: »
    Since when is there a license for video game sellers, or software retailers in general?

    Since ever?

    You can't just decide you want to start selling a game because you found a copy or you managed to produce the keys on your own.

    If someone is selling keys they either got them legitimately from the publisher or developer, or they didn't.

    Valve can't just put up any old game it wants to on steam, it has to be licensed to do so per game, per publisher. This is true for all stores. If EA doesn't want Gamestop to sell its games anymore, Gamestop can't just say "fuck you" and do it anyway.

    I may have missed this, but explain this in terms of the used game market. Pretty sure all the people selling their games to Gamestop are not licensed.

    Dracil on
    3DS: 2105-8644-6304
    Switch: US 1651-2551-4335 JP 6310-4664-2624
    MH3U Monster Cheat Sheet / MH3U Veggie Elder Ticket Guide
  • The Dude With HerpesThe Dude With Herpes Lehi, UTRegistered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Dracil wrote: »
    Shadowfire wrote: »
    Since when is there a license for video game sellers, or software retailers in general?

    Since ever?

    You can't just decide you want to start selling a game because you found a copy or you managed to produce the keys on your own.

    If someone is selling keys they either got them legitimately from the publisher or developer, or they didn't.

    Valve can't just put up any old game it wants to on steam, it has to be licensed to do so per game, per publisher. This is true for all stores. If EA doesn't want Gamestop to sell its games anymore, Gamestop can't just say "fuck you" and do it anyway.

    I may have missed this, but explain this in terms of the used game market. Pretty sure all the people selling their games to Gamestop are not licensed.

    Long story short; the discussion wasn't about used games, but new games, as the site in question is claiming that the "product" (i.e. questionably acquired keys) was new. The used game market is a different beast entirely, and a completely different subject.

    The Dude With Herpes on
    Steam: Galedrid - XBL: Galedrid - PSN: Galedrid
    Origin: Galedrid - Nintendo: Galedrid/3222-6858-1045
    Blizzard: Galedrid#1367 - FFXIV: Galedrid Kingshand

  • ZephosZephos Climbin in yo ski lifts, snatchin your people up. MichiganRegistered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Used or not, from my understanding they would be allowed to sell the product as long as they purchased it legally.

    Zephos on
    Xbox One/360: Penguin McCool
  • NewblarNewblar Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Klyka wrote: »
    What if I buy a key from this site and then rent a game for one day, use the disc to install with the key and return the game to the store.

    Illegal?

    From a strictly legal sense ignoring practicality, enforcability and the ability to differentiate between rented game files and purchased ones yes that would probably be illegal. The game files were meant to be used with the rental for which your time and payment of has expired. I'm not saying I believe this is right in the moral sense, I'm saying that is how I understand it to be in the legal sense. If you believe in the game industry's typical you only own the liscense line there could be some arguement for its legality.

    Newblar on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • The Dude With HerpesThe Dude With Herpes Lehi, UTRegistered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Zephos wrote: »
    Used or not, from my understanding they would be allowed to sell the product as long as they purchased it legally.

    I fully agree. What's always been in question is whether or not they were legally obtained. The current answer from Cyanide/Focus is: no.

    The Dude With Herpes on
    Steam: Galedrid - XBL: Galedrid - PSN: Galedrid
    Origin: Galedrid - Nintendo: Galedrid/3222-6858-1045
    Blizzard: Galedrid#1367 - FFXIV: Galedrid Kingshand

  • Eat it You Nasty Pig.Eat it You Nasty Pig. tell homeland security 'we are the bomb'Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Newblar wrote: »
    Klyka wrote: »
    What if I buy a key from this site and then rent a game for one day, use the disc to install with the key and return the game to the store.

    Illegal?

    From a strictly legal sense ignoring practicality, enforcability and the ability to differentiate between rented game files and purchased ones yes that would probably be illegal. The game files were meant to be used with the rental for which your time and payment of has expired. I'm not saying I believe this is right in the moral sense, I'm saying that is how I understand it to be in the legal sense. If you believe in the game industry's typical you only own the liscense line there could be some arguement for its legality.

    IANAL, but that isn't how it works.

    If you rent a game, what you've paid for is a license (with various stipulations as to how you can use it) to possess it until the rentor wants it back.

    Buying a game is similar; you've purchased a license to possess a copy of that game under certain stipulations (that depend on locality but generally don't copy/distribute it is the major one.)

    In this situation the CD key is essentially functioning as that license. If you bought a legitimate one, you have the license to play that game, regardless of where you bought the key or where the game files actualyl come from.

    edit: another example would be, if I buy a game on steam or other digital distributor, but I don't feel like waiting on the download and my buddy has a hard copy, I'm perfectly within my rights to install from his disc and use the steam-purchased key.

    edit2: assuming the keys being sold were legitimately obtained by purchased bulk copies in SE asia or something, I don't think there's a copyright violation here. In the U.S. I would think you'd have a hard time even enforcing a EULA violation, if it went to court.

    Eat it You Nasty Pig. on
    hold your head high soldier, it ain't over yet
    that's why we call it the struggle, you're supposed to sweat
  • DracilDracil Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Dracil wrote: »
    Shadowfire wrote: »
    Since when is there a license for video game sellers, or software retailers in general?

    Since ever?

    You can't just decide you want to start selling a game because you found a copy or you managed to produce the keys on your own.

    If someone is selling keys they either got them legitimately from the publisher or developer, or they didn't.

    Valve can't just put up any old game it wants to on steam, it has to be licensed to do so per game, per publisher. This is true for all stores. If EA doesn't want Gamestop to sell its games anymore, Gamestop can't just say "fuck you" and do it anyway.

    I may have missed this, but explain this in terms of the used game market. Pretty sure all the people selling their games to Gamestop are not licensed.

    Long story short; the discussion wasn't about used games, but new games, as the site in question is claiming that the "product" (i.e. questionably acquired keys) was new. The used game market is a different beast entirely, and a completely different subject.

    How is it different? As per EB Game's definition of "used" if you open a package, it is "used" even if you never really used it. Of course this doesn't apply when they do it with gutted games.

    Dracil on
    3DS: 2105-8644-6304
    Switch: US 1651-2551-4335 JP 6310-4664-2624
    MH3U Monster Cheat Sheet / MH3U Veggie Elder Ticket Guide
  • The Dude With HerpesThe Dude With Herpes Lehi, UTRegistered User regular
    edited July 2009
    It's different in that new does not mean used? Again, we're talking about g2play, not EB, and we're not talking about used games.

    EDIT: I'm not entirely sure what you point even is. A used game is used. A new game is new. If they said they were selling a second hand copy, a possibly used CD-key, that would be different. But they clearly say they are new keys and have never been used.

    Hence new.

    Thus the discussion is related to new games.

    The Dude With Herpes on
    Steam: Galedrid - XBL: Galedrid - PSN: Galedrid
    Origin: Galedrid - Nintendo: Galedrid/3222-6858-1045
    Blizzard: Galedrid#1367 - FFXIV: Galedrid Kingshand

  • Eat it You Nasty Pig.Eat it You Nasty Pig. tell homeland security 'we are the bomb'Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    The distinction is pointless.

    Eat it You Nasty Pig. on
    hold your head high soldier, it ain't over yet
    that's why we call it the struggle, you're supposed to sweat
  • DracilDracil Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    It's different in that new does not mean used? Again, we're talking about g2play, not EB, and we're not talking about used games.

    EDIT: I'm not entirely sure what you point even is. A used game is used. A new game is new. If they said they were selling a second hand copy, a possibly used CD-key, that would be different. But they clearly say they are new keys and have never been used.

    Hence new.

    Thus the discussion is related to new games.
    Dyscord wrote: »
    The distinction is pointless.

    This is what I mean.

    Yeah, we KNOW what the semantics of new and used is. The onus is on you to show what the difference is and why it matters here.

    In other words, you seem to be claiming that somehow "using" something (as defined differently by at least 3 or 4 different involved parties) makes it ok to resell, why?

    Dracil on
    3DS: 2105-8644-6304
    Switch: US 1651-2551-4335 JP 6310-4664-2624
    MH3U Monster Cheat Sheet / MH3U Veggie Elder Ticket Guide
  • taliosfalcontaliosfalcon Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Zephos wrote: »
    Used or not, from my understanding they would be allowed to sell the product as long as they purchased it legally.

    I fully agree. What's always been in question is whether or not they were legally obtained. The current answer from Cyanide/Focus is: no.
    I thought the current answer was they had no idea, but its against the EULA either way so once they figure out what the hells going on they're blocked.

    At least thats what i got from the community manager requesting people to send keys they got in to them so they could figure out where they were from

    taliosfalcon on
    steam xbox - adeptpenguin
  • The Dude With HerpesThe Dude With Herpes Lehi, UTRegistered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Dracil wrote: »
    It's different in that new does not mean used? Again, we're talking about g2play, not EB, and we're not talking about used games.

    EDIT: I'm not entirely sure what you point even is. A used game is used. A new game is new. If they said they were selling a second hand copy, a possibly used CD-key, that would be different. But they clearly say they are new keys and have never been used.

    Hence new.

    Thus the discussion is related to new games.
    Dyscord wrote: »
    The distinction is pointless.

    This is what I mean.

    Yeah, we KNOW what the semantics of new and used is. The onus is on you to show what the difference is and why it matters here.

    In other words, you seem to be claiming that somehow "using" something (as defined differently by at least 3 or 4 different involved parties) makes it ok to resell, why?

    Because "used" games are covered by the first sale doctrine. They technically own the game at that point and can sell it for whatever price they want without permission from the publisher. As new they're not the owners of the game and would have to get them through proper retail channels, be it a distributor or directly from the publisher. If the website in question didn't obtain them legitimately, which is pretty damn obvious in this case, the publisher and/or developer are fully within their rights to ban any keys provided by said site for violating their rights.

    The Dude With Herpes on
    Steam: Galedrid - XBL: Galedrid - PSN: Galedrid
    Origin: Galedrid - Nintendo: Galedrid/3222-6858-1045
    Blizzard: Galedrid#1367 - FFXIV: Galedrid Kingshand

  • Eat it You Nasty Pig.Eat it You Nasty Pig. tell homeland security 'we are the bomb'Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    I don't exactly trust the publisher to be honest and forthright about the legality of these keys in any case, any more than I trust the resellers to be.

    The answer should be pretty easy for them to track down, after all. Just call around to their asian distros and see if anyone sold a bulk order to these guys.

    Eat it You Nasty Pig. on
    hold your head high soldier, it ain't over yet
    that's why we call it the struggle, you're supposed to sweat
  • DracilDracil Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Dracil wrote: »
    It's different in that new does not mean used? Again, we're talking about g2play, not EB, and we're not talking about used games.

    EDIT: I'm not entirely sure what you point even is. A used game is used. A new game is new. If they said they were selling a second hand copy, a possibly used CD-key, that would be different. But they clearly say they are new keys and have never been used.

    Hence new.

    Thus the discussion is related to new games.
    Dyscord wrote: »
    The distinction is pointless.

    This is what I mean.

    Yeah, we KNOW what the semantics of new and used is. The onus is on you to show what the difference is and why it matters here.

    In other words, you seem to be claiming that somehow "using" something (as defined differently by at least 3 or 4 different involved parties) makes it ok to resell, why?

    Because "used" games are covered by the first sale doctrine. They technically own the game at that point and can sell it for whatever price they want without permission from the publisher. As new they're not the owners of the game and would have to get them through proper retail channels, be it a distributor or directly from the publisher. If the website in question didn't obtain them legitimately, which is pretty damn obvious in this case, the publisher and/or developer are fully within their rights to ban any keys provided by said site for violating their rights.

    Really? So when I buy a game, but never actually open it and keep it on a shelf, I don't actually own the game?

    Are you sure that's the claim you want to make here? Someone should tell the people on Ebay selling old, unopened, mint condition games to collectors.

    Dracil on
    3DS: 2105-8644-6304
    Switch: US 1651-2551-4335 JP 6310-4664-2624
    MH3U Monster Cheat Sheet / MH3U Veggie Elder Ticket Guide
  • kaliyamakaliyama Left to find less-moderated fora Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Zephos wrote: »
    Used or not, from my understanding they would be allowed to sell the product as long as they purchased it legally.

    I fully agree. What's always been in question is whether or not they were legally obtained. The current answer from Cyanide/Focus is: no.

    If you purchase it, it's legal. Illegal means there is a statute against doing something.

    Breaking a contract, or a EULA, for that matter, isn't illegal. Neither is most libel. It violates the contract. Within limits, if the company suffers harm from the the breach of the contract, they can sue.

    The only way G2play could have gotten keys "illegally" is if they broke into Cyanide's offices and stole them, or are using a keygen, in which case you'd probably have to shoehorn it into DMCA-style stuff of circumventing copy protection. It's highly unlikely that G2play obtained keys illegally.

    I can't believe everyone here is OK with software retailers trying to get away with perfect price discrimination.

    kaliyama on
    fwKS7.png?1
  • kaliyamakaliyama Left to find less-moderated fora Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Dracil wrote: »
    It's different in that new does not mean used? Again, we're talking about g2play, not EB, and we're not talking about used games.

    EDIT: I'm not entirely sure what you point even is. A used game is used. A new game is new. If they said they were selling a second hand copy, a possibly used CD-key, that would be different. But they clearly say they are new keys and have never been used.

    Hence new.

    Thus the discussion is related to new games.
    Dyscord wrote: »
    The distinction is pointless.

    This is what I mean.

    Yeah, we KNOW what the semantics of new and used is. The onus is on you to show what the difference is and why it matters here.

    In other words, you seem to be claiming that somehow "using" something (as defined differently by at least 3 or 4 different involved parties) makes it ok to resell, why?

    Because "used" games are covered by the first sale doctrine. They technically own the game at that point and can sell it for whatever price they want without permission from the publisher. As new they're not the owners of the game and would have to get them through proper retail channels, be it a distributor or directly from the publisher. If the website in question didn't obtain them legitimately, which is pretty damn obvious in this case, the publisher and/or developer are fully within their rights to ban any keys provided by said site for violating their rights.

    I'm not sure where you're getting the inference that the website didn't obtain them legitimately - i'm sure they just picked them up cheap in asia where games are priced less.

    kaliyama on
    fwKS7.png?1
  • iguanacusiguanacus Desert PlanetRegistered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Actually, no it doesn't work that way. If I start up a company that sells games, as long as my product is legally obtained from any market, I can sell it for whatever I want. If the publisher has a deal with a distributor that says they, the distributor, can only sell it to certain resellers and the distributor sells it to me anyway, it's between the distributor and the the publisher. I have done nothing wrong or illegal.

    iguanacus on
  • DracilDracil Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Who says we're okay with it? I can't speak for Herpes though.

    Dracil on
    3DS: 2105-8644-6304
    Switch: US 1651-2551-4335 JP 6310-4664-2624
    MH3U Monster Cheat Sheet / MH3U Veggie Elder Ticket Guide
  • The Dude With HerpesThe Dude With Herpes Lehi, UTRegistered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Dyscord wrote: »
    I don't exactly trust the publisher to be honest and forthright about the legality of these keys in any case, any more than I trust the resellers to be.

    The answer should be pretty easy for them to track down, after all. Just call around to their asian distros and see if anyone sold a bulk order to these guys.

    Yes, that, or the seller could easily provide proof of right to distribute; or if they got them from a distributor/reseller, where they got them and proof they were acquired legitimately.

    But they haven't and likely wont.

    Also, I'm sorry but it's pretty damn silly to vilify publishers like that. I mean, honestly; they are the means by which most of us get the games we play every day. Sure, their practices aren't always on the level, but for the love of all, talk about biting the hand that feeds you. I have no great love for publishers, but acting like they are all untrustworthy and only out to screw everyone is just asinine.

    The Dude With Herpes on
    Steam: Galedrid - XBL: Galedrid - PSN: Galedrid
    Origin: Galedrid - Nintendo: Galedrid/3222-6858-1045
    Blizzard: Galedrid#1367 - FFXIV: Galedrid Kingshand

  • The Dude With HerpesThe Dude With Herpes Lehi, UTRegistered User regular
    edited July 2009
    iguanacus wrote: »
    Actually, no it doesn't work that way. If I start up a company that sells games, as long as my product is legally obtained from any market, I can sell it for whatever I want. If the publisher has a deal with a distributor that says they, the distributor, can only sell it to certain resellers and the distributor sells it to me anyway, it's between the distributor and the the publisher. I have done nothing wrong or illegal.

    Again, this is pretty simple people, the key works here are "as long as my product is legally obtained".

    FFS, the developer and publisher are saying that they weren't legally obtained and that is the entire point of this fucking discussion.

    EDIT: I've said like a dozen times now that if the copies being sold by g2play are legitimate then nothing being done is wrong. I'm assuming that it isn't legitimate because although games are cheaper in various parts of Asia they're not $10USD for a brand new game cheap.

    The Dude With Herpes on
    Steam: Galedrid - XBL: Galedrid - PSN: Galedrid
    Origin: Galedrid - Nintendo: Galedrid/3222-6858-1045
    Blizzard: Galedrid#1367 - FFXIV: Galedrid Kingshand

  • Eat it You Nasty Pig.Eat it You Nasty Pig. tell homeland security 'we are the bomb'Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Dracil wrote: »
    It's different in that new does not mean used? Again, we're talking about g2play, not EB, and we're not talking about used games.

    EDIT: I'm not entirely sure what you point even is. A used game is used. A new game is new. If they said they were selling a second hand copy, a possibly used CD-key, that would be different. But they clearly say they are new keys and have never been used.

    Hence new.

    Thus the discussion is related to new games.
    Dyscord wrote: »
    The distinction is pointless.

    This is what I mean.

    Yeah, we KNOW what the semantics of new and used is. The onus is on you to show what the difference is and why it matters here.

    In other words, you seem to be claiming that somehow "using" something (as defined differently by at least 3 or 4 different involved parties) makes it ok to resell, why?

    Because "used" games are covered by the first sale doctrine. They technically own the game at that point and can sell it for whatever price they want without permission from the publisher. As new they're not the owners of the game and would have to get them through proper retail channels, be it a distributor or directly from the publisher. If the website in question didn't obtain them legitimately, which is pretty damn obvious in this case, the publisher and/or developer are fully within their rights to ban any keys provided by said site for violating their rights.

    Well, of course if they're selling illegally obtained keys it's illegal. That is the whole question and it seems pretty fucking far from obvious to me, at least based on this thread.

    That being said, it's a little hard for me to believe that a completely illegal operation is openly selling to U.S. customers. Like I said, it shouldn't be all that hard to figure out whether these keys are legit, and if they aren't it's not going to take very long for them to get figured out. Especially given the number of products they are selling on their website.

    Eat it You Nasty Pig. on
    hold your head high soldier, it ain't over yet
    that's why we call it the struggle, you're supposed to sweat
  • The Dude With HerpesThe Dude With Herpes Lehi, UTRegistered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Dyscord wrote: »
    Dracil wrote: »
    It's different in that new does not mean used? Again, we're talking about g2play, not EB, and we're not talking about used games.

    EDIT: I'm not entirely sure what you point even is. A used game is used. A new game is new. If they said they were selling a second hand copy, a possibly used CD-key, that would be different. But they clearly say they are new keys and have never been used.

    Hence new.

    Thus the discussion is related to new games.
    Dyscord wrote: »
    The distinction is pointless.

    This is what I mean.

    Yeah, we KNOW what the semantics of new and used is. The onus is on you to show what the difference is and why it matters here.

    In other words, you seem to be claiming that somehow "using" something (as defined differently by at least 3 or 4 different involved parties) makes it ok to resell, why?

    Because "used" games are covered by the first sale doctrine. They technically own the game at that point and can sell it for whatever price they want without permission from the publisher. As new they're not the owners of the game and would have to get them through proper retail channels, be it a distributor or directly from the publisher. If the website in question didn't obtain them legitimately, which is pretty damn obvious in this case, the publisher and/or developer are fully within their rights to ban any keys provided by said site for violating their rights.

    Well, of course if they're selling illegally obtained keys it's illegal. That is the whole question and it seems pretty fucking far from obvious to me, at least based on this thread.

    That being said, it's a little hard for me to believe that a completely illegal operation is openly selling to U.S. customers. Like I said, it shouldn't be all that hard to figure out whether these keys are legit, and if they aren't it's not going to take very long for them to get figured out. Especially given the number of products they are selling on their website.

    What? Are you new to the internet? You find it hard to believe a company is illegally selling goods to U.S. customers? Is that a joke?

    The Dude With Herpes on
    Steam: Galedrid - XBL: Galedrid - PSN: Galedrid
    Origin: Galedrid - Nintendo: Galedrid/3222-6858-1045
    Blizzard: Galedrid#1367 - FFXIV: Galedrid Kingshand

  • DracilDracil Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    iguanacus wrote: »
    Actually, no it doesn't work that way. If I start up a company that sells games, as long as my product is legally obtained from any market, I can sell it for whatever I want. If the publisher has a deal with a distributor that says they, the distributor, can only sell it to certain resellers and the distributor sells it to me anyway, it's between the distributor and the the publisher. I have done nothing wrong or illegal.

    Again, this is pretty simple people, the key works here are "as long as my product is legally obtained".

    FFS, the developer and publisher are saying that they weren't legally obtained and that is the entire point of this fucking discussion.

    EDIT: I've said like a dozen times now that if the copies being sold by g2play are legitimate then nothing being done is wrong. I'm assuming that it isn't legitimate because although games are cheaper in various parts of Asia they're not $10USD for a brand new game cheap.

    Having actually grown up in Asia, I beg to differ and say yes, some games are actually that cheap.

    You assume they are actually doing this illegally because the company said so. Well guess what, I assume the companies are calling it illegal because it's better PR and they wish it was, not because it actually is illegal.

    In fact here, http://www.zest.co.th/www/main/detail.php?product_id=GME0001890 Blood bowl is about 500 baht, about £9. As the OP said, they were selling it for £14. So yes, this is quite feasible.

    Dracil on
    3DS: 2105-8644-6304
    Switch: US 1651-2551-4335 JP 6310-4664-2624
    MH3U Monster Cheat Sheet / MH3U Veggie Elder Ticket Guide
  • Eat it You Nasty Pig.Eat it You Nasty Pig. tell homeland security 'we are the bomb'Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Dyscord wrote: »
    I don't exactly trust the publisher to be honest and forthright about the legality of these keys in any case, any more than I trust the resellers to be.

    The answer should be pretty easy for them to track down, after all. Just call around to their asian distros and see if anyone sold a bulk order to these guys.

    Yes, that, or the seller could easily provide proof of right to distribute; or if they got them from a distributor/reseller, where they got them and proof they were acquired legitimately.

    But they haven't and likely wont.

    Also, I'm sorry but it's pretty damn silly to vilify publishers like that. I mean, honestly; they are the means by which most of us get the games we play every day. Sure, their practices aren't always on the level, but for the love of all, talk about biting the hand that feeds you. I have no great love for publishers, but acting like they are all untrustworthy and only out to screw everyone is just asinine.

    The burden isn't on them to prove 'right to distribute.'

    And, I'm not acting like all publishers are untrustworthy, I am pointing out that content owners in the U.S. (especially corporate ones) do not have a history of being open and honest with consumers WRT to their rights. Especially when it's a case of being honest vs. the bottom line.

    Eat it You Nasty Pig. on
    hold your head high soldier, it ain't over yet
    that's why we call it the struggle, you're supposed to sweat
  • The Dude With HerpesThe Dude With Herpes Lehi, UTRegistered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Dracil wrote: »
    iguanacus wrote: »
    Actually, no it doesn't work that way. If I start up a company that sells games, as long as my product is legally obtained from any market, I can sell it for whatever I want. If the publisher has a deal with a distributor that says they, the distributor, can only sell it to certain resellers and the distributor sells it to me anyway, it's between the distributor and the the publisher. I have done nothing wrong or illegal.

    Again, this is pretty simple people, the key works here are "as long as my product is legally obtained".

    FFS, the developer and publisher are saying that they weren't legally obtained and that is the entire point of this fucking discussion.

    EDIT: I've said like a dozen times now that if the copies being sold by g2play are legitimate then nothing being done is wrong. I'm assuming that it isn't legitimate because although games are cheaper in various parts of Asia they're not $10USD for a brand new game cheap.

    Having actually grown up in Asia, I beg to differ and say yes, some games are actually that cheap.

    You assume they are actually doing this illegally because the company said so. Well guess what, I assume the companies are calling it illegal because it's better PR, not because it actually is illegal.

    How is it better PR? All it's going to do is get people who care about the topic to get more angry one way or another and probably hurt sales. The people who aren't in the know on the issue either won't hear about it or won't care anyway.

    EDIT: Also it is shit like this that leads to more draconian protection measures through DRM or region locked codes/gameplay, etc.

    The Dude With Herpes on
    Steam: Galedrid - XBL: Galedrid - PSN: Galedrid
    Origin: Galedrid - Nintendo: Galedrid/3222-6858-1045
    Blizzard: Galedrid#1367 - FFXIV: Galedrid Kingshand

Sign In or Register to comment.