The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

[WoW] [Chat] The Horde Employs Cylon Paladins!

1111214161764

Posts

  • EvilBadmanEvilBadman DO NOT TRUST THIS MAN Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Mmo-champion for 8-) Datamining.
    Wow Insider for aforementioned Yellow Journalism, and some decent articles.

    EvilBadman on
    FyreWulff wrote: »
    I should note that Badman is fucking awesome
    XBL- Evil Badman; Steam- EvilBadman; Twitter - EvilBadman
  • CuntyCunty Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    appreciated

    looking at those models i really have one thing to say

    holy shit blizzard, you are lazy

    also do we have any models for the weapons?

    Cunty on
    gameintownk.png
  • lionheart_mlionheart_m Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    EvilBadman wrote: »
    Mmo-champion for 8-) Datamining.
    Wow Insider for aforementioned Yellow Journalism, and some decent articles.

    I...am not sure I'd called the articles decent.

    lionheart_m on
    3DS: 5069-4122-2826 / WiiU: Lionheart-m / PSN: lionheart_m / Steam: lionheart_jg
  • WassermeloneWassermelone Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    I hate that fucking BLIZZARD ARE LAZY shit.

    Wassermelone on
  • BrainleechBrainleech 機知に富んだコメントはここにあります Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    I hate that fucking BLIZZARD ARE LAZY shit.

    Like the Q&A classes?

    I am not looking forward to the rogue one

    Brainleech on
  • CuntyCunty Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    i'm sorry, making in essence 4 models for 10 classes just seems lazy and dumb, hunters shouldn't look exactly the same as shamans, sorry

    most of those just don't really seem to fit the classes at all, in my opinion

    the plate looks fine i guess but some of the gear just does not seem to look right

    and is it just me or does the spellcaster chest/shoulders/bracers look like plate

    Cunty on
    gameintownk.png
  • HalfmexHalfmex I mock your value system You also appear foolish in the eyes of othersRegistered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Yeah, from the looks of things, very few people have been happy with the Class Q&A sessions. GC mentioned that they might switch to selecting questions based on poll results the next time they do this, which seems like the smarter way to go. At least then you have fewer people bitching that you didn't get to the "real questions".

    But yeah, I don't expect the rogue Q&A to be any more informative than the previous classes' have been.

    Halfmex on
  • BikkstahBikkstah Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    I like LOTRO's take on armor: You have 2 sets of gear. 1 is your actual gear with stats that may or may not make you look like a rainbow clown. Your second set is your vanity set: any pieces of armor you've collected along the way that you think looks nice. You click a little tab labeled "Show vanity" and it's the difference between a pink chest with purple pants and neon green shoes or a good looking outfit.

    Also, lol @ the backpacks on the T9 shoulders for rogue/druid.

    Bikkstah on
  • reVersereVerse Attack and Dethrone God Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Cunty wrote: »
    i'm sorry, making in essence 4 models for 10 classes just seems lazy and dumb

    Someone with grammar like yours is in no position to go around calling people lazy and dumb.
    hunters shouldn't look exactly the same as shamans, sorry

    They don't.

    reVerse on
  • HalfmexHalfmex I mock your value system You also appear foolish in the eyes of othersRegistered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Vanity/appearance slots are probably one of the most-often-requested things ever since late TBC, at least from what I've seen. I would love, and I mean LOVE, to see this happen, but who knows if it ever will.

    Halfmex on
  • ExistentialSoundandFuryExistentialSoundandFury Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Personally I think the Q&A's accomplished their stated goal, "A high level discussion of our design vision for X Class and changes we are debating to fulfill that vision."

    Everyone seemed to expect a rigorous discussion of every little issue they have the class. They did not say they were giving that to you, why did you think thats what you'd get, and why are you mad that you didn't get what they said they weren't giving you?
    Halfmex wrote: »
    Vanity/appearance slots are probably one of the most-often-requested things ever since late TBC, at least from what I've seen. I would love, and I mean LOVE, to see this happen, but who knows if it ever will.

    This is a cool idea, but I like being able to glance at someone and get a gauge for what they have, especially in PvP ("Oh shits that guys in full Season 6, I'm fucked!"). I don't believe its as cut and dry as 'Everyone wants it but Blizzard just says No.'

    Also, in the grand scheme, it would basically hand you a full gear sets worth of inventory which is nice, but they're not big on freebies. Its also a lot of work to implement this, when there is still so much to be done.

    ExistentialSoundandFury on
    399831.jpg
  • CuntyCunty Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    reVerse wrote: »
    Cunty wrote: »
    i'm sorry, making in essence 4 models for 10 classes just seems lazy and dumb

    Someone with grammar like yours is in no position to go around calling people lazy and dumb.
    hunters shouldn't look exactly the same as shamans, sorry

    They don't.

    typing on forums isn't something i get paid for, and the grammar isn't completely terrible anyway. it would sound better if i removed "in essence" but it was key to my point

    i type like i speak, and spoken that sounds fine, I apologize if i don't treat the penny arcade forums as some medium for my master thesis

    also

    http://static.mmo-champion.com/mmoc/images/news/2009/july/tier9_alliance_10116_2.jpg

    seriously, hunter and shaman
    seriously
    helmet, bracers, chest, shoulders
    that doesn't look the same to you?
    seriously?

    Cunty on
    gameintownk.png
  • Racist JokeRacist Joke Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    reVerse wrote: »
    Cunty wrote: »
    i'm sorry, making in essence 4 models for 10 classes just seems lazy and dumb

    Someone with grammar like yours is in no position to go around calling people lazy and dumb.
    hunters shouldn't look exactly the same as shamans, sorry

    They don't.

    Pulling the grammar card? Really? Grow up.

    Racist Joke on
    Steam
    Xbox Live: Kunohara
  • 815165815165 Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    So I'd like to try a ranged DPS class, which one (and spec I guess) is fun?

    edit: fun to level and at 80 too, so none of this shaman bullcrap.

    815165 on
  • reVersereVerse Attack and Dethrone God Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    reVerse wrote: »
    Cunty wrote: »
    i'm sorry, making in essence 4 models for 10 classes just seems lazy and dumb

    Someone with grammar like yours is in no position to go around calling people lazy and dumb.
    hunters shouldn't look exactly the same as shamans, sorry

    They don't.

    Pulling the grammar card? Really? Grow up.

    Pulling the "Grow up" card? Really? How original.

    reVerse on
  • HalfmexHalfmex I mock your value system You also appear foolish in the eyes of othersRegistered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Exactly, though that's really the problem. A high-level discussion on something with such subtle nuances as class design/direction is not the best idea, because, as we've seen, it's so easy to gloss over things which many people consider to be crucial issues.

    I've always been of the mind that each class needs its own dev team, with its own respective community manager. It makes more sense to have people who are responsible for the class design being the ones who actually step out and say "here is the decision we are making and here is why we're making it". That's not to say that they should cave to consumer demands or anthing, just have the same group of people familiar with that one class's changes and design. Rather than having one guy be the voicebox of your whole class dev team, which has got to be rough on his sanity at this point, what with having to keep everything he's said about every class in every discussion from contradicting itself.

    Edit: Wow, that moved fast. Was responding to ESAF's post.

    Halfmex on
  • lionheart_mlionheart_m Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    815165 wrote: »
    So I'd like to try a ranged DPS class, which one (and spec I guess) is fun?

    edit: fun to level and at 80 too, so none of this shaman bullcrap.

    I'd say Hunter. I dislike Mages and Priests with all the drinking they do (until they get Evo). Warlocks are kinda like Hunters but they aren't my cup of tea.

    lionheart_m on
    3DS: 5069-4122-2826 / WiiU: Lionheart-m / PSN: lionheart_m / Steam: lionheart_jg
  • ExistentialSoundandFuryExistentialSoundandFury Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Cunty wrote: »
    reVerse wrote: »
    Cunty wrote: »
    i'm sorry, making in essence 4 models for 10 classes just seems lazy and dumb

    Someone with grammar like yours is in no position to go around calling people lazy and dumb.
    hunters shouldn't look exactly the same as shamans, sorry

    They don't.

    typing on forums isn't something i get paid for, and the grammar isn't completely terrible anyway. it would sound better if i removed "in essence" but it was key to my point

    i type like i speak, and spoken that sounds fine, I apologize if i don't treat the penny arcade forums as some medium for my master thesis

    also

    http://static.mmo-champion.com/mmoc/images/news/2009/july/tier9_alliance_10116_2.jpg

    seriously, hunter and shaman
    seriously
    helmet, bracers, chest, shoulders
    that doesn't look the same to you?
    seriously?

    Actually you don't type like you speak, when speaking there would be pauses and inflection which are indicated by things like punctuation and capitalization. Commas? Yeah they actually mean something, they aren't just a spacer.

    ExistentialSoundandFury on
    399831.jpg
  • CuntyCunty Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    please explain how the hunter and shaman outfits are different without mentioning the leg gear or colors

    Cunty on
    gameintownk.png
  • ExistentialSoundandFuryExistentialSoundandFury Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Halfmex wrote: »
    Exactly, though that's really the problem. A high-level discussion on something with such subtle nuances as class design/direction is not the best idea, because, as we've seen, it's so easy to gloss over things which many people consider to be crucial issues.

    I've always been of the mind that each class needs its own dev team, with its own respective community manager. It makes more sense to have people who are responsible for the class design being the ones who actually step out and say "here is the decision we are making and here is why we're making it". That's not to say that they should cave to consumer demands or anthing, just have the same group of people familiar with that one class's changes and design. Rather than having one guy be the voicebox of your whole class dev team, which has got to be rough on his sanity at this point, what with having to keep everything he's said about every class in every discussion from contradicting itself.

    Edit: Wow, that moved fast. Was responding to ESAF's post.

    I agree that the direction of the Q&A may not have been ideal, but realistically the kind of rigor people wanted would take more time than the team probably can afford to dedicate.

    I liked them, but I don't think it was the best idea for the community.

    ExistentialSoundandFury on
    399831.jpg
  • lionheart_mlionheart_m Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Cunty wrote: »
    reVerse wrote: »
    Cunty wrote: »
    i'm sorry, making in essence 4 models for 10 classes just seems lazy and dumb

    Someone with grammar like yours is in no position to go around calling people lazy and dumb.
    hunters shouldn't look exactly the same as shamans, sorry

    They don't.

    typing on forums isn't something i get paid for, and the grammar isn't completely terrible anyway. it would sound better if i removed "in essence" but it was key to my point

    i type like i speak, and spoken that sounds fine, I apologize if i don't treat the penny arcade forums as some medium for my master thesis

    also

    http://static.mmo-champion.com/mmoc/images/news/2009/july/tier9_alliance_10116_2.jpg

    seriously, hunter and shaman
    seriously
    helmet, bracers, chest, shoulders
    that doesn't look the same to you?
    seriously?

    Actually you don't type like you speak, when speaking there would be pauses and inflection which are indicated by things like punctuation and capitalization. Commas? Yeah they actually mean something, they aren't just a spacer.

    This comic comes to mind...
    20030707h.jpg

    lionheart_m on
    3DS: 5069-4122-2826 / WiiU: Lionheart-m / PSN: lionheart_m / Steam: lionheart_jg
  • CuntyCunty Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Cunty wrote: »
    reVerse wrote: »
    Cunty wrote: »
    i'm sorry, making in essence 4 models for 10 classes just seems lazy and dumb

    Someone with grammar like yours is in no position to go around calling people lazy and dumb.
    hunters shouldn't look exactly the same as shamans, sorry

    They don't.

    typing on forums isn't something i get paid for, and the grammar isn't completely terrible anyway. it would sound better if i removed "in essence" but it was key to my point

    i type like i speak, and spoken that sounds fine, I apologize if i don't treat the penny arcade forums as some medium for my master thesis

    also

    http://static.mmo-champion.com/mmoc/images/news/2009/july/tier9_alliance_10116_2.jpg

    seriously, hunter and shaman
    seriously
    helmet, bracers, chest, shoulders
    that doesn't look the same to you?
    seriously?

    Actually you don't type like you speak, when speaking there would be pauses and inflection which are indicated by things like punctuation and capitalization. Commas? Yeah they actually mean something, they aren't just a spacer.

    i'm sorry, making, in essence, 4 models...

    i thought to do this but this is just too many commas and taking them out made it more readable, in my opinion

    you can disagree, of course, but it's my casual typing style, i use commas for pauses, i don't capitalize the first word of every sentence, I use enter instead of periods for subject breaks, it's really not the end of the world

    holy shit, look at all those commas, everyone panic

    guaranteed if i use a semicolon incorrectly you'll all be on my ass about it, so why even bother?

    and yes, that one comma would be the only place i would pause while speaking that sentence

    Cunty on
    gameintownk.png
  • WassermeloneWassermelone Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Cunty wrote: »
    i'm sorry, making, in essence, 4 models...

    8 models. 8. Two less than normal. And 20 textures. 10 more than normal.

    Wassermelone on
  • ArkadyArkady Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Cunty wrote: »
    please explain how the hunter and shaman outfits are different without mentioning the leg gear or colors

    Come on now, the shaman color scheme is visual diarrhea. I am very seriously considering a side transfer to get away from it, but in the end I'll probably just not stop wearing my t8 until icecrown

    Arkady on
    untitled-1.jpg
    LoL: failboattootoot
  • GrobianGrobian What's on sale? Pliers!Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Shawnasee wrote: »
    Grobian wrote: »
    Speaking of which, my fiance just bought (with gold) a run through Uld 10 for a rusted proto drake... for my birthday.

    Why hello Clarise. That was awfully quick.
    snip

    What did she pay, btw? I'm just asking, because some people in my guild also sell those drakes. (for minimum 30k and highest offer goes first)

    She paid 20k gold. She bought the traveler's tundra mammoth a week or two ago too. She my WoW sugar mama.

    If I could get my wife to play, I swear she would be a money making machine.


    My girlfriend does play and has (way) more gold than me but she doesn't share it. She's like Scrooge McDuck, always hording her precious precious coins.

    Grobian on
  • CuntyCunty Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Cunty wrote: »
    i'm sorry, making, in essence, 4 models...

    8 models. 8. Two less than normal. And 20 textures. 10 more than normal.

    if you don't count leggings, these sets look incredibly similar:
    1. death knight, paladin, warrior
    2. druid, rogue
    3. shaman, hunter
    4. warlock, priest, mage

    if you made this a black and white picture and didn't count the leggings i don't think i'd be able to spot one difference except for the emblem changes on deathknight, pally, and warrior

    For some reason, and maybe i'm delusional, I recall warlock shoulders being completely different from priest shoulders, and pally helmet being completely different from deathknight helmet

    if i'm wrong, i'll admit it, but that's what i'm looking at

    tier 8, notice that every class looks distinguished:
    http://www.wowcryptlords.com/WoW-News/tier-8-model-for-all-classes.html

    the armor on its own, for the most part, looks fine in my opinion, i just don't like so many classes looking so similar

    Cunty on
    gameintownk.png
  • HalfmexHalfmex I mock your value system You also appear foolish in the eyes of othersRegistered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Halfmex wrote: »
    Vanity/appearance slots are probably one of the most-often-requested things ever since late TBC, at least from what I've seen. I would love, and I mean LOVE, to see this happen, but who knows if it ever will.

    This is a cool idea, but I like being able to glance at someone and get a gauge for what they have, especially in PvP ("Oh shits that guys in full Season 6, I'm fucked!"). I don't believe its as cut and dry as 'Everyone wants it but Blizzard just says No.'

    Also, in the grand scheme, it would basically hand you a full gear sets worth of inventory which is nice, but they're not big on freebies. Its also a lot of work to implement this, when there is still so much to be done.
    Oh yeah, it's definitely not a cut and dry issue. For one thing, it has a weird condition of both complimenting and at the same time spitting in the face of the art/design team. For people who decide that they want to wear an entire set of Might gear, that's sort of akin to saying "nothing you've designed since then appeals to me more than this does". So it's got its share of problems.

    There would have to be restrictions, certainly, if this were ever to be implemented. For example, the class armor restrictions would have to be in place (ie. no cloth wearers using plate for their appearance slots), but moreover than that, you could take it further and say 'only like armor types can be used in each appearance slot' (that is, only cloth armor can be used to cover the appearance of a cloth slot, leather for leather, etc.) so you don't have the issue of someone in full plate looking like they're wearing robes.

    But yeah, it could be challenging to implement, but enough MMOs have pulled it off successfully that I'm sure Blizzard could find a way to do it right.

    Halfmex on
  • WassermeloneWassermelone Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Cunty wrote: »
    Cunty wrote: »
    i'm sorry, making, in essence, 4 models...

    8 models. 8. Two less than normal. And 20 textures. 10 more than normal.

    if you don't count leggings, look incredibly similar:
    1. death knight, paladin, warrior
    2. druid, rogue
    3. shaman, hunter
    4. warlock, priest, mage

    if you made this a black and white picture and didn't count the leggings i don't think i'd be able to spot one difference except for the emblem changes on deathknight, pally, and warrior

    For some reason, and maybe i'm delusional, I recall warlock shoulders being completely different from priest shoulders, and pally helmet being completely different from deathknight helmet

    if i'm wrong, i'll admit it, but that's what i'm looking at

    There are four different armor classes. There are two factions.

    2 x 4 = 8



    *edit

    Besides, its not even the fucking point. Even if there WAS only four models, it would be the height of stupidity to call them lazy. You have no clue the amount of work that is going to making games for you. Theres only so much time and theres only so many people. This isn't a major expansion, its a free content patch. We only expect that we get this content because they have made a habit of giving us stuff for which we havn't given them extra beyond the monthly fee that we are happy paying now before the patch. Blizzard is making four (known) games right now, it would not be uncommon or at all wrong or lazy for them to move people from working on WoW all the time. In fact it would be prudent.

    Wassermelone on
  • CuntyCunty Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    right, there are 8 sets total

    but see you're looking at raw numbers, and you're saying that because the number of models is slightly less, that because the horde druid looks different from the alliance druid, that that's ok. Almost same number of models.

    i am saying that i don't care if horde gear is similar to alliance gear, ultimately i don't run raids with horde, all I will be seeing is 4 models in this new tier. In past times, running raids or running around town, you'd see 10 models, that's where the difference lies for me 4v10. In the past, each class had its own model, now classes are sharing models. I don't like this sharing. Does that make sense? I like to see shoulders and be able to say "oh, that's a warlock" or "oh, that's a warrior". Not only that, but this is tier gear, not PVP gear where you'd be fighting horde. Raiding is where this is significant, I think having 10 models for 10 classes make each of those models more valuable. Having gear that doesn't distinguish you cheapens it in my eyes.

    I'll take away the claim of lazy, and simply claim that it looks dumb for so many classes to look the same

    people spend most of their time around their own faction, I think, so most people are going to see just 4 models, and rarely see the others

    having a model for each class distinguished classes

    i don't really know how else to say it
    i am trying to reach a level of understanding here

    but anyway, that monthly fee basically goes towards the new content, new content isn't charity
    guaranteed that if blizzard stopped making expansions/content, you would see a significant decrease in the top level of players

    this new content is what drives people to stay in the game and pay that monthly fee

    Cunty on
    gameintownk.png
  • HalfmexHalfmex I mock your value system You also appear foolish in the eyes of othersRegistered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Look, you're both right.

    Blizzard aren't 'lazy', in the sense that they're probably not sitting in the office beating off and sipping mai-tais. They're a busy group of people who, if the rumors are to be believed, are probably asshole-deep in designing the next expansion.

    On the other hand, it is extremely obvious that they didn't put the level of effort into these armor sets that they did into the previous eight tiers. Whether or not that is acceptable is entirely based on personal opinion. You're either cool with that or you're not.

    Personally, I'm not wild about it, but I'll deal. I just hope we see some more impressive designs for Icecrown.

    Halfmex on
  • reVersereVerse Attack and Dethrone God Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Halfmex wrote: »
    On the other hand, it is extremely obvious that they didn't put the level of effort into these armor sets that they did into the previous eight tiers.

    I don't think it's "extremely obvious". Most of them look good. I know, opinions opinions and all that.

    reVerse on
  • HalfmexHalfmex I mock your value system You also appear foolish in the eyes of othersRegistered User regular
    edited July 2009
    reVerse wrote: »
    Halfmex wrote: »
    On the other hand, it is extremely obvious that they didn't put the level of effort into these armor sets that they did into the previous eight tiers.
    I don't think it's "extremely obvious". Most of them look good. I know, opinions opinions and all that.
    Well yes, but in the sense that classes are sharing models, less effort was put in. Maybe it was a matter of hours, maybe it was a matter of days, whatever. I'm just saying, aesthetic appeal aside, less effort was made to create these sets.

    Not saying it's a catastrophic thing or anything either. It is what it is.

    Halfmex on
  • CuntyCunty Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Since i got bottom of the paged I will summarize my whole point

    This is tier gear that you get from raids. When you are in raids you only see your faction. In the past you saw 10 models, and could distinguish between classes in raids by looking at their gear. Now there will be 4 models in raids. To me, this cheapens the gear. Were this PVP it would make more sense to me, but it isn't PVP.

    I think the gear itself looks fine, but every clothy wearing very similar looking gear just doesn't sit well with me


    and new content isn't charity as you make it sound, it keeps people paying that monthly fee, and were people not looking forward to new content they may not pay it

    Cunty on
    gameintownk.png
  • HalfmexHalfmex I mock your value system You also appear foolish in the eyes of othersRegistered User regular
    edited July 2009
    And that's a valid viewpoint, absolutely. In fact that's probably the most oft-made complaint about the set, since it sort of counters the devs own stated philosophy of tier sets: they should be distinguishable.

    Now, some would argue that the color differentiations and, in some cases, robes/skirts rather than leggings, makes that distinction. That is a matter of some debate.

    But in any case, they aren't changing it, so we'll have to deal.

    Halfmex on
  • EndEnd Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Personally, I'm glad I'm not alliance. ;-)

    End on
    I wish that someway, somehow, that I could save every one of us
    zaleiria-by-lexxy-sig.jpg
  • reVersereVerse Attack and Dethrone God Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Halfmex wrote: »
    And that's a valid viewpoint, absolutely. In fact that's probably the most oft-made complaint about the set, since it sort of counters the devs own stated philosophy of tier sets: they should be distinguishable.

    Now, some would argue that the color differentiations and, in some cases, robes/skirts rather than leggings, makes that distinction. That is a matter of some debate.

    But in any case, they aren't changing it, so we'll have to deal.

    I think it'll be easy enough to differentiate between, say, the two mail wearing classes because one of them will be shooting at shit with a gun, and the other will either be beating crap up close and personal or casting spells.

    reVerse on
  • 815165815165 Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    I think the armor classes looking similar can be justified in the lore, the Argent dudes are amassing a force to take on ol' Lichy so I can see why they'd want a unified look amongst their troops, and the two factions arms race to take him down creates the distinction between the Horde and Alliances armors.

    Its kind of like how the arena sets work, the two factions started to share armor because of where it was coming from (the goblins running the arena) and not their factions as it had been pre-TBC.

    815165 on
  • RedDawnRedDawn Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    815165 wrote: »
    I think the armor classes looking similar can be justified in the lore, the Argent dudes are amassing a force to take on ol' Lichy so I can see why they'd want a unified look amongst their troops, and the two factions arms race to take him down creates the distinction between the Horde and Alliances armors.

    Its kind of like how the arena sets work, the two factions started to share armor because of where it was coming from (the goblins running the arena) and not their factions as it had been pre-TBC.

    I was coming in to post something along these lines, but you said it better than I could.

    RedDawn on
  • HalfmexHalfmex I mock your value system You also appear foolish in the eyes of othersRegistered User regular
    edited July 2009
    reVerse wrote: »
    Halfmex wrote: »
    And that's a valid viewpoint, absolutely. In fact that's probably the most oft-made complaint about the set, since it sort of counters the devs own stated philosophy of tier sets: they should be distinguishable.

    Now, some would argue that the color differentiations and, in some cases, robes/skirts rather than leggings, makes that distinction. That is a matter of some debate.

    But in any case, they aren't changing it, so we'll have to deal.
    I think it'll be easy enough to differentiate between, say, the two mail wearing classes because one of them will be shooting at shit with a gun, and the other will either be beating crap up close and personal or casting spells.
    Unless you encounter the sadly not uncommon primarily-meleeing Hunter. :(

    But seriously, while the class's actions can serve as a distinction, the complaint is leveled mostly at the aesthetics of the armor itself.

    Halfmex on
  • HalfmexHalfmex I mock your value system You also appear foolish in the eyes of othersRegistered User regular
    edited July 2009
    RedDawn wrote: »
    815165 wrote: »
    I think the armor classes looking similar can be justified in the lore, the Argent dudes are amassing a force to take on ol' Lichy so I can see why they'd want a unified look amongst their troops, and the two factions arms race to take him down creates the distinction between the Horde and Alliances armors.

    Its kind of like how the arena sets work, the two factions started to share armor because of where it was coming from (the goblins running the arena) and not their factions as it had been pre-TBC.
    I was coming in to post something along these lines, but you said it better than I could.
    "And for you, Alliance Rogues and Druids: Come forth and accept this armor, created by our own skilled craftsmen."

    Druids: "Sweet, a beak!"

    Rogues: "Fuck, a beak!"

    Halfmex on
This discussion has been closed.