The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Mully's Art Thread

mullymully Registered User regular
edited February 2013 in Artist's Corner
Y'ello. I'm new. I've read a lot through these forums and I hope to not be despised by each and every one of you! It's something I aspire to. It seems like a difficult task. ANYWAY.

So, I draw and stuff. I figure the best way to kick this thread off is to post some fan-art that my friend and I did tonight of Tycho and Gabe. I did Tycho. Friend did Gabe.

Then I'll post some of my actual art. I'm always looking for suggestions, even if I don't correct them, it doesn't mean I won't learn from them.

IMAGE REMOVED -- DUE TO MULLY'S GOOGLE EGO SEARCHING.

mully on
«1345

Posts

  • mullymully Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    Now for the art-puke.

    marriotta.jpg

    mel.jpg
    photo reference used

    taurenmullyp.jpg
    i don't play WoW anymore.

    smokeymuscletsao.png
    photo ref used for body, not for head. ... obviously, ugh.

    hellohello.jpg
    no ref, but .. wtf is it? iuno.

    earth2.jpg
    hey this must be pretty image-heavy by now, eh?

    fiveofclubssmall.jpg
    small version of this'un.

    h'okay i'll leave this alone for awhile now.

    mully on
  • LlyLly Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    I like it. Don't have time right now for specific crits, so i'll just say Welcome to the forum! You're the most promising newbie we've had for a while i reckon.

    Lly on
  • GreatnationGreatnation Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    When your not using a photo ref some of the anatomy (mostly joints) start lacking. But you do have some really good technique with the digital painting thing down.


    The main problem is the backgrounds. Work with some perspective maybe, or at least establish some kind of horizon.


    Overall though,
    :^:

    Greatnation on
  • mullymully Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    w00t, haven't been chased out yet!

    thanks for the crits thus far. i definitely agree with what you're saying about the joint problem.. i hadn't actually noticed it was so specific to that, but you're right.

    as for backgrounds.. haha, not a single one of these has either a) a background at all, or b) a background that's supposed to be noted. i'll have to post something with an actual background ... that could be a challenge; for i am a lazy bastard.

    thank ye thank ye for the welcomes!

    mully on
  • MagicToasterMagicToaster JapanRegistered User regular
    edited December 2006
    mully wrote:
    marriotta.jpg

    Yes, this is exactly the kind of girl I go for! The seat looks like it could come undone any minute.

    MagicToaster on
  • no_toastno_toast Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    Great to have new talented people here, I agree with Greatnation about the backgrounds, they need some work. Maybe do a really time consuming work where you use multiple refs. I'm trying something like that myself, tough I'm mainly working on color theory... but still a large and complex work would be a good variation, i think. Something less character-centered perhaps.

    no_toast on
  • SheriSheri Resident Fluffer My Living RoomRegistered User regular
    edited December 2006
    As a non-drawing-artist, I have to say that some of these are just beautiful. I'll leave the real crits to everyone who knows what they're talking about, but. . . wow.

    Sheri on
  • Vargas PrimeVargas Prime King of Nothing Just a ShowRegistered User regular
    edited December 2006
    Some super-looking stuff here. A few issues, which you and others have mentioned, Mully. (Most notably, the head on the Calvin Klein model guy, but you already knew that.)

    The painting of the old man is really nice. I totally dig that. Some really good use of color in there.

    Do you paint all these directly in Photoshop (or whatever software you're using), or do you do the linework on paper first? If the latter, I'd like to see some of the pencils or sketches that preceded the painted versions.

    Vargas Prime on
  • mullymully Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    I've done most of these in a program called OpenCanvas. You can find OpenCanvas 1.1 free for download, on the "interweb". I also use Painter IX. And Oekaki. Photoshop and I are not on speaking terms.

    The "model" looking dude is Oekaki though, and I can show you an animation of that! That's something. Here's the animation.

    mully on
  • EWomEWom Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    To me it looks like anytime you use a photo referance you just trace over the photo referance with whatever program you use.

    EWom on
    Whether they find a life there or not, I think Jupiter should be called an enemy planet.
  • Kuro HouKuro Hou Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    The painting of the old man is really nice. I totally dig that. Some really good use of color in there.

    That "old man" appears to be none other than comedy legend Mel Brooks.

    I like the art, but the Gabe and Tycho look like final fantasy characters.

    Kuro Hou on
    "For a man who looks like a garden gnome, you sure have a lot of demands."

    I dare you to make less sense.
  • GreatnationGreatnation Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    EWom,


    Totally uncool to accuse someone of paintover. Really. They arent paintovers.





    for reals lame.

    Greatnation on
  • mullymully Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    EWom wrote:
    To me it looks like anytime you use a photo referance you just trace over the photo referance with whatever program you use.

    S'okay other people, he's welcome to make his accusations.

    Feel free to take any one of my photo reference'd drawings, find the photo, and put one over the top. Y'know, if you're into feeling like a jackass, and spotting the many (to me) glaring mistakes with some help for yourself.

    But thank you for thinking that they look good enough to be paintovers!

    (( Note -- OpenCanvas 1.1 I use in a networking mode. This means that up to 3 other people may join it, and there is absolutely no way to do a paintover this way. Also, Oekaki (if you click the animation you will plainly see) has no option for this. ))

    mully on
  • mullymully Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    Kuro Hou wrote:
    I like the art, but the Gabe and Tycho look like final fantasy characters.

    Ahahah. Yeah. Agreed. Meh, that's what happens when you don't really have any outcome in focus.

    But we all know that Tycho is Cloud in another time and place, anyway.

    ((Auch, kidding.))

    mully on
  • EWomEWom Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    EWom,


    Totally uncool to accuse someone of paintover. Really. They arent paintovers.


    for reals lame.

    All Mully's other work other than the parts where Mully said there was photo referance there are genericish, with less than accurate anatomy and shading. The ones with photo referance are stunningly accurate with anatomy and shading. I just calls them how I sees them.

    I also don't give a fuck if you think it's lame to say that, then good go fuck yourself, there is nothing in the rules thread about that; and I've seen other posters say the same thing in other threads. And also, how can you say they aren't paintovers? Were you there when these works of art were done?

    If Mully were to post the photo referances for us to compare, that would be one thing, but to post some pretty darn good looking art, with some faults, then to post two that are absolute spot on I can think of nothing else. And from my experiance with art, and watching others, and looking at others, if people make anatomy and shading mistakes in their own works they are prone to do the same even when copying from a referance as they draw it how they think they see it, not how they do see it.

    The great differance in the shading on the head of the ripped man, and anatomical differances show this in Mully's work.

    Until the referances are posted I stand by my claim. I'm not saying Mully should be tarred and feathered or banned from the forums, or yelled at or anything, I'm just saying: that's what it looks like, particularly in comparison to the other work.

    for the TL;DR : FOAD -> Greatnation

    EWom on
    Whether they find a life there or not, I think Jupiter should be called an enemy planet.
  • mullymully Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    For the darling EWom:

    Mel Brooks

    There's my Mel Brooks reference.

    The only other photo ref'ed one is the one of the model-y male, which is going to be harder than hell to find. But the freaking ANIMATION of the ENTIRE process is listed. Go inspect an Oekaki board for yourself. I use www.fearsome-oekaki.com, if that helps you.

    This is so cute, I've been here like, what. 1 day? And there's already cursing in my thread! Hot damn, I win!

    mully on
  • mullymully Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    EWom wrote:
    All Mully's other work other than the parts where Mully said there was photo referance there are genericish, with less than accurate anatomy and shading. The ones with photo referance are stunningly accurate with anatomy and shading. I just calls them how I sees them.

    You, go draw a giraffe from your head. Then, go draw a giraffe from a photo reference. You will be shocked to discover how much more accurate it will be! From colouring, to anatomy, the results will be AMAZING!

    mully on
  • mullymully Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    296.png

    More drawrings. I did this in OpenCanvas too. But it's old and makes no sense. Huzzah!

    328.png

    Oekaki. Photo reference, self portrait. ... I horrify myself with my resemblance to one of those Hanson chicks, here.

    royalboiler.jpg

    If you don't know Brandon Grahams' comix, you will soon. Did this up for him of a character of his. Micron pen + Painter IX.

    sharpieowl.jpg

    Photo reference. Sharpie, 2 gray felt pens. It's an owl.

    mully on
  • yumeyume Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    omg owl ;o;!

    XD the comment about final fantasy characters rocks my socks

    yume on
  • EWomEWom Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    mully wrote:
    296.png

    That guy looks like my friend symon and his little sister; which makes it kind of creepy.

    EWom on
    Whether they find a life there or not, I think Jupiter should be called an enemy planet.
  • mullymully Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    EWom wrote:
    That guy looks like my friend symon and his little sister; which makes it kind of creepy.

    Now you know the truth, through art. They get it on every night through the power of bass.

    mully on
  • EWomEWom Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    mully wrote:
    EWom wrote:
    That guy looks like my friend symon and his little sister; which makes it kind of creepy.

    Now you know the truth, through art. They get it on every night through the power of bass.

    If you knew the family, you would find it almost possible; which once again, makes it creepy. :p

    EWom on
    Whether they find a life there or not, I think Jupiter should be called an enemy planet.
  • mullymully Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    EWom wrote:
    mully wrote:
    EWom wrote:
    That guy looks like my friend symon and his little sister; which makes it kind of creepy.

    Now you know the truth, through art. They get it on every night through the power of bass.

    If you knew the family, you would find it almost possible; which once again, makes it creepy. :p

    Sexcellent. XD

    mully on
  • SheriSheri Resident Fluffer My Living RoomRegistered User regular
    edited December 2006
    That self-portrait, mully? Definitely thought it was a photo for a second. Especially the mouth-area.

    Sheri on
  • (ohms)Crunchy(ohms)Crunchy Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    Sheri wrote:
    That self-portrait, mully? Definitely thought it was a photo for a second. Especially the mouth-area.
    Yeah, I thought it was a photo right away also. :^:

    (ohms)Crunchy on
    14e9iqh.jpg
  • TamTam Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    Yowza. The referenced ones are really awesome.

    Tam on
  • mullymully Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    Auch, tried to find the animation for that one and could not.

    However.

    395.png

    I have the animation for this'un!

    mully on
  • squeefishsqueefish Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    :shock:

    You, sir, have rocked my socks right off. Awesome stuff. Hurray for a cool newb! :D (I especially love the self portrait and the one of that shirtless man at the beginning.)

    squeefish on
  • (ohms)Crunchy(ohms)Crunchy Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    You better have a job in the art business! *shakes fist*

    (ohms)Crunchy on
    14e9iqh.jpg
  • mullymully Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    You better have a job in the art business! *shakes fist*

    Nah, for now I work in Insurance. I use AutoCAD though ... That's .. KIND of like an art.

    I'm sort of waiting for a bit in a boring job before I try to jump into doing concept art for video game companies. I have so many connections in that field that it's inevitable, but.. it will take time.

    But I'm scared. :[

    mully on
  • mullymully Registered User regular
    edited February 2013
    I think I will be gutsy and post my "comic".

    I've seen what you people do to other comics, though.

    Let this be known: I am aware that it sucks and that it is mostly cut/paste, and that it is most likely unfunny as it is an inside joke.

    ...

    Uh. Yeah. Don't know why I'm posting this. I'm working on another one right now that you guys will hate even MORE! Look forward to that, eh?

    (( PS -- this is true, word for word. ACTUALLY HAPPENED. ... Minus the ball. ))

    IMAGE REMOVED FOR FEAR OF GOOGLE RESULTS

    mully on
  • mullymully Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    everettwallpaper.jpg

    commission

    mully on
  • TwoRightFeetTwoRightFeet Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    mully wrote:
    I think I will be gutsy and post my "comic".

    I've seen what you people do to other comics, though.


    fetchcomic.jpg

    Well...
    1. The expressions usually change once a panel +5 points
    2. You didn't use comic sans font +5 points
    3. The characters maintain a regular size throughout the strip +5
    4. It wasn't done in MS Paint +100 points

    that's 115 points more than most strips on AC get...

    TwoRightFeet on
  • JCMJCM Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    mully wrote:
    I think I will be gutsy and post my "comic".

    I've seen what you people do to other comics, though.


    fetchcomic.jpg

    Well...
    1. The expressions usually change once a panel +5 points
    2. You didn't use comic sans font +5 points
    3. The characters maintain a regular size throughout the strip +5
    4. It wasn't done in MS Paint +100 points

    that's 115 points more than most strips on AC get...

    Agreed.

    And I give an extra 100points for it not being
    a)game related or
    b)image-comics superhero knockoff

    JCM on
  • GreatnationGreatnation Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    "
    All Mully's other work other than the parts where Mully said there was photo referance there are genericish, with less than accurate anatomy and shading. The ones with photo referance are stunningly accurate with anatomy and shading. I just calls them how I sees them.

    I also don't give a fuck if you think it's lame to say that, then good go fuck yourself, there is nothing in the rules thread about that; and I've seen other posters say the same thing in other threads. And also, how can you say they aren't paintovers? Were you there when these works of art were done?

    If Mully were to post the photo referances for us to compare, that would be one thing, but to post some pretty darn good looking art, with some faults, then to post two that are absolute spot on I can think of nothing else. And from my experiance with art, and watching others, and looking at others, if people make anatomy and shading mistakes in their own works they are prone to do the same even when copying from a referance as they draw it how they think they see it, not how they do see it.

    The great differance in the shading on the head of the ripped man, and anatomical differances show this in Mully's work.

    Until the referances are posted I stand by my claim. I'm not saying Mully should be tarred and feathered or banned from the forums, or yelled at or anything, I'm just saying: that's what it looks like, particularly in comparison to the other work.

    for the TL;DR : FOAD -> Greatnation"



    Defenseive much?


    There are simple ways to verrify claims like this, for example a simple google image search of Mel Gibson brings up the picture at least by page two. The fact that you would rather see the artist scurry to defend herself, than make claims with some sort of backed up opinion- is lame.


    And what the fuck are you talking about, "TL;DR : FOAD"?


    Mully-

    Im looking at the animation process for your painting, and im pretty impressed. But I also feel like you may be torturing yourself to a degree. You took the whole thing to completion peice by peice, which always feels tedious to me. Have you ever tried doing it in passes? Like lay down lines, then colors, then go back and define all the colors a little more, then go back and add a lightsource, wash rinse and repeat?

    Lookin good though.

    Greatnation on
  • Sir PeechizworthSir Peechizworth Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    mully wrote:
    It's an owl.

    orly?

    /cliché

    Sir Peechizworth on
    If it don't Blam, we don't want it.
  • SublimusSublimus Artist. nowhereRegistered User regular
    edited December 2006
    Mully-

    Im looking at the animation process for your painting, and im pretty impressed. But I also feel like you may be torturing yourself to a degree. You took the whole thing to completion peice by peice, which always feels tedious to me. Have you ever tried doing it in passes? Like lay down lines, then colors, then go back and define all the colors a little more, then go back and add a lightsource, wash rinse and repeat?

    I agree. When you work in this method, it gives you a foundation for everything you place on top of it. Which, in turn helps to keep you value key and many other things in check. They already look pretty good, but working this way from reference will probably help you with your non reffed works.

    Sublimus on
  • mullymully Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    JCM wrote:
    And I give an extra 100points for it not being
    a)game related or
    b)image-comics superhero knockoff

    You guys are being too nice to me, I think ... Especially since the next one is game-ish related. ... And entirely stupid.

    Actually, I think if you saw the first comic I did (was forced to), you'd probably beat me out of here with blunt objects.

    Mmm.. blunt.

    mully on
  • mullymully Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    Sublimus wrote:
    Mully-

    Im looking at the animation process for your painting, and im pretty impressed. But I also feel like you may be torturing yourself to a degree. You took the whole thing to completion peice by peice, which always feels tedious to me. Have you ever tried doing it in passes? Like lay down lines, then colors, then go back and define all the colors a little more, then go back and add a lightsource, wash rinse and repeat?

    I agree. When you work in this method, it gives you a foundation for everything you place on top of it. Which, in turn helps to keep you value key and many other things in check. They already look pretty good, but working this way from reference will probably help you with your non reffed works.

    Ahh, you guys have a good point. I don't know why I do things the way I do. I think it has a lot to do with the fact that I never trust my placement with my lines, so I tend to do things piece by piece so its easier to move if I realize that hey -- noses don't go on chins, or what have you.

    I'll have to give that a try though, thank you for the suggestions.

    mully on
  • mullymully Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    zebrapainting.jpg

    acrylic painting i did for a nursery.

    LOOK HOW LIFELIKE MY ZEBRA IS???

    mully on
Sign In or Register to comment.