If the wishes of a dead person were unimportant then we wouldn't have wills to decide how their property would be divided up, we would just take whatever we can get.
people lined up outside sickrooms like on Black Friday
Say a decent argument instead of saying "you annoy me by thinking something stupid"
Should we go ahead and completely excise the concept of a last will then?
I mean, this is what you are arguing against.
technically that concerns the deceased's property more often than the deceased
possessions can have value after their poessessor is dead
corpses rarely have value on the open market, except maybe for extremely broad-minded fertilizer/animal feed salesmen
No, it concerns the wishes of the deceased.
If the wishes of a dead person were unimportant then we wouldn't have wills to decide how their property would be divided up, we would just take whatever we can get.
Wait what?
Shit, I have been doing it wrong.
What, you don't roll for loot in your family?
Corvus on
:so_raven:
0
ElldrenIs a woman dammitceterum censeoRegistered Userregular
If the wishes of a dead person were unimportant then we wouldn't have wills to decide how their property would be divided up, we would just take whatever we can get.
people lined up outside sickrooms like on Black Friday
waiting to rush in and grab the best deals
CHEST BUSTER DEALS
GRAB ALL THE ORGANS
Comes with a free drink if you a pair of matching kidneys.
Say a decent argument instead of saying "you annoy me by thinking something stupid"
Should we go ahead and completely excise the concept of a last will then?
I mean, this is what you are arguing against.
technically that concerns the deceased's property more often than the deceased
possessions can have value after their poessessor is dead
corpses rarely have value on the open market, except maybe for extremely broad-minded fertilizer/animal feed salesmen
If I do not own my own body then I don't know what.
The value or lack thereof has nothing to do with it. People leave pieces of otherwise worthless sentimental junk in their wills all the time. This has no bearing on the legal concept and its underlying cultural base.
You don't own it after your death, dead person cannot own property. We inherit automatically, or the state takes it, because it has to go somewhere as there is no owner anymore.
This is false. The estates of dead people often exist long after they do.
At least in common-law countries.
An estate is different from normal property.
Abdhyius on
0
Powerpuppiesdrinking coffee in themountain cabinRegistered Userregular
I would have less sympathy for WTO et al protesters if the cops weren't utter cockbags
I hate it when people are completely correct and they manage to make themselves seem wrong. This is not precisely what I mean to say but I'm struggling to rephrase it.
Say a decent argument instead of saying "you annoy me by thinking something stupid"
Should we go ahead and completely excise the concept of a last will then?
I mean, this is what you are arguing against.
technically that concerns the deceased's property more often than the deceased
possessions can have value after their poessessor is dead
corpses rarely have value on the open market, except maybe for extremely broad-minded fertilizer/animal feed salesmen
No, it concerns the wishes of the deceased.
If the wishes of a dead person were unimportant then we wouldn't have wills to decide how their property would be divided up, we would just take whatever we can get.
I would have less sympathy for WTO et al protesters if the cops weren't utter cockbags
I hate it when people are completely correct and they manage to make themselves seem wrong. This is not precisely what I mean to say but I'm struggling to rephrase it.
I am absolutely certain this is not the case for anyone involved in those protests.
I would have less sympathy for WTO et al protesters if the cops weren't utter cockbags
I would have less sympathy for cops if the WTO et al protesters weren't utter cockbags
The protesters aren't abusing the powers afforded them by their job, nor do they benefit from a sickening presumption of innocence when they do all manner of heinous shit
The protesters are at least providing a useful service to society in baiting these sociopathic fucks into outing themselves.
Senjutsu on
0
Powerpuppiesdrinking coffee in themountain cabinRegistered Userregular
I would have less sympathy for WTO et al protesters if the cops weren't utter cockbags
I would have less sympathy for cops if the WTO et al protesters weren't utter cockbags
The protesters aren't abusing the powers afforded them by their job, nor do they benefit from a sickening presumption of innocence when they do all manner of heinous shit
The protesters are at least providing a useful service to society in baiting these sociopathic fucks into outing themselves.
No?
Black people do that. Protesters get beat up by good and bad cop alike.
Abdhyius on
0
CindersWhose sails were black when it was windyRegistered Userregular
I would have less sympathy for WTO et al protesters if the cops weren't utter cockbags
I hate it when people are completely correct and they manage to make themselves seem wrong. This is not precisely what I mean to say but I'm struggling to rephrase it.
I am absolutely certain this is not the case for anyone involved in those protests.
I was referring to the cops. Don't they have every right to stop the protest from getting out of hand? I mean, if they don't just start hitting people randomly like they always do?
I would have less sympathy for WTO et al protesters if the cops weren't utter cockbags
I would have less sympathy for cops if the WTO et al protesters weren't utter cockbags
The protesters aren't abusing the powers afforded them by their job, nor do they benefit from a sickening presumption of innocence when they do all manner of heinous shit
The protesters are at least providing a useful service to society in baiting these sociopathic fucks into outing themselves.
No?
Black people do that. Protesters get beat up by good and bad cop alike.
Okay. I'd thought it might have been on Stormfront-Britain.
All I know is nothing confuses them more than telling them that you will not allow The Union Jack to be seized by those who would use it as a divisive symbol.
Posts
This is really the best strategy.
It's in a sort of deserty area. I'm not sure how many bridges there are.
the neo-nazis always tended to loose the ensuing fight to the blitzers, the anti-nazi people
but last time about a hundred neo-nazis showed up and seven hundred blitzers
CHEST BUSTER DEALS
GRAB ALL THE ORGANS
I need to infiltrate their numbers and feed information to my Muslim brethren.
What, you don't roll for loot in your family?
I would have less sympathy for cops if the WTO et al protesters weren't utter cockbags
Comes with a free drink if you a pair of matching kidneys.
An estate is different from normal property.
This amuses me greatly. Do the police have any interest in preventing the fight?
I would have less cops for sympathy is cockbags weren't protesting utters.
no you see a protestor is only a potential cockbag for that one night
a cop is a cockbag every day
Is it on foreign aid?
I hate it when people are completely correct and they manage to make themselves seem wrong. This is not precisely what I mean to say but I'm struggling to rephrase it.
I am jealous of your snow
I have been literally stealing from coffins.
I am at least as large as a majority of neo-nazis.
Plus I will conceal a discreet length of steel pipe about my person.
You make your own advantages in these things, really.
are you
are you talking about your penis here?
It was like 85 this morning... what?
I thought colorado got some snow!
it has been stupid cold here recently but not today
the main problem is that some weekend nights, there's only two of them on call for an areas of 120'000
Around here?
It's the BNP deciding what it is to be British and imposing it on others. Usually anyone brown who happens to be handy.
I am absolutely certain this is not the case for anyone involved in those protests.
The protesters aren't abusing the powers afforded them by their job, nor do they benefit from a sickening presumption of innocence when they do all manner of heinous shit
The protesters are at least providing a useful service to society in baiting these sociopathic fucks into outing themselves.
It was 42 one morning this week when I went to work. I will keep my eyes peeled for snow and keep you posted sir skippy!
it is
bogus
No?
Black people do that. Protesters get beat up by good and bad cop alike.
going to tahoe in january
southwest is better than united i feel
but united has better times
both around the same price
I was referring to the cops. Don't they have every right to stop the protest from getting out of hand? I mean, if they don't just start hitting people randomly like they always do?
Go jerk off to some corpse porn, casket
All I know is nothing confuses them more than telling them that you will not allow The Union Jack to be seized by those who would use it as a divisive symbol.
No they tear gas college kids exercising their right to peaceably assemble
much better