The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is the world's largest and highest-energy particle accelerator, intended to collide opposing particle beams of either protons at an energy of 7 TeV (1.12 microjoules) per particle, or lead nuclei at an energy of 574 TeV (92.0 microjoules) per nucleus. The term hadron refers to such particles that are composed of quarks. It is expected that it will address the most fundamental questions of physics, hopefully allowing progress in understanding the deepest laws of nature. The LHC lies in a tunnel 27 kilometres (17 mi) in circumference, as much as 175 metres (574 ft) beneath the Franco-Swiss border near Geneva, Switzerland.
My problem with that thread is that poor formatting makes me unwilling to read it.
My thread? I will gladly reformat it, but I just don't know how to present paragraphs in a more digestible form. Honestly I usually go for a title and a tl;dr to reel people in.
My problem with that thread is that poor formatting makes me unwilling to read it.
My thread? I will gladly reformat it, but I just don't know how to present paragraphs in a more digestible form. Honestly I usually go for a title and a tl;dr to reel people in.
I don't know what's up with it, I opened it up, gave it skim and just couldn't engage with the topic. The replies were no better.
Have you considered graphs?
Mojo_Jojo on
Homogeneous distribution of your varieties of amuse-gueule
I get the basics of how markets work. But evidence suggests that with ETS's it's never going to work. It's too complicated to implement well, and faces steep political opposition even then. I'm interested in actually doing something good - and that means beating the tough sell to the electorate, opposition parties which simply don't believe in climate change etc.
Anything which can tweaked, tinkered with or managed has administrative costs - you need those to be low to simply pass the legislation otherwise you get the classic "they're raising taxes!!!" argument.
Not raising taxes is the most important thing you can do, first and foremost, with environmental policy which a lot of people would prefer not to see happen at all.
My problem with that thread is that poor formatting makes me unwilling to read it.
My thread? I will gladly reformat it, but I just don't know how to present paragraphs in a more digestible form. Honestly I usually go for a title and a tl;dr to reel people in.
I don't know what's up with it, I opened it up, gave it skim and just couldn't engage with the topic. The replies were no better.
Have you considered graphs?
You can't really graph political expendience, except in those stupid theoretical graphs.
Posts
They tried to bury us. They didn't know that we were seeds. 2018 Midterms. Get your shit together.
so someone spilled soda on the cake and then you had to spend another 11 million dollars on a birthday part six months later
that about right
---
I've got a spare copy of Portal, if anyone wants it message me.
Nice.
No, it used to happen every single chat back when we had explicit length and who was next rules.
I want to have words with him over his OP in the carbon emissions thread
apparently one of the new advanced classes is a assassiny type guy who uses, and i quote
"hallucinogenic poisons"
this is the best tactic ever
make your enemies trip balls
just get them loaded up on LSD and run at them screaming "I'M A SPIDER!" and they're like "OH FUCK"
Man that would make for a really neat character in a thing.
I am I'm just wondering if he's here
Somebody did eat the Hydrogen (cupcake) early, though, so we had to find another source to replace it.
They tried to bury us. They didn't know that we were seeds. 2018 Midterms. Get your shit together.
Doubt it!
Cool. You have a wierd sense of economics.
It takes me 12 minutes to drive to work.
I need to be there in 20 minutes.
should i get off my ass and leave?
Is definitive spelled difinitive?
---
I've got a spare copy of Portal, if anyone wants it message me.
I just met her
economize, slack off for 8 minutes.
no, definitive has an e in it while difinitive has an i in it.
Difinitive is also not a word.
My thread? I will gladly reformat it, but I just don't know how to present paragraphs in a more digestible form. Honestly I usually go for a title and a tl;dr to reel people in.
i'm hearing a lot of complaints as she's playing it so
i would hazard no
also apparently Return to Ostagar is AWFUL
I don't know what's up with it, I opened it up, gave it skim and just couldn't engage with the topic. The replies were no better.
Have you considered graphs?
stolen. facebooked.
off to work.
What evidence suggests it's never going to work?
EDIT: In the thread, maybe
If I were to ask you for sex, would your answer be the same as the answer to this question?
one of those six has an IV of 31 in special defence, and another has 31 in speed
this is a good start
You can't really graph political expendience, except in those stupid theoretical graphs.
I should look for some though.