got kinda drunk at a pub with my parents and watched the soccer match
if team spain ever wants to gang bang me
they totally can
but that's, like, 11 guys
It might not be enough for him.
I worked out once that I'd need 9 people to be fully satiated at the core of a gangbang. I'm sure you could find some spare parts in those 9 for 2 more.
Why 9?
3 to be airtight. 2 for her hands. 1 for her breasts. 2 for her feet. And 1 to attempt conversation?
I had one for each breast, but otherwise you're right.
Oh you meant fondling. I was going for something else. And that would probably be less physically awkward.
Thomamelas on
0
HonkHonk is this poster.Registered User, __BANNED USERSregular
I had one for each breast, but otherwise you're right.
Being sandwiched is too distracting for me to attempt conversation.
I was left with a spare and I figured I'd go for the brain as erogenous zone joke. It works even more poorly when you think about it because he mouth would be full. And talking with your mouth full is just rude.
Thomamelas on
0
LudiousI just wanted a sandwich A temporally dislocated QuiznosRegistered Userregular
edited July 2010
This should be renamed Harlot [chat]. You seemed like such a nice, pure boy, Eddy.
TL DRNot at all confident in his reflexive opinions of thingsRegistered Userregular
edited July 2010
9 seems like more than would be practical or enjoyable. Then you have concerns about cooling/ventilation, people being crushed under 4-5 other bodies, etc.
The proper amount of playthings to service a person is probably around 4. If I was a drug lord or CEO or whatever, that's about what I'd go with.
TL DR on
0
TavIrish Minister for DefenceRegistered Userregular
edited July 2010
Man, we have weekly LANs in college
Tav on
0
HonkHonk is this poster.Registered User, __BANNED USERSregular
I had one for each breast, but otherwise you're right.
Being sandwiched is too distracting for me to attempt conversation.
I was left with a spare and I figured I'd go for the brain as erogenous zone joke. It works even more poorly when you think about it because he mouth would be full. And talking with your mouth full is just rude.
When you have eight people paying attention to you, you're lucky your brain doesn't come bouncing out your ears.
9 seems like more than would be practical or enjoyable. Then you have concerns about cooling/ventilation, people being crushed under 4-5 other bodies, etc.
The proper amount of playthings to service a person is probably around 4. If I was a drug lord or CEO or whatever, that's about what I'd go with.
Some people are ambitious. Personally I agree. If structural engineering has to be done, then I draw the line.
I could have been part of a spanish gang bang in london but I didn't really feel like being murdered by a group of strangers, handsome and swarthy as they may have been
got kinda drunk at a pub with my parents and watched the soccer match
if team spain ever wants to gang bang me
they totally can
but that's, like, 11 guys
It might not be enough for him.
I worked out once that I'd need 9 people to be fully satiated at the core of a gangbang. I'm sure you could find some spare parts in those 9 for 2 more.
Why 9?
3 to be airtight. 2 for her hands. 1 for her breasts. 2 for her feet. And 1 to attempt conversation?
I had one for each breast, but otherwise you're right.
So you basically wet yourself during the Doc Manhattan sex scene, right?
Glorious Cretin on
0
VariableMouth CongressStroke Me Lady FameRegistered Userregular
Posts
Oh you meant fondling. I was going for something else. And that would probably be less physically awkward.
Also, it is fun to gather a few people and play games with each other.
I am at once intrigued and anxious
edit: Oh, I guessed right!
Being sandwiched is too distracting for me to attempt conversation.
Face Twit Rav Gram
Fondling, suckling, oral sex - my calculations were based upon performant parts, not any specific ideas thereof.
I was left with a spare and I figured I'd go for the brain as erogenous zone joke. It works even more poorly when you think about it because he mouth would be full. And talking with your mouth full is just rude.
The proper amount of playthings to service a person is probably around 4. If I was a drug lord or CEO or whatever, that's about what I'd go with.
well it was a long time ago I imagine
When you have eight people paying attention to you, you're lucky your brain doesn't come bouncing out your ears.
anyone that's ever had two people go down on them would know this
Some people are ambitious. Personally I agree. If structural engineering has to be done, then I draw the line.
Eddy I have problems getting even one person to go down on me. :P
I'm sure they could make it back if they pawned a few of their solid gold and platinum diamond encrusted cock rings.
PSN/XBL: Zampanov -- Steam: Zampanov
It takes a lot of money to keep people quiet
and to buy candy
Iheard we were talking about spanish gangbangs and I came as fast as I could
Here, cute animals to distract you.
Face Twit Rav Gram
hence it taking awhile for you to get here, eh?
So you basically wet yourself during the Doc Manhattan sex scene, right?
this doesn't make sense
and
QUE GUAPO
and they took pity on me and recognized me as hilariously easy
That's not Sarks.
Face Twit Rav Gram
I should stop buying copies in the store to wear out and just get Alan's porn wishlist
cut out all the middlemen, make the solo sex complete
Man, for some reason Nexus's av made me think Sarks. Must be more out of it than I thought.
this is when they started getting sad!
The third one is still the best one. All successive and previous movies contain far too little Gary Oldman.
cedric noooooooo
Hrmm. Gary Oldman's sort-of-face in smoldering charcoals.
Nope, not enough Gary Oldman.
SPOLIER ALERTTT T
Well, it's got 10 more minutes to cook. We'll see how it turns out. :?
Face Twit Rav Gram