every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.
the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
0
ShivahnUnaware of her barrel shifter privilegeWestern coastal temptressRegistered Userregular
edited September 2010
Oh dear lord.
If they were still there, I'd be over checking it out so fast. That sounds like something.
Researching dildo hilts while having udon is kind of a weird thing.
Also this research has caused me to be slightly disturbed at the size of dildos. Some of those look more painful than anything.
I think you have to work up to the big leagues. You start with those little bullet vibrators but, after a few years worth of stretching, you're ready to handle Ron Jeremy replicas.
Researching dildo hilts while having udon is kind of a weird thing.
Also this research has caused me to be slightly disturbed at the size of dildos. Some of those look more painful than anything.
I think you have to work up to the big leagues. You start with those little bullet vibrators but, after a few years worth of stretching, you're ready to handle Ron Jeremy replicas.
Ever heard of an anal training kit?
Hmmm, I wonder if Christine O'Donnell has ever heard of an anal training kit.
every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.
the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
0
ShivahnUnaware of her barrel shifter privilegeWestern coastal temptressRegistered Userregular
Hmmm, I wonder if Christine O'Donnell has ever heard of an anal training kit.
Reporter: "Ms. O'Donnell! Ms. O'Donnell! One question, please. Are you aware butt plugs come in multiple sizes as a method of gradually expanding the rectum? Inquiring minds want to know!"
emnmnme on
0
lonelyahavaCall me AhavaMove to New ZealandRegistered Userregular
edited September 2010
hahahaha
that's almost as good a Town Hall question as Fredonia. Or Asking if she heard about Ron Jeremy's latest film.
Hmmm, I wonder if Christine O'Donnell has ever heard of an anal training kit.
Reporter: "Ms. O'Donnell! Ms. O'Donnell! One question, please. Are you aware butt plugs come in multiple sizes as a method of gradually expanding the rectum? Inquiring minds want to know!"
She's undoubtedly crazy for many reasons, but I don't understand why people are giving her so much shit for the masturbation thing like it's unprecedented and bizarre. Christianity has seen masturbation as sinful since the beginning and many sects still do. I admit it's bizarre to see your Senator talking about it on MTV (and her phrasing was bizarre as well), but her actual position is not that strange. And I heard somewhere she also said her views have matured since MTV, although I didn't care enough to learn what that actually meant.
Coinage on
0
lonelyahavaCall me AhavaMove to New ZealandRegistered Userregular
edited September 2010
because, i'm sorry, but life without masturbation is a pretty depressing life.
life without lust of some type is a pretty depressing life.
And I frankly don't want somebody that crazily religious that she hasn't even thought of getting herself off when she was horny because it might possibly make her adulterous (she's not married) anywhere near my government.
because, i'm sorry, but life without masturbation is a pretty depressing life.
life without lust of some type is a pretty depressing life.
And I frankly don't want somebody that crazily religious that she hasn't even thought of getting herself off when she was horny because it might possibly make her adulterous (she's not married) anywhere near my government.
It bugs me.
You can live a fine life without masturbation or lust. I have at least two friends who don't feel it.
The real problem is when people think that others shouldn't do it, or, perhaps more depressingly, feel the urges but consider them wrong somehow. That's messed up.
"Christine O'Donnell wants to stop everyone from being allowed to masturbate" isn't exactly the most ineffective attack against her campaign.
DeShadowC on
0
Casually HardcoreOnce an Asshole. Trying to be better.Registered Userregular
edited September 2010
Yeah, there are people who are as asexual as you can get.
There are also people who gets a boner looking at a moist hole in the ground.
Then there are people in the middle who just needs to jerk one out every once and a while.
I mean, shit, every once and awhile I just need to fucking rub one out. Whether it's because of some hot cock tease toying with me, or because I'm shit bored and that lingerie model in that catalog is pretty damn hot.
Telling people that masturbating is wrong is just....wrong.
Casually Hardcore on
0
lonelyahavaCall me AhavaMove to New ZealandRegistered Userregular
edited September 2010
tell that to the 18-25 y/o demographic.
yes yes i know, that's probably most of this board.
Telling people that masturbating is wrong is just....wrong.
And quite a lot of people would disagree with you. Arguing the morality of masturbation with you would be off-topic and a waste of time, but saying that's the position that makes her crazy is disingenuous.
And for the record, Christine has publicly made it clear she's not asexual.
Coinage on
0
KalTorakOne way or another, they all end up inthe Undercity.Registered Userregular
edited September 2010
The weird thing to me isn't that masturbation is right or wrong to people, it's that it's such a non-issue. If you want to pick fights about sex, there are plenty out there that people will be willing to fight with you. Abortion, gay sex, even birth-control, you'll get people on your side. But masturbation? Sure, some people will agree with you, but who's going to fight battles over legislating masturbation?
It's like adultery. Unlike masturbation, I'd say most people agree that it's bad. People do it anyway, but it's bad. But who's going to lead the charge on criminalizing adultery? Not very many people. Try to get even a church on your side, they'll say "Well yeah, we agree that adultery is bad, but right now we're trying to deal with other issues like abortion and we don't want to look like lunatics while we're doing it."
The weird thing to me isn't that masturbation is right or wrong to people, it's that it's such a non-issue. If you want to pick fights about sex, there are plenty out there that people will be willing to fight with you. Abortion, gay sex, even birth-control, you'll get people on your side. But masturbation? Sure, some people will agree with you, but who's going to fight battles over legislating masturbation?
It's like adultery. Unlike masturbation, I'd say most people agree that it's bad. People do it anyway, but it's bad. But who's going to lead the charge on criminalizing adultery? Not very many people. Try to get even a church on your side, they'll say "Well yeah, we agree that adultery is bad, but right now we're trying to deal with other issues like abortion and we don't want to look like lunatics while we're doing it."
Did she actually suggest legislating masturbation? If so, then I will agree that is really crazy. Almost nobody thinks moral issues like masturbation and adultery have a place in law, but there's a big difference between thinking something is wrong and thinking something should be illegal.
Coinage on
0
Casually HardcoreOnce an Asshole. Trying to be better.Registered Userregular
The weird thing to me isn't that masturbation is right or wrong to people, it's that it's such a non-issue. If you want to pick fights about sex, there are plenty out there that people will be willing to fight with you. Abortion, gay sex, even birth-control, you'll get people on your side. But masturbation? Sure, some people will agree with you, but who's going to fight battles over legislating masturbation?
It's like adultery. Unlike masturbation, I'd say most people agree that it's bad. People do it anyway, but it's bad. But who's going to lead the charge on criminalizing adultery? Not very many people. Try to get even a church on your side, they'll say "Well yeah, we agree that adultery is bad, but right now we're trying to deal with other issues like abortion and we don't want to look like lunatics while we're doing it."
Did she actually suggest legislating masturbation? If so, then I will agree that is really crazy. Almost nobody thinks moral issues like masturbation and adultery have a place in law, but there's a big difference between thinking something is wrong and thinking something should be illegal.
She doesn't just dislike masturbation, she wants to stop it from occurring. This is an insane ideology.
Y'know, I'm not overly bothered by her being anti-masturbation. It's a religious thing, I get that. It's the fact that she equates masturbation to adultery that gets me. That, combined with the whole "why would men have sex when they can just masturbate" line makes me think she regards all sexual activity as being interchangeable. Given her belief in absolute good and evil, that's not really a stretch -- anything other than vaginal intercourse between husband and wife is sinful, and all sinful acts are equally forbidden.
Not to mention that if masturbation is "cheating," isn't it also homosexual? I mean, you and your hand are presumably the same gender...
I'm also faintly horrified by her conception of what a "proper" marriage should be -- she's claims women should submit to their husbands, but at the same time she justifies the whole women-shouldn't-enjoy-sex bit by dragging out the old canard "woman give sex to get love, men give love to get sex." So her ideal marriage scenario is one where an obedient wife earns her husband's love by submitting to his every lust.
Then again, this is the woman who says that when she gets married and has kids, she wants them to "see Christ" in her husband.
I have a problem with her masturbation thing, when she thinks it should be stopped and is put into a position to legislate. Then her "religious thing" becomes my issue.
If Texas can't keep sodomy illegal, then I'm not worried about some frigid, closet sex-pervert (you know she is) trying to legislate masturbation.
Can't we agree that someone who wants to though shouldn't be given the ability to legislate?
I would prefer she not run for office, but to deny her the chance would be a weakness on our end. It would send a message that we have no confidence in voters or fellow legislators, and that we are genuinely afraid of this broad and her spooky Jesus powers.
Witch_Hunter_84 on
If you can't beat them, arrange to have them beaten in your presence.
If Texas can't keep sodomy illegal, then I'm not worried about some frigid, closet sex-pervert (you know she is) trying to legislate masturbation.
Can't we agree that someone who wants to though shouldn't be given the ability to legislate?
I would prefer she not run for office, but to deny her the chance would be a weakness on our end. It would send a message that we have no confidence in voters or fellow legislators, and that we are genuinely afraid of this broad and her spooky Jesus powers.
Did I say we should deny her the chance? I just think everyone should be made aware how bat shit crazy she is so they vote for her opponent.
every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.
the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
If Texas can't keep sodomy illegal, then I'm not worried about some frigid, closet sex-pervert (you know she is) trying to legislate masturbation.
Can't we agree that someone who wants to though shouldn't be given the ability to legislate?
I would prefer she not run for office, but to deny her the chance would be a weakness on our end. It would send a message that we have no confidence in voters or fellow legislators, and that we are genuinely afraid of this broad and her spooky Jesus powers.
Did I say we should deny her the chance? I just think everyone should be made aware how bat shit crazy she is so they vote for her opponent.
Even if she made a politically disaterous move like trying to push an anti-whacking it bill through congress, it would get shot down. There would be debate, some press, but I'd like to think that most of congress would shoot it down because they all know there's bigger shit that needs legislating, and frankly, calling a vote on such a measure would be a blatant waste of everyone's time.
If Texas can't keep sodomy illegal, then I'm not worried about some frigid, closet sex-pervert (you know she is) trying to legislate masturbation.
Until there's an attempt to ban or heavily tax pornography or sex toys in Congress.
If that ever came up I'd hope the Adult Industry would throw enough money and lawyers against it to keep it from happening. Hell, the ACLU could knock it down as a violation of privacy and speech if they wanted.
Witch_Hunter_84 on
If you can't beat them, arrange to have them beaten in your presence.
Why do you think its a bad idea to convince voters that this is proof of her being insane and that they should not vote for her? I don't like the option of, well we can send insane people to legislate for us but its ok because they won't accomplish their goals. I know it happens, but I refuse to be complacent about it.
If Texas can't keep sodomy illegal, then I'm not worried about some frigid, closet sex-pervert (you know she is) trying to legislate masturbation.
Until there's an attempt to ban or heavily tax pornography or sex toys in Congress.
If that ever came up I'd hope the Adult Industry would throw enough money and lawyers against it to keep it from happening. Hell, the ACLU could knock it down as a violation of privacy and speech if they wanted.
And she'll be 1 vote among 100 even if she wins.
I'm not too worried. I'd still rather have more sex-positive legislators than sex-phobic ones.
every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.
the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
Why do you think its a bad idea to convince voters that this is proof of her being insane and that they should not vote for her? I don't like the option of, well we can send insane people to legislate for us but its ok because they won't accomplish their goals. I know it happens, but I refuse to be complacent about it.
But she's not insane, she just proscribes to an archaic belief system that has a puritan and restrictive view on sexual practices that I don't consider taboo. You can do as much harm telling people that she's crazy when most people don't care about what she has to say on masturbation. Most Catholics I know don't care what the Pope says on masturbation, and he's the Pope.
My point being that saying she's crazy, when she's just being conservative actually gives her support from people who would otherwise not offer it. It's just much better to make fun of her because then it's not a real attack, just us calling her a silly goose.
Witch_Hunter_84 on
If you can't beat them, arrange to have them beaten in your presence.
Why do you think its a bad idea to convince voters that this is proof of her being insane and that they should not vote for her? I don't like the option of, well we can send insane people to legislate for us but its ok because they won't accomplish their goals. I know it happens, but I refuse to be complacent about it.
But she's not insane, she just proscribes to an archaic belief system that has a puritan and restrictive view on sexual practices that I don't consider taboo. You can do as much harm telling people that she's crazy when most people don't care about what she has to say on masturbation. Most Catholics I know don't care what the Pope says on masturbation, and he's the Pope.
My point being that saying she's crazy, when she's just being conservative actually gives her support from people who would otherwise not offer it. It's just much better to make fun of her because then it's not a real attack, just us calling her a silly goose.
This isn't the only reason I think she's insane and would make a horrible legislator though.
I should clarify: When I said I didn't have a problem with it, I wasn't speaking of her as a Senatorial candidate, just her "philosophy" and psychology in general. Looking at it from that perspective, I see so much batshit that "anti-masturbation" is really a minor point compared to her misogyny and homophobia, her creationist apologia, her moral absolutism, and her paranoid delusions of importance.
Why do you think its a bad idea to convince voters that this is proof of her being insane and that they should not vote for her? I don't like the option of, well we can send insane people to legislate for us but its ok because they won't accomplish their goals. I know it happens, but I refuse to be complacent about it.
But she's not insane, she just proscribes to an archaic belief system that has a puritan and restrictive view on sexual practices that I don't consider taboo. You can do as much harm telling people that she's crazy when most people don't care about what she has to say on masturbation. Most Catholics I know don't care what the Pope says on masturbation, and he's the Pope.
My point being that saying she's crazy, when she's just being conservative actually gives her support from people who would otherwise not offer it. It's just much better to make fun of her because then it's not a real attack, just us calling her a silly goose.
This isn't the only reason I think she's insane and would make a horrible legislator though.
Oh I agree, she would make a horrible legislator, but if anything she'll probably be regulated to supporting fellow right-wingers rather than introducing ultra-conservative legislation herself. I mean, what with all the fipping she does to herself, who has the time to write up a bill for congress?
Witch_Hunter_84 on
If you can't beat them, arrange to have them beaten in your presence.
Why do you think its a bad idea to convince voters that this is proof of her being insane and that they should not vote for her? I don't like the option of, well we can send insane people to legislate for us but its ok because they won't accomplish their goals. I know it happens, but I refuse to be complacent about it.
But she's not insane, she just proscribes to an archaic belief system that has a puritan and restrictive view on sexual practices that I don't consider taboo. You can do as much harm telling people that she's crazy when most people don't care about what she has to say on masturbation. Most Catholics I know don't care what the Pope says on masturbation, and he's the Pope.
My point being that saying she's crazy, when she's just being conservative actually gives her support from people who would otherwise not offer it. It's just much better to make fun of her because then it's not a real attack, just us calling her a silly goose.
This isn't the only reason I think she's insane and would make a horrible legislator though.
Oh I agree, she would make a horrible legislator, but if anything she'll probably be regulated to supporting fellow right-wingers rather than introducing ultra-conservative legislation herself. I mean, what with all the fipping she does to herself, who has the time to write up a bill for congress?
Why do you think its a bad idea to convince voters that this is proof of her being insane and that they should not vote for her? I don't like the option of, well we can send insane people to legislate for us but its ok because they won't accomplish their goals. I know it happens, but I refuse to be complacent about it.
But she's not insane, she just proscribes to an archaic belief system that has a puritan and restrictive view on sexual practices that I don't consider taboo. You can do as much harm telling people that she's crazy when most people don't care about what she has to say on masturbation. Most Catholics I know don't care what the Pope says on masturbation, and he's the Pope.
My point being that saying she's crazy, when she's just being conservative actually gives her support from people who would otherwise not offer it. It's just much better to make fun of her because then it's not a real attack, just us calling her a silly goose.
This isn't the only reason I think she's insane and would make a horrible legislator though.
Oh I agree, she would make a horrible legislator, but if anything she'll probably be regulated to supporting fellow right-wingers rather than introducing ultra-conservative legislation herself. I mean, what with all the fipping she does to herself, who has the time to write up a bill for congress?
I'd rather have a rational person fill the seat.
Me too, but . . . you know . . . that Tea Party.
Witch_Hunter_84 on
If you can't beat them, arrange to have them beaten in your presence.
Posts
Also this research has caused me to be slightly disturbed at the size of dildos. Some of those look more painful than anything.
There used to be a sex shop in the Castro called Jaguar and the centerpiece of their collection was a life-sized black latex foot.
If they were still there, I'd be over checking it out so fast. That sounds like something.
I think you have to work up to the big leagues. You start with those little bullet vibrators but, after a few years worth of stretching, you're ready to handle Ron Jeremy replicas.
Ever heard of an anal training kit?
Hmmm, I wonder if Christine O'Donnell has ever heard of an anal training kit.
Whoever checks my search history is going to get a face full of anal training kits and dildo hilts. Serves them right.
Reporter: "Ms. O'Donnell! Ms. O'Donnell! One question, please. Are you aware butt plugs come in multiple sizes as a method of gradually expanding the rectum? Inquiring minds want to know!"
that's almost as good a Town Hall question as Fredonia. Or Asking if she heard about Ron Jeremy's latest film.
Democrats Abroad! || Vote From Abroad
Warren 2020
life without lust of some type is a pretty depressing life.
And I frankly don't want somebody that crazily religious that she hasn't even thought of getting herself off when she was horny because it might possibly make her adulterous (she's not married) anywhere near my government.
It bugs me.
Democrats Abroad! || Vote From Abroad
You can live a fine life without masturbation or lust. I have at least two friends who don't feel it.
The real problem is when people think that others shouldn't do it, or, perhaps more depressingly, feel the urges but consider them wrong somehow. That's messed up.
There are also people who gets a boner looking at a moist hole in the ground.
Then there are people in the middle who just needs to jerk one out every once and a while.
I mean, shit, every once and awhile I just need to fucking rub one out. Whether it's because of some hot cock tease toying with me, or because I'm shit bored and that lingerie model in that catalog is pretty damn hot.
Telling people that masturbating is wrong is just....wrong.
yes yes i know, that's probably most of this board.
shutting up now.
Democrats Abroad! || Vote From Abroad
And for the record, Christine has publicly made it clear she's not asexual.
It's like adultery. Unlike masturbation, I'd say most people agree that it's bad. People do it anyway, but it's bad. But who's going to lead the charge on criminalizing adultery? Not very many people. Try to get even a church on your side, they'll say "Well yeah, we agree that adultery is bad, but right now we're trying to deal with other issues like abortion and we don't want to look like lunatics while we're doing it."
I mean
I'd hit that
kind of ironic given the circumstances
but I could totally whack it to her picture
...please don't make me get the newspaper.
She is into that kinky witchcraft shit....
Now...if you excuse me....I need to be in my room for a few minutes.
She doesn't just dislike masturbation, she wants to stop it from occurring. This is an insane ideology.
Not to mention that if masturbation is "cheating," isn't it also homosexual? I mean, you and your hand are presumably the same gender...
I'm also faintly horrified by her conception of what a "proper" marriage should be -- she's claims women should submit to their husbands, but at the same time she justifies the whole women-shouldn't-enjoy-sex bit by dragging out the old canard "woman give sex to get love, men give love to get sex." So her ideal marriage scenario is one where an obedient wife earns her husband's love by submitting to his every lust.
Then again, this is the woman who says that when she gets married and has kids, she wants them to "see Christ" in her husband.
Can't we agree that someone who wants to though shouldn't be given the ability to legislate?
I would prefer she not run for office, but to deny her the chance would be a weakness on our end. It would send a message that we have no confidence in voters or fellow legislators, and that we are genuinely afraid of this broad and her spooky Jesus powers.
Did I say we should deny her the chance? I just think everyone should be made aware how bat shit crazy she is so they vote for her opponent.
Until there's an attempt to ban or heavily tax pornography or sex toys in Congress.
Even if she made a politically disaterous move like trying to push an anti-whacking it bill through congress, it would get shot down. There would be debate, some press, but I'd like to think that most of congress would shoot it down because they all know there's bigger shit that needs legislating, and frankly, calling a vote on such a measure would be a blatant waste of everyone's time.
If that ever came up I'd hope the Adult Industry would throw enough money and lawyers against it to keep it from happening. Hell, the ACLU could knock it down as a violation of privacy and speech if they wanted.
Are you planning on covering the floor with that newspaper? Because I'm with Rent, she's in my rotation now.
And she'll be 1 vote among 100 even if she wins.
I'm not too worried. I'd still rather have more sex-positive legislators than sex-phobic ones.
But she's not insane, she just proscribes to an archaic belief system that has a puritan and restrictive view on sexual practices that I don't consider taboo. You can do as much harm telling people that she's crazy when most people don't care about what she has to say on masturbation. Most Catholics I know don't care what the Pope says on masturbation, and he's the Pope.
My point being that saying she's crazy, when she's just being conservative actually gives her support from people who would otherwise not offer it. It's just much better to make fun of her because then it's not a real attack, just us calling her a silly goose.
This isn't the only reason I think she's insane and would make a horrible legislator though.
Oh I agree, she would make a horrible legislator, but if anything she'll probably be regulated to supporting fellow right-wingers rather than introducing ultra-conservative legislation herself. I mean, what with all the fipping she does to herself, who has the time to write up a bill for congress?
I'd rather have a rational person fill the seat.
Me too, but . . . you know . . . that Tea Party.