i'm kind of confused with where criss is headed in the show
i mean, it'd be nice if they were sending a simple message: not all gay guys want to fuck each other, criss isn't a 'token' gay character filling a relationship hole
but that seems a little more than i'd expect of the writers so i expect they'll reveal he has a BF or something
i dunno
Right now my prediction is that he's going to be uninterested, which then leads kurt to go back to McKinley. It's hard to tell, though, especially when the episodes are so scattershot (really, what the hell did Colfenor and Criss's number from the Christmas episode have to do with anything?)
But regardless, the mere fact of including a gay character who isn't a complete fashion slut, pedo, or random collector of creepy porcelain dolls helps the show so much.
The video for Cold Outside reverses it at the end though right (I had it on whilst foruming, but it seemed too)?
In the Glee episode it helps that they're both boys (subversive!) and that the one playing holdout (Kurt) is actually hardcore in love with the one who plays predator (Criss).
MrMister on
0
ElldrenIs a woman dammitceterum censeoRegistered Userregular
mike it looks like i'm gonna dj for a sports bar on nye
it's very simple stuff, plugging into their system, only bringing my own music and input device
but
it's p cool
easy stuff, they pretty much want top 40 dance stuff with a few holiday songs and then the countdown at midnight
$200 for 4 hours!
i am happy
that's awesome!
have you DJ'ed before?
being a DJ at a sports bar on NYE = guaranteed to get laid bee tee dubs
not really, no
i mean i know the basic equipment- i've helped my uncle connect at a few of his shows
he is p much gonna pre make the music for me, no mixing, nothing effort intensive
i pretty much have to plug everything in, open the software, queue up the list he made me, and make sure that the happy new year track is perfectly synced
MrMisterJesus dying on the cross in pain? Morally better than us. One has to go "all in".Registered Userregular
edited December 2010
Been alternating paper writing and hard drinking for the last four days. Lost track of time--I woke up at 6pm today and thought it was 6am, got confused about what day of the week it was, and etc.
I would like to go further, however, and claim that the very framework of outcome and choice in which preferences are supposed to be revealed itself presupposes the subjective psychological entities which it ostensibly is to replace. Imagine, for instance, that A and B are in a lab playing a classical prisoner's dilemma game. The payoff grid is:
[$2, $2] , [$3, 0]
[0, $3], [$1, $1]
Now suppose that A cooperates; classically, this would be treated as irrational, since defection strictly dominates cooperation in monetary payoff. But that only demonstrates that A is irrational if what she cares about is maximizing her monetary payoff. If we suppose instead that what she cares about is maximizing the monetary payoff to both players, then cooperation is actually the strictly dominant strategy. In that case, the grid above doesn't actually characterize the game A is playing.
Instead, an appropriate grid for A would be:
[4] , [3]
[3] , [2]
It might be tempting to treat this as an epistemic problem: how do we know what game A is playing without adverting to knowledge of A's subjective psychological states? But I urge that this is the wrong interpretation. The problem is instead a metaphysical one: unless A has certain subjective psychological states there just isn't an answer at all to the question of what game A is playing. We cannot take for granted any notion of choosing x versus y independent of an implicit understanding of those states.
Posts
and the bazaar is half a week away
I need fertilizer damnit!
And more radish seeds
Right now my prediction is that he's going to be uninterested, which then leads kurt to go back to McKinley. It's hard to tell, though, especially when the episodes are so scattershot (really, what the hell did Colfenor and Criss's number from the Christmas episode have to do with anything?)
But regardless, the mere fact of including a gay character who isn't a complete fashion slut, pedo, or random collector of creepy porcelain dolls helps the show so much.
it's very simple stuff, plugging into their system, only bringing my own music and input device
but
it's p cool
easy stuff, they pretty much want top 40 dance stuff with a few holiday songs and then the countdown at midnight
$200 for 4 hours!
i am happy
I still rank it as Indian food's mediocre cousin, though.
also why did i have to eat it with two serrated knives
maybe i was supposed to use my hands as well?
is this farmville talk or something
Yay!!!
My weenus.
have you DJ'ed before?
being a DJ at a sports bar on NYE = guaranteed to get laid bee tee dubs
In the Glee episode it helps that they're both boys (subversive!) and that the one playing holdout (Kurt) is actually hardcore in love with the one who plays predator (Criss).
fuck no
Harvest Moon
Hooray!
See if you can get any referral work out of it.
Bars are always interested in DJs that can last the night without getting drunk themselves and molesting the bar staff.
not really, no
i mean i know the basic equipment- i've helped my uncle connect at a few of his shows
he is p much gonna pre make the music for me, no mixing, nothing effort intensive
i pretty much have to plug everything in, open the software, queue up the list he made me, and make sure that the happy new year track is perfectly synced
at least two lady gaga songs
[$2, $2] , [$3, 0]
[0, $3], [$1, $1]
Now suppose that A cooperates; classically, this would be treated as irrational, since defection strictly dominates cooperation in monetary payoff. But that only demonstrates that A is irrational if what she cares about is maximizing her monetary payoff. If we suppose instead that what she cares about is maximizing the monetary payoff to both players, then cooperation is actually the strictly dominant strategy. In that case, the grid above doesn't actually characterize the game A is playing.
Instead, an appropriate grid for A would be:
[4] , [3]
[3] , [2]
It might be tempting to treat this as an epistemic problem: how do we know what game A is playing without adverting to knowledge of A's subjective psychological states? But I urge that this is the wrong interpretation. The problem is instead a metaphysical one: unless A has certain subjective psychological states there just isn't an answer at all to the question of what game A is playing. We cannot take for granted any notion of choosing x versus y independent of an implicit understanding of those states.
i have missed you
They have to be a fair way down the list though.
Got to let the nervous straight people get sufficiently drunk first.
my thumbs are sore from all the planting
i am filling in for him as it were so if i fuck up it could reflect poorly on him
oh well
no excuses, chu, play like a champion
"These are the hands of a working man."
thats what she said
the guy who picks on Kurt kissed him, and
Will kissed the football coach
never in my life have i seen more utterly ridiculous plot points
the whole "i hate gays because i'm secretly gay and i will reveal myself by making out with a guy in the climax of a heated argument" thing is SO
FUCKING
STUPID
American Beauty gets a pass. Everything else doesn't.
I agree with all of this except for American Beauty getting a pass.
when and why would a lady say this, nexus
I'm a little confused
when she's been gardening?
Or playing Harvest Moon?
yes
I have interesting erotic dreams
WHERE THE FUCK DO YOU GET OFF, TRAVIS
YOU DON'T KNOW THE STREETS FROM WHICH I COME
ummmm...
IT'S A WOMAN'S RIGHT, FASCIST
Why did you ever let it out of your loving embrace?
At least there is expensive food for free.