Is it? I saw previews for it and have since closed my eyes, stuck my fingers in my ears and went LALALALALALALA anytime I started to catch something else about ut
Monsters vs. Aliens is currently the worst CGI film released by A Big Studio into theaters
it is a festering sack of especially smelly and plague-ridden pigshit
Monsters vs. Aliens is currently the worst CGI film released by A Big Studio into theaters
it is a festering sack of especially smelly and plague-ridden pigshit
I look forward to Brave
I bet it'll be good
If you want to talk shitty CGI films, let's talk about the Dreamworks productions...
I liked Megamind, and MvA wasn't awful, just not good. And while shrek 4 wasn't good out had the pied piper playing beastie boys, so it at least gets 1 star from me
That's like saying Caddyshack 2 is better than Casablanca because it's in color...
MvA looked way blander than MNM edit: visual style, rather than tech
it was also worse in every other way
there are plenty of shitty CGI movies, mostly from DreamWorks, and MvA is the sludge that oozed out under the barrel
My vitriol is also partly a result of the fact that I paid $8.50 to see MvA and then (picking up the pieces of my shattered soul) went to the dollar theater and saw Coraline for $1.50
My vitriol is also partly a result of the fact that I paid $8.50 to see MvA and then (picking up the pieces of my shattered soul) went to the dollar theater and saw Coraline for $1.50
Oh god Coraline was so good, can we talk about that for the next few pages.
What was that movie that came out after Madagascar but cribbed the 'zoo animals out of their comfort zone' idea?
I didn't see it but it looked awful.
The Wild? That was Disney's version.
Like it always goes, Dreamwork's has one, Disney has the other. And they seem to alternate who gets what out first (though I suspect it's because in a lot of cases, Dreamworks catches wind of what Disney/Pixar has in mind, and rushes out a similar movie. But it probably goes both ways too).
Bug's Life / Antz
Finding Nemo / Shark Tale
Steam
3DS FC: 4699-5714-8940 Playing Pokemon, add me! Ho, SATAN!
0
Options
PaperLuigi44My amazement is at maximum capacity.Registered Userregular
My vitriol is also partly a result of the fact that I paid $8.50 to see MvA and then (picking up the pieces of my shattered soul) went to the dollar theater and saw Coraline for $1.50
Oh god Coraline was so good, can we talk about that for the next few pages.
Coraline was seriously close to Miyazaki quality, just smaller in scope and with more bite to it
What was that movie that came out after Madagascar but cribbed the 'zoo animals out of their comfort zone' idea?
I didn't see it but it looked awful.
The Wild? That was Disney's version.
Like it always goes, Dreamwork's has one, Disney has the other. And they seem to alternate who gets what out first (though I suspect it's because in a lot of cases, Dreamworks catches wind of what Disney/Pixar has in mind, and rushes out a similar movie. But it probably goes both ways too).
Bug's Life / Antz
Finding Nemo / Shark Tale
I know Pixar cancelled Newt because of Rio and Alpha and Omega coming out. Which was probably a good idea because a movie about animals trying to bone made for kids is kinda awkward.
What was that movie that came out after Madagascar but cribbed the 'zoo animals out of their comfort zone' idea?
I didn't see it but it looked awful.
The Wild? That was Disney's version.
Like it always goes, Dreamwork's has one, Disney has the other. And they seem to alternate who gets what out first (though I suspect it's because in a lot of cases, Dreamworks catches wind of what Disney/Pixar has in mind, and rushes out a similar movie. But it probably goes both ways too).
Bug's Life / Antz
Finding Nemo / Shark Tale
I know Pixar cancelled Newt because of Rio and Alpha and Omega coming out. Which was probably a good idea because a movie about animals trying to bone made for kids is kinda awkward.
I think that was a missed opportunity. Alpha and Omega looked like shit, and Rio seemed forgettable at best. But I've seen some of the sketches for Newt, and they would've looked fantastic. You know some of those scenes in Fern Gully, that used the early CGI for blooming flowers and leaves with sun shining through them? That, but on Pixar's special blend of visual crack. I would've loved it, and it would've been more original then Brave.
But, alas, it's not to be.
Steam
3DS FC: 4699-5714-8940 Playing Pokemon, add me! Ho, SATAN!
Posts
They really are though
It's called Planes ( or something like that ) and set in the world of Cars
I wish I was lying about this...
There are some pretty good moments in it but it's just merchandise fodder with a stupid ending
No Pixar involvement, though.
Pixar's worst? Maybe. Probably. But still not a horrible movie
3DS FC: 4699-5714-8940 Playing Pokemon, add me! Ho, SATAN!
it is a festering sack of especially smelly and plague-ridden pigshit
I look forward to Brave
I bet it'll be good
Dude on the far left bears a startling resemblance to myself
you took your daughter to see infectious pigshit
(fair enough)
Tumblr | Twitter PSN: misterdapper Av by Satellite_09
If you want to talk shitty CGI films, let's talk about the Dreamworks productions...
Like Over the Hedge, or Flushed Away
Or Shark Tale
Tumblr | Twitter PSN: misterdapper Av by Satellite_09
Mars Needs Moms?
and yes, Mars Needs Moms was better than MvA
if only because of its visuals
Bluuuurgh.
MvA looked way blander than MNM edit: visual style, rather than tech
it was also worse in every other way
there are plenty of shitty CGI movies, mostly from DreamWorks, and MvA is the sludge that oozed out under the barrel
Also not to hate on Dreamworks too much I just want to say HTTYD is one of my favorite animated movies and Puss In Boots was surprisingly good.
Tumblr | Twitter PSN: misterdapper Av by Satellite_09
And it's not a Big Major Studio, but I saw Battle for Terra in the theater and it was very very meh.
I didn't see it but it looked awful.
I think Mars Needs Moms is way worse than MvA
not that MvA is particularly great or anything, just that MNM is fucking awful
Was it something like this?
It had a koala in it, and they were in New York or some other big city.
The Wild
Oh god Coraline was so good, can we talk about that for the next few pages.
Tumblr | Twitter PSN: misterdapper Av by Satellite_09
The Wild? That was Disney's version.
Like it always goes, Dreamwork's has one, Disney has the other. And they seem to alternate who gets what out first (though I suspect it's because in a lot of cases, Dreamworks catches wind of what Disney/Pixar has in mind, and rushes out a similar movie. But it probably goes both ways too).
Bug's Life / Antz
Finding Nemo / Shark Tale
3DS FC: 4699-5714-8940 Playing Pokemon, add me! Ho, SATAN!
Coraline was seriously close to Miyazaki quality, just smaller in scope and with more bite to it
love that movie so much
I was in Korea at the time and we got Over the Hedge there but I don't remember seeing The Wild on the theater posters at all.
I know Pixar cancelled Newt because of Rio and Alpha and Omega coming out. Which was probably a good idea because a movie about animals trying to bone made for kids is kinda awkward.
Tumblr | Twitter PSN: misterdapper Av by Satellite_09
it made me think of Spirited Away if only because a girl becomes a better person in it
I think that was a missed opportunity. Alpha and Omega looked like shit, and Rio seemed forgettable at best. But I've seen some of the sketches for Newt, and they would've looked fantastic. You know some of those scenes in Fern Gully, that used the early CGI for blooming flowers and leaves with sun shining through them? That, but on Pixar's special blend of visual crack. I would've loved it, and it would've been more original then Brave.
But, alas, it's not to be.
3DS FC: 4699-5714-8940 Playing Pokemon, add me! Ho, SATAN!
I actually really like this movie, if only for the scene where the squirrel drinks coffee and everything goes into slow motion
But in general it was pretty decent for a non-Pixar animated film
wow