You know I liked it better when rich people weren't overt about wanting to destroy us all because fuck you you're not rich
Like when they really fucked up they would at least pretend to that they were sorry and take their goddamn medicine. These days? We save AIG from cratering themselves and everyone else and reducing the value of all those dollars they worship to so much toilet paper and they have the gall to sue because it wasn't fair to them?
Fuck's sake where are the insane gun toting patriots threatening AIG instead of shooting at targets that look like Obama. I'm befuddled this has zero outrage from people
i just drove so illegally. our family friend just had a seizure and was completely, totally out of it and unable to drive and my aunt was stranded at the hospital a few dozen miles away.
Just licked my salad bowl clean. This is the best salad dressing there is and everyone else is wrong. I'm so annoyed that they don't have this dressing at any store near where I go to school. It's the BEST.
So how the fuck was the deal with AIG unfair? The government could have completely crushed AIG's balls if it wanted to.
the lawsuit was originally started because the argument is that it circumvented established bankruptcy law and didn't provide shareholders due process and equal protection and etc.
AIG basically just wants to make money back as they paid interest for the bailout out the nose as far as I can tell.
They paid about $30 Billion in interest and they're getting about $27 Billion in special tax breaks no one else gets over the next five-or-something years.
So a net total of $3 Billion extra on a $138 Billion loan.
the argument can be made that this graph would look different otherwise. i mean, if you have a 401k chances are you held some aig at the time. fuck the shareholders.
a guy like greenberg is pissed though because the government stepping in infront of the shareholders prevented him from taking the company over
Gooey on
0
VanguardBut now the dream is over. And the insect is awake.Registered User, __BANNED USERSregular
i thought a gis for "buttons straight jacket pretzels" would be better but alas
0
VanguardBut now the dream is over. And the insect is awake.Registered User, __BANNED USERSregular
i just drove so illegally. our family friend just had a seizure and was completely, totally out of it and unable to drive and my aunt was stranded at the hospital a few dozen miles away.
FIRST WORLD ANARCHISM
Hope friend is ok
Allegedly a voice of reason.
0
GonmunHe keeps kickin' me inthe dickRegistered Userregular
Except that any Sam Raimi anything ends up with something so ridiculous its funny. I think that is his strength really. I'm not sure if this new one is going to be good just because it doesn't seem to be playing to his true might.
So how the fuck was the deal with AIG unfair? The government could have completely crushed AIG's balls if it wanted to.
the lawsuit was originally started because the argument is that it circumvented established bankruptcy law and didn't provide shareholders due process and equal protection and etc.
AIG basically just wants to make money back as they paid interest for the bailout out the nose as far as I can tell.
If they didn't like the deal they didn't have to take it
I'm not saying it's right or wrong, I'm just trying to provide the facts amongst the wharblgarbl
Tell me this is a parody comic and there are not people who are this clinically stupid operating in the real world?
40 dollars per year.
Unlike some of the largest email service providers like Google, Yahoo, AOL, and Hotmail, @Reagan.com will not copy, scan, or sell a single word of your email content. Your "Private" email will stay "Private"!
They do know that... ah fuck it.
0
Donkey KongPutting Nintendo out of business with AI nipsRegistered Userregular
I am so goddamned hungry.
I hate everyone and everything.
Thousands of hot, local singles are waiting to play at bubbulon.com.
What developments in film making, technology or society have come about in thirty years that would make it worthwhile to invest money retelling Evil Dead rather than just releasing the original in the Cinema?
i just drove so illegally. our family friend just had a seizure and was completely, totally out of it and unable to drive and my aunt was stranded at the hospital a few dozen miles away.
FIRST WORLD ANARCHISM
Hope friend is ok
yeah he's fine. he just gets seizures. he's supposed to go like, six months without a seizure to be cleared for his license so this was a p uncommon occurrence. he told me to not even bother calling rescue; he just can't drive for a while, now. his wife is gonna have to come pick him up along with their car tonight.
0
cptruggedI think it has something to do with free will.Registered Userregular
So how the fuck was the deal with AIG unfair? The government could have completely crushed AIG's balls if it wanted to.
the lawsuit was originally started because the argument is that it circumvented established bankruptcy law and didn't provide shareholders due process and equal protection and etc.
AIG basically just wants to make money back as they paid interest for the bailout out the nose as far as I can tell.
They paid about $30 Billion in interest and they're getting about $27 Billion in special tax breaks no one else gets over the next five-or-something years.
So a net total of $3 Billion extra on a $138 Billion loan.
the argument can be made that this graph would look different otherwise. i mean, if you have a 401k chances are you held some aig at the time. fuck the shareholders.
a guy like greenberg is pissed though because the government stepping in infront of the shareholders prevented him from taking the company over
Maybe shareholders, and I'm including 401ks here, need to realize that if a company you invest money in nearly crashes the world economy ya might not get your money back.
So how the fuck was the deal with AIG unfair? The government could have completely crushed AIG's balls if it wanted to.
the lawsuit was originally started because the argument is that it circumvented established bankruptcy law and didn't provide shareholders due process and equal protection and etc.
AIG basically just wants to make money back as they paid interest for the bailout out the nose as far as I can tell.
They paid about $30 Billion in interest and they're getting about $27 Billion in special tax breaks no one else gets over the next five-or-something years.
So a net total of $3 Billion extra on a $138 Billion loan.
the argument can be made that this graph would look different otherwise. i mean, if you have a 401k chances are you held some aig at the time. fuck the shareholders.
a guy like greenberg is pissed though because the government stepping in infront of the shareholders prevented him from taking the company over
Well, yeah, but the little guy got screwed already. This lawsuit isn't going to change that, and it surely isn't in the interest of Joe 401k.
So how the fuck was the deal with AIG unfair? The government could have completely crushed AIG's balls if it wanted to.
the lawsuit was originally started because the argument is that it circumvented established bankruptcy law and didn't provide shareholders due process and equal protection and etc.
AIG basically just wants to make money back as they paid interest for the bailout out the nose as far as I can tell.
They paid about $30 Billion in interest and they're getting about $27 Billion in special tax breaks no one else gets over the next five-or-something years.
So a net total of $3 Billion extra on a $138 Billion loan.
the argument can be made that this graph would look different otherwise. i mean, if you have a 401k chances are you held some aig at the time. fuck the shareholders.
a guy like greenberg is pissed though because the government stepping in infront of the shareholders prevented him from taking the company over
Maybe shareholders, and I'm including 401ks here, need to realize that if a company you invest money in nearly crashes the world economy ya might not get your money back.
What developments in film making, technology or society have come about in thirty years that would make it worthwhile to invest money retelling Evil Dead rather than just releasing the original in the Cinema?
The Lurssen Quatroelle Yacht.
As in, the studio execs need more money so they can buy some.
every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.
the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
+1
Donkey KongPutting Nintendo out of business with AI nipsRegistered Userregular
Thousands of hot, local singles are waiting to play at bubbulon.com.
Posts
or is it
maybe it is you... who is the onion
Like when they really fucked up they would at least pretend to that they were sorry and take their goddamn medicine. These days? We save AIG from cratering themselves and everyone else and reducing the value of all those dollars they worship to so much toilet paper and they have the gall to sue because it wasn't fair to them?
Fuck's sake where are the insane gun toting patriots threatening AIG instead of shooting at targets that look like Obama. I'm befuddled this has zero outrage from people
o rite the media
but sometimes you will get the dreaded mismatch where you reach the end of the line and you have one more button but no more button holes
and then I start over, bottom up, because fuck if I'll make that mistake twice on the same morning
WILDCARD, BITCHES
Evil Dead is not funny
This is a horror movie
That remake trailer is pretty much dead on.
Hah
Al Jazeera is run by Arabs. Arabs being dirty is just a tautology according to the extreme right.
He only wears ladies shirts so that it's easier for his servants to button.
twitch.tv/tehsloth
Evil Dead 2 funny but still a bit scary
Army of Darkness not scary in the slightest and as slapsticky as the Stooges
maybe i'm streaming terrible dj right now if i am its here
FIRST WORLD ANARCHISM
If I had servants I would wear mens shirts so it would be more difficult for them to button.
http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=AIG+Interactive#symbol=aig;range=5y;compare=;indicator=ke_sd+volume;charttype=area;crosshair=on;ohlcvalues=0;logscale=off;source=undefined;
the argument can be made that this graph would look different otherwise. i mean, if you have a 401k chances are you held some aig at the time. fuck the shareholders.
a guy like greenberg is pissed though because the government stepping in infront of the shareholders prevented him from taking the company over
blackberry has been dead for years
Hope friend is ok
Probably in the American Pie sort of way.
i know where you're coming from
Except that any Sam Raimi anything ends up with something so ridiculous its funny. I think that is his strength really. I'm not sure if this new one is going to be good just because it doesn't seem to be playing to his true might.
I'm not saying it's right or wrong, I'm just trying to provide the facts amongst the wharblgarbl
40 dollars per year.
They do know that... ah fuck it.
I hate everyone and everything.
all i need is a little phone to text people, make calls like 'be there in 5', and have a direct line as a freelancer, so a blackberry is all i need
twitch.tv/tehsloth
yeah he's fine. he just gets seizures. he's supposed to go like, six months without a seizure to be cleared for his license so this was a p uncommon occurrence. he told me to not even bother calling rescue; he just can't drive for a while, now. his wife is gonna have to come pick him up along with their car tonight.
Prison?
Maybe shareholders, and I'm including 401ks here, need to realize that if a company you invest money in nearly crashes the world economy ya might not get your money back.
Ladies.
Top down like a boss.
(are jokes about Chu's love of analingus getting old?)
I think I found the problem
Well, yeah, but the little guy got screwed already. This lawsuit isn't going to change that, and it surely isn't in the interest of Joe 401k.
ok
The Lurssen Quatroelle Yacht.
As in, the studio execs need more money so they can buy some.
the "no true scotch man" fallacy.