No seriously. The FBI is hell on people who just rob banks. Whereas with embezzlement, the DA has to wonder if it's worth risking the jury falling asleep when the forensic accountant comes out. White collar crime really is the way to go.
Step 1) Get OWS jury
Step 2) Watch jury fall asleep when the forensic accountant comes out
Step 3) Watch rich guy go to jail anyway
No seriously. The FBI is hell on people who just rob banks. Whereas with embezzlement, the DA has to wonder if it's worth risking the jury falling asleep when the forensic accountant comes out. White collar crime really is the way to go.
Step 1) Get OWS jury
Step 2) Watch jury fall asleep when the forensic accountant comes out
Step 3) Watch rich guy go to jail anyway
Let's realtalk solo
Nobody in OWS would be on a jury because that's real civic duty.
No seriously. The FBI is hell on people who just rob banks. Whereas with embezzlement, the DA has to wonder if it's worth risking the jury falling asleep when the forensic accountant comes out. White collar crime really is the way to go.
Step 1) Get OWS jury
Step 2) Watch jury fall asleep when the forensic accountant comes out
Step 3) Watch rich guy go to jail anyway
Let's realtalk solo
Nobody in OWS would be on a jury because that's real civic duty.
On the other hand, is your typical OWSer smart enough to dodge jury duty?
Celebrity footballers are the inevitable consequence of paying 20 year olds £75,000 a week while not imposing any particularly onerous responsibilities and also surrounding them with people very keen to tell them how brilliant they are.
I think that would turn anyone into a douchebag.
+2
Options
TehSlothHit Or MissI Guess They Never Miss, HuhRegistered Userregular
Within days of joining Manchester City, Balotelli was involved in a car crash. It was reported that Balotelli was carrying £5000 cash at the time – and that when a police officer asked why he had such a large sum of cash Balotelli replied: "Because I am rich"
Still wanna punch a man that brilliant?
He should've done this and said it was his phone.
Keep in mind, this is a hockey player, who as a general rule should never be considered cool.
No seriously. The FBI is hell on people who just rob banks. Whereas with embezzlement, the DA has to wonder if it's worth risking the jury falling asleep when the forensic accountant comes out. White collar crime really is the way to go.
Step 1) Get OWS jury
Step 2) Watch jury fall asleep when the forensic accountant comes out
Step 3) Watch rich guy go to jail anyway
Let's realtalk solo
Nobody in OWS would be on a jury because that's real civic duty.
On the other hand, is your typical OWSer smart enough to dodge jury duty?
Yes. They will blather on about Jury Nullification for hours
No seriously. The FBI is hell on people who just rob banks. Whereas with embezzlement, the DA has to wonder if it's worth risking the jury falling asleep when the forensic accountant comes out. White collar crime really is the way to go.
Step 1) Get OWS jury
Step 2) Watch jury fall asleep when the forensic accountant comes out
Step 3) Watch rich guy go to jail anyway
Dude, like my defense attorney is gonna let the jury be stacked with hippies. The moment he sees the white person dreads, he's gonna strike them.
+1
Options
ThomamelasOnly one man can kill this many Russians. Bring his guitar to me! Registered Userregular
So is the word finally out that OWS was just a bunch of blathering nonsense, with the few good and noble ideas lost in a sea of ignorance and poorly aimed discontent?
0
Options
Mojo_JojoWe are only now beginning to understand the full power and ramifications of sexual intercourseRegistered Userregular
Could applying for welfare be more demeaning? Oh, yes, it could, Scott could've gotten away with the drug testing proposal.
Will teach for food.
Ah, did they remove the (extremely silly) drug testing requirement?
A court made them.
It turned out they were losing a bunch of money off of it. People on welfare actually use drugs less often than the general population (spoiler: poor people can't afford drugs).
+2
Options
LudiousI just wanted a sandwich A temporally dislocated QuiznosRegistered Userregular
one of the best things about real life is that there are, oddly, not very many scientists that vote republican
liberal brain washing camp great success in amerika
It surprises me that a group that is dependent on academic spending wouldn't support the party dedicated to cutting educational funding.
It's basically like, a group dependent upon academic spending, spurned for being out of touch, with high understanding of evolution, ecology, and the scientific method, as well as a predisposition to trusting consensus on fields such as global warming?
I wonder who they'll vote for.
0
Options
AManFromEarthLet's get to twerk!The King in the SwampRegistered Userregular
Could applying for welfare be more demeaning? Oh, yes, it could, Scott could've gotten away with the drug testing proposal.
Will teach for food.
Ah, did they remove the (extremely silly) drug testing requirement?
Last I heard it had been thrown out by court, but of course the state is fighting it. I swear, all the money Scott and Friends have "saved" taxpayers by gutting services and taxes is being spent on fees for lawsuits against his crazy bad laws.
So is the word finally out that OWS was just a bunch of blathering nonsense, with the few good and noble ideas lost in a sea of ignorance and poorly aimed discontent?
I see OWS as a great idea that was carried out by (and co-opted by) terrible people. I was involved with the initial organization of Occupy DC, I was really excited when it started up... and then I met the people the other occupiers and left in disgust.
Could applying for welfare be more demeaning? Oh, yes, it could, Scott could've gotten away with the drug testing proposal.
Will teach for food.
Ah, did they remove the (extremely silly) drug testing requirement?
Last I heard it had been thrown out by court, but of course the state is fighting it. I swear, all the money Scott and Friends have "saved" taxpayers by gutting services and taxes is being spent on fees for lawsuits against his crazy bad laws.
Could applying for welfare be more demeaning? Oh, yes, it could, Scott could've gotten away with the drug testing proposal.
Will teach for food.
Ah, did they remove the (extremely silly) drug testing requirement?
Last I heard it had been thrown out by court, but of course the state is fighting it. I swear, all the money Scott and Friends have "saved" taxpayers by gutting services and taxes is being spent on fees for lawsuits against his crazy bad laws.
When is he up for reelection?
2014, and he can run for one more term.
0
Options
surrealitychecklonely, but not unloveddreaming of faulty keys and latchesRegistered Userregular
one of the best things about real life is that there are, oddly, not very many scientists that vote republican
liberal brain washing camp great success in amerika
It surprises me that a group that is dependent on academic spending wouldn't support the party dedicated to cutting educational funding.
It's basically like, a group dependent upon academic spending, spurned for being out of touch, with high understanding of evolution, ecology, and the scientific method, as well as a predisposition to trusting consensus on fields such as global warming?
I wonder who they'll vote for.
lesbians
+1
Options
CorehealerThe ApothecaryThe softer edge of the universe.Registered Userregular
Posts
Step 1) Get OWS jury
Step 2) Watch jury fall asleep when the forensic accountant comes out
Step 3) Watch rich guy go to jail anyway
the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
im blak fuk u
Let's realtalk solo
Nobody in OWS would be on a jury because that's real civic duty.
Will teach for food.
If stories of vent are true, you're the ponciest blak guy ever.
On the other hand, is your typical OWSer smart enough to dodge jury duty?
I think that would turn anyone into a douchebag.
He should've done this and said it was his phone.
Keep in mind, this is a hockey player, who as a general rule should never be considered cool.
twitch.tv/tehsloth
Dude, like my defense attorney is gonna let the jury be stacked with hippies. The moment he sees the white person dreads, he's gonna strike them.
I'm sure crack Republican scientists are working on that exact project right now.
Ah, did they remove the (extremely silly) drug testing requirement?
twitch.tv/tehsloth
:O
i keep it real
liberal brain washing camp great success in amerika
How much back child support do you owe
i fucking lost it at "authentic civilian disguise"
It surprises me that a group that is dependent on academic spending wouldn't support the party dedicated to cutting educational funding.
Sage advice.
A court made them.
It turned out they were losing a bunch of money off of it. People on welfare actually use drugs less often than the general population (spoiler: poor people can't afford drugs).
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:XO-2FXJCbkAJ:dlministries.wordpress.com/2012/02/11/the-soldier/+
look a lot of cats have that name
its also that like 95% of the naas is atheist or watevs
scientists just 2 marxist
It's basically like, a group dependent upon academic spending, spurned for being out of touch, with high understanding of evolution, ecology, and the scientific method, as well as a predisposition to trusting consensus on fields such as global warming?
I wonder who they'll vote for.
Last I heard it had been thrown out by court, but of course the state is fighting it. I swear, all the money Scott and Friends have "saved" taxpayers by gutting services and taxes is being spent on fees for lawsuits against his crazy bad laws.
I see OWS as a great idea that was carried out by (and co-opted by) terrible people. I was involved with the initial organization of Occupy DC, I was really excited when it started up... and then I met the people the other occupiers and left in disgust.
if they're not spending all of their money on drugs then what are they spending all their money on
I watch Fox News, which has taught me that poor people spend their food stamps on lobster, high-end liquor, and television sets.
Your adorable.
When is he up for reelection?
2014, and he can run for one more term.
lesbians
Don't forget abortions.