and that snippet is either a very interesting bit of early 2nd century apocrypha or (I think more likely by current scholarship) the most elaborate troll in the history of mankind.
Attacked by tweeeeeeees!
+1
Options
CorehealerThe ApothecaryThe softer edge of the universe.Registered Userregular
In the dark liberal future homosexuality will be the religion, and wars will rage against bears and twinks, subs will turn against their doms and the first gay religions will form.
And they come into Bethany. And a certain woman whose brother had died was there. And, coming, she prostrated herself before Jesus and says to him, 'Son of David, have mercy on me.' But the disciples rebuked her. And Jesus, being angered, went off with her into the garden where the tomb was, and straightway a great cry was heard from the tomb. And going near Jesus rolled away the stone from the door of the tomb. And straightway, going in where the youth was, he stretched forth his hand and raised him, seizing his hand. But the youth, looking upon him, loved him and began to beseech him that he might be with him. And going out of the tomb they came into the house of the youth, for he was rich. And after six days Jesus told him what to do and in the evening the youth comes to him, wearing a linen cloth over his naked body. And he remained with him that night, for Jesus taught him the mystery of the kingdom of God. And thence, arising, he returned to the other side of the Jordan.
0
Options
LudiousI just wanted a sandwich A temporally dislocated QuiznosRegistered Userregular
and that snippet is either a very interesting bit of early 2nd century apocrypha or (I think more likely by current scholarship) the most elaborate troll in the history of mankind.
[quote=The Secret Gospel of Mark]And they come into Bethany. And a certain woman whose brother had died was there. And, coming, she prostrated herself before Jesus and says to him, 'Son of David, have mercy on me.' But the disciples rebuked her. And Jesus, being angered, went off with her into the garden where the tomb was, and straightway a great cry was heard from the tomb. And going near Jesus rolled away the stone from the door of the tomb. And straightway, going in where the youth was, he stretched forth his hand and raised him, seizing his hand. But the youth, looking upon him, loved him and began to beseech him that he might be with him. And going out of the tomb they came into the house of the youth, for he was rich. And after six days Jesus told him what to do and in the evening the youth comes to him, wearing a linen cloth over his naked body. And he remained with him that night, for Jesus taught him the mystery of the kingdom of God. And thence, arising, he returned to the other side of the Jordan.
That's what I get for not quoting.
I know it's a town, I was making a crude joke.
knitdan on
“I was quick when I came in here, I’m twice as quick now”
-Indiana Solo, runner of blades
0
Options
CorehealerThe ApothecaryThe softer edge of the universe.Registered Userregular
and that snippet is either a very interesting bit of early 2nd century apocrypha or (I think more likely by current scholarship) the most elaborate troll in the history of mankind.
my people call to me from the past
it was probably a super elaborate forgery by an extremely well respected scholar who published two books on it in 1973 and who spent over 20 years having every expert he could authenticate the text.
If it's a forgery it's an absurdly detailed and erudite forgery.
But it seems likely that is the case. A massive effort spanning decades. All to pull of an aboslutely grand "jesus was gay lol"
Attacked by tweeeeeeees!
0
Options
LudiousI just wanted a sandwich A temporally dislocated QuiznosRegistered Userregular
and that snippet is either a very interesting bit of early 2nd century apocrypha or (I think more likely by current scholarship) the most elaborate troll in the history of mankind.
my people call to me from the past
it was probably a super elaborate forgery by an extremely well respected scholar who published two books on it in 1973 and who spent over 20 years having every expert he could authenticate the text.
If it's a forgery it's an absurdly detailed and erudite forgery.
But it seems likely that is the case. A massive effort spanning decades. All to pull of an aboslutely grand "jesus was gay lol"
it certainly would explain his fascination with rainbows
and that snippet is either a very interesting bit of early 2nd century apocrypha or (I think more likely by current scholarship) the most elaborate troll in the history of mankind.
my people call to me from the past
it was probably a super elaborate forgery by an extremely well respected scholar who published two books on it in 1973 and who spent over 20 years having every expert he could authenticate the text.
If it's a forgery it's an absurdly detailed and erudite forgery.
But it seems likely that is the case. A massive effort spanning decades. All to pull of an aboslutely grand "jesus was gay lol"
To be fair, a lot of the gnostic gospels and aprocypha from the dawn of Christianity are forgeries of the writings, or lack thereof, of the apostles and Jesus's disciples from antiquity. If this is done in their style, there's no reason to believe at a glance that it's not another legit ancient "source".
like just an example of the detail that prof. Smith lavished on his Secret Gospel of Mark troll: the supposed letter by Clement of Alexandria was discovered in a 17th century printing of the collected letters of Clement. This new letter of course was previously unknown and someone at the monastary had copied it (in perfect 17 century handwriting) into the reverse pages at the end of the printed book. Presumably from an earlier copy that was degrading.
Anyway, the particular edition of the printed letters of Clement that he says he found this in was the very first edition to be printed that removed several forged letters by Clement that were popular in the Middle Ages. And the very edition which contained a forward by the printer warning the reader of the dangers of forgery!
he even dedicated his extremely learned and erudite 1973 book on the subject to "The One Who Knows"
RiemannLives on
Attacked by tweeeeeeees!
0
Options
Element BrianPeanut Butter ShillRegistered Userregular
and that snippet is either a very interesting bit of early 2nd century apocrypha or (I think more likely by current scholarship) the most elaborate troll in the history of mankind.
my people call to me from the past
it was probably a super elaborate forgery by an extremely well respected scholar who published two books on it in 1973 and who spent over 20 years having every expert he could authenticate the text.
If it's a forgery it's an absurdly detailed and erudite forgery.
But it seems likely that is the case. A massive effort spanning decades. All to pull of an aboslutely grand "jesus was gay lol"
To be fair, a lot of the gnostic gospels and aprocypha from the dawn of Christianity are forgeries of the writings, or lack thereof, of the apostles and Jesus's disciples from antiquity. If this is done in their style, there's no reason to believe at a glance that it's not another legit ancient "source".
a lot of writing that that made it into the New Testament itself is definetly forgery. Only about half of the Epistles of Paul in the canon could possible be by him. Titus and Timothy 1-2 for example are forged.
And Hebrews isn't even an epistle let alone by Paul. But that isn't a dishonest forgery because it doesn't claim to be by Paul. It was just a mistake by later people who thought it was.
edit
or even in the gospels, the last few versus of Mark are later editions. And the entire story in John about Jesus and the adulteress from which we get the line "let he who is without sin cast the first stone" is a later addition as well. Not original to the gospel and definetly not dating back to Jesus.
and that snippet is either a very interesting bit of early 2nd century apocrypha or (I think more likely by current scholarship) the most elaborate troll in the history of mankind.
my people call to me from the past
it was probably a super elaborate forgery by an extremely well respected scholar who published two books on it in 1973 and who spent over 20 years having every expert he could authenticate the text.
If it's a forgery it's an absurdly detailed and erudite forgery.
But it seems likely that is the case. A massive effort spanning decades. All to pull of an aboslutely grand "jesus was gay lol"
and that snippet is either a very interesting bit of early 2nd century apocrypha or (I think more likely by current scholarship) the most elaborate troll in the history of mankind.
my people call to me from the past
it was probably a super elaborate forgery by an extremely well respected scholar who published two books on it in 1973 and who spent over 20 years having every expert he could authenticate the text.
If it's a forgery it's an absurdly detailed and erudite forgery.
But it seems likely that is the case. A massive effort spanning decades. All to pull of an aboslutely grand "jesus was gay lol"
To be fair, a lot of the gnostic gospels and aprocypha from the dawn of Christianity are forgeries of the writings, or lack thereof, of the apostles and Jesus's disciples from antiquity. If this is done in their style, there's no reason to believe at a glance that it's not another legit ancient "source".
a lot of writing that that made it into the New Testament itself is definetly forgery. Only about half of the Epistles of Paul in the canon could possible be by him. Titus and Timothy 1-2 for example are forged.
And Hebrews isn't even an epistle let alone by Paul. But that isn't a dishonest forgery because it doesn't claim to be by Paul. It was just a mistake by later people who thought it was.
edit
or even in the gospels, the last few versus of Mark are later editions. And the entire story in John about Jesus and the adulteress from which we get the line "let he who is without sin cast the first stone" is a later addition as well. Not original to the gospel and definetly not dating back to Jesus.
Forgery is such an ugly word
I prefer to say that it's sourced to the fan modding community
A trap is for fish: when you've got the fish, you can forget the trap. A snare is for rabbits: when you've got the rabbit, you can forget the snare. Words are for meaning: when you've got the meaning, you can forget the words.
+4
Options
ElldrenIs a woman dammitceterum censeoRegistered Userregular
so i stood up and nearly fainted and twisted my ankle as i fell and managed to catch myself on the wall
and that snippet is either a very interesting bit of early 2nd century apocrypha or (I think more likely by current scholarship) the most elaborate troll in the history of mankind.
my people call to me from the past
it was probably a super elaborate forgery by an extremely well respected scholar who published two books on it in 1973 and who spent over 20 years having every expert he could authenticate the text.
If it's a forgery it's an absurdly detailed and erudite forgery.
But it seems likely that is the case. A massive effort spanning decades. All to pull of an aboslutely grand "jesus was gay lol"
To be fair, a lot of the gnostic gospels and aprocypha from the dawn of Christianity are forgeries of the writings, or lack thereof, of the apostles and Jesus's disciples from antiquity. If this is done in their style, there's no reason to believe at a glance that it's not another legit ancient "source".
a lot of writing that that made it into the New Testament itself is definetly forgery. Only about half of the Epistles of Paul in the canon could possible be by him. Titus and Timothy 1-2 for example are forged.
And Hebrews isn't even an epistle let alone by Paul. But that isn't a dishonest forgery because it doesn't claim to be by Paul. It was just a mistake by later people who thought it was.
Personally I prefer reading the Old Testament anyway; less preachy and more entertaining and solemnly spiritual in places, and for the most part legit insofar as any part of the Bible can be in terms of human authorship and from ancient times.
New Testament has a lot of mixed messages and doesn't mesh well with the Old, and goes in a bunch of different directions at the end.
Corehealer on
0
Options
Element BrianPeanut Butter ShillRegistered Userregular
My bedroom is next to the garage, i was sitting on the floor with my back to the wall watching a movie and he came home and parked, and just nudged the wall with his car, with my head directly behind the wall, like i felt the wall give. If he had let it push forward a little bit more it would probably break through.
Well, failed my Japanese test. Managed to get a lower score this time than before, even after studying lots.
And I am failing to make ends meet freelancing, so I am looking around for a full-time job, but am finding it hard to get a good one, as I have failed to acquire a higher degree.
I am sensing a pattern.
Which is, for the slow of reading, of me failing and being a failure.
and that snippet is either a very interesting bit of early 2nd century apocrypha or (I think more likely by current scholarship) the most elaborate troll in the history of mankind.
my people call to me from the past
it was probably a super elaborate forgery by an extremely well respected scholar who published two books on it in 1973 and who spent over 20 years having every expert he could authenticate the text.
If it's a forgery it's an absurdly detailed and erudite forgery.
But it seems likely that is the case. A massive effort spanning decades. All to pull of an aboslutely grand "jesus was gay lol"
To be fair, a lot of the gnostic gospels and aprocypha from the dawn of Christianity are forgeries of the writings, or lack thereof, of the apostles and Jesus's disciples from antiquity. If this is done in their style, there's no reason to believe at a glance that it's not another legit ancient "source".
a lot of writing that that made it into the New Testament itself is definetly forgery. Only about half of the Epistles of Paul in the canon could possible be by him. Titus and Timothy 1-2 for example are forged.
And Hebrews isn't even an epistle let alone by Paul. But that isn't a dishonest forgery because it doesn't claim to be by Paul. It was just a mistake by later people who thought it was.
edit
or even in the gospels, the last few versus of Mark are later editions. And the entire story in John about Jesus and the adulteress from which we get the line "let he who is without sin cast the first stone" is a later addition as well. Not original to the gospel and definetly not dating back to Jesus.
Forgery is such an ugly word
I prefer to say that it's sourced to the fan modding community
nah that's the rest of the New Testament. Most of it is by totally unknown authors (for example the gospels definetly were not written by the people, Matthew Mark Luke and John, they were named for) but they are not dishonest forgeries. The books were written without titles at all (as was the style of the time) and only later when churches started owning more than one different Gospel did they need to assign titles to tell them apart.
So the text itself never claims to be by Mark (for example). It is internally honest. But about half the letters of Paul which actually claim to be by him are not. They are internally dishonest. Hence forgeries.
and that snippet is either a very interesting bit of early 2nd century apocrypha or (I think more likely by current scholarship) the most elaborate troll in the history of mankind.
my people call to me from the past
it was probably a super elaborate forgery by an extremely well respected scholar who published two books on it in 1973 and who spent over 20 years having every expert he could authenticate the text.
If it's a forgery it's an absurdly detailed and erudite forgery.
But it seems likely that is the case. A massive effort spanning decades. All to pull of an aboslutely grand "jesus was gay lol"
To be fair, a lot of the gnostic gospels and aprocypha from the dawn of Christianity are forgeries of the writings, or lack thereof, of the apostles and Jesus's disciples from antiquity. If this is done in their style, there's no reason to believe at a glance that it's not another legit ancient "source".
a lot of writing that that made it into the New Testament itself is definetly forgery. Only about half of the Epistles of Paul in the canon could possible be by him. Titus and Timothy 1-2 for example are forged.
And Hebrews isn't even an epistle let alone by Paul. But that isn't a dishonest forgery because it doesn't claim to be by Paul. It was just a mistake by later people who thought it was.
edit
or even in the gospels, the last few versus of Mark are later editions. And the entire story in John about Jesus and the adulteress from which we get the line "let he who is without sin cast the first stone" is a later addition as well. Not original to the gospel and definetly not dating back to Jesus.
Forgery is such an ugly word
I prefer to say that it's sourced to the fan modding community
Christianity is just an Unofficial Fan Patch that adds a Second Campaign for Judaism, which is itself just a Total Mod to Zoroastrianism
Senjutsu on
+1
Options
Element BrianPeanut Butter ShillRegistered Userregular
and that snippet is either a very interesting bit of early 2nd century apocrypha or (I think more likely by current scholarship) the most elaborate troll in the history of mankind.
my people call to me from the past
it was probably a super elaborate forgery by an extremely well respected scholar who published two books on it in 1973 and who spent over 20 years having every expert he could authenticate the text.
If it's a forgery it's an absurdly detailed and erudite forgery.
But it seems likely that is the case. A massive effort spanning decades. All to pull of an aboslutely grand "jesus was gay lol"
if I buy the secret world should I play as alliance or horde and rogue or hunter
Templars are sort of like Alliance with less retard and more fascism. There are no classes but if you focus on rifles and guns in general as well as some melee weapons you can probably pull off a good rogue or hunter, and eventually find a cosmetic pet like my quetzel bird Jimmy to complete the illusion.
My bedroom is next to the garage, i was sitting on the floor with my back to the wall watching a movie and he came home and parked, and just nudged the wall with his car, with my head directly behind the wall, like i felt the wall give. If he had let it push forward a little bit more it would probably break through.
Get him a string and a ping pong ball like old people put in their garages so they don't do what he did
if I buy the secret world should I play as alliance or horde and rogue or hunter
Templars are sort of like Alliance with less retard and more fascism. There are no classes but if you focus on rifles and guns in general as well as some melee weapons you can probably pull off a good rogue or hunter, and eventually find a cosmetic pet like my quetzel bird Jimmy to complete the illusion.
Posts
-Indiana Solo, runner of blades
I don't know
why don't you tell us
church
it's a town
and that snippet is either a very interesting bit of early 2nd century apocrypha or (I think more likely by current scholarship) the most elaborate troll in the history of mankind.
my people call to me from the past
I hope you don't. Want to talk about something?
That's what I get for not quoting.
I know it's a town, I was making a crude joke.
-Indiana Solo, runner of blades
Because I am a complex and multifaceted individual.
For some reason, part of me wasn't sure if you ment lesbian domination hardcore porn.
I'm not listening to that part of me anymore.
it was probably a super elaborate forgery by an extremely well respected scholar who published two books on it in 1973 and who spent over 20 years having every expert he could authenticate the text.
If it's a forgery it's an absurdly detailed and erudite forgery.
But it seems likely that is the case. A massive effort spanning decades. All to pull of an aboslutely grand "jesus was gay lol"
it certainly would explain his fascination with rainbows
if your dick is talking to you, you need to up your lithium anyway
To be fair, a lot of the gnostic gospels and aprocypha from the dawn of Christianity are forgeries of the writings, or lack thereof, of the apostles and Jesus's disciples from antiquity. If this is done in their style, there's no reason to believe at a glance that it's not another legit ancient "source".
I'm taking this show on the ROAD, SON!
Sorry, we, are taking this show on the road.
Anyway, the particular edition of the printed letters of Clement that he says he found this in was the very first edition to be printed that removed several forged letters by Clement that were popular in the Middle Ages. And the very edition which contained a forward by the printer warning the reader of the dangers of forgery!
he even dedicated his extremely learned and erudite 1973 book on the subject to "The One Who Knows"
and my roommate almost hit me with his car
Arch,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_goGR39m2k
a lot of writing that that made it into the New Testament itself is definetly forgery. Only about half of the Epistles of Paul in the canon could possible be by him. Titus and Timothy 1-2 for example are forged.
And Hebrews isn't even an epistle let alone by Paul. But that isn't a dishonest forgery because it doesn't claim to be by Paul. It was just a mistake by later people who thought it was.
edit
or even in the gospels, the last few versus of Mark are later editions. And the entire story in John about Jesus and the adulteress from which we get the line "let he who is without sin cast the first stone" is a later addition as well. Not original to the gospel and definetly not dating back to Jesus.
how much poop came out?
The driveway is your bedroom?
Now that's what I call a long troll
Forgery is such an ugly word
I prefer to say that it's sourced to the fan modding community
i'm now lying in bed feeling bad
ugh
Personally I prefer reading the Old Testament anyway; less preachy and more entertaining and solemnly spiritual in places, and for the most part legit insofar as any part of the Bible can be in terms of human authorship and from ancient times.
New Testament has a lot of mixed messages and doesn't mesh well with the Old, and goes in a bunch of different directions at the end.
i pooped earlier luckily
My bedroom is next to the garage, i was sitting on the floor with my back to the wall watching a movie and he came home and parked, and just nudged the wall with his car, with my head directly behind the wall, like i felt the wall give. If he had let it push forward a little bit more it would probably break through.
Arch,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_goGR39m2k
Do you get dizzy like that a lot?
And ugh, that does not sound fun. At least you caught yourself ><
It will (most likely already is) be glorious.
And I am failing to make ends meet freelancing, so I am looking around for a full-time job, but am finding it hard to get a good one, as I have failed to acquire a higher degree.
I am sensing a pattern.
Which is, for the slow of reading, of me failing and being a failure.
nah that's the rest of the New Testament. Most of it is by totally unknown authors (for example the gospels definetly were not written by the people, Matthew Mark Luke and John, they were named for) but they are not dishonest forgeries. The books were written without titles at all (as was the style of the time) and only later when churches started owning more than one different Gospel did they need to assign titles to tell them apart.
So the text itself never claims to be by Mark (for example). It is internally honest. But about half the letters of Paul which actually claim to be by him are not. They are internally dishonest. Hence forgeries.
Christianity is just an Unofficial Fan Patch that adds a Second Campaign for Judaism, which is itself just a Total Mod to Zoroastrianism
Mark Hoffman?
Arch,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_goGR39m2k
relatively common
Templars are sort of like Alliance with less retard and more fascism. There are no classes but if you focus on rifles and guns in general as well as some melee weapons you can probably pull off a good rogue or hunter, and eventually find a cosmetic pet like my quetzel bird Jimmy to complete the illusion.
Someone is a Borges fan.
the class is really powerful but you are weak to spears and if you die you have to wait 3 days to rez
Get him a string and a ping pong ball like old people put in their garages so they don't do what he did
That sucks.
Illuminati
Dragon