That is some of the most moronic shit I have heard in a long time.
How do you even approach those ideas and try to grapple with them seriously? There's so much bigotry to unpack...
I guess I would just end up accusing the person who said it of internalizing the language of white racism, and suggest they break free of the rhetorical chains in which they're bound. Additional slavery metaphor, blatant accusation that the opinion is an example of patriarchy instead of a protest against it, etc.
The thing about erotic fiction is that I can't get off if I don't see a scrotum slapping meatily against angry red recently shaved genitals
seriously though WHY DO THEY DO THIS
Because the most devoted porn addicts love the undeniable evidence of sexual penetration occurring I guess? They need to see it vivid and explicit in front of them because it is the last element of vanilla sex that is still transgressive enough to stir the bruise-mottled tube of meat hanging flaccid in their fist.
God damn, you've pretty much nailed me down and hovered over me with a microscope
"and the morning stars I have seen
and the gengars who are guiding me" -- W.S. Merwin
Surprising no one, the free ObamaphoneReaganphone program has been poorly managed with very little oversight. Looking at that little chart accompanying the article, Virgin Mobile and AT&T drank deeply from the government teat.
The U.S. government spent about $2.2 billion last year to provide phones to low-income Americans, but a Wall Street Journal review of the program shows that a large number of those who received the phones haven't proved they are eligible to receive them ... A review of five top recipients of Lifeline support conducted by the FCC for the Journal showed that 41% of their more than six million subscribers either couldn't demonstrate their eligibility or didn't respond to requests for certification ... The FCC until last year allowed consumers to self-certify, without requiring documentation, that they met federal poverty guidelines. Subscribers didn't have to recertify once they were enrolled in the program, and there were few checks on whether households signed up for more than one cellphone.
The Obamaphone "scandal" is something meant to anger old (white) voters who don't realize how important a cell phone is these days
Why back in my day you walked into the door and shook the owner's hand and you had a job by crikey, you didn't need to telemephone or fancy futuristic cellular phone (which is cheaper than a landline)
override367 on
0
MortiousThe Nightmare BeginsMove to New ZealandRegistered Userregular
That is some of the most moronic shit I have heard in a long time.
How do you even approach those ideas and try to grapple with them seriously? There's so much bigotry to unpack...
I guess I would just end up accusing the person who said it of internalizing the language of white racism, and suggest they break free of the rhetorical chains in which they're bound. Additional slavery metaphor, blatant accusation that the opinion is an example of patriarchy instead of a protest against it, etc.
Good grief.
wait i can't tell which side you're on
i'm confused
+1
MortiousThe Nightmare BeginsMove to New ZealandRegistered Userregular
And that has been your Mortious sharing moment. Move along, nothing to see here.
That is some of the most moronic shit I have heard in a long time.
How do you even approach those ideas and try to grapple with them seriously? There's so much bigotry to unpack...
I guess I would just end up accusing the person who said it of internalizing the language of white racism, and suggest they break free of the rhetorical chains in which they're bound. Additional slavery metaphor, blatant accusation that the opinion is an example of patriarchy instead of a protest against it, etc.
Good grief.
wait i can't tell which side you're on
i'm confused
There are more than two sides here
"and the morning stars I have seen
and the gengars who are guiding me" -- W.S. Merwin
0
SarksusATTACK AND DETHRONE GODRegistered Userregular
The thing about erotic fiction is that I can't get off if I don't see a scrotum slapping meatily against angry red recently shaved genitals
seriously though WHY DO THEY DO THIS
Because the most devoted porn addicts love the undeniable evidence of sexual penetration occurring I guess? They need to see it vivid and explicit in front of them because it is the last element of vanilla sex that is still transgressive enough to stir the bruise-mottled tube of meat hanging flaccid in their fist.
I can only be aroused if the penis and balls are tied up like a ham.
Do college kids in other countries have Baywatch theme parties and/or dress up like Pam Anderson to be sexy?
0
CindersWhose sails were black when it was windyRegistered Userregular
The FCC said new verification procedures saved nearly $214 million last year, and projected total savings over the next three years would reach $2 billion. Disbursements under the program began to drop in the third quarter after 12 consecutive quarters of increases.
Surprising no one, the free ObamaphoneReaganphone program has been poorly managed with very little oversight. Looking at that little chart accompanying the article, Virgin Mobile and AT&T drank deeply from the government teat.
The U.S. government spent about $2.2 billion last year to provide phones to low-income Americans, but a Wall Street Journal review of the program shows that a large number of those who received the phones haven't proved they are eligible to receive them ... A review of five top recipients of Lifeline support conducted by the FCC for the Journal showed that 41% of their more than six million subscribers either couldn't demonstrate their eligibility or didn't respond to requests for certification ... The FCC until last year allowed consumers to self-certify, without requiring documentation, that they met federal poverty guidelines. Subscribers didn't have to recertify once they were enrolled in the program, and there were few checks on whether households signed up for more than one cellphone.
Surprising no one, the free ObamaphoneReaganphone program has been poorly managed with very little oversight. Looking at that little chart accompanying the article, Virgin Mobile and AT&T drank deeply from the government teat.
The U.S. government spent about $2.2 billion last year to provide phones to low-income Americans, but a Wall Street Journal review of the program shows that a large number of those who received the phones haven't proved they are eligible to receive them ... A review of five top recipients of Lifeline support conducted by the FCC for the Journal showed that 41% of their more than six million subscribers either couldn't demonstrate their eligibility or didn't respond to requests for certification ... The FCC until last year allowed consumers to self-certify, without requiring documentation, that they met federal poverty guidelines. Subscribers didn't have to recertify once they were enrolled in the program, and there were few checks on whether households signed up for more than one cellphone.
I mean jokes where you pretend to be racist but it's not really racist because it's a joke.
With scare quotes because I don't really observe the distinction.
i kind of don't understand this position
I guess it's like death of the author shit. Like, all I know about Seth McFarlane is that he makes Family Guy. So when he (or one of his writers, I guess) writes a homophobic joke or whatever, all that is presented is the homophobic joke. There isn't a disclaimer that the real joke is that anyone would make such a joke (and I'm not advocating such a disclaimer; jokes that need explanation are not good jokes)... as far as anyone can reasonably tell, it is what it is. A statement where the humor capitalizes on bigoted assumptions without challenging them.
0
Tiger BurningDig if you will, the pictureRegistered User, SolidSaints Tuberegular
I've never hypersexualized anything.
I don't even know if i could.
Ain't no particular sign I'm more compatible with
0
BeNarwhalThe Work Left UnfinishedRegistered Userregular
haha i really hope i didn't speak too soon re: new yawk. i just kind of assumed that my check would arrive by then but i didn't look at a calendar and realize it might be razor close.
NYC PEOPLE JUST IN CASE PLZ FORGIVE ME IN ADVANCE IF I ACTUALLY SHOW UP ON FRIDAY THE 8TH INSTEAD OF FRIDAY THE 1ST :V
Surprising no one, the free ObamaphoneReaganphone program has been poorly managed with very little oversight. Looking at that little chart accompanying the article, Virgin Mobile and AT&T drank deeply from the government teat.
The U.S. government spent about $2.2 billion last year to provide phones to low-income Americans, but a Wall Street Journal review of the program shows that a large number of those who received the phones haven't proved they are eligible to receive them ... A review of five top recipients of Lifeline support conducted by the FCC for the Journal showed that 41% of their more than six million subscribers either couldn't demonstrate their eligibility or didn't respond to requests for certification ... The FCC until last year allowed consumers to self-certify, without requiring documentation, that they met federal poverty guidelines. Subscribers didn't have to recertify once they were enrolled in the program, and there were few checks on whether households signed up for more than one cellphone.
anyway it was always inevitable that conservative ethnic nationalists would eventually appropriate the language of anticolonial antiimperialism
the only requirement was that the people benefiting from reaction in the global south be the restored local hierarchs rather than the white interlopers
0
LudiousI just wanted a sandwich A temporally dislocated QuiznosRegistered Userregular
haha i really hope i didn't speak too soon re: new yawk. i just kind of assumed that my check would arrive by then but i didn't look at a calendar and realize it might be razor close.
NYC PEOPLE JUST IN CASE PLZ FORGIVE ME IN ADVANCE IF I ACTUALLY SHOW UP ON FRIDAY THE 8TH INSTEAD OF FRIDAY THE 1ST :V
What fiction have you read that New Yorkers are forgiving
Ironic racism to me sounds like when you make a joke about or allude to a stereotype and the joke is funny because of how blatantly stupid and absurd the stereotype is
Like if Chu were to say he's been cutting his spending and saving up for something important and I made some absurd reference to Jewish folk and money, or the international conspiracy backing his efforts
Posts
That is some of the most moronic shit I have heard in a long time.
How do you even approach those ideas and try to grapple with them seriously? There's so much bigotry to unpack...
I guess I would just end up accusing the person who said it of internalizing the language of white racism, and suggest they break free of the rhetorical chains in which they're bound. Additional slavery metaphor, blatant accusation that the opinion is an example of patriarchy instead of a protest against it, etc.
Good grief.
God damn, you've pretty much nailed me down and hovered over me with a microscope
and the gengars who are guiding me" -- W.S. Merwin
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpAOwJvTOio
Why back in my day you walked into the door and shook the owner's hand and you had a job by crikey, you didn't need to telemephone or fancy futuristic cellular phone (which is cheaper than a landline)
I actually have a bit of a wrapping fetish..
Buttons, zippers, tied strings etc.
It’s not a very important country most of the time
http://steamcommunity.com/id/mortious
wait i can't tell which side you're on
i'm confused
It’s not a very important country most of the time
http://steamcommunity.com/id/mortious
There are more than two sides here
and the gengars who are guiding me" -- W.S. Merwin
I can only be aroused if the penis and balls are tied up like a ham.
Hooray!
I know about the Obamaphone lady
Doesn't change the fact that it was started by Reagan and the specific expansion the WSJ article is talking about was a Bush policy
the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
how do you differentiate between that theme and "wear a bikini" themes
When the only response to fucking reality is to post Obama phone lady, as if that's a serious rebuttal. the argument is already won.
Well, you make it a red one-piece and then stuff a shit ton of silicone in your bra.
Red one-pieces and lifesavers
and the gengars who are guiding me" -- W.S. Merwin
I guess it's like death of the author shit. Like, all I know about Seth McFarlane is that he makes Family Guy. So when he (or one of his writers, I guess) writes a homophobic joke or whatever, all that is presented is the homophobic joke. There isn't a disclaimer that the real joke is that anyone would make such a joke (and I'm not advocating such a disclaimer; jokes that need explanation are not good jokes)... as far as anyone can reasonably tell, it is what it is. A statement where the humor capitalizes on bigoted assumptions without challenging them.
I don't even know if i could.
Pretending to run in slow motion
By the fact that pam anderson didn't wear a bikini on baywatch
swimsuit all the way
NYC PEOPLE JUST IN CASE PLZ FORGIVE ME IN ADVANCE IF I ACTUALLY SHOW UP ON FRIDAY THE 8TH INSTEAD OF FRIDAY THE 1ST :V
or well maybe right now isn't the right time because frostbite isn't particularly sexy
Free cell phones in 1986, huh? Well, Reagan and Bush seem like great guys who care about the impoverished, then. Vote Republican.
that
is
ADORBS
comcast getting into the cell phone game?
They really are.
the only requirement was that the people benefiting from reaction in the global south be the restored local hierarchs rather than the white interlopers
What fiction have you read that New Yorkers are forgiving
all races putting Shepard under the spotlight
waiting...waiting...
"Hold on dudes gotta romance my crew!"
maybe i'm streaming terrible dj right now if i am its here
Like if Chu were to say he's been cutting his spending and saving up for something important and I made some absurd reference to Jewish folk and money, or the international conspiracy backing his efforts
You could have one kid get really hammered, then go 'fake drown' somewhere while the sexy ladies save them. I'm sure nothing would go wrong.
Obama could punch a kitten in the face and you would say the black eye makes its fur look more lustrous.