1. Do we get our dice roll results? (which we've all started getting at this point)
2. Are jeer/cheer results included in our final quality in these results PMs?
3. Can our individual dice rolls be manipulated by the abilities of other players?
I'll !vote ihaveachair since I've been vaguely suspicious of him since his throwaway vote wording on day 1, and this seems as good a time as any to put him to the test.
At first I thought Ketbra was saying "They might not affect your dice rolls, but they could still affect your dice roll results (IE: number of matches)!" which was just O_o but now I guess not?
Yeah of course your clarification is going to be CD'd Egos.
My attention is completely distracted and I need to finish writing this review, so I'm just gonna drop my !vote for KetBra in case the vote needs to turn away from ihaveachair for any reason.
Including my vote, that should put ihaveachair in a three vote lead (7 votes) over KetBra and Farangu (4 votes each).
Since it looks like I may be saying goodbye, and I'm not sure I've played enough of these to tell...am I just the target of a major random bandwagon or did I do anything that seemed suspicious?
Why aren't we taking out the reserves that have a 50/50 shot of being mafia?
Or are we still pretending to ignore that slip-up?
It seems significantly more likely that the mafia role was randomly distributed to someone who had previously been just a villager, and not simply given to a replacement.
Why aren't we taking out the reserves that have a 50/50 shot of being mafia?
Or are we still pretending to ignore that slip-up?
It seems significantly more likely that the mafia role was randomly distributed to someone who had previously been just a villager, and not simply given to a replacement.
Why do you think this? I think it would be very strange for someone's victory condition to change mid-game because of withdrawals.
Since it looks like I may be saying goodbye, and I'm not sure I've played enough of these to tell...am I just the target of a major random bandwagon or did I do anything that seemed suspicious?
Generally when people are voting for you, you should do something besides just vote for the person who gave a reason for you.
Address their argument and explain why you disagree, suggest someone else you suspect, anything. Just being all "oh I'll vote for the guy who started a vote against me" makes you seem either like
A: A very lazy villager
or
B: A mafioso who wants to minimize how useful their vote record is by voting for the one person who is probably already getting viewed as village-aligned for killing you.
Neither of which is really going to motivate people to try to keep you alive!
Rawkking Goodguy on
0
vertroueI am FemaleTotes Not a SithRegistered Userregular
Since it looks like I may be saying goodbye, and I'm not sure I've played enough of these to tell...am I just the target of a major random bandwagon or did I do anything that seemed suspicious?
They love you.
Blood and Fire
From the Desk of Darth Vertroue Diplomat to the USA.
Why aren't we taking out the reserves that have a 50/50 shot of being mafia?
Or are we still pretending to ignore that slip-up?
Given it was day one and that vanillagers are a thing. I'm entertaining the idea that Jdark could have easily taken the two reserves, along with the vanillagers, mixed the names and then drew the remaining mafioso. Pretty much, I have some doubts that the two reserves are a 50/50 shot.
Why aren't we taking out the reserves that have a 50/50 shot of being mafia?
Or are we still pretending to ignore that slip-up?
Given it was day one and that vanillagers are a thing. I'm entertaining the idea that Jdark could have easily taken the two reserves, along with the vanillagers, mixed the names and then drew the remaining mafioso. Pretty much, I have some doubts that the two reserves are a 50/50 shot.
If you think this is likely then you should tell them everything because they are essentially confirmed.
0
ObiFettUse the ForceAs You WishRegistered Userregular
Why aren't we taking out the reserves that have a 50/50 shot of being mafia?
Or are we still pretending to ignore that slip-up?
It seems significantly more likely that the mafia role was randomly distributed to someone who had previously been just a villager, and not simply given to a replacement.
Why do you think this? I think it would be very strange for someone's victory condition to change mid-game because of withdrawals.
Well, it was still only day one, so the change would be minor as networks aren't set up, and that sort of thing didn't used to be so unusual. Besides, it seems a relatively elegant solution as opposed to the alternatives (losing a mafia and skewing the percentages, or bringing in a villain we all know about.)
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
+1
Sir FabulousMalevolent Squid GodRegistered Userregular
Given it was day one and that vanillagers are a thing. I'm entertaining the idea that Jdark could have easily taken the two reserves, along with the vanillagers, mixed the names and then drew the remaining mafioso. Pretty much, I have some doubts that the two reserves are a 50/50 shot.
Sir Fab. Doing his best to prevent forum miscommunication since 2010.
Posts
Why all the tie hate lately
3DS: 1289-8447-4695
isn't ihaveachair immune to the vote (my vote doesn't count either)?
Never trust revealed mafia, never tie the vote, never reveal, never speculate!
or am I missing something?
ihaveachair
2. No.
3. No.
Penny Arcade Rockstar Social Club / This is why I despise cyclists
Island Name: Felinefine
ah nice catch
Brah? I find this exceedingly nitpicky.
Though ask that clarification yourself if you find it actually something jdark would make the distinction between.
From the Desk of Darth Vertroue Diplomat to the USA.
Unless you're already safe from elimination, and there's someone you specifically want to help or set up for failure, it might be smart.
Are you talking about the results of dice rolls (your reported number of matches) or the results of the competition?
Because I think we're in agreement that the results of the competition can be influenced by cheer/jeer, and anything else that exists.
I think jdark and most hosts would get all "lawyer-y" (aka nitpicky)
Guys.
It's time to stop making mistakes that have been made 100 times before. Please, actually read the thread.
You can vote for people who won a challenge, the "immunity" they get only applies to elimination by game mechanics.
Jdarksun has explicitly stated that there is nothing that can cause immunity to the red vote.
You can vote for people who are immune.
In fact, I encourage you to do so.
Thank you.
Switch Friend Code: SW-1406-1275-7906
Yeah of course your clarification is going to be CD'd Egos.
@S
@Sir Fabulous , I suspect Gizzy meant she can't vote for another team 2 member out of loyalty vs mechanics
Including my vote, that should put ihaveachair in a three vote lead (7 votes) over KetBra and Farangu (4 votes each).
Or are we still pretending to ignore that slip-up?
3DS: 5129-3454-7122
how do you know it's 50/50
It seems significantly more likely that the mafia role was randomly distributed to someone who had previously been just a villager, and not simply given to a replacement.
Correct! I probably should have worded that better .. like I don't want to vote for a team 2 member.
Island Name: Felinefine
Why do you think this? I think it would be very strange for someone's victory condition to change mid-game because of withdrawals.
Because one of the withdrawals was mafia.
Generally when people are voting for you, you should do something besides just vote for the person who gave a reason for you.
Address their argument and explain why you disagree, suggest someone else you suspect, anything. Just being all "oh I'll vote for the guy who started a vote against me" makes you seem either like
A: A very lazy villager
or
B: A mafioso who wants to minimize how useful their vote record is by voting for the one person who is probably already getting viewed as village-aligned for killing you.
Neither of which is really going to motivate people to try to keep you alive!
They love you.
From the Desk of Darth Vertroue Diplomat to the USA.
Given it was day one and that vanillagers are a thing. I'm entertaining the idea that Jdark could have easily taken the two reserves, along with the vanillagers, mixed the names and then drew the remaining mafioso. Pretty much, I have some doubts that the two reserves are a 50/50 shot.
battletag: Millin#1360
Nice chart to figure out how honest a news source is.
If you think this is likely then you should tell them everything because they are essentially confirmed.
Well, it was still only day one, so the change would be minor as networks aren't set up, and that sort of thing didn't used to be so unusual. Besides, it seems a relatively elegant solution as opposed to the alternatives (losing a mafia and skewing the percentages, or bringing in a villain we all know about.)
Sir Fab. Doing his best to prevent forum miscommunication since 2010.
Switch Friend Code: SW-1406-1275-7906
That is day 2 you have thrown a reasonless vote on me, Obi. I could see the day 1 vote for reasons :P
Are you going to contribute anything? I know you can.