As was foretold, we've added advertisements to the forums! If you have questions, or if you encounter any bugs, please visit this thread: https://forums.penny-arcade.com/discussion/240191/forum-advertisement-faq-and-reports-thread/
Options

SE++ Game On Threads

12346

Posts

  • Options
    TubeTube Registered User admin
    edited September 2006
    Seriously, I'm sorry but you've had your time for making big statements about the chat thread thing. ENOUGH. PM them to a moderator. Don't derail threads about other things. You've been given AMPLE opportunity to express your opinions.

    This is an example of a few people ruining an opportunity to talk about possible changes to a policy (the game on threads). This thread is probably going to be locked, so my apologies to august and the others who were trying to be constructive.

    Tube on
  • Options
    A duck!A duck! Moderator, ClubPA mod
    edited September 2006
    A duck! wrote:
    They did take these questions! There's a 17 page locked thread about these questions!

    I know, and people are still asking these questions because we've been given the middle finger and told to suck it up. Either we're susposed to assimiliate into the SE++ forum, or move on.

    Many of us have chosen the latter.

    Or you can post stuff in D&D! There are other forums.

    A duck! on
  • Options
    PheezerPheezer Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited September 2006
    Look. SE is a forum for any discussion. G&T is a forum for discussion regarding G&T.

    If someone in SE starts a thread about the 360, they're (to my understanding of the rules) free to do so, but they have no right whatsoever to expect it to stay on topic, or to expect a mod to help them keep it on topic.

    If someone in G&T starts a thread about the 360, they can expect it to stay on topic. They can't expect to talk about the movie they saw last week or their delicious supper.

    There are different rules for different forums.

    If you can't grasp that, man, I don't fucking know what you want. We're not going to make SE into G&T nor are we going to make G&T into SE. They are different strokes for different folks and if you're not one of the folks that can understand or appreciate that, maybe you should just find somewhere that better suits your tastes.

    Pheezer on
    IT'S GOT ME REACHING IN MY POCKET IT'S GOT ME FORKING OVER CASH
    CUZ THERE'S SOMETHING IN THE MIDDLE AND IT'S GIVING ME A RASH
  • Options
    TayaTaya Registered User regular
    edited September 2006
    I don't like how these threads get locked. If you don't want to argue anymore then just stop posting. I think people just want a place to rant and vent.

    Taya on
  • Options
    TubeTube Registered User admin
    edited September 2006
    august wrote:
    The problem arises when the choice is one OR the other. Then you have to choose between cliques, essentialy.

    Indeed. While I'm theoretically fine with crossposting, I think the logistics need some working out.

    Honestly, a game on forum would be good if it worked, but I just don't see any difference in the situation now and when it was tried previously.

    Tube on
  • Options
    ThanatosThanatos Registered User regular
    edited September 2006
    pheezer FD wrote:
    ShimSham wrote:
    Sorry you're having to answer the same questions, that's terrible I know. Voluntarily being in a position of authority over a lot of people and having to answer questions about drastic changes that affected a huge number of people. That's unreasonable, sorry.

    If you'd like to be taken seriously you should probably be less snarky towards people who are going out of their way to be polite to you about your inability to hack change.
    Polite?
    So are we back to complaining about the chat thread or are we going to discuss the topic at hand? Because you have NO FUCKING IDEA HOW SICK I AM OF TALKING ABOUT THE GODDAMN FUCKING be calm it is the monkey den a place for calm.

    I really don't see how this could be considered polite. Actually, i'm going to go out on a limb here and say that most of the mods here haven't been polite for the past week now.

    I understand that you guys are under a ton of damn stress from these changes, but acting like powerhungry assholes isn't exactly helping your situation here. I'm not in support of these changes, oh no, quite the opposite.

    But part of a moderators job is to take on these questions, if you don't like having to answer questions all the time then why the hell are you a moderator? Considering the fact that most of the mods here have simply gave G&T the finger, and told us all we're replaceable, along with whippy giving tube the endorsement to be as big as an asshole as possible does not bode well for these forums.

    Basically, the respect for the whole team of mods and admins has gone down the drain for most people of G&T. If the people you mod, the people you try to help (By banning trolls, warning people about future changes etc) don't respect you, then you aren't much of a mod at all.
    We've been every bit as polite to people as they've been to us. However, if they're not going to give us any respect, why should we give them any? Have we gone around jailing/banning people for bitching about us in the appropriate threads? Hell, have we gone around jailing/banning people for bitching about us in the inappropriate threads? Have we jumped all over someone who was being perfectly reasonable?

    Thanatos on
  • Options
    ShimShamShimSham Registered User regular
    edited September 2006
    Seriously, I'm sorry but you've had your time for making big statements about the chat thread thing. ENOUGH. PM them to a moderator. Don't derail threads about other things. You've been given AMPLE opportunity to express your opinions.

    This is an example of a few people ruining an opportunity to talk about possible changes to a policy (the game on threads). This thread is probably going to be locked, so my apologies to august and the others who were trying to be constructive.
    I didn't mention the Chat Thread.

    When I did I was talking about how I previously didnt mention the GnT Chat.

    ShimSham on
    QcGKhPm.jpg
  • Options
    PheezerPheezer Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited September 2006
    august wrote:
    august wrote:
    Yeah, I dunno... I like people from both forums, but I've been thinking about making a Tribes GameOn, but then I stop and think about where I would make it. Probably G&T, because they'd probably be more serious about getting a game going, but the SE people are a lot of fun. If there were some way where people from the two contentious camps could organize games together, optionaly, without being forced into it, maybe it would be a good thing.

    See, I question whether or not it's possible that having that choice of where to post it is a good thing. If you want people who are going to be a little less serious, you can post it in SE, but if you want an assurance that they'll be more serious, try it in G&T. It's difficult to have that kind of choice if the game ons are all together. Thoughts?

    The problem arises when the choice is one OR the other. Then you have to choose between cliques, essentialy.

    No you don't. You can talk about games when you want to be serious and on topic in one place, and you can talk about shit and just hang out in the other place. We're all capable of both. At least I am. And if I can, for fucks sakes people.

    Pheezer on
    IT'S GOT ME REACHING IN MY POCKET IT'S GOT ME FORKING OVER CASH
    CUZ THERE'S SOMETHING IN THE MIDDLE AND IT'S GIVING ME A RASH
  • Options
    DJ EebsDJ Eebs Moderator, Administrator admin
    edited September 2006
    I guess I don't see what the big deal is here. To me, this is basically the last little thread that people are hanging on and arguing about, because after last weekend nobody wants to hear about the other issues anymore, because that's all last weekend was.

    I'm sorry, I just don't see why there was an urgent need to bring this up outside of "well they took shit away from us, why do they get to keep their shit, it's not fair"

    DJ Eebs on
  • Options
    TubeTube Registered User admin
    edited September 2006
    pheezer FD wrote:
    No you don't. You can talk about games when you want to be serious and on topic in one place, and you can talk about shit and just hang out in the other place. We're all capable of both. At least I am. And if I can, for fucks sakes people.

    I think he's talking specifically about game on threads pheez.

    Tube on
  • Options
    A duck!A duck! Moderator, ClubPA mod
    edited September 2006
    I can't believe people are stressing out over supposed cliques on an internet forum.

    PA: HIGHSCHOOL++

    A duck! on
  • Options
    ThanatosThanatos Registered User regular
    edited September 2006
    Taya wrote:
    I don't like how these threads get locked. If you don't want to argue anymore then just stop posting. I think people just want a place to rant and vent.
    How many hundreds of pages do we need to let people rant and vent for?

    Thanatos on
  • Options
    PheezerPheezer Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited September 2006
    Taya wrote:
    I don't like how these threads get locked. If you don't want to argue anymore then just stop posting. I think people just want a place to rant and vent.

    There's a productive limit on these things. After a certain point, these threads lose value. That's when they get locked. Then new ones come up. We all talk about it for a while, then a few people decide they no longer are interested in anything but bitching, and we shut it down because really, we don't care and neither does anyone else. Get a livejournal if you want a venue to just bitch and moan.

    Pheezer on
    IT'S GOT ME REACHING IN MY POCKET IT'S GOT ME FORKING OVER CASH
    CUZ THERE'S SOMETHING IN THE MIDDLE AND IT'S GIVING ME A RASH
  • Options
    TayaTaya Registered User regular
    edited September 2006
    Thanatos wrote:
    Taya wrote:
    I don't like how these threads get locked. If you don't want to argue anymore then just stop posting. I think people just want a place to rant and vent.
    How many hundreds of pages do we need to let people rant and vent for?
    As long as it takes?

    Pages in a thread aren't made of trees or anything. What's the difference?

    Taya on
  • Options
    PheezerPheezer Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited September 2006
    pheezer FD wrote:
    No you don't. You can talk about games when you want to be serious and on topic in one place, and you can talk about shit and just hang out in the other place. We're all capable of both. At least I am. And if I can, for fucks sakes people.

    I think he's talking specifically about game on threads pheez.

    I think I'm reading through about five or six drinks right now.

    Pheezer on
    IT'S GOT ME REACHING IN MY POCKET IT'S GOT ME FORKING OVER CASH
    CUZ THERE'S SOMETHING IN THE MIDDLE AND IT'S GIVING ME A RASH
  • Options
    augustaugust where you come from is gone Registered User regular
    edited September 2006
    pheezer FD wrote:
    No you don't. You can talk about games when you want to be serious and on topic in one place, and you can talk about shit and just hang out in the other place. We're all capable of both. At least I am. And if I can, for fucks sakes people.

    I think he's talking specifically about game on threads pheez.

    Yep.

    august on
  • Options
    ShimShamShimSham Registered User regular
    edited September 2006
    A duck! wrote:
    I can't believe people are stressing out over supposed cliques on an internet forum.

    PA: HIGHSCHOOL++
    Now I will mention the Chat thread because of this comment.

    Whippy was stressing out about the GnT chat and Megathreads because they were clique-like.

    ShimSham on
    QcGKhPm.jpg
  • Options
    TubeTube Registered User admin
    edited September 2006
    Taya wrote:
    Pages in a thread aren't made of trees or anything. What's the difference?

    Well, bandwidth isn't free but that's not the issue. We have to move on sooner or later, and this stuff is just morbid.

    Tube on
  • Options
    ThanatosThanatos Registered User regular
    edited September 2006
    ShimSham wrote:
    A duck! wrote:
    I can't believe people are stressing out over supposed cliques on an internet forum.

    PA: HIGHSCHOOL++
    Now I will mention the Chat thread because of this comment.

    Whippy was stressing out about the GnT chat and Megathreads because they were clique-like.
    Yes, look how impatient we've been, here.

    Apparently, Tube is trying to be nice, and thus, not following through with his threat, however, I swear to god, the next person to mention or even imply the chat thread, I'm going to fucking ban the holy fuck out of.

    Thanatos on
  • Options
    Just_Bri_ThanksJust_Bri_Thanks Seething with rage from a handbasket.Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited September 2006
    As Tube said several pages ago, there are about three [Game On] posts in SE++. One of tem being a FFXI thread, which I happen to be a major contributer to.

    Way back in the day when the game first came out, SE++ folks got together on the Carbuncle server. G&T seems to have congregated on the Pandimonium server, and perhaps a few others.

    The latest FFXI thread was an attempt to get members of the old Carbuncle linkshell back together again. It mostly failed, but Xero and I are still playing.

    In response to the Clique accusations concerning that thread, we have had forumers from other servers stop in on many an occasion in that thread, and we are not telling them to GtFO. We are being cool and chill about the whole thing.

    As for future [Game On] threads in SE++... I have no problem with them going into either SE++ or G&T. I kinda dig Tube's thought about a Cross post sticky in SE++ ruled with an iron fist.

    I have never had a problem with further forum community integration. I enjoy SE++'s "red Headed Step Child" reputation, but it is all in good fun for me.

    Just_Bri_Thanks on
    ...and when you are done with that; take a folding
    chair to Creation and then suplex the Void.
  • Options
    Munkus BeaverMunkus Beaver You don't have to attend every argument you are invited to. Philosophy: Stoicism. Politics: Democratic SocialistRegistered User, ClubPA regular
    edited September 2006
    ShimSham wrote:
    Seriously, I'm sorry but you've had your time for making big statements about the chat thread thing. ENOUGH. PM them to a moderator. Don't derail threads about other things. You've been given AMPLE opportunity to express your opinions.

    This is an example of a few people ruining an opportunity to talk about possible changes to a policy (the game on threads). This thread is probably going to be locked, so my apologies to august and the others who were trying to be constructive.
    I didn't mention the Chat Thread.

    When I did I was talking about how I previously didnt mention the GnT Chat.

    The reason there was a GnT Chat thread was for GnTers to talk to other GnTers about offtopic things without dealing with SE++ people.

    Munkus Beaver on
    Humor can be dissected as a frog can, but dies in the process.
  • Options
    A duck!A duck! Moderator, ClubPA mod
    edited September 2006
    ShimSham wrote:
    A duck! wrote:
    I can't believe people are stressing out over supposed cliques on an internet forum.

    PA: HIGHSCHOOL++
    Now I will mention the Chat thread because of this comment.

    Whippy was stressing out about the GnT chat and Megathreads because they were clique-like.

    Yeah, and they were. God-forbid you said something nice about the PS3 in the...PS3 thread. There's honestly very little of that activity outside of where fanboys fester.

    A duck! on
  • Options
    ThanatosThanatos Registered User regular
    edited September 2006
    Taya wrote:
    Thanatos wrote:
    Taya wrote:
    I don't like how these threads get locked. If you don't want to argue anymore then just stop posting. I think people just want a place to rant and vent.
    How many hundreds of pages do we need to let people rant and vent for?
    As long as it takes?

    Pages in a thread aren't made of trees or anything. What's the difference?
    It won't end. It will just continue, forever and ever. It's like picking at a scab; it'll never have a chance to heal.

    Thanatos on
  • Options
    A duck!A duck! Moderator, ClubPA mod
    edited September 2006
    This spot reserved for on topic response, that I am busy typing now. I just want to get a place holder in here in case Tube carries through with his thoughts about locking the topic.

    Please stand by...

    Actually, you can't edit after a lock.

    A duck! on
  • Options
    F-Zero_RacerF-Zero_Racer Registered User regular
    edited September 2006
    Thanatos wrote:
    pheezer FD wrote:
    ShimSham wrote:
    Sorry you're having to answer the same questions, that's terrible I know. Voluntarily being in a position of authority over a lot of people and having to answer questions about drastic changes that affected a huge number of people. That's unreasonable, sorry.

    If you'd like to be taken seriously you should probably be less snarky towards people who are going out of their way to be polite to you about your inability to hack change.
    Polite?
    So are we back to complaining about the chat thread or are we going to discuss the topic at hand? Because you have NO FUCKING IDEA HOW SICK I AM OF TALKING ABOUT THE GODDAMN FUCKING be calm it is the monkey den a place for calm.

    I really don't see how this could be considered polite. Actually, i'm going to go out on a limb here and say that most of the mods here haven't been polite for the past week now.

    I understand that you guys are under a ton of damn stress from these changes, but acting like powerhungry assholes isn't exactly helping your situation here. I'm not in support of these changes, oh no, quite the opposite.

    But part of a moderators job is to take on these questions, if you don't like having to answer questions all the time then why the hell are you a moderator? Considering the fact that most of the mods here have simply gave G&T the finger, and told us all we're replaceable, along with whippy giving tube the endorsement to be as big as an asshole as possible does not bode well for these forums.

    Basically, the respect for the whole team of mods and admins has gone down the drain for most people of G&T. If the people you mod, the people you try to help (By banning trolls, warning people about future changes etc) don't respect you, then you aren't much of a mod at all.
    We've been every bit as polite to people as they've been to us. However, if they're not going to give us any respect, why should we give them any? Have we gone around jailing/banning people for bitching about us in the appropriate threads? Hell, have we gone around jailing/banning people for bitching about us in the inappropriate threads? Have we jumped all over someone who was being perfectly reasonable?

    Except that, as a moderator and admin you are susposed to be above such petty arguements.

    If a person says "FUCK YOU" to a leader, the leader doesn't get in the persons face and say "FUCK YOU" back. He responds with dignity, and usually manners in a way to denote that he is indeed higher then those who swore at them in the first place.

    The problem is that the leaders here started the chain, and we merely responded as fit. You mods have told us G&Ters oh so many times that we have no opinion in this matter, that we are replaceable, and you've yelled at the top of your lungs "FUCK YOU G&T" right in our face.

    The leaders have to show a level of maturity, and from what i've seen of Tube and many other moderators, i have not seen this, and no longer do i expect it from the moderators.

    F-Zero_Racer on
  • Options
    DJ EebsDJ Eebs Moderator, Administrator admin
    edited September 2006
    ShimSham wrote:
    A duck! wrote:
    I can't believe people are stressing out over supposed cliques on an internet forum.

    PA: HIGHSCHOOL++
    Now I will mention the Chat thread because of this comment.

    Whippy was stressing out about the GnT chat and Megathreads because they were clique-like.

    Yes, because like it or not, G&T is the first forum most new users are going to go to, because the subject has more to do with this comic than any other subforum, and Whippy did say that. Also, this topic has been argued to death and I don't have anything to add to it.

    And besides, that has literally nothing to do with this issue. The issue here is something that will never affect you, yet you still are bitching about it. I guess I don't understand why this is a big deal, other than if you perceived it as a slight from the mods against G&T.

    DJ Eebs on
  • Options
    PheezerPheezer Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited September 2006
    A duck! wrote:
    This spot reserved for on topic response, that I am busy typing now. I just want to get a place holder in here in case Tube carries through with his thoughts about locking the topic.

    Please stand by...

    Actually, you can't edit after a lock.

    I think he might be hoping Tube would hold off until the post is filled in.

    Pheezer on
    IT'S GOT ME REACHING IN MY POCKET IT'S GOT ME FORKING OVER CASH
    CUZ THERE'S SOMETHING IN THE MIDDLE AND IT'S GIVING ME A RASH
  • Options
    TayaTaya Registered User regular
    edited September 2006
    Thanatos wrote:
    Taya wrote:
    Thanatos wrote:
    Taya wrote:
    I don't like how these threads get locked. If you don't want to argue anymore then just stop posting. I think people just want a place to rant and vent.
    How many hundreds of pages do we need to let people rant and vent for?
    As long as it takes?

    Pages in a thread aren't made of trees or anything. What's the difference?
    It won't end. It will just continue, forever and ever. It's like picking at a scab; it'll never have a chance to heal.
    It'll end eventually, probably.

    I've given up complaining because I know I can't change anything. I'm not happy about the changes but I'll survive. I guess my point is that people want to be able to discuss this stuff with other people over the forum and they can't because the threads get locked. PMing a mod won't do anything and bitching in a LiveJournal won't satisfy anyone because no one will read it.

    Taya on
  • Options
    TubeTube Registered User admin
    edited September 2006
    Except that, as a moderator and admin you are susposed to be above such petty arguements.

    I'm not an admin. I'm sorry if you don't like the way things are run here, but you are welcome to leave. I can go and dig you up the links to some treehouse forums.

    Tube on
  • Options
    PheezerPheezer Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited September 2006
    Except that, as a moderator and admin you are susposed to be above such petty arguements.

    If a person says "FUCK YOU" to a leader, the leader doesn't get in the persons face and say "FUCK YOU" back. He responds with dignity, and usually manners in a way to denote that he is indeed higher then those who swore at them in the first place.

    The problem is that the leaders here started the chain, and we merely responded as fit. You mods have told us G&Ters oh so many times that we have no opinion in this matter, that we are replaceable, and you've yelled at the top of your lungs "FUCK YOU G&T" right in our face.

    The leaders have to show a level of maturity, and from what i've seen of Tube and many other moderators, i have not seen this, and no longer do i expect it from the moderators.

    You're welcome to stop posting here and stick to your treehouse forum. I see you have one in your sig, and it's as hyperbole loaded as your posts here.

    Pheezer on
    IT'S GOT ME REACHING IN MY POCKET IT'S GOT ME FORKING OVER CASH
    CUZ THERE'S SOMETHING IN THE MIDDLE AND IT'S GIVING ME A RASH
  • Options
    A duck!A duck! Moderator, ClubPA mod
    edited September 2006
    pheezer FD wrote:
    A duck! wrote:
    This spot reserved for on topic response, that I am busy typing now. I just want to get a place holder in here in case Tube carries through with his thoughts about locking the topic.

    Please stand by...

    Actually, you can't edit after a lock.

    I think he might be hoping Tube would hold off until the post is filled in.

    Yeah, but it would have been quicker to just type it up and not make that post.

    A duck! on
  • Options
    TheHanku6TheHanku6 Registered User regular
    edited September 2006
    Thanatos wrote:
    ShimSham wrote:
    A duck! wrote:
    I can't believe people are stressing out over supposed cliques on an internet forum.

    PA: HIGHSCHOOL++
    Now I will mention the Chat thread because of this comment.

    Whippy was stressing out about the GnT chat and Megathreads because they were clique-like.
    Yes, look how impatient we've been, here.

    Apparently, Tube is trying to be nice, and thus, not following through with his threat, however, I swear to god, the next person to mention or even imply the chat thread, I'm going to fucking ban the holy fuck out of.
    Now that seems a bit harsh. it is on topic...

    TheHanku6 on
  • Options
    PheezerPheezer Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited September 2006
    A duck! wrote:
    pheezer FD wrote:
    A duck! wrote:
    This spot reserved for on topic response, that I am busy typing now. I just want to get a place holder in here in case Tube carries through with his thoughts about locking the topic.

    Please stand by...

    Actually, you can't edit after a lock.

    I think he might be hoping Tube would hold off until the post is filled in.

    Yeah, but it would have been quicker to just type it up and not make that post.

    I didn't say his post was particularly well advised or thought out.

    Pheezer on
    IT'S GOT ME REACHING IN MY POCKET IT'S GOT ME FORKING OVER CASH
    CUZ THERE'S SOMETHING IN THE MIDDLE AND IT'S GIVING ME A RASH
  • Options
    ThanatosThanatos Registered User regular
    edited September 2006
    Except that, as a moderator and admin you are susposed to be above such petty arguements.

    If a person says "FUCK YOU" to a leader, the leader doesn't get in the persons face and say "FUCK YOU" back. He responds with dignity, and usually manners in a way to denote that he is indeed higher then those who swore at them in the first place.

    The problem is that the leaders here started the chain, and we merely responded as fit. You mods have told us G&Ters oh so many times that we have no opinion in this matter, that we are replaceable, and you've yelled at the top of your lungs "FUCK YOU G&T" right in our face.

    The leaders have to show a level of maturity, and from what i've seen of Tube and many other moderators, i have not seen this, and no longer do i expect it from the moderators.
    I double-checked the Mod Handbook. Nowhere in there does it say "be nice to people who are being shitcocks."

    Also, we're not congressmen; nor are we teachers. We are moderators on an internet forum. If you are seriously expecting a higher level of behavior out of us than you are getting, I suggest you close the browser, shut off the computer, go outside, and re-acquaint yourself with "real life."

    Thanatos on
  • Options
    Just_Bri_ThanksJust_Bri_Thanks Seething with rage from a handbasket.Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited September 2006
    A duck! wrote:
    This spot reserved for on topic response, that I am busy typing now. I just want to get a place holder in here in case Tube carries through with his thoughts about locking the topic.

    Please stand by...

    Actually, you can't edit after a lock.

    It is a good thing I made it in time then.

    Just_Bri_Thanks on
    ...and when you are done with that; take a folding
    chair to Creation and then suplex the Void.
  • Options
    TheHanku6TheHanku6 Registered User regular
    edited September 2006
    Thanatos wrote:
    Except that, as a moderator and admin you are susposed to be above such petty arguements.

    If a person says "FUCK YOU" to a leader, the leader doesn't get in the persons face and say "FUCK YOU" back. He responds with dignity, and usually manners in a way to denote that he is indeed higher then those who swore at them in the first place.

    The problem is that the leaders here started the chain, and we merely responded as fit. You mods have told us G&Ters oh so many times that we have no opinion in this matter, that we are replaceable, and you've yelled at the top of your lungs "FUCK YOU G&T" right in our face.

    The leaders have to show a level of maturity, and from what i've seen of Tube and many other moderators, i have not seen this, and no longer do i expect it from the moderators.
    I double-checked the Mod Handbook. Nowhere in there does it say "be nice to people who are being shitcocks."

    Also, we're not congressmen; nor are we teachers. We are moderators on an internet forum. If you are seriously expecting a higher level of behavior out of us than you are getting, I suggest you close the browser, shut off the computer, go outside, and re-acquaint yourself with "real life."
    Being the leaders of a large community while not showing dignity and maturity in heated debates just because it's online?

    TheHanku6 on
  • Options
    LanzLanz ...Za?Registered User regular
    edited September 2006
    Thanatos wrote:
    Except that, as a moderator and admin you are susposed to be above such petty arguements.

    If a person says "FUCK YOU" to a leader, the leader doesn't get in the persons face and say "FUCK YOU" back. He responds with dignity, and usually manners in a way to denote that he is indeed higher then those who swore at them in the first place.

    The problem is that the leaders here started the chain, and we merely responded as fit. You mods have told us G&Ters oh so many times that we have no opinion in this matter, that we are replaceable, and you've yelled at the top of your lungs "FUCK YOU G&T" right in our face.

    The leaders have to show a level of maturity, and from what i've seen of Tube and many other moderators, i have not seen this, and no longer do i expect it from the moderators.
    I double-checked the Mod Handbook. Nowhere in there does it say "be nice to people who are being shitcocks."

    Also, we're not congressmen; nor are we teachers. We are moderators on an internet forum. If you are seriously expecting a higher level of behavior out of us than you are getting, I suggest you close the browser, shut off the computer, go outside, and re-acquaint yourself with "real life."

    this might be a little off topic, so apologies in advance I don't mean to flame or spark anything, but veering off into more why people do take this so personally, but one may very well to consider the forums part of real life, not much different than sending a letter, calling on the phone, or meeting in the town square.

    Lanz on
    waNkm4k.jpg?1
  • Options
    ThanatosThanatos Registered User regular
    edited September 2006
    TheHanku6 wrote:
    Being the leaders of a large community while not showing dignity and maturity in heated debates just because it's online?
    I would like to know what in the world made you think you would find anything resembling "reason" or "maturity" in this place. Have you ever read the comic? Seriously.

    Thanatos on
  • Options
    A duck!A duck! Moderator, ClubPA mod
    edited September 2006
    TheHanku6 wrote:
    Thanatos wrote:
    Except that, as a moderator and admin you are susposed to be above such petty arguements.

    If a person says "FUCK YOU" to a leader, the leader doesn't get in the persons face and say "FUCK YOU" back. He responds with dignity, and usually manners in a way to denote that he is indeed higher then those who swore at them in the first place.

    The problem is that the leaders here started the chain, and we merely responded as fit. You mods have told us G&Ters oh so many times that we have no opinion in this matter, that we are replaceable, and you've yelled at the top of your lungs "FUCK YOU G&T" right in our face.

    The leaders have to show a level of maturity, and from what i've seen of Tube and many other moderators, i have not seen this, and no longer do i expect it from the moderators.
    I double-checked the Mod Handbook. Nowhere in there does it say "be nice to people who are being shitcocks."

    Also, we're not congressmen; nor are we teachers. We are moderators on an internet forum. If you are seriously expecting a higher level of behavior out of us than you are getting, I suggest you close the browser, shut off the computer, go outside, and re-acquaint yourself with "real life."
    Being the leaders of a large community while not showing dignity and maturity in heated debates just because it's online?
    Well, it's nice like they're getting any compensation. You have to remember, mods were just regular posters at one point. Despite the fact that they were picked for whatever good qualities they have, they're still just PA folks.

    A duck! on
  • Options
    ShimShamShimSham Registered User regular
    edited September 2006
    Thanatos wrote:
    TheHanku6 wrote:
    Being the leaders of a large community while not showing dignity and maturity in heated debates just because it's online?
    I would like to know what in the world made you think you would find anything resembling "reason" or "maturity" in this place. Have you ever read the comic? Seriously.
    So you're suggesting that, despite being responsible for a large number of things and people considering your position, that is okay to act like comic characters because that is Penny Arcade's main lure?

    ShimSham on
    QcGKhPm.jpg
This discussion has been closed.