mi-go hunterOnce again I'm back in the lab.Cleaning my knives, ready for stabs.Registered Userregular
Night 10
Tonight, the vote overwhelmingly tipped in favor of Jpants. He always had a strange glint in his eye that seemed to reveal murderous intent, and this trait was used against him today.
The master gave an audible sigh of disappointment before uttering, "Wrong, poor poor fools. I question your lack of judgment in these trials. Now @JPants, you look eager to off someone. Be my guest!"
The Anonymous, Matev, Obifett, Phyphor, Kristmas Kthulhu, Egos, and Ketbra waited anxiously while digesting perhaps the last meal they will ever have.
I think that there could maybe be some meta-"I wonder why he voted for him and not the front runner DID HE KNOW SOMETHING OR DID HE JUST NOT WANT TO DIE"-analysis but honestly... it's still kinda a crapshoot
I think that there could maybe be some meta-"I wonder why he voted for him and not the front runner DID HE KNOW SOMETHING OR DID HE JUST NOT WANT TO DIE"-analysis but honestly... it's still kinda a crapshoot
Yeah I kinda went with that...awhile ago : hey guys notice how nobody who might be guilty is voting for the main dude. But considering the randomness of killing and such and the fact that the people who get away with it get more power, there is nothing to really deter it. Now if you could say kill people the same night that the voting is going down...then you might get more "have to blend in" etc. Would help with the pacing of this game a bit also.
Anyway I think a game where everyone is an unconditional SK is a bit problematic. And after watching Clue on netflix and playing this, I have a need for a Clue Phalla
I think it might work better if you get judgement points if you vote for the right target whether or not they win the vote. As it is, I can't kill anyone because I'm the only poison left - nobody else would use poison as a second type so if poison shows up everyone likely just votes me anyway. So, my optimal strategy right now is to jump on the winning bandwagon, whether or not it's right
I think it might work better if you get judgement points if you vote for the right target whether or not they win the vote. As it is, I can't kill anyone because I'm the only poison left - nobody else would use poison as a second type so if poison shows up everyone likely just votes me anyway. So, my optimal strategy right now is to jump on the winning bandwagon, whether or not it's right
In theory that would be good, but then you would know who to kill if you suddenly got an update on Judgement. Granted with the current set-up one would want to keep it to themselves potentially so they can get the kill and there is no technical "voting out" even if someone is a past murderer.
Anyway I think a game where everyone is an unconditional SK is a bit problematic. And after watching Clue on netflix and playing this, I have a need for a Clue Phalla
I think it might work better if you get judgement points if you vote for the right target whether or not they win the vote. As it is, I can't kill anyone because I'm the only poison left - nobody else would use poison as a second type so if poison shows up everyone likely just votes me anyway. So, my optimal strategy right now is to jump on the winning bandwagon, whether or not it's right
In theory that would be good, but then you would know who to kill if you suddenly got an update on Judgement. Granted with the current set-up one would want to keep it to themselves potentially so they can get the kill and there is no technical "voting out" even if someone is a past murderer.
Wait, I thought the only murderer you could catch was the previous days' one. So it wouldn't matter, since they would have successfully gotten away with it
I think it might work better if you get judgement points if you vote for the right target whether or not they win the vote. As it is, I can't kill anyone because I'm the only poison left - nobody else would use poison as a second type so if poison shows up everyone likely just votes me anyway. So, my optimal strategy right now is to jump on the winning bandwagon, whether or not it's right
In theory that would be good, but then you would know who to kill if you suddenly got an update on Judgement. Granted with the current set-up one would want to keep it to themselves potentially so they can get the kill and there is no technical "voting out" even if someone is a past murderer.
Wait, I thought the only murderer you could catch was the previous days' one. So it wouldn't matter, since they would have successfully gotten away with it
But you would know to murder them and thus assimilate them *insert horror music*
granted Judgement> Killing for some reason when it's down to 1 vs 1.. You think the trained killer would have an advantage over the detective.
By this stage the stench of death has pervaded the room for so long that the remaining guests only notice a pervading suffocating blanket diffused through the room.
The flies, that have been collecting within and around the corpse for several days, have now taken to landing on the guests themselves, seeking moisture that the bag of bones in the middle of the room lacks.
mi-go hunterOnce again I'm back in the lab.Cleaning my knives, ready for stabs.Registered Userregular
edited February 2014
Day 12
It came as no surprise for the residents of the mansion that the next victim was Jpants. He lied dead in his own bunk, a strange colored foam bubbling out of his mouth. In addition, his chest bled severely from several bullet holes. The stakes were getting higher, with only nine players left in the mansion they had to make a decision.
Posts
because why not?
Yup, that's me on Steam.
If you are interested in playing, discussing, or hosting Arkham Horror, click here!
The Division, Warframe (XB1)
GT: Tanith 6227
Luckily I missed the post button
T A
3DS: 1289-8447-4695
@Matev, @Kristmas Kthulhu
Yup, that's me on Steam.
If you are interested in playing, discussing, or hosting Arkham Horror, click here!
Jpants is indeed the clear choice here.
@Kristmas Kthulhu
Yup, that's me on Steam.
If you are interested in playing, discussing, or hosting Arkham Horror, click here!
Yup, that's me on Steam.
If you are interested in playing, discussing, or hosting Arkham Horror, click here!
Tonight, the vote overwhelmingly tipped in favor of Jpants. He always had a strange glint in his eye that seemed to reveal murderous intent, and this trait was used against him today.
The master gave an audible sigh of disappointment before uttering, "Wrong, poor poor fools. I question your lack of judgment in these trials. Now @JPants, you look eager to off someone. Be my guest!"
The Anonymous, Matev, Obifett, Phyphor, Kristmas Kthulhu, Egos, and Ketbra waited anxiously while digesting perhaps the last meal they will ever have.
Yup, that's me on Steam.
If you are interested in playing, discussing, or hosting Arkham Horror, click here!
Yup, that's me on Steam.
If you are interested in playing, discussing, or hosting Arkham Horror, click here!
Everyone can stay silent and just put down a vote (and that's basically what's been happening) and as long as they avoid a tie. They're fine.
3DS: 1289-8447-4695
Yeah I kinda went with that...awhile ago : hey guys notice how nobody who might be guilty is voting for the main dude. But considering the randomness of killing and such and the fact that the people who get away with it get more power, there is nothing to really deter it. Now if you could say kill people the same night that the voting is going down...then you might get more "have to blend in" etc. Would help with the pacing of this game a bit also.
Anyway I think a game where everyone is an unconditional SK is a bit problematic. And after watching Clue on netflix and playing this, I have a need for a Clue Phalla
Yup, that's me on Steam.
If you are interested in playing, discussing, or hosting Arkham Horror, click here!
In theory that would be good, but then you would know who to kill if you suddenly got an update on Judgement. Granted with the current set-up one would want to keep it to themselves potentially so they can get the kill and there is no technical "voting out" even if someone is a past murderer.
3DS: 1289-8447-4695
Wait, I thought the only murderer you could catch was the previous days' one. So it wouldn't matter, since they would have successfully gotten away with it
But you would know to murder them and thus assimilate them *insert horror music*
granted Judgement> Killing for some reason when it's down to 1 vs 1.. You think the trained killer would have an advantage over the detective.
By this stage the stench of death has pervaded the room for so long that the remaining guests only notice a pervading suffocating blanket diffused through the room.
The flies, that have been collecting within and around the corpse for several days, have now taken to landing on the guests themselves, seeking moisture that the bag of bones in the middle of the room lacks.
Yup, that's me on Steam.
If you are interested in playing, discussing, or hosting Arkham Horror, click here!
Yup, that's me on Steam.
If you are interested in playing, discussing, or hosting Arkham Horror, click here!
It came as no surprise for the residents of the mansion that the next victim was Jpants. He lied dead in his own bunk, a strange colored foam bubbling out of his mouth. In addition, his chest bled severely from several bullet holes. The stakes were getting higher, with only nine players left in the mansion they had to make a decision.
Yup, that's me on Steam.
If you are interested in playing, discussing, or hosting Arkham Horror, click here!
Yup, that's me on Steam.
If you are interested in playing, discussing, or hosting Arkham Horror, click here!
maybe
Boom
Analyze that vote
3DS: 1289-8447-4695