i've had zero issues with my 360 controller on my pc. it seamlessly works with basically every game i've played and switching back to the mouse is as simple as touching my mouse
That's what I want to hear.
0
Irond WillWARNING: NO HURTFUL COMMENTS, PLEASE!!!!!Cambridge. MAModeratormod
When I need to lose several pounds quickly I just swap out my usual breakfast or lunch with a smoothie. A handful of frozen fruit, a few tablespoons of yogurt, a cup of unsweetened coconut milk, and a teaspoon of sweetener (I prefer Truvia - expensive but tastes exactly like sugar to me). Low calorie, nutrient dense, and filling. I keep my diet the same otherwise. Should shave several hundred calories off your typical intake a day.
So I was going to use a chunk of my tax return to buy a new PS4.
But I just got a call from the game place I took all the old consoles and games to and they're offering just over $500 in store credit. So now I'm just going to play the waiting game for them to get new consoles in
No, but I'd argue the concept of plural commitment is.
you can find those in hunter-gatherer societies though, afaik. loosely speaking. Obviously whether they conceive of it as plural commitment in the way we do is a bit iffy, but you can find societies where the particular identity of the biological father is not particularly stressed
i've had zero issues with my 360 controller on my pc. it seamlessly works with basically every game i've played and switching back to the mouse is as simple as touching my mouse
That's what I want to hear.
i use it to play nba2k14, mark of the ninja, tomb raider, sleeping dogs, arkham city, la noire...
if at any point i want to use my mouse for like, a shooting section? i don't have to go into menus or whatever
just move my mouse at all or press any key and it automatically, instantly switches (then i can move the analog stick in any direction to instantly switch back)
i still haven't gotten the hang of properly cooking chicken or fish. i tried to use the foreman grill but stuff comes out way more done than i want it to. i guess it'd be nice to bake it? i dunno. i often end up snacking specifically because properly cooking an entree is so daunting.
0
Atomikaactually just 30 trillion differentiated and specialized cells in a trenchcoat Registered Userregular
No, but I'd argue the concept of plural commitment is.
you can find those in hunter-gatherer societies though, afaik. loosely speaking. Obviously whether they conceive of it as plural commitment in the way we do is a bit iffy, but you can find societies where the particular identity of the biological father is not particularly stressed
This is true, as I recall the small culture (in southern China? Maybe?) where monogamy isn't a thing and children have no fathers, and are instead raised by their mother and maternal uncles.
These people are well aware of the modern conventions of marriage, and think they're hilariously dumb.
i still haven't gotten the hang of properly cooking chicken or fish. i tried to use the foreman grill but stuff comes out way more done than i want it to. i guess it'd be nice to bake it? i dunno. i often end up snacking specifically because properly cooking an entree is so daunting.
I've taken to roasting chicken breasts. Dip em in olive oil, pound them out a little bit, sprinkle with spices and cook
No, but I'd argue the concept of plural commitment is.
you can find those in hunter-gatherer societies though, afaik. loosely speaking. Obviously whether they conceive of it as plural commitment in the way we do is a bit iffy, but you can find societies where the particular identity of the biological father is not particularly stressed
This is true, as I recall the small culture (in southern China? Maybe?) where monogamy isn't a thing and children have no fathers, and are instead raised by their mother and maternal uncles.
These people are well aware of the modern conventions of marriage, and think they're hilariously dumb.
Hey, as long as babies get fed and spend time with role models, hard to criticize.
0
TL DRNot at all confident in his reflexive opinions of thingsRegistered Userregular
Lol Yoga pants
Funny because butts
+1
Atomikaactually just 30 trillion differentiated and specialized cells in a trenchcoat Registered Userregular
Sexually progressive 'alt' communities exist exclusively in a bubble of cultural liberalism
Depends on the scope of observation and what qualities you consider to make something sexually progressive and/or alt.
Managed infidelity is not a modern anomaly.
true, but there's a vast gap between hunter-gatherer society and the industrial society
I assume that giving up the material quality of life generated by the latter is not on the table
I'm not talking hunter-gatherer either.
As a broad, messy generalization, the most common sexual norms vis-a-vis fidelity aren't of the form "don't have sex outside of marriage," they're of the form "whatever you do outside of marriage, don't let it disrupt the family unit." You disavow having sex with your neighbor's wife because you don't want to cast a doubt on whether any offspring born from that dalliance are disruptive to the patrilineage rights of either house. Alternatively, a man can have sex with his neighbor's husband as long as he continues to play the good role of father and husband after he's done. Discretion is more important than fidelity. We see this today with some of the polygynous societies we've been talking about. It's okay to creep as long as you keep it on the down-low.
As a generalization, it is often wrong... but it is less wrong than the generalization that sexual fidelity is the traditional historical worldwide mainstream.
every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.
the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
No, but I'd argue the concept of plural commitment is.
you can find those in hunter-gatherer societies though, afaik. loosely speaking. Obviously whether they conceive of it as plural commitment in the way we do is a bit iffy, but you can find societies where the particular identity of the biological father is not particularly stressed
This is true, as I recall the small culture (in southern China? Maybe?) where monogamy isn't a thing and children have no fathers, and are instead raised by their mother and maternal uncles.
These people are well aware of the modern conventions of marriage, and think they're hilariously dumb.
Hey, as long as babies get fed and spend time with role models, hard to criticize.
I completely agree.
As I said, I've come to view monogamy and western coupling traditions with a more critical eye of late.
Sexually progressive 'alt' communities exist exclusively in a bubble of cultural liberalism
Depends on the scope of observation and what qualities you consider to make something sexually progressive and/or alt.
Managed infidelity is not a modern anomaly.
true, but there's a vast gap between hunter-gatherer society and the industrial society
I assume that giving up the material quality of life generated by the latter is not on the table
I'm not talking hunter-gatherer either.
As a broad, messy generalization, the most common sexual norms vis-a-vis fidelity aren't of the form "don't have sex outside of marriage," they're of the form "whatever you do outside of marriage, don't let it disrupt the family unit." You disavow having sex with your neighbor's wife because you don't want to cast a doubt on whether any offspring born from that dalliance are disruptive to the patrilineage rights of either house. Alternatively, a man can have sex with his neighbor's husband as long as he continues to play the good role of father and husband after he's done. Discretion is more important than fidelity. We see this today with some of the polygynous societies we've been talking about. It's okay to creep as long as you keep it on the down-low.
well, that observation is true, but then the emphasis on discretion indicates that (1) it isn't progressive (2) it isn't explicit, the non-explicitness means it can't be formalized, and the non-formalizability means it can't scale into something that is actually an organized threat to whatever established order there is, be it contemporary liberalism or Victorian repression
i still haven't gotten the hang of properly cooking chicken or fish. i tried to use the foreman grill but stuff comes out way more done than i want it to. i guess it'd be nice to bake it? i dunno. i often end up snacking specifically because properly cooking an entree is so daunting.
I've taken to roasting chicken breasts. Dip em in olive oil, pound them out a little bit, sprinkle with spices and cook
Yeah cooking things on or a grill or pan requires a lot of care and attention, and often, you'll need a really thin piece of meat and to marinade the fuck out of it or it'll dry out.
Baking is the best solution. Toss it in for like 30-40 minutes, and make your side dish.
not a doctor, not a lawyer, examples I use may not be fully researched so don't take out of context plz, don't @ me
0
Atomikaactually just 30 trillion differentiated and specialized cells in a trenchcoat Registered Userregular
No, but I'd argue the concept of plural commitment is.
you can find those in hunter-gatherer societies though, afaik. loosely speaking. Obviously whether they conceive of it as plural commitment in the way we do is a bit iffy, but you can find societies where the particular identity of the biological father is not particularly stressed
This is true, as I recall the small culture (in southern China? Maybe?) where monogamy isn't a thing and children have no fathers, and are instead raised by their mother and maternal uncles.
These people are well aware of the modern conventions of marriage, and think they're hilariously dumb.
Hey, as long as babies get fed and spend time with role models, hard to criticize.
I completely agree.
As I said, I've come to view monogamy and western coupling traditions with a more critical eye of late.
Sexually progressive 'alt' communities exist exclusively in a bubble of cultural liberalism
Depends on the scope of observation and what qualities you consider to make something sexually progressive and/or alt.
Managed infidelity is not a modern anomaly.
true, but there's a vast gap between hunter-gatherer society and the industrial society
I assume that giving up the material quality of life generated by the latter is not on the table
I'm not talking hunter-gatherer either.
As a broad, messy generalization, the most common sexual norms vis-a-vis fidelity aren't of the form "don't have sex outside of marriage," they're of the form "whatever you do outside of marriage, don't let it disrupt the family unit." You disavow having sex with your neighbor's wife because you don't want to cast a doubt on whether any offspring born from that dalliance are disruptive to the patrilineage rights of either house. Alternatively, a man can have sex with his neighbor's husband as long as he continues to play the good role of father and husband after he's done. Discretion is more important than fidelity. We see this today with some of the polygynous societies we've been talking about. It's okay to creep as long as you keep it on the down-low.
As a generalization, it is often wrong... but it is less wrong than the generalization that sexual fidelity is the traditional historical worldwide mainstream.
I think the traditional thinking might be more narrowly focused on "I want my babies to be mine if they're to inherit my stuff" than on the general notion of "don't disrupt the family unit".
Posts
No, but I'd argue the concept of plural commitment is.
why would you do it ironically
yoga is good excercise
the Christian Democratic Party of Italy in the 1950s apparently used to buy votes by giving voters left shoes
Gotta say your diet sounds delicious.
That's what I want to hear.
i thought coconut milk had crazy calories.
Do I get a vote?
my friend says she wont wear them
i responded with 'yoga pants or i feed'
i don't think she understands LoL jokes
Arch,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_goGR39m2k
.... that's pretty fucking tempting.
Thread Recycle: page 100
Resistance is quaint.
you can find those in hunter-gatherer societies though, afaik. loosely speaking. Obviously whether they conceive of it as plural commitment in the way we do is a bit iffy, but you can find societies where the particular identity of the biological father is not particularly stressed
OLD
QEDMF xbl: PantsB G+
i use it to play nba2k14, mark of the ninja, tomb raider, sleeping dogs, arkham city, la noire...
if at any point i want to use my mouse for like, a shooting section? i don't have to go into menus or whatever
just move my mouse at all or press any key and it automatically, instantly switches (then i can move the analog stick in any direction to instantly switch back)
the main lesson of rotary pohnes was you grow to hate people with 9s in their phone number
This is true, as I recall the small culture (in southern China? Maybe?) where monogamy isn't a thing and children have no fathers, and are instead raised by their mother and maternal uncles.
These people are well aware of the modern conventions of marriage, and think they're hilariously dumb.
I've taken to roasting chicken breasts. Dip em in olive oil, pound them out a little bit, sprinkle with spices and cook
Hey, as long as babies get fed and spend time with role models, hard to criticize.
Funny because butts
"Please input your credit card number."
*hangs up, goes to neighbor's house*
I'm not talking hunter-gatherer either.
As a broad, messy generalization, the most common sexual norms vis-a-vis fidelity aren't of the form "don't have sex outside of marriage," they're of the form "whatever you do outside of marriage, don't let it disrupt the family unit." You disavow having sex with your neighbor's wife because you don't want to cast a doubt on whether any offspring born from that dalliance are disruptive to the patrilineage rights of either house. Alternatively, a man can have sex with his neighbor's husband as long as he continues to play the good role of father and husband after he's done. Discretion is more important than fidelity. We see this today with some of the polygynous societies we've been talking about. It's okay to creep as long as you keep it on the down-low.
As a generalization, it is often wrong... but it is less wrong than the generalization that sexual fidelity is the traditional historical worldwide mainstream.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=17-139-054
Keep in mind that I do want a fully modular PSU.
I completely agree.
As I said, I've come to view monogamy and western coupling traditions with a more critical eye of late.
China is the worst.
[Chat] is the worst
Any of the corsair stuff is high quality, so yeah, that's a pretty good deal.
Schedule a meeting and then spend the whole time playing with the helicopter
Make one of them designate their laptop/tablet as the landing pad so they can't open/use it
well, that observation is true, but then the emphasis on discretion indicates that (1) it isn't progressive (2) it isn't explicit, the non-explicitness means it can't be formalized, and the non-formalizability means it can't scale into something that is actually an organized threat to whatever established order there is, be it contemporary liberalism or Victorian repression
Yeah cooking things on or a grill or pan requires a lot of care and attention, and often, you'll need a really thin piece of meat and to marinade the fuck out of it or it'll dry out.
Baking is the best solution. Toss it in for like 30-40 minutes, and make your side dish.
It's a matriarchal society that also encourages large extended families living under one roof.
It's probably not a bad way to manage your wealth and resources.
I am a million times more interested in helping out with my nieces and nephews than I am with having my own kids.
Loads more fun.
aren't you married?
I think the traditional thinking might be more narrowly focused on "I want my babies to be mine if they're to inherit my stuff" than on the general notion of "don't disrupt the family unit".