"Do" "two" and "you" are maybe not measuring up to your Sick Aladdin Rhymes Heritage, disney
A trap is for fish: when you've got the fish, you can forget the trap. A snare is for rabbits: when you've got the rabbit, you can forget the snare. Words are for meaning: when you've got the meaning, you can forget the words.
It's not that she hates jewelry, but that she only usually likes aesthetically standout instances of it, which is true in almost every context any ways.
Makes sense. I dated a girl a few years ago who legitimately hated jewelry. But she was kind of a serious 'abolish the wage system' type of communist.
She didn't march or shout or anything (she was actually really shy and quiet) but she thought conspicuous consumption was dumb.
it is
also i am an abolish the wage system type communist (aka just a communist)
Do you know much about economics?
Because I've been told that Labor Theory is pretty shit wrong, but it wasn't sufficiently explained to me why.
I need someone to learn me a thing.
Because I'm pretty attracted to some traditional marxist stuff, but it's mixed up with economics that look right, but I don't know much about economics.
the most awkward thing about the LTV is that the tendency for the rate of profit to fall doesn't seem to have actually happened. here there is both much empirical and theoretical discussion, in particular over Okishio's theorem.
(And then you take a pen and work through the Solow growth model like a lazy undergraduate, or even the Ramsey overlapping-generations model, and then you wonder what the fuss is all about. No, seriously, do it. Non-mathematical analysis invoking Marxist theories of capital tend to implicitly assume a stupid version of the TRPF, where the tendency arises through a positive rate of return on capital necessitating a permanent expansion of capital (!!!!). This is seductive to the mathematically illiterate layman, but it is wrong wrong wrong. And then you can readily observe that the mathematically rigorous version of the TRPF is much more fragile than standard neoclassical exogenous growth approaches. Note that both then need add-ons to match empirics; the point is the theoretical robustness of intuition)
On the LTV specifically, there are two traps. It important to distinguish between those Marxists that treat it as a different set of terms for the same underlying phenomenon as the standard neoclassical school, and those that treat it as a theory with different implications (for whatever reason). The latter tends to be defined in an evasive, hard-to-pin-down manner.
Secondly, it is important to avoid the error of, in the great CR Shalizi's words, 'trying to explain a variable with a constant'. That is to say, if you want to explain a trend, or worse, a cycle (like, say, crises of capitalism), you had better come up with mechanism that also varies over time. If it is a cycle that allegedly gets worse, you also have to identify the mechanism of positive feedback! This is something which the analytical Marxist school tries to tackle; IMO not very well - the school seems to have utterly given up on the positive feedback, and only grudgingly argues for a fragile capital order rather than an intrinsically self-destabilizing one. The result is, as Delong observed a while ago, that alleged Marxists start writing stuff that is not very different from the reactionary doomsaying you get pouring out of the WSJ editorial page.
I don't have tickets it is hard to convince myself to spend the time/money to go and I dunno what I'd do when people are busy!
I don't have a ticket either. We can hang out and be lame together!
"The only way to get rid of a temptation is to give into it." - Oscar Wilde
"We believe in the people and their 'wisdom' as if there was some special secret entrance to knowledge that barred to anyone who had ever learned anything." - Friedrich Nietzsche
"The only way to get rid of a temptation is to give into it." - Oscar Wilde
"We believe in the people and their 'wisdom' as if there was some special secret entrance to knowledge that barred to anyone who had ever learned anything." - Friedrich Nietzsche
+4
Options
simonwolfi can feel a differencetoday, a differenceRegistered Userregular
I don't have tickets it is hard to convince myself to spend the time/money to go and I dunno what I'd do when people are busy!
I don't have a ticket either. We can hang out and be lame together!
Well
You can hang out
but only one of you will be lame
which one? stay tuned to find out, right after this word from our sponsors
It's you, isn't it?
"The only way to get rid of a temptation is to give into it." - Oscar Wilde
"We believe in the people and their 'wisdom' as if there was some special secret entrance to knowledge that barred to anyone who had ever learned anything." - Friedrich Nietzsche
0
Options
simonwolfi can feel a differencetoday, a differenceRegistered Userregular
I don't have tickets it is hard to convince myself to spend the time/money to go and I dunno what I'd do when people are busy!
I don't have a ticket either. We can hang out and be lame together!
Shiv, he wants your kidneys!
I TOTALLY DON'T WANT YOUR KIDNEYS AT ALL, THIS IS NOT THE REASON THAT I WANT TO HANG OUT.
YOU WILL LEAVE HANGING OUT WITH ALL THE KIDNEYS THAT YOU ARRIVED WITH I TOTALLY PROMISE AND YOU SHOULD DRINK THIS IT'S GOOD FOR YOU
"The only way to get rid of a temptation is to give into it." - Oscar Wilde
"We believe in the people and their 'wisdom' as if there was some special secret entrance to knowledge that barred to anyone who had ever learned anything." - Friedrich Nietzsche
0
Options
knitdanIn ur baseKillin ur guysRegistered Userregular
Looks like maybe the road up ahead is blocked, and they're all trying to turn around to get back to an exit or something.
“I was quick when I came in here, I’m twice as quick now”
-Indiana Solo, runner of blades
0
Options
ThomamelasOnly one man can kill this many Russians. Bring his guitar to me! Registered Userregular
the prince guy being evil is as disappointing as it was predictable
like it doesn't really match his behavior up until then
and it was nice to have a story where the girl's sorta realizing that her fiancee is a nice guy but maybe she rushed into this all too fast, without giving her an easy get-out-of-love free card
A trap is for fish: when you've got the fish, you can forget the trap. A snare is for rabbits: when you've got the rabbit, you can forget the snare. Words are for meaning: when you've got the meaning, you can forget the words.
the prince guy being evil is as disappointing as it was predictable
like it doesn't really match his behavior up until then
and it was nice to have a story where the girl's sorta realizing that her fiancee is a nice guy but maybe she rushed into this all too fast, without giving her an easy get-out-of-love free card
Posts
https://media3.giphy.com/media/cEYFeDInNuHzdGMFjag/giphy.gif?t=1
Saw this one for an iBank under qualifications...
•Lean six sigma green belt—or equivalent
No. I am not an acolyte of your cult.
but can I just say I dig this jam:
bonus troyboi
I am trying to think of good classic Mannie Fresh type beats with the snare rolls that trap inherited hmm
stay sexy chat
I got a little excited when I saw your ship.
save me john wall
and the gengars who are guiding me" -- W.S. Merwin
dat water looks amazing
on the other hand these rhymes man
"Do" "two" and "you" are maybe not measuring up to your Sick Aladdin Rhymes Heritage, disney
I got a little excited when I saw your ship.
@LoserForHireX
LTV for philosophers, eh.
the most awkward thing about the LTV is that the tendency for the rate of profit to fall doesn't seem to have actually happened. here there is both much empirical and theoretical discussion, in particular over Okishio's theorem.
it is fascinating reading - Wikipedia is actually a good place to start; next is Kliman's contemporary defences of the TRPF and rebuttals.
(And then you take a pen and work through the Solow growth model like a lazy undergraduate, or even the Ramsey overlapping-generations model, and then you wonder what the fuss is all about. No, seriously, do it. Non-mathematical analysis invoking Marxist theories of capital tend to implicitly assume a stupid version of the TRPF, where the tendency arises through a positive rate of return on capital necessitating a permanent expansion of capital (!!!!). This is seductive to the mathematically illiterate layman, but it is wrong wrong wrong. And then you can readily observe that the mathematically rigorous version of the TRPF is much more fragile than standard neoclassical exogenous growth approaches. Note that both then need add-ons to match empirics; the point is the theoretical robustness of intuition)
On the LTV specifically, there are two traps. It important to distinguish between those Marxists that treat it as a different set of terms for the same underlying phenomenon as the standard neoclassical school, and those that treat it as a theory with different implications (for whatever reason). The latter tends to be defined in an evasive, hard-to-pin-down manner.
Secondly, it is important to avoid the error of, in the great CR Shalizi's words, 'trying to explain a variable with a constant'. That is to say, if you want to explain a trend, or worse, a cycle (like, say, crises of capitalism), you had better come up with mechanism that also varies over time. If it is a cycle that allegedly gets worse, you also have to identify the mechanism of positive feedback! This is something which the analytical Marxist school tries to tackle; IMO not very well - the school seems to have utterly given up on the positive feedback, and only grudgingly argues for a fragile capital order rather than an intrinsically self-destabilizing one. The result is, as Delong observed a while ago, that alleged Marxists start writing stuff that is not very different from the reactionary doomsaying you get pouring out of the WSJ editorial page.
one I completed with chu's help, although I don't really understand the answer
the other I don't really know how to tackle
however, I successfully completed an additional two problems tonight
so I feel kinda better about it now
I don't have a ticket either. We can hang out and be lame together!
"We believe in the people and their 'wisdom' as if there was some special secret entrance to knowledge that barred to anyone who had ever learned anything." - Friedrich Nietzsche
Coding is for nerds
Tru facts
"We believe in the people and their 'wisdom' as if there was some special secret entrance to knowledge that barred to anyone who had ever learned anything." - Friedrich Nietzsche
Well
You can hang out
but only one of you will be lame
which one? stay tuned to find out, right after this word from our sponsors
It's you, isn't it?
"We believe in the people and their 'wisdom' as if there was some special secret entrance to knowledge that barred to anyone who had ever learned anything." - Friedrich Nietzsche
look at how boring the white dude is, this is clearly hurtful to my people
last time we left you on a cliffhanger - who would be considered the lamest?
would it be LoserForHireX, the hometown favourite
or Shivahn, the rising newcomer in the featherweight Lame League
these two are going to meet head to head
and only one can be crowned the Lord of Lame
the winner - and loser - will be revealed right after this word from our sponsor
I got a little excited when I saw your ship.
Holy crap, I have no idea how to play this class. I died on level 1.
Such shame. Wow.
Shiv, he wants your kidneys!
Might lose a liver here though.
hello c[hat]
I want to dislike that ad
but dang that tune is catchy
Dallas drivers can't drive.
I TOTALLY DON'T WANT YOUR KIDNEYS AT ALL, THIS IS NOT THE REASON THAT I WANT TO HANG OUT.
YOU WILL LEAVE HANGING OUT WITH ALL THE KIDNEYS THAT YOU ARRIVED WITH I TOTALLY PROMISE AND YOU SHOULD DRINK THIS IT'S GOOD FOR YOU
"We believe in the people and their 'wisdom' as if there was some special secret entrance to knowledge that barred to anyone who had ever learned anything." - Friedrich Nietzsche
-Indiana Solo, runner of blades
There was an accident slowing traffic. Someone got the bright idea of turning around. Other's followed. Then it became clear that was a dumb plan.
Speaking of catchy, if you'll allow me a brief digression.
"Pop some of our bubblegum, and you too can be a cute asian girl that has a talent for spontaneous dance."
I got a little excited when I saw your ship.
WTF Kojima stop trying to be edgy
hodor
Hodor Hodor Hodor.
Hodor!
-Indiana Solo, runner of blades
the prince guy being evil is as disappointing as it was predictable
like it doesn't really match his behavior up until then
and it was nice to have a story where the girl's sorta realizing that her fiancee is a nice guy but maybe she rushed into this all too fast, without giving her an easy get-out-of-love free card
Keep watching
there are twists ahead