Someone keeps tagging the sidewalks with "All Lives Matter!" By my apartment.
Stop! Just... stop....
Hillary Clinton threw out an "All lives matter" during a speech about Charleston to a black congregation.
She apparently did not know the recent history of the term.
how recent are we talking? Because jesus fuck it must be exhausting to be the people in charge on staying on top of everything you're allowed write into a president's speech
About as old as the whole #BlackLivesMatter thing
it was a reactionary hashtag started by racists and adopted by other racists and by ignorant people who don't think of themselves as racists but are basically saying something really ignorant without really thinking it through
Keeping up with the things that really matter, like twitter hashtags...
Honestly, I'd be more concerned if a candidate was apprised of twitter hashtag minutiae, because they should be doing their actual jobs, which is hard and time consuming to do properly.
you know it's really easy for you to be snide about this
and this is a popular tactic to dismiss protest movements for whom things like social media are very real and useful tools
but it's more than a "twitter hashtag", it's a protest slogan, and protest slogans are as old as protests themselves
knowing protest slogans of important social justice movements that are sweeping a nation in the middle of racial strife is kind of important for a presidential candidate
and knowing not to use the racist counter-protest version of that slogan is also important, politically
c'mon, man
don't yell at clouds
I will be snide about people ridiculously reading into hyper specific wording that is a typical colloquial phrase, deliberately and maliciously misinterpreted 180 degrees from the context in which it was meant, because that is shitty when anyone does it to anyone, but especially stupid, immoral, and self-defeating when done to one's own natural allies.
Emphasizing style over substance is how you get shitty policy and shitty rhetoric.
A lot of people, myself one of them, don't consider Hillary their natural ally and are kind of suspicious of her and watch her pretty carefully and she's walking a pretty fine line.
She doesn't get a pass, she doesn't get credit, she doesn't get leeway. She has a really horrible history in politics in some people's opinions and where she stands on a lot of things for some people ranges from nebulous to objectionable. She has changed where she stands on some things, but on others she's either not changed or not really clarified.
So when she uses a phrase that has it's origins with racists, even if she does it by accident (which, to be honest, I think she did honestly do by accident), she doesn't get leeway. She gets narrowed eyes and calls for accountability.
There are people who do not trust her and she has not earned their trust.
"Accountability?"
So, she's going to clarify that she obviously meant what she obviously meant, and that clarification/apology will be deemed as sufficient, or alternatively will further be pecked over for something to further willfully misinterpret.
So is it now just impossible to express the idea that everyone's life matters because of some people on twitter?
Apparently we should all follow prominent racists on twitter so we can not accidentally use similar wording as they did, despite the actual meaning being obvious from context.
Instead of actually focusing on actual policy to benefit the same people who have been allegedly slighted.
Bernie Sanders is the one we all want but know will never be
and Hilary will be the one that probably will, if she wins
that's how I'm seeing this year.
what kills me is Bernie is actually electable...
...in Canada
and deep down I think enough Americans actually want Bernie that he could fucking win but there's this weird complex where they doubt themselves and think he can't so they won't vote for him so then he's judged unelectable so he won't win the primary and Hillary will.
it's like Americans psych themselves out of good candidates into the same old same old
Maybe it'll cut down on some of the "you just think x because she's a woman" I'm going to have to endure for the next year and a half.
I'm not sure anybody's going to spend too much time rushing to Clinton's defense.
She inspires a powerful apathy.
life's a game that you're bound to lose / like using a hammer to pound in screws
fuck up once and you break your thumb / if you're happy at all then you're god damn dumb
that's right we're on a fucked up cruise / God is dead but at least we have booze
bad things happen, no one knows why / the sun burns out and everyone dies
the difference between an array and an ArrayList (or array and List<> in C#) is that an array has to be put in a continuous block of memory while an ArrayList does not.
Attacked by tweeeeeeees!
+1
Options
TTODewbackPuts the drawl in ya'llI think I'm in HellRegistered Userregular
@spool32 just reply to everything with
benghazzzzziiiiiiiiiiiiii *hiss*
Bernie Sanders is the one we all want but know will never be
and Hilary will be the one that probably will, if she wins
that's how I'm seeing this year.
what kills me is Bernie is actually electable...
...in Canada
and deep down I think enough Americans actually want Bernie that he could fucking win but there's this weird complex where they doubt themselves and think he can't so they won't vote for him so then he's judged unelectable so he won't win the primary and Hillary will.
it's like Americans psych themselves out of good candidates into the same old same old
No, Bernie would lose horribly. His purpose right now is to last as long as he fucking can, debate Hillary, and put his ideas out there into the national dialog such that Hillary has to adopt the better ones into her platform.
We gotta shift that Overton window a bit here.
syndalis on
SW-4158-3990-6116
Let's play Mario Kart or something...
I'm making a class that takes an integer N in its constructor and then creates an N by N grid for the instance. What's the proper way to do that? If I declare variables in the constructor, they're out of scope once the constructor is done running, but I won't know how big to make them before running the constructor. I know there is an easy way to do this, but it has been a while and I am very unsure of myself.
Shiv, iirc, you just declare the array in the body of the class and it's not necessary to give it a size until you instantiate it.
Someone keeps tagging the sidewalks with "All Lives Matter!" By my apartment.
Stop! Just... stop....
Hillary Clinton threw out an "All lives matter" during a speech about Charleston to a black congregation.
She apparently did not know the recent history of the term.
how recent are we talking? Because jesus fuck it must be exhausting to be the people in charge on staying on top of everything you're allowed write into a president's speech
About as old as the whole #BlackLivesMatter thing
it was a reactionary hashtag started by racists and adopted by other racists and by ignorant people who don't think of themselves as racists but are basically saying something really ignorant without really thinking it through
Keeping up with the things that really matter, like twitter hashtags...
Honestly, I'd be more concerned if a candidate was apprised of twitter hashtag minutiae, because they should be doing their actual jobs, which is hard and time consuming to do properly.
you know it's really easy for you to be snide about this
and this is a popular tactic to dismiss protest movements for whom things like social media are very real and useful tools
but it's more than a "twitter hashtag", it's a protest slogan, and protest slogans are as old as protests themselves
knowing protest slogans of important social justice movements that are sweeping a nation in the middle of racial strife is kind of important for a presidential candidate
and knowing not to use the racist counter-protest version of that slogan is also important, politically
c'mon, man
don't yell at clouds
I will be snide about people ridiculously reading into hyper specific wording that is a typical colloquial phrase, deliberately and maliciously misinterpreted 180 degrees from the context in which it was meant, because that is shitty when anyone does it to anyone, but especially stupid, immoral, and self-defeating when done to one's own natural allies.
Emphasizing style over substance is how you get shitty policy and shitty rhetoric.
A lot of people, myself one of them, don't consider Hillary their natural ally and are kind of suspicious of her and watch her pretty carefully and she's walking a pretty fine line.
She doesn't get a pass, she doesn't get credit, she doesn't get leeway. She has a really horrible history in politics in some people's opinions and where she stands on a lot of things for some people ranges from nebulous to objectionable. She has changed where she stands on some things, but on others she's either not changed or not really clarified.
So when she uses a phrase that has it's origins with racists, even if she does it by accident (which, to be honest, I think she did honestly do by accident), she doesn't get leeway. She gets narrowed eyes and calls for accountability.
There are people who do not trust her and she has not earned their trust.
Those people should just fucking vote for Jeb.
They will never be pleased by any electable Democrat.
Nah that's a terrible idea.
It is a horrible idea!
And yet it's still more reasonable than complaining that Hillary is some sort of closet racist because her staffers weren't sufficiently aware of twitter hashtags.
Because here is the thing. Those complaints? They aren't reasonable. These are unreasonable people. Perhaps being ignored will give them pause and cause them to reevaluate, though I doubt it.
I'm making a class that takes an integer N in its constructor and then creates an N by N grid for the instance. What's the proper way to do that? If I declare variables in the constructor, they're out of scope once the constructor is done running, but I won't know how big to make them before running the constructor. I know there is an easy way to do this, but it has been a while and I am very unsure of myself.
in your class you declare a private member variable for the N by N grid (2d array?)
that variable is a reference to data of that type not the data itself. It starts out referencing null.
in the constructor you use the new operator to actually allocate the data and store a refererence to it in your member variable.
ie:
class Foo
{
public Foo(int size)
{
dataGrid = new int[size][size];
}
private int dataGrid[][];
}
Thanks!
That is what I was trying so I was getting flustered by it not working. I am missing some punctuation somewhere clearly.
If you know for sure how big an array or list will be at the point of allocation then an array (be it in C++, C# or Java) will be more efficient. But if you ever have to resize it then the ArrayList will be more efficient. To resize an array what you are doing is creating a whole new array at the new size, copying data over then deleting the old one.
if y'all could start just calling me Matt instead of Pony, I'd kind of appreciate it
like everyone uniformly calls Dread Pirate Arbuthnot Cass, nobody calls her by her username
I haven't been bugging chat about it because I didn't want to be a bother, I think I've mentioned it maybe twice ever
but I did mention in Tube's AMA and since it's being brought up
hey if people could do that
that'd be super
to clarify is, is this for all posters or like just the regulars?
because this is one of those I have wondered how to approach since some forumers gets called by their real name quite often (like Cass as you mentioned)
and it feels like it is more for the "in crowd" if you will, the people that have chat meet-ups at pax or go out to bars in nyc occasionally?
and so I'm not a very prolific poster here, though I have been posting in chat threads since at least 2010 (I think), and I live on the other side of the ocean
so it kind of feels very presumptuous to start using real names, like I'm that weird guy that thinks he is a buddy but you barely know? so I have mostly been avoiding it
(a bit late reply, I too was catching up on the Tube AMA thread)
Someone keeps tagging the sidewalks with "All Lives Matter!" By my apartment.
Stop! Just... stop....
Hillary Clinton threw out an "All lives matter" during a speech about Charleston to a black congregation.
She apparently did not know the recent history of the term.
how recent are we talking? Because jesus fuck it must be exhausting to be the people in charge on staying on top of everything you're allowed write into a president's speech
About as old as the whole #BlackLivesMatter thing
it was a reactionary hashtag started by racists and adopted by other racists and by ignorant people who don't think of themselves as racists but are basically saying something really ignorant without really thinking it through
Keeping up with the things that really matter, like twitter hashtags...
Honestly, I'd be more concerned if a candidate was apprised of twitter hashtag minutiae, because they should be doing their actual jobs, which is hard and time consuming to do properly.
you know it's really easy for you to be snide about this
and this is a popular tactic to dismiss protest movements for whom things like social media are very real and useful tools
but it's more than a "twitter hashtag", it's a protest slogan, and protest slogans are as old as protests themselves
knowing protest slogans of important social justice movements that are sweeping a nation in the middle of racial strife is kind of important for a presidential candidate
and knowing not to use the racist counter-protest version of that slogan is also important, politically
c'mon, man
don't yell at clouds
I will be snide about people ridiculously reading into hyper specific wording that is a typical colloquial phrase, deliberately and maliciously misinterpreted 180 degrees from the context in which it was meant, because that is shitty when anyone does it to anyone, but especially stupid, immoral, and self-defeating when done to one's own natural allies.
Emphasizing style over substance is how you get shitty policy and shitty rhetoric.
A lot of people, myself one of them, don't consider Hillary their natural ally and are kind of suspicious of her and watch her pretty carefully and she's walking a pretty fine line.
She doesn't get a pass, she doesn't get credit, she doesn't get leeway. She has a really horrible history in politics in some people's opinions and where she stands on a lot of things for some people ranges from nebulous to objectionable. She has changed where she stands on some things, but on others she's either not changed or not really clarified.
So when she uses a phrase that has it's origins with racists, even if she does it by accident (which, to be honest, I think she did honestly do by accident), she doesn't get leeway. She gets narrowed eyes and calls for accountability.
There are people who do not trust her and she has not earned their trust.
Those people should just fucking vote for Jeb.
They will never be pleased by any electable Democrat.
Nah that's a terrible idea.
It is a horrible idea!
And yet it's still more reasonable than complaining that Hillary is some sort of closet racist because her staffers weren't sufficiently aware of twitter hashtags.
Because here is the thing. Those complaints? They aren't reasonable. These are unreasonable people. Perhaps being ignored will give them pause and cause them to reevaluate, though I doubt it.
I'm making a class that takes an integer N in its constructor and then creates an N by N grid for the instance. What's the proper way to do that? If I declare variables in the constructor, they're out of scope once the constructor is done running, but I won't know how big to make them before running the constructor. I know there is an easy way to do this, but it has been a while and I am very unsure of myself.
in your class you declare a private member variable for the N by N grid (2d array?)
that variable is a reference to data of that type not the data itself. It starts out referencing null.
in the constructor you use the new operator to actually allocate the data and store a refererence to it in your member variable.
ie:
class Foo
{
public Foo(int size)
{
dataGrid = new int[size][size];
}
private int dataGrid[][];
}
Thanks!
That is what I was trying so I was getting flustered by it not working. I am missing some punctuation somewhere clearly.
are you doing
dataGrid = new int[size][size]();
cause with array you don't use a function operator () on the constructor. Because lame old holdovers from C.
Someone keeps tagging the sidewalks with "All Lives Matter!" By my apartment.
Stop! Just... stop....
Hillary Clinton threw out an "All lives matter" during a speech about Charleston to a black congregation.
She apparently did not know the recent history of the term.
how recent are we talking? Because jesus fuck it must be exhausting to be the people in charge on staying on top of everything you're allowed write into a president's speech
About as old as the whole #BlackLivesMatter thing
it was a reactionary hashtag started by racists and adopted by other racists and by ignorant people who don't think of themselves as racists but are basically saying something really ignorant without really thinking it through
Keeping up with the things that really matter, like twitter hashtags...
Honestly, I'd be more concerned if a candidate was apprised of twitter hashtag minutiae, because they should be doing their actual jobs, which is hard and time consuming to do properly.
you know it's really easy for you to be snide about this
and this is a popular tactic to dismiss protest movements for whom things like social media are very real and useful tools
but it's more than a "twitter hashtag", it's a protest slogan, and protest slogans are as old as protests themselves
knowing protest slogans of important social justice movements that are sweeping a nation in the middle of racial strife is kind of important for a presidential candidate
and knowing not to use the racist counter-protest version of that slogan is also important, politically
c'mon, man
don't yell at clouds
I will be snide about people ridiculously reading into hyper specific wording that is a typical colloquial phrase, deliberately and maliciously misinterpreted 180 degrees from the context in which it was meant, because that is shitty when anyone does it to anyone, but especially stupid, immoral, and self-defeating when done to one's own natural allies.
Emphasizing style over substance is how you get shitty policy and shitty rhetoric.
A lot of people, myself one of them, don't consider Hillary their natural ally and are kind of suspicious of her and watch her pretty carefully and she's walking a pretty fine line.
She doesn't get a pass, she doesn't get credit, she doesn't get leeway. She has a really horrible history in politics in some people's opinions and where she stands on a lot of things for some people ranges from nebulous to objectionable. She has changed where she stands on some things, but on others she's either not changed or not really clarified.
So when she uses a phrase that has it's origins with racists, even if she does it by accident (which, to be honest, I think she did honestly do by accident), she doesn't get leeway. She gets narrowed eyes and calls for accountability.
There are people who do not trust her and she has not earned their trust.
"Accountability?"
So, she's going to clarify that she obviously meant what she obviously meant, and that clarification/apology will be deemed as sufficient, or alternatively will further be pecked over for something to further willfully misinterpret.
So is it now just impossible to express the idea that everyone's life matters because of some people on twitter?
Apparently we should all follow prominent racists on twitter so we can not accidentally use similar wording as they did, despite the actual meaning being obvious from context.
Instead of actually focusing on actual policy to benefit the same people who have been allegedly slighted.
you are not a presidential candidate
presidential candidates literally have people whose job it is to keep their candidate from saying things that sound like they're kinda sorta endorsing the viewpoint of racists
like i said
this is a minor gaff that only reveals someone in Clinton's camp went "whoops"
and that's all
personally I don't even really think Clinton needs to apologize or address this, except maybe with her staff
some might disagree with me, and that's their prerogative
if y'all could start just calling me Matt instead of Pony, I'd kind of appreciate it
like everyone uniformly calls Dread Pirate Arbuthnot Cass, nobody calls her by her username
I haven't been bugging chat about it because I didn't want to be a bother, I think I've mentioned it maybe twice ever
but I did mention in Tube's AMA and since it's being brought up
hey if people could do that
that'd be super
to clarify is, is this for all posters or like just the regulars?
because this is one of those I have wondered how to approach since some forumers gets called by their real name quite often (like Cass as you mentioned)
and it feels like it is more for the "in crowd" if you will, the people that have chat meet-ups at pax or go out to bars in nyc occasionally?
and so I'm not a very prolific poster here, though I have been posting in chat threads since at least 2010 (I think), and I live on the other side of the ocean
so it kind of feels very presumptuous to start using real names, like I'm that weird guy that thinks he is a buddy but you barely know? so I have mostly been avoiding it
(a bit late reply, I too was catching up on the Tube AMA thread)
sparvy you can call me cass all you want even though we've never had drinks together in nyc
Allegedly a voice of reason.
0
Options
syndalisGetting ClassyOn the WallRegistered User, Loves Apple Productsregular
There are a lot of people who know my real name here.
I'm still gonna be synd or syndalis or that fucking Apple apologist.
Gotta keep some semblance of my firewall intact.
SW-4158-3990-6116
Let's play Mario Kart or something...
+1
Options
AManFromEarthLet's get to twerk!The King in the SwampRegistered Userregular
I actually do not want to be called by my real name here. The few times it's happened has upset me. Because I don't want anyone googling my name to ever read the atrocities I have wrought against this forum.
Someone keeps tagging the sidewalks with "All Lives Matter!" By my apartment.
Stop! Just... stop....
Hillary Clinton threw out an "All lives matter" during a speech about Charleston to a black congregation.
She apparently did not know the recent history of the term.
how recent are we talking? Because jesus fuck it must be exhausting to be the people in charge on staying on top of everything you're allowed write into a president's speech
About as old as the whole #BlackLivesMatter thing
it was a reactionary hashtag started by racists and adopted by other racists and by ignorant people who don't think of themselves as racists but are basically saying something really ignorant without really thinking it through
Keeping up with the things that really matter, like twitter hashtags...
Honestly, I'd be more concerned if a candidate was apprised of twitter hashtag minutiae, because they should be doing their actual jobs, which is hard and time consuming to do properly.
you know it's really easy for you to be snide about this
and this is a popular tactic to dismiss protest movements for whom things like social media are very real and useful tools
but it's more than a "twitter hashtag", it's a protest slogan, and protest slogans are as old as protests themselves
knowing protest slogans of important social justice movements that are sweeping a nation in the middle of racial strife is kind of important for a presidential candidate
and knowing not to use the racist counter-protest version of that slogan is also important, politically
c'mon, man
don't yell at clouds
I will be snide about people ridiculously reading into hyper specific wording that is a typical colloquial phrase, deliberately and maliciously misinterpreted 180 degrees from the context in which it was meant, because that is shitty when anyone does it to anyone, but especially stupid, immoral, and self-defeating when done to one's own natural allies.
Emphasizing style over substance is how you get shitty policy and shitty rhetoric.
A lot of people, myself one of them, don't consider Hillary their natural ally and are kind of suspicious of her and watch her pretty carefully and she's walking a pretty fine line.
She doesn't get a pass, she doesn't get credit, she doesn't get leeway. She has a really horrible history in politics in some people's opinions and where she stands on a lot of things for some people ranges from nebulous to objectionable. She has changed where she stands on some things, but on others she's either not changed or not really clarified.
So when she uses a phrase that has it's origins with racists, even if she does it by accident (which, to be honest, I think she did honestly do by accident), she doesn't get leeway. She gets narrowed eyes and calls for accountability.
There are people who do not trust her and she has not earned their trust.
Those people should just fucking vote for Jeb.
They will never be pleased by any electable Democrat.
Nah that's a terrible idea.
It is a horrible idea!
And yet it's still more reasonable than complaining that Hillary is some sort of closet racist because her staffers weren't sufficiently aware of twitter hashtags.
Because here is the thing. Those complaints? They aren't reasonable. These are unreasonable people. Perhaps being ignored will give them pause and cause them to reevaluate, though I doubt it.
Someone keeps tagging the sidewalks with "All Lives Matter!" By my apartment.
Stop! Just... stop....
Hillary Clinton threw out an "All lives matter" during a speech about Charleston to a black congregation.
She apparently did not know the recent history of the term.
how recent are we talking? Because jesus fuck it must be exhausting to be the people in charge on staying on top of everything you're allowed write into a president's speech
About as old as the whole #BlackLivesMatter thing
it was a reactionary hashtag started by racists and adopted by other racists and by ignorant people who don't think of themselves as racists but are basically saying something really ignorant without really thinking it through
Keeping up with the things that really matter, like twitter hashtags...
Honestly, I'd be more concerned if a candidate was apprised of twitter hashtag minutiae, because they should be doing their actual jobs, which is hard and time consuming to do properly.
you know it's really easy for you to be snide about this
and this is a popular tactic to dismiss protest movements for whom things like social media are very real and useful tools
but it's more than a "twitter hashtag", it's a protest slogan, and protest slogans are as old as protests themselves
knowing protest slogans of important social justice movements that are sweeping a nation in the middle of racial strife is kind of important for a presidential candidate
and knowing not to use the racist counter-protest version of that slogan is also important, politically
c'mon, man
don't yell at clouds
I will be snide about people ridiculously reading into hyper specific wording that is a typical colloquial phrase, deliberately and maliciously misinterpreted 180 degrees from the context in which it was meant, because that is shitty when anyone does it to anyone, but especially stupid, immoral, and self-defeating when done to one's own natural allies.
Emphasizing style over substance is how you get shitty policy and shitty rhetoric.
A lot of people, myself one of them, don't consider Hillary their natural ally and are kind of suspicious of her and watch her pretty carefully and she's walking a pretty fine line.
She doesn't get a pass, she doesn't get credit, she doesn't get leeway. She has a really horrible history in politics in some people's opinions and where she stands on a lot of things for some people ranges from nebulous to objectionable. She has changed where she stands on some things, but on others she's either not changed or not really clarified.
So when she uses a phrase that has it's origins with racists, even if she does it by accident (which, to be honest, I think she did honestly do by accident), she doesn't get leeway. She gets narrowed eyes and calls for accountability.
There are people who do not trust her and she has not earned their trust.
Those people should just fucking vote for Jeb.
They will never be pleased by any electable Democrat.
Nah that's a terrible idea.
It is a horrible idea!
And yet it's still more reasonable than complaining that Hillary is some sort of closet racist because her staffers weren't sufficiently aware of twitter hashtags.
Because here is the thing. Those complaints? They aren't reasonable. These are unreasonable people. Perhaps being ignored will give them pause and cause them to reevaluate, though I doubt it.
No one called Hillary a closet racist.
that woman fucking hates closets. I heard one time she filled a closet with straw and cement, then shoved an armoire and two dressers in front of the door.
0
Options
21stCenturyCall me Pixel, or Pix for short![They/Them]Registered Userregular
I think starting tomorrow (because I have no time this evening), i'll try to get one game of Shonen done every day.
Any takers? Shonen is my anime-inspired card game that's super fun and awesome.
Posts
My plan is for President Clinton to retake Texas with fire and with blood and then install Bernie as governor-general for the pacification.
if you are speaking to a black congregation in the wake of a terrorist attack by a racist on a black congregation
the time to use the exact three word combination
"all lives matter", a slogan made popular by racists
is not right that moment
i don't think that's unfair
what if electing michael moore president makes the internet angry at hillary
pla i know you already saw this
http://nintendoeverything.com/fire-emblem-fates-has-pretty-extensive-online-multiplayer/
fite me 1v1 tho
You do though
If she was not a woman you'd just think not-x
I know you, and also predicate logic >: (
"Accountability?"
So, she's going to clarify that she obviously meant what she obviously meant, and that clarification/apology will be deemed as sufficient, or alternatively will further be pecked over for something to further willfully misinterpret.
Apparently we should all follow prominent racists on twitter so we can not accidentally use similar wording as they did, despite the actual meaning being obvious from context.
Instead of actually focusing on actual policy to benefit the same people who have been allegedly slighted.
three DS lites into non-functionality
but i am not a speechwriter on a major presidential campaign
knowning the clinton machine though that speech was probably being finished in the car to the event
but she seems to have fixed most of the problems from 2008 so maybe not
I'm not sure anybody's going to spend too much time rushing to Clinton's defense.
She inspires a powerful apathy.
fuck up once and you break your thumb / if you're happy at all then you're god damn dumb
that's right we're on a fucked up cruise / God is dead but at least we have booze
bad things happen, no one knows why / the sun burns out and everyone dies
benghazzzzziiiiiiiiiiiiii *hiss*
Joke's on you it's been raining like a motherfucker here for a couple months.
Also we bleed oil so
you're 0 for 2 right now.
No, Bernie would lose horribly. His purpose right now is to last as long as he fucking can, debate Hillary, and put his ideas out there into the national dialog such that Hillary has to adopt the better ones into her platform.
We gotta shift that Overton window a bit here.
Let's play Mario Kart or something...
woah
Shiv, iirc, you just declare the array in the body of the class and it's not necessary to give it a size until you instantiate it.
It is a horrible idea!
And yet it's still more reasonable than complaining that Hillary is some sort of closet racist because her staffers weren't sufficiently aware of twitter hashtags.
Because here is the thing. Those complaints? They aren't reasonable. These are unreasonable people. Perhaps being ignored will give them pause and cause them to reevaluate, though I doubt it.
yeah i've seen the horribile weather you guys have been getting lately
did you see that post Mazzy linked earlier about Putin funding the crazoids who want Texas to leave?
I had a hearty chuckle at that and thought you might enjoy it too.
Thanks!
That is what I was trying so I was getting flustered by it not working. I am missing some punctuation somewhere clearly.
to clarify is, is this for all posters or like just the regulars?
because this is one of those I have wondered how to approach since some forumers gets called by their real name quite often (like Cass as you mentioned)
and it feels like it is more for the "in crowd" if you will, the people that have chat meet-ups at pax or go out to bars in nyc occasionally?
and so I'm not a very prolific poster here, though I have been posting in chat threads since at least 2010 (I think), and I live on the other side of the ocean
so it kind of feels very presumptuous to start using real names, like I'm that weird guy that thinks he is a buddy but you barely know? so I have mostly been avoiding it
(a bit late reply, I too was catching up on the Tube AMA thread)
No one called Hillary a closet racist.
not interested (inject the single player into my veins tho)
Putin is a DC villain, I swear.
are you doing
dataGrid = new int[size][size]();
cause with array you don't use a function operator () on the constructor. Because lame old holdovers from C.
you are not a presidential candidate
presidential candidates literally have people whose job it is to keep their candidate from saying things that sound like they're kinda sorta endorsing the viewpoint of racists
like i said
this is a minor gaff that only reveals someone in Clinton's camp went "whoops"
and that's all
personally I don't even really think Clinton needs to apologize or address this, except maybe with her staff
some might disagree with me, and that's their prerogative
I think she could, and it's not a bad idea per se
but eh
I also don't follow twitter
sparvy you can call me cass all you want even though we've never had drinks together in nyc
I'm still gonna be synd or syndalis or that fucking Apple apologist.
Gotta keep some semblance of my firewall intact.
Let's play Mario Kart or something...
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/06/vladimir-putin-texas-secession-119288.html?ml=m_a1_1
No one here, of course.
I did not mean to imply that was the case.
that woman fucking hates closets. I heard one time she filled a closet with straw and cement, then shoved an armoire and two dressers in front of the door.
Any takers? Shonen is my anime-inspired card game that's super fun and awesome.
Check out my site, the Bismuth Heart | My Twitter
i prefer kool-aid dranker