I'll take questions about whether I can relate to any of your "emotions" or "relationships"
why haven't you smurged anyone
I don't think there's a way to answer this?
I've never been in a relationship
I guess I find that harder to relate to because I was so desperate to find a sex person when I realized my sexuality and I tried for years
And then I realized I wanted to a relationship more
But then I realized people don't want or need it as bad or have a whole bungh of reasons I've never even thought of not to
Idk
yeah I feel like it'd be great but I've literally nveer dated or tried to date anyone and am not the type to I guess try to hook up for a night or something. it would never occur to me and if I wanted to I would not really know what to do.
you should go out on some dates sometime
personally i found out a lot about myself by dating others
I'll take questions about whether I can relate to any of your "emotions" or "relationships"
why haven't you smurged anyone
I don't think there's a way to answer this?
I've never been in a relationship
I guess I find that harder to relate to because I was so desperate to find a sex person when I realized my sexuality and I tried for years
And then I realized I wanted to a relationship more
But then I realized people don't want or need it as bad or have a whole bungh of reasons I've never even thought of not to
Idk
yeah I feel like it'd be great but I've literally nveer dated or tried to date anyone and am not the type to I guess try to hook up for a night or something. it would never occur to me and if I wanted to I would not really know what to do.
you should go out on some dates sometime
personally i found out a lot about myself by dating others
Any Fallen Londoners need to reduce Suspicion? Have I got a card for you!
0
Options
Sir Landsharkresting shark faceRegistered Userregular
an important part of evaluating fluidity is determining the properties of the flow
for example, whether it is lamellar or turbulent
the Reynolds number is an important parameter that helps us evaluate where on the lamellar-turbulent scale a particular flow falls, and is calculated thusly:
R = p * v * L / u where R is the Reynolds number, p is the fluid density, v is the fluid velocity, L is the characteristic length and u is the dynamic viscosity of the fluid
Please consider the environment before printing this post.
+7
Options
ShivahnUnaware of her barrel shifter privilegeWestern coastal temptressRegistered User, Moderatormod
Also most people never sit down and define monogamy, boundaries, etc, so it's kind of... well, fluid isn't quite the right word, but like, amorphous and unpredictable?
Like, fuck, even I haven't done that, instead settling for roughly what Spool's saying and trusting that I have enough of a handle on who Querry is that our definition borders match up fuzzily but well enough that no one's gonna destroy the other
Most people don't even do that
it's true
it's almost like lawmaking by court ruling
issues come up as they come up, and that sets precedent, and that precedent is what is considered the rules going forward
until an issue comes up, the rules are whatever each partner thinks the other partner thinks it is
To be clear, we DID sit down and define monogamy and cheating and basically came to the conclusion that kissing others isn't ok, cuddling others is if it's someone the other's aware of, but in general given we are similar people with similar thoughts and backgrounds, don't do anything we might feel guilty for and tell the other ASAP if we do is an ok cheating test
Fans have long imagined a more devious version of Hermione who readily embraces rule-breaking. That’s partly why she’s frequently paired romantically with Draco Malfoy in fanfiction, in a couple known as Dramione.
Hmm I see ok
Slytherin Hermione
Really, it's absolutely a joke that Hermione isn't in Ravenclaw
If she isn't, why does the house exist
Some days Blue wonders why anyone ever bothered making numbers so small; other days she supposes even infinity needs to start somewhere.
+1
Options
cptruggedI think it has something to do with free will.Registered Userregular
Is their a difference between emotional cheating and your partner having a complicated part of their emotional life that's separate from you?
i dont even know what this means without context
but generally i would say that if you are physically and emotionally intimate, compartmentalizing a certain aspect of your life from your partner is emotional cheating by way of omission
but everyone, or almost everyone, does this to a degree
100% honesty all the time sounds like a disaster if you're with someone for a long time
I don't lie about things but there are many things I will not mention unless my partner directly asks about it (unless it's something like, I suddenly racked up credit card debt, have a drug addiction or cheated that stuff comes out)
Idk I feel like compartmentalizing is vital in many cases
I disagree and don't operate my relationship like that.
There are plenty of times when I just don't mention something because it's inconsequential or irrelevant, but if I ever feel like I probably shouldn't tell Belasco something, I immediately go and tell her.
But do you always agree on what is inconsequential and irrelevant?
You're still making a judgment call there.
0
Options
ChanusHarbinger of the Spicy Rooster ApocalypseThe Flames of a Thousand Collapsed StarsRegistered Userregular
a super funny thing that happens with my wife is patients flirt with her at work constantly
when that starts to become less playful flirting and more like, he's making a semi-serious move or testing the waters, she will "my husband" a conversation
if he... uh... keeps going after that? like tosses her his number or asks for hers or whatever after that?
he's a complete write-off to her, like he's lost all charm. prior to that, if he bails out, she might actually speak well of him and consider his flirting endearing
but if she openly points out she's married and he goes for the punt anyway, fuck that guy
0
Options
Sir Landsharkresting shark faceRegistered Userregular
you will note, class, that the Reynolds number is a dimensionless constant
therefore it may be helpful to track your units through your calculations to ensure they properly cancel, otherwise you might improperly conclude a turbulent flow is lamellar and wouldn't that be a messy situation!
*chuckles deeply to himself*
Please consider the environment before printing this post.
Is their a difference between emotional cheating and your partner having a complicated part of their emotional life that's separate from you?
i guess the definition is kind of fluid. some people say like, anything that, if your partner knew about it, would make them uncomfortable. but some people are incredibly sensitive and jealous and would regard any conversation in private with the opposite sex as inappropriate. i think that's kind of silly. something i heard that i thought was a pretty reasonable definition is if your behavior with another person draws away from your behavior with your partner. so like, if you don't feel sexy- you think your partner doesn't communicate desire to you or whatever- so you get that effect from someone else, by flirting.
i guess that doesn't exactly gel with polyamory but for monogamous relationships it seems p close to me. if you're not contributing all the thoughts and actions you would in a happy relationship because you're siphoning off some of that validation or closeness or whatever to another person, that seems p bad.
i think trying to define cheating so empirically isn't really going to work as it really depends on the sort of implied relationship agreement between two (or more) individuals
right, like i said it's very fluid. all anyone can attempt to do is make a best-fit guess at it for most people.
I disagree utterly. It's not fluid - here's Scalzi on this issue, and he is correct:
Scenario: You’ve just done something physically and/or emotionally intimate with another consenting adult human being who is not your spouse/partner.
So, gonna tell your partner?
a) Yes.
b) Any other response.
If the answer is “b,” then there’s a really excellent chance you’re cheating.
could be a and you were still cheating though
or b and you weren't
or you and your partner could not 100% agree on what counts as physically or emotionally intimate
it's fraught with peril!
he goes on:
Cheating is allowing another person into a level of intimacy your partner expects to be theirs alone. That level of intimacy is not uniform from person to person. There is no guarantee that your partner’s expected level of intimacy will be entirely congenial to you; in that respect what qualifies as “cheating” is not up to you.
Most people get that. Most people also don’t want to hurt their partner and/or don’t want to get caught doing something they know their partner will consider cheating. Which is why any other response than an unqualified “yes” to telling your partner about an intimate encounter with another consenting adult human being is a good first indicator you’ve just done yourself some cheating.
okay so yeah i agree to that but it almost literally defines it as fluid
within the boundaries of the relationship, I don't see any fluidity here at all.
that's not the disagreement. if people agree upon boundaries, then those can be relatively static. we're saying those boundaries are fluid across other relationships.
'did i do something wrong' in the micro sense is probably easily answered. there isn't much fluidity there. the point is that the high water mark of wrongness is fluid between different people, so you saying to your friend 'you did x? that's cheating!' doesn't make sense
oh, yeah I agree with this. I don't get to say whether you cheated unless we're the ones in the relationship.
And by that I mean that I know what you did, you're a cheating sonovabitch, and you're never getting another taste of this so you might as well unfriend me coz it's over
+4
Options
TehSlothHit Or MissI Guess They Never Miss, HuhRegistered Userregular
an important part of evaluating fluidity is determining the properties of the flow
for example, whether it is lamellar or turbulent
the Reynolds number is an important parameter that helps us evaluate where on the lamellar-turbulent scale a particular flow falls, and is calculated thusly:
R = p * v * L / u where R is the Reynolds number, p is the fluid density, v is the fluid velocity, L is the characteristic length and u is the dynamic viscosity of the fluid
Isn't lamellar when they have the things that shoot out water and it stays in a line.
ChanusHarbinger of the Spicy Rooster ApocalypseThe Flames of a Thousand Collapsed StarsRegistered Userregular
i wonder how much more successful my life would have been if i had realized my sexuality maybe ten years earlier and stopped trying to pursue relationships just because i thought that's what i was supposed to do
Allegedly a voice of reason.
0
Options
DemonStaceyTTODewback's DaughterIn love with the TaySwayRegistered Userregular
Fans have long imagined a more devious version of Hermione who readily embraces rule-breaking. That’s partly why she’s frequently paired romantically with Draco Malfoy in fanfiction, in a couple known as Dramione.
you will note, class, that the Reynolds number is a dimensionless constant
therefore it may be helpful to track your units through your calculations to ensure they properly cancel, otherwise you might improperly conclude a turbulent flow is lamellar and wouldn't that be a messy situation!
*chuckles deeply to himself*
Lamellar? I hardly know her
....
+2
Options
HonkHonk is this poster.Registered User, __BANNED USERSregular
Fans have long imagined a more devious version of Hermione who readily embraces rule-breaking. That’s partly why she’s frequently paired romantically with Draco Malfoy in fanfiction, in a couple known as Dramione.
Hmm I see ok
Slytherin Hermione
Really, it's absolutely a joke that Hermione isn't in Ravenclaw
If she isn't, why does the house exist
She's super brave!
And also they heavily imply you get to pick the house you want to be in anyway.
an important part of evaluating fluidity is determining the properties of the flow
for example, whether it is lamellar or turbulent
the Reynolds number is an important parameter that helps us evaluate where on the lamellar-turbulent scale a particular flow falls, and is calculated thusly:
R = p * v * L / u where R is the Reynolds number, p is the fluid density, v is the fluid velocity, L is the characteristic length and u is the dynamic viscosity of the fluid
oh hey thanks for clearing that up
+1
Options
ChanusHarbinger of the Spicy Rooster ApocalypseThe Flames of a Thousand Collapsed StarsRegistered Userregular
a super funny thing that happens with my wife is patients flirt with her at work constantly
when that starts to become less playful flirting and more like, he's making a semi-serious move or testing the waters, she will "my husband" a conversation
if he... uh... keeps going after that? like tosses her his number or asks for hers or whatever after that?
he's a complete write-off to her, like he's lost all charm. prior to that, if he bails out, she might actually speak well of him and consider his flirting endearing
but if she openly points out she's married and he goes for the punt anyway, fuck that guy
I'll take questions about whether I can relate to any of your "emotions" or "relationships"
why haven't you smurged anyone
I don't think there's a way to answer this?
I've never been in a relationship
I guess I find that harder to relate to because I was so desperate to find a sex person when I realized my sexuality and I tried for years
And then I realized I wanted to a relationship more
But then I realized people don't want or need it as bad or have a whole bungh of reasons I've never even thought of not to
Idk
yeah I feel like it'd be great but I've literally nveer dated or tried to date anyone and am not the type to I guess try to hook up for a night or something. it would never occur to me and if I wanted to I would not really know what to do.
you should go out on some dates sometime
personally i found out a lot about myself by dating others
an important part of evaluating fluidity is determining the properties of the flow
for example, whether it is lamellar or turbulent
the Reynolds number is an important parameter that helps us evaluate where on the lamellar-turbulent scale a particular flow falls, and is calculated thusly:
R = p * v * L / u where R is the Reynolds number, p is the fluid density, v is the fluid velocity, L is the characteristic length and u is the dynamic viscosity of the fluid
u fkin nerd
+2
Options
ChanusHarbinger of the Spicy Rooster ApocalypseThe Flames of a Thousand Collapsed StarsRegistered Userregular
Fans have long imagined a more devious version of Hermione who readily embraces rule-breaking. That’s partly why she’s frequently paired romantically with Draco Malfoy in fanfiction, in a couple known as Dramione.
Hmm I see ok
Slytherin Hermione
Really, it's absolutely a joke that Hermione isn't in Ravenclaw
If she isn't, why does the house exist
it's kind of a thing that she is in gryffindor
the idea is that the sorting hat gets to the core of why someone would be in a house
hermione is smart and all about gaining knowledge for it's own sake, but then it is more important to her to do the right thing, no matter what it takes
which means at her core she's a gryffindor
+1
Options
ChanusHarbinger of the Spicy Rooster ApocalypseThe Flames of a Thousand Collapsed StarsRegistered Userregular
Posts
maybe I will make up a reason to ask my boss if I can work from home tomorrow
they're probably mentally retarded
Hope you're not in Texas.
https://www.texastribune.org/2016/12/20/texas-kicks-planned-parenthood-out-medicaid/
you should go out on some dates sometime
personally i found out a lot about myself by dating others
Only if you're a gorilla.
pleasepaypreacher.net
Depends on what % is tip vs shaft.
That sounds like a double nightmare IMO
twitch.tv/tehsloth
what if love is a battlefield
this is static across all relationships and the answer, of course, is 'no' IF it's just for a second AND just to see how it feels
for example, whether it is lamellar or turbulent
the Reynolds number is an important parameter that helps us evaluate where on the lamellar-turbulent scale a particular flow falls, and is calculated thusly:
R = p * v * L / u where R is the Reynolds number, p is the fluid density, v is the fluid velocity, L is the characteristic length and u is the dynamic viscosity of the fluid
To be clear, we DID sit down and define monogamy and cheating and basically came to the conclusion that kissing others isn't ok, cuddling others is if it's someone the other's aware of, but in general given we are similar people with similar thoughts and backgrounds, don't do anything we might feel guilty for and tell the other ASAP if we do is an ok cheating test
Ok ACTUALLY going to PP now
Really, it's absolutely a joke that Hermione isn't in Ravenclaw
If she isn't, why does the house exist
But do you always agree on what is inconsequential and irrelevant?
You're still making a judgment call there.
like 65%
when that starts to become less playful flirting and more like, he's making a semi-serious move or testing the waters, she will "my husband" a conversation
if he... uh... keeps going after that? like tosses her his number or asks for hers or whatever after that?
he's a complete write-off to her, like he's lost all charm. prior to that, if he bails out, she might actually speak well of him and consider his flirting endearing
but if she openly points out she's married and he goes for the punt anyway, fuck that guy
therefore it may be helpful to track your units through your calculations to ensure they properly cancel, otherwise you might improperly conclude a turbulent flow is lamellar and wouldn't that be a messy situation!
*chuckles deeply to himself*
ddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd
oh, yeah I agree with this. I don't get to say whether you cheated unless we're the ones in the relationship.
And by that I mean that I know what you did, you're a cheating sonovabitch, and you're never getting another taste of this so you might as well unfriend me coz it's over
Isn't lamellar when they have the things that shoot out water and it stays in a line.
That's pretty rad.
twitch.tv/tehsloth
Definitely cheating.
Also, I'm sorry.
I object to my likeness being used in a piece of art devoid of thrusting.
the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
H-hello!!
Lamellar? I hardly know her
....
She's super brave!
And also they heavily imply you get to pick the house you want to be in anyway.
oh hey thanks for clearing that up
it's kind of gross how many guys will do that too
honestly it's a risky strategy
u fkin nerd
no it's like 10" and 65% tip
these constraints are not required if the tip crosses a state or national boundary in order to achieve penetration
it's kind of a thing that she is in gryffindor
the idea is that the sorting hat gets to the core of why someone would be in a house
hermione is smart and all about gaining knowledge for it's own sake, but then it is more important to her to do the right thing, no matter what it takes
which means at her core she's a gryffindor
not if you're rich enough that it doesn't actually matter anyway
ah of course, you'll see in subsection 3(b)iii 'The Ludacris Exemption',