a super funny thing that happens with my wife is patients flirt with her at work constantly
when that starts to become less playful flirting and more like, he's making a semi-serious move or testing the waters, she will "my husband" a conversation
if he... uh... keeps going after that? like tosses her his number or asks for hers or whatever after that?
he's a complete write-off to her, like he's lost all charm. prior to that, if he bails out, she might actually speak well of him and consider his flirting endearing
but if she openly points out she's married and he goes for the punt anyway, fuck that guy
it's kind of gross how many guys will do that too
it's super fucking gross!
it just speaks fucking volumes about their views on all kinds of shit and ugh
fiancee is touchy and a big flirt
once he kissed a dude at a convention
he came to me in tears
and I was like
.....its....its okay.....
because it didn't bother me at all
he also travels a lot but we have had the convo re: monogamy and traveling and so far we are both faithful to each other 100%
except when I bare my butt to chat
but that doesn't count
Hrm. That Scalzi thing is fraught with issues. His "test" places the onus on the reader to determine if a given activity passed an internal subjective threshold, but assumes the reader can accurately gauge their partner's reaction to the activity.
Scenario:
Alice cybers with a dude in her favorite MMO. She does not tell her husband, Bob, because she thinks he'd get mad about it. After weeks of guilt, she finally tells Bob, only to find out that he really doesn't care, so long as she's not having sex with other people.
Now, look at Scalzi's test. The onus is on Alice to determine what Bob's reaction will be to a thing, and the question is not even "would your partner think this is cheating", but rather "would you tell your partner". Alice now needs to make a subjective valuation on how she feels about her action, and a second subjective and uninformed valuation on how Bob would react.
Purely as a test, it's a terrible metric and prone to far too much error to be of any scientific use.
Fans have long imagined a more devious version of Hermione who readily embraces rule-breaking. That’s partly why she’s frequently paired romantically with Draco Malfoy in fanfiction, in a couple known as Dramione.
Hmm I see ok
Slytherin Hermione
Really, it's absolutely a joke that Hermione isn't in Ravenclaw
If she isn't, why does the house exist
She was a hero type genius. Ravenclaw is for anti social nerds geniuses.
an important part of evaluating fluidity is determining the properties of the flow
for example, whether it is lamellar or turbulent
the Reynolds number is an important parameter that helps us evaluate where on the lamellar-turbulent scale a particular flow falls, and is calculated thusly:
R = p * v * L / u where R is the Reynolds number, p is the fluid density, v is the fluid velocity, L is the characteristic length and u is the dynamic viscosity of the fluid
Isn't lamellar when they have the things that shoot out water and it stays in a line.
an important part of evaluating fluidity is determining the properties of the flow
for example, whether it is lamellar or turbulent
the Reynolds number is an important parameter that helps us evaluate where on the lamellar-turbulent scale a particular flow falls, and is calculated thusly:
R = p * v * L / u where R is the Reynolds number, p is the fluid density, v is the fluid velocity, L is the characteristic length and u is the dynamic viscosity of the fluid
Isn't lamellar when they have the things that shoot out water and it stays in a line.
That's pretty rad.
ya lamellar flow is where the fluid moves in parallel layers, with friction between layers. the analogy I think of is traffic in separate lanes during rush hour, where a nearby lane may be slowed by merging traffic from an on-ramp but each lane is running in parallel.
this may not be perfectly accurate as I do 0 fluid dynamics stuff and just had to learn it in undergrad as part of my degree
Please consider the environment before printing this post.
0
Options
amateurhourOne day I'll be professionalhourThe woods somewhere in TennesseeRegistered Userregular
i wonder how much more successful my life would have been if i had realized my sexuality maybe ten years earlier and stopped trying to pursue relationships just because i thought that's what i was supposed to do
I don't know how successful your life would have been but ten years ago we'd have fucked in a tent.
are YOU on the beer list?
+1
Options
simonwolfi can feel a differencetoday, a differenceRegistered Userregular
goodbye sweet chat
+3
Options
DemonStaceyTTODewback's DaughterIn love with the TaySwayRegistered Userregular
Hrm. That Scalzi thing is fraught with issues. His "test" places the onus on the reader to determine if a given activity passed an internal subjective threshold, but assumes the reader can accurately gauge their partner's reaction to the activity.
Scenario:
Alice cybers with a dude in her favorite MMO. She does not tell her husband, Bob, because she thinks he'd get mad about it. After weeks of guilt, she finally tells Bob, only to find out that he really doesn't care, so long as she's not having sex with other people.
Now, look at Scalzi's test. The onus is on Alice to determine what Bob's reaction will be to a thing, and the question is not even "would your partner think this is cheating", but rather "would you tell your partner". Alice now needs to make a subjective valuation on how she feels about her action, and a second subjective and uninformed valuation on how Bob would react.
Purely as a test, it's a terrible metric and prone to far too much error to be of any scientific use.
you wouldn't tell a car
Allegedly a voice of reason.
+2
Options
ChanusHarbinger of the Spicy Rooster ApocalypseThe Flames of a Thousand Collapsed StarsRegistered Userregular
fiancee is touchy and a big flirt
once he kissed a dude at a convention
he came to me in tears
and I was like
.....its....its okay.....
because it didn't bother me at all
he also travels a lot but we have had the convo re: monogamy and traveling and so far we are both faithful to each other 100%
except when I bare my butt to chat
but that doesn't count
i would kiss your handsome future husband hue hue hue hue hue
his mustache would tickle
+1
Options
Sir Landsharkresting shark faceRegistered Userregular
Hrm. That Scalzi thing is fraught with issues. His "test" places the onus on the reader to determine if a given activity passed an internal subjective threshold, but assumes the reader can accurately gauge their partner's reaction to the activity.
Scenario:
Alice cybers with a dude in her favorite MMO. She does not tell her husband, Bob, because she thinks he'd get mad about it. After weeks of guilt, she finally tells Bob, only to find out that he really doesn't care, so long as she's not having sex with other people.
Now, look at Scalzi's test. The onus is on Alice to determine what Bob's reaction will be to a thing, and the question is not even "would your partner think this is cheating", but rather "would you tell your partner". Alice now needs to make a subjective valuation on how she feels about her action, and a second subjective and uninformed valuation on how Bob would react.
Purely as a test, it's a terrible metric and prone to far too much error to be of any scientific use.
an important part of evaluating fluidity is determining the properties of the flow
for example, whether it is lamellar or turbulent
the Reynolds number is an important parameter that helps us evaluate where on the lamellar-turbulent scale a particular flow falls, and is calculated thusly:
R = p * v * L / u where R is the Reynolds number, p is the fluid density, v is the fluid velocity, L is the characteristic length and u is the dynamic viscosity of the fluid
Isn't lamellar when they have the things that shoot out water and it stays in a line.
an important part of evaluating fluidity is determining the properties of the flow
for example, whether it is lamellar or turbulent
the Reynolds number is an important parameter that helps us evaluate where on the lamellar-turbulent scale a particular flow falls, and is calculated thusly:
R = p * v * L / u where R is the Reynolds number, p is the fluid density, v is the fluid velocity, L is the characteristic length and u is the dynamic viscosity of the fluid
Isn't lamellar when they have the things that shoot out water and it stays in a line.
That's pretty rad.
ya lamellar flow is where the fluid moves in parallel layers, with friction between layers. the analogy I think of is traffic in separate lanes during rush hour, where a nearby lane may be slowed by merging traffic from an on-ramp but each lane is running in parallel.
this may not be perfectly accurate as I do 0 fluid dynamics stuff and just had to learn it in undergrad as part of my degree
yeah I pretty much instantaneously forgot everything about fluid dynamics as soon as I was done with thermo
0
Options
TehSlothHit Or MissI Guess They Never Miss, HuhRegistered Userregular
Posts
it's super fucking gross!
it just speaks fucking volumes about their views on all kinds of shit and ugh
once he kissed a dude at a convention
he came to me in tears
and I was like
.....its....its okay.....
because it didn't bother me at all
he also travels a lot but we have had the convo re: monogamy and traveling and so far we are both faithful to each other 100%
except when I bare my butt to chat
but that doesn't count
Scenario:
Alice cybers with a dude in her favorite MMO. She does not tell her husband, Bob, because she thinks he'd get mad about it. After weeks of guilt, she finally tells Bob, only to find out that he really doesn't care, so long as she's not having sex with other people.
Now, look at Scalzi's test. The onus is on Alice to determine what Bob's reaction will be to a thing, and the question is not even "would your partner think this is cheating", but rather "would you tell your partner". Alice now needs to make a subjective valuation on how she feels about her action, and a second subjective and uninformed valuation on how Bob would react.
Purely as a test, it's a terrible metric and prone to far too much error to be of any scientific use.
She was a hero type genius. Ravenclaw is for anti social nerds geniuses.
Doctor bb
ya lamellar flow is where the fluid moves in parallel layers, with friction between layers. the analogy I think of is traffic in separate lanes during rush hour, where a nearby lane may be slowed by merging traffic from an on-ramp but each lane is running in parallel.
this may not be perfectly accurate as I do 0 fluid dynamics stuff and just had to learn it in undergrad as part of my degree
I don't know how successful your life would have been but ten years ago we'd have fucked in a tent.
I repeat, I'm sorry.
Also, see a doctor.
i'd beat him at magic!
you wouldn't tell a car
i did he had terrible depth perception
i would kiss your handsome future husband hue hue hue hue hue
his mustache would tickle
lol im p sure you just made a public challenge for whoever wanted to take it
spoiler: the answer is yes.
don't kinkshame
The meteors
yeah I pretty much instantaneously forgot everything about fluid dynamics as soon as I was done with thermo
Is chess trolling a thing? Just trying out all the possible room combinations and then stomping people.
twitch.tv/tehsloth
Careful in case you get Sephiroth Meteor and this engenders the anime
SUMMON THE METEORS
welp
Switch - SW-7373-3669-3011
Fuck Joe Manchin
no i would never!
nope
this is usually heterosexual couples, and it's usually the woman who thinks this, and generally because other women have told her so
but not always
On average, this thread was speeding through space at warp 5.5
@OnTheLastCastle will create the new thread
@Houn is backup