As was foretold, we've added advertisements to the forums! If you have questions, or if you encounter any bugs, please visit this thread: https://forums.penny-arcade.com/discussion/240191/forum-advertisement-faq-and-reports-thread/
Options

The [Impeachment] of the 45th President of the United States

19293949698

Posts

  • Options
    MarathonMarathon Registered User regular
    Gaddez wrote: »
    Xantomas wrote: »
    Marco Rubio said essentially the same thing when asked by reporters about it. That Trump was trolling the media and it wasn't a serious request and they were all falling for it. I don't think I saw the reporters response to that answer (or if he even had one) but he should have then asked Rubio if that means people should just not believe anything Trump says.

    "You can't impeach Trump because he was just kidding." doesn't' seem like a very strong defense.

    The issue is it's impossible to tell when he's just trolling and when he's serious.

    Probably because he's always serious.

    And the Presidency isn’t the kind of job where you get to just casually fuck with people.

  • Options
    GoumindongGoumindong Registered User regular
    Javen wrote: »
    Billion with a B? Really?

    Bidens firm* (but not Biden) did receive a 1.5 billion dollar investment (not payment) from a Chinese firm/aligned organization. That is where the number comes from

    *or maybe it was a wealth management firm that the lawfirm that Biden works for got it i am not sure exactly.

    wbBv3fj.png
  • Options
    MorganVMorganV Registered User regular
    Gaddez wrote: »
    Xantomas wrote: »
    Marco Rubio said essentially the same thing when asked by reporters about it. That Trump was trolling the media and it wasn't a serious request and they were all falling for it. I don't think I saw the reporters response to that answer (or if he even had one) but he should have then asked Rubio if that means people should just not believe anything Trump says.

    "You can't impeach Trump because he was just kidding." doesn't' seem like a very strong defense.

    The issue is it's impossible to tell when he's just trolling and when he's serious.

    Probably because he's always serious.

    Either he's serious, or he's got the worst comedic timing on the planet. Like if Kevin Spacey and Harvey Weinstein did a tour built completely about making sexual assault jokes. And not self-deprecating jokes either.

    And few people, even his allies, know if Trump is joking or not. Even Rubio seems unsure, because he's afraid if he definitively declares it's a joke, and Trump demands it isn't (which has happened more than a couple times already) he looks like an even bigger tool.

    And Rubio's built a reputation around being a small tool. A small, spineless tool. Spackle, maybe.

  • Options
    Santa ClaustrophobiaSanta Claustrophobia Ho Ho Ho Disconnecting from Xbox LIVERegistered User regular
    Xantomas wrote: »
    Just saw a Trump campaign commercial on CNN showing that clip of Biden talking about how he told Ukraine that they need to fire a prosecutor or they get no money, then some quote from said prosecutor claiming he was fired for investigating Hunter Biden, then a declaration that Democrats are trying to impeach Trump for simply asking Ukraine about it.

    This is Biden's "her emails" moment and impeachment will be elevating it into the consciousnesses of every American household twisted by Trump's lies.

    I'm so very glad that we have a large field vying to run against Trump this year, and we still have options with early frontrunners starting to look substantially vulnerable.

    It's a good thing that sound bites in political ads are always true.

  • Options
    Twenty SidedTwenty Sided Registered User regular
    edited October 2019
    Gaddez wrote: »
    Xantomas wrote: »
    Marco Rubio said essentially the same thing when asked by reporters about it. That Trump was trolling the media and it wasn't a serious request and they were all falling for it. I don't think I saw the reporters response to that answer (or if he even had one) but he should have then asked Rubio if that means people should just not believe anything Trump says.

    "You can't impeach Trump because he was just kidding." doesn't' seem like a very strong defense.

    The issue is it's impossible to tell when he's just trolling and when he's serious.

    Probably because he's always serious.

    Those are not mutually exclusive.

    EDIT:
    Also, the "Trump was only joking" is commonly understood to be Shrodinger's joke. It's only a joke when your audience is offended.

    Twenty Sided on
  • Options
    halkunhalkun Registered User regular
    I'm pretty sure "It's just a prank, bro!" as never worked as a legal defense. That's not saying it's been tried.

  • Options
    ZekZek Registered User regular
    The "second hand information" thing has always just been a gish gallop attempt to spread more confusion, even though nobody really doubts that this conversation happened exactly as described. A second whistleblower probably defeats that argument, but they've got lots more. Maybe it helps with perception though that more people keep coming forward against Trump. The more the tides appear to be turning, the more likely it is that the GOP cuts him loose.

  • Options
    monikermoniker Registered User regular
    Zek wrote: »
    The "second hand information" thing has always just been a gish gallop attempt to spread more confusion, even though nobody really doubts that this conversation happened exactly as described. A second whistleblower probably defeats that argument, but they've got lots more. Maybe it helps with perception though that more people keep coming forward against Trump. The more the tides appear to be turning, the more likely it is that the GOP cuts him loose.

    The second hand information thing never made sense because they released an official direct summary of the phone call, and it was worse than what the whistleblower suggested it might be.

  • Options
    joshofalltradesjoshofalltrades Class Traitor Smoke-filled roomRegistered User regular
    edited October 2019
    EDIT: No YOU posted in the wrong thread

    Embarrassed for you

    joshofalltrades on
  • Options
    SeñorAmorSeñorAmor !!! Registered User regular
    Couscous wrote: »
    Politico reporter on a Senator saying Trump is not serious.


    It must be the GOP's new stance.

    Jim Jordan said the same thing on This Week this morning.

    https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/rep-jim-jordan-trumps-comments-china/story?id=66083374

  • Options
    NotYouNotYou Registered User regular
    edited October 2019
    You think they mailed out new talking to points to all the GOP senators? "If you pressured, just say Trump was only maybe kidding (unless he wasn't)"

    NotYou on
  • Options
    HevachHevach Registered User regular
    NotYou wrote: »
    You think they mailed out new talking to points to all the GOP senators? "If you pressured, just say Trump was only maybe kidding (unless he wasn't)"

    This is definitely a thing that happens, and all flimsy denial of that went away when they sent it to the wrong list a couple weeks back and the Democrats got it first.

  • Options
    TomantaTomanta Registered User regular
    SeñorAmor wrote: »
    Couscous wrote: »
    Politico reporter on a Senator saying Trump is not serious.


    It must be the GOP's new stance.

    Jim Jordan said the same thing on This Week this morning.

    https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/rep-jim-jordan-trumps-comments-china/story?id=66083374

    Words matter. Words said by the President of the United States matter. The "it wasn't serious" defense is, or at least should be, a joke in itself.

  • Options
    MorganVMorganV Registered User regular
    NotYou wrote: »
    You think they mailed out new talking to points to all the GOP senators? "If you pressured, just say Trump was only maybe kidding (unless he wasn't)"

    You know the GOP are feverishly pressuring Whitd House aides to tell Trump "Please, for the love of God, say you were joking!".

    And even if he does say that, and even if the media buy that, and even if he doesn't double down on it tomorrow, it still changes absolutely nothing.

    Because China is like the 8th thing wrong here. He still pressured the Ukranian President for interference in domestic politics. Anything else is just extra impeachment.

  • Options
    PhillisherePhillishere Registered User regular
    MorganV wrote: »
    NotYou wrote: »
    You think they mailed out new talking to points to all the GOP senators? "If you pressured, just say Trump was only maybe kidding (unless he wasn't)"

    You know the GOP are feverishly pressuring Whitd House aides to tell Trump "Please, for the love of God, say you were joking!".

    And even if he does say that, and even if the media buy that, and even if he doesn't double down on it tomorrow, it still changes absolutely nothing.

    Because China is like the 8th thing wrong here. He still pressured the Ukranian President for interference in domestic politics. Anything else is just extra impeachment.

    The main dynamic here is that Trump hates the GOP leadership, and the base loves Trump. So, they protect him, but he does not give a shit about them.

  • Options
    MeeqeMeeqe Lord of the pants most fancy Someplace amazingRegistered User regular
    They are throwing anything and everything at the wall right now, just to see what sticks. That the litany of excuses has continued to flail finding something that will stick in the face of growing support for impeachment means that, on the whole, the GOP attempts to control narrative aren't working outside their base. Good news to me at least.

  • Options
    monikermoniker Registered User regular
    Xantomas wrote: »
    Just saw a Trump campaign commercial on CNN showing that clip of Biden talking about how he told Ukraine that they need to fire a prosecutor or they get no money, then some quote from said prosecutor claiming he was fired for investigating Hunter Biden, then a declaration that Democrats are trying to impeach Trump for simply asking Ukraine about it.

    This is Biden's "her emails" moment and impeachment will be elevating it into the consciousnesses of every American household twisted by Trump's lies.

    I'm so very glad that we have a large field vying to run against Trump this year, and we still have options with early frontrunners starting to look substantially vulnerable.

    Swift Boat Veterans for Ukrainian Extortion

  • Options
    CouscousCouscous Registered User regular
    edited October 2019
    I find the "he is not serious" or "he did not literally mean that" argument infuriating because the GOP tried it several times and failed because Trump kept saying he was serious. Like the border wall. Or gestapo like immigration enforcement.

    Couscous on
  • Options
    CouscousCouscous Registered User regular
    Meeqe wrote: »
    They are throwing anything and everything at the wall right now, just to see what sticks. That the litany of excuses has continued to flail finding something that will stick in the face of growing support for impeachment means that, on the whole, the GOP attempts to control narrative aren't working outside their base. Good news to me at least.

    Their base is probably still at the false "he did not mention Biden in the call" talking point stage.

  • Options
    GaddezGaddez Registered User regular
    The other thing about this insipid defense is that it's everyone other then the president saying that trump was joking.

  • Options
    DacDac Registered User regular
    Marathon wrote: »
    Gaddez wrote: »
    Xantomas wrote: »
    Marco Rubio said essentially the same thing when asked by reporters about it. That Trump was trolling the media and it wasn't a serious request and they were all falling for it. I don't think I saw the reporters response to that answer (or if he even had one) but he should have then asked Rubio if that means people should just not believe anything Trump says.

    "You can't impeach Trump because he was just kidding." doesn't' seem like a very strong defense.

    The issue is it's impossible to tell when he's just trolling and when he's serious.

    Probably because he's always serious.

    And the Presidency isn’t the kind of job where you get to just casually fuck with people.

    It isn't even worth the air spent rebutting it, because we already know he's serious, because he's attempted to do the exact same thing in private.

    Steam: catseye543
    PSN: ShogunGunshow
    Origin: ShogunGunshow
  • Options
    ChanusChanus Harbinger of the Spicy Rooster Apocalypse The Flames of a Thousand Collapsed StarsRegistered User regular
    Dac wrote: »
    Marathon wrote: »
    Gaddez wrote: »
    Xantomas wrote: »
    Marco Rubio said essentially the same thing when asked by reporters about it. That Trump was trolling the media and it wasn't a serious request and they were all falling for it. I don't think I saw the reporters response to that answer (or if he even had one) but he should have then asked Rubio if that means people should just not believe anything Trump says.

    "You can't impeach Trump because he was just kidding." doesn't' seem like a very strong defense.

    The issue is it's impossible to tell when he's just trolling and when he's serious.

    Probably because he's always serious.

    And the Presidency isn’t the kind of job where you get to just casually fuck with people.

    It isn't even worth the air spent rebutting it, because we already know he's serious, because he's attempted to do the exact same thing in private.

    also his continued ALL CAPS insistence that he’s serious

    Allegedly a voice of reason.
  • Options
    DarkPrimusDarkPrimus Registered User regular
    It doesn't matter to Trump's base whether or not he was being serious, they will read it whichever way is most advantageous for them at any given moment.

    What matters is how long the fabled "principled Republican" section is going to continue to engage in the same cognitive dissonance because they prefer getting their agendas advanced more than actually sticking by the principles they ostensibly stand for.

    If they're actually principled then surely at some point, they will be against Trump's behavior... and they will always have been. Just like with Nixon.

  • Options
    GaddezGaddez Registered User regular
    DarkPrimus wrote: »
    It doesn't matter to Trump's base whether or not he was being serious, they will read it whichever way is most advantageous for them at any given moment.

    What matters is how long the fabled "principled Republican" section is going to continue to engage in the same cognitive dissonance because they prefer getting their agendas advanced more than actually sticking by the principles they ostensibly stand for.

    If they're actually principled then surely at some point, they will be against Trump's behavior... and they will always have been. Just like with Nixon.

    The GOP turning on trump is going to be very much like a mudslide; it looks really benign at first because of how slow it's moving, but as it adds more mass to itself it increases in speed.

    My guess is that the handful of GOP critters that have already called out trump on this are the first bits of that hypthetical slide and as more time and evidence comes out trump will rapidly find the senate flipping on him.

  • Options
    Dark_SideDark_Side Registered User regular
    When he called himself the chosen one, he was probably joking. When he asked China to investigate Biden he was having a hissy fit and pretty clearly lashing out. He was definitely not joking.

  • Options
    Mx. QuillMx. Quill I now prefer "Myr. Quill", actually... {They/Them}Registered User regular
    Dark_Side wrote: »
    When he called himself the chosen one, he was probably joking. When he asked China to investigate Biden he was having a hissy fit and pretty clearly lashing out. He was definitely not joking.

    Being the egotistical nightmare that he is, he most assuredly wasn't joking about being The Chosen One.

  • Options
    DiannaoChongDiannaoChong Registered User regular
    Gaddez wrote: »
    The thing that gets to me about all of this is that Trump could have gotten away with all of this shit regarding Hunter if this had been relegated to a lower tier investigation by the justice and state departments; you could have gotten all that you wanted (whatever the hell that might be) without having to directly implicate yourself or your appointees.

    But of course that's what someone who had any idea of how to work the system would do if they had like, a year's worth of expierience in government prior to being president.

    That's kind of the thing, everything illegal trump has done, there's a completely legal loophole way to do. Even paying off the story on stormy. He just doesn't understand or care, because he's never been held accountable for anything hes ever done. And on the rare occasion it might have, it just put a chip on his shoulder to do worse things later and justify it by what he feels is injustice on him.

    steam_sig.png
  • Options
    TetraRayTetraRay Registered User regular
    Dark_Side wrote: »
    When he called himself the chosen one, he was probably joking. When he asked China to investigate Biden he was having a hissy fit and pretty clearly lashing out. He was definitely not joking.

    Being the egotistical nightmare that he is, he most assuredly wasn't joking about being The Chosen One.

    His base refers to him as such, he was just repeating it. Like how everything else he says comes from the same conspiracy sources.

    Steam ID: TetraRay
  • Options
    ZekZek Registered User regular
    edited October 2019
    Gaddez wrote: »
    DarkPrimus wrote: »
    It doesn't matter to Trump's base whether or not he was being serious, they will read it whichever way is most advantageous for them at any given moment.

    What matters is how long the fabled "principled Republican" section is going to continue to engage in the same cognitive dissonance because they prefer getting their agendas advanced more than actually sticking by the principles they ostensibly stand for.

    If they're actually principled then surely at some point, they will be against Trump's behavior... and they will always have been. Just like with Nixon.

    The GOP turning on trump is going to be very much like a mudslide; it looks really benign at first because of how slow it's moving, but as it adds more mass to itself it increases in speed.

    My guess is that the handful of GOP critters that have already called out trump on this are the first bits of that hypthetical slide and as more time and evidence comes out trump will rapidly find the senate flipping on him.

    I think what most of these GOP senators will want is camouflage. They need to know that enough of the party is doing it that they won't personally take the blame from the perspective of their voters. If the GOP itself has decided to convict Trump, then if challenged the individual members can say they were reluctant but they stand with the party, etc. That's why it's pretty much an all or nothing thing. Either it happens all at once, or not at all.

    Zek on
  • Options
    NobeardNobeard North Carolina: Failed StateRegistered User regular
    There are no principled Republicans. There is no cohesive strategy against impeachment. Trump's administration has almost no one of intelligence as most of those have left or been forced out. Elected Republicans are beholden to the base, and for now that base belongs to Trump.

    Thus, what we are seeing is either chaotic flailing or callous self preservation. I don't think any Republican in power really knows what the hell to do. They want to hold onto power and avoid consequences but it's tough (for me at least) to see how that can be accomplished.

  • Options
    Undead ScottsmanUndead Scottsman Registered User regular
    edited October 2019
    Trump has taught the GOP to just weather through all of his dumbass actions, and they'll come out on the other side no worse for wear. They still think 2018 was a fluke (and who knows, they could be right) and they fear primary challenges more than they do democrat challengers. (As I've mentioned, they have a great big playbook for fighting against Democrats; they do not have the first clue how to fight against a strong far-right challenger.)

    If the House votes to start impeachment, I'll be genuinely shocked if they manage to get 50 votes in the Senate, let alone anywhere near the 67 needed.

    Undead Scottsman on
  • Options
    FoefallerFoefaller Registered User regular
    Gaddez wrote: »
    DarkPrimus wrote: »
    It doesn't matter to Trump's base whether or not he was being serious, they will read it whichever way is most advantageous for them at any given moment.

    What matters is how long the fabled "principled Republican" section is going to continue to engage in the same cognitive dissonance because they prefer getting their agendas advanced more than actually sticking by the principles they ostensibly stand for.

    If they're actually principled then surely at some point, they will be against Trump's behavior... and they will always have been. Just like with Nixon.

    The GOP turning on trump is going to be very much like a mudslide; it looks really benign at first because of how slow it's moving, but as it adds more mass to itself it increases in speed.

    My guess is that the handful of GOP critters that have already called out trump on this are the first bits of that hypthetical slide and as more time and evidence comes out trump will rapidly find the senate flipping on him.

    It's like bankruptcy.

    Gradually, and then suddenly.

    steam_sig.png
  • Options
    DiannaoChongDiannaoChong Registered User regular
    Dark_Side wrote: »
    When he called himself the chosen one, he was probably joking. When he asked China to investigate Biden he was having a hissy fit and pretty clearly lashing out. He was definitely not joking.

    "Just a joke, bro" only gets said once the 'joke' creates backlash. We aren't at that step yet, because the 3 other times he's done this has had no repercussions thus far. That's why statements like 'I am the chosen one' are truly scary in a culture that is just continuously pushing the boundry but ready to step it back if its not accepted. If Trump ever takes a stand, thats when we will get the 'I wasnt serious' response.

    steam_sig.png
  • Options
    MillMill Registered User regular
    Even before this story broke, Trump was pretty much hated by most of the public. It's kind of mystifying that the GOP insists on trying to cover his ass, but then this is the crowd of assclowns that assumes their brand of conservatism can't fail, it can only be failed or cheated. So naturally, they didn't learn anything from 2018. A ton of the pubic had no fucking patience left for Trump or the GOP that was enabling him and this was when most people just considered him to be a giant incompetent, rat fucking, authoritarian, racist, egotistical shit lord. We can now definitively add traitor fucker, that asks foreign powers to rig the elections in his favor to the list. The GOP are fools if they think their current play won't bite them in the ass.

    I think they likely do turn on him in the end because the scandal that started this wasn't the worst thing. Now that Trump has essentially made clear that he wants to purge the intel community of all those not deemed loyal enough, most shit is going to come to light. The people in the intel community that were keeping their heads down, now have little reason to do so. Not to mention, there are going to be other agencies full of people say "if being in intelligence won't save your ass. I might as well blow my whistle, while I still have a chance at helping shut this fucker down and keeping my job because if I don't, I'll probably get fired because one of his toadies felt I wasn't being a loyal enough." Of course, by the time they do, the public will find out that so much of Trump's administration was pulling super heinous shit and they'll remember that the GOP bent over backwards to defend him. Once that connection is made, the GOP is going to be in for some very bad times. Methinks, they'll find out that as bad as the pubic memory is, there are times where it crystalizes vividly around an event. Selling your country out, seems like it'll be one of those events; especially, when that is done in the defense of people as loathsome as Trump.

    I mean there is a reason the media isn't carrying water for them this time around. It's not just because making the shit lords squirm gets them eyeballs, the media is probably aware enough of the fact that there is likely worse to be revealed and that the public will not be forgiving of those that try to brush this shit storm under the rug.

  • Options
    Commander ZoomCommander Zoom Registered User regular
    I would love to believe all of this.
    But these past three years... :(

  • Options
    Twenty SidedTwenty Sided Registered User regular
    edited October 2019
    Impeachment talk hasn't yet had any notable affect on Don's approval rating. I think forecasts of the GOP's imminent demise are overly optimistic.

    Unless there's a real slam dunk incoming, I don't see anything changing. It doesn't matter if Trump or the GOP are stupid if the votes keep rewarding them for it.

    I've said this before, but my brain cannot escape the logic. If a full blown confession of guilt from Trump only elicits a "meh" from conservatives and independents, then I see no hope for the future. And I know one of these "independent" libertarians. I also can't escape the conclusion that a GOP hopeful will look at Trump and go, "Well if that idiot can do it, then so can I." Then he crowns himself and there's nothing you or I can do about it.

    Trump isn't the end of all this.

    Twenty Sided on
  • Options
    MillMill Registered User regular
    Independents don't like Trump and without them, the GOP is a dead party in most of the US.

  • Options
    Twenty SidedTwenty Sided Registered User regular
    edited October 2019
    My understanding of independents is that they're usually more right-leaning or left-leaning than the label implies.

    Libertarians are functionally Republican-lite in my experience and their stated ideology in no way corresponds to actual practice. They hate Hillary with a sharp loathing, believe soy feminizes men and really do think AOC wants to ban planes. Which means they're the exact crowd that don't really don't care or understand the significance of Trump confessing to a crime. Partly that may be because they are perfectly happy to watch the government burn down because the government is always the Deep State Empire. Federalism is always bad, mmkay. They're only liberal on social issues in a lazy slacktivist lip-service sort of way. They don't vote based on those ideals.

    Left-leaning independents are the part of the crowd that will stay home just because Bernie didn't get the nomination. If the Democrats aren't as virtuous and pure as the driven snow, then there is never any compromise for them.

    These are the people you're relying on to vote Democrat. And it's winner-takes-all. You don't get anything if these people stay home. 41% approval isn't exactly a large margin of error, with the way the electoral system works.

    Twenty Sided on
  • Options
    ViskodViskod Registered User regular
    Lindsey Graham wants the whistleblower(s) to have public congressional hearings.

  • Options
    Desktop HippieDesktop Hippie Registered User regular
    The Associated Press are reporting that while Trump was urging Ukraine to "investigate corruption" in their country, Giuliani decided to help his friends benefit from a spot of corruption in their country.

    AP wrote:
    BREAKING: As President Trump urged Ukraine’s leaders to investigate his political rival Joe Biden, associates of his personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani were looking to profit from the country’s state-run natural gas company, AP sources say.

This discussion has been closed.