As was foretold, we've added advertisements to the forums! If you have questions, or if you encounter any bugs, please visit this thread: https://forums.penny-arcade.com/discussion/240191/forum-advertisement-faq-and-reports-thread/
Options

Star Trek: Amok Rhyme

16869717374100

Posts

  • Options
    KrathoonKrathoon Registered User regular
    They should have done some cgi work on data.

  • Options
    CambiataCambiata Commander Shepard The likes of which even GAWD has never seenRegistered User regular
    Krathoon wrote: »
    They should have done some cgi work on data.

    Yeah, wondering why they didn't. Could it be a money thing?

    "If you divide the whole world into just enemies and friends, you'll end up destroying everything" --Nausicaa of the Valley of Wind
  • Options
    KrathoonKrathoon Registered User regular
    It would really help the scene more if Data looked exactly like he used to look.

    Still we get Spiner to play him again.

  • Options
    initiatefailureinitiatefailure Registered User regular
    Well... it appears (if the scenes are actually connected and not just trailer connected) to be a dream and I kind of like idea of letting an android, especially data, age like a human in your memory

  • Options
    WinkyWinky rRegistered User regular
    It's off-putting in the trailer, but depending on how they deliver that scene I actually really like the idea that in Picard's mind, he sees Data as having aged just like he did.

  • Options
    That_GuyThat_Guy I don't wanna be that guy Registered User regular
    If it's not a dream, they could explain it away with B4 looking slightly different somehow. Maybe B4 wasn't put together as well as data or something.

  • Options
    The WolfmanThe Wolfman Registered User regular
    It would be hilarious as hell if they brought back the "Shut up Data" joke whenever he went off on a too detailed tangent, by having him go into his backstory involving B4 only for somebody to interrupt and say "Shut up Data".

    "The sausage of Green Earth explodes with flavor like the cannon of culinary delight."
  • Options
    MancingtomMancingtom Registered User regular
    It could also be incomplete CGI for the trailer.

    The more I think about it, my hesitation with Discovery S3 and Picard is the implication that the Federation is either no more or not benevolent.

    The core idea of Trek is that there was a fundamental change in people that made us better—not perfect, but able to avoid the awful parts of our world. I think that idea relies as much on institutions as individuals. There are always exceptional individuals, people of incredible moral courage, no matter how immoral their societies might be. Trek is usually about exceptional individuals working within exceptional institutions.

    That isn’t to say you can’t make good story otherwise—Babylon 5 and the Expanse are fantastic shows that pretty much run on the idea of failed institutions and the people who have to deal with them—but Trek should stay unique.

    You can make great story exploring the Federation’s or Starfleet’s flaws, or the ways they might lose their way, but ultimately they should come down on the side of the angels. Otherwise, I think you lose something good about Trek.

    That was my biggest problem with Discovery S2. If you’re going to do Section 31 at all (and God know it’s getting stale), it should be an aberration, not business as usual. The heroes should either be actively fighting them (Bashir) or forced to work with them temporarily because the alternative is even worse (Ross). They should never accept Section 31 with barely a grumble like a local Sheriff teaming up with the FBI.

    I’m worried they’ll continue the trend of showing that the future is no different than the present. And that probably wouldn’t make good Trek.

    But I’m going to choose to be optimistic about it.

  • Options
    WinkyWinky rRegistered User regular
    I think I've said this before, but I don't mind if the premise behind these new shows is that the Federation has failed or is in a decline, if the purpose is to then show that the Federation recovers and how they do so. Ideally in these cases the point is to sell you on the idea that the Federation is good and we should want it. Everyone loves Pike because he's sold as basically Federation Ideals: The Guy.

    I understand that a lot of people miss TNG and wish we could just go back to exactly that, but TNG is already a thing that exists and honestly I'm not sure if I want to watch a show that is just trying to mimic what it did with nothing new to say, we can still watch it if we just want to watch the Federation going around being the Federation at its best.

    But I'd also argue that most of us already love the Federation and a major point of interest for us is "how do you get to the Federation (where we want to go) from Not The Federation (where we are)" and there's probably a lot of worthwhile things to be said in that space.

  • Options
    HardtargetHardtarget There Are Four Lights VancouverRegistered User regular
    Cambiata wrote: »
    I think bringing kids movies into this is a low blow. I doubt Stewart cared about those characters.

    Nemesis is another animal entirely, of course, so you have a point on that one I guess. I still trust Stewart, though.

    because kids movies can't be good?
    ukc8105ndh34.png
    prrybb4cogdk.png
    fguj7lm5u4kj.png

    This is just the last few months. I love patrick stewart but it was his choice to make garbage kids movies.

    steam_sig.png
    kHDRsTc.png
  • Options
    Commander ZoomCommander Zoom Registered User regular
    (Liked your whole post, but trimmed to respond specifically to:)
    Winky wrote: »
    I think I've said this before, but I don't mind if the premise behind these new shows is that the Federation has failed or is in a decline, if the purpose is to then show that the Federation recovers and how they do so. Ideally in these cases the point is to sell you on the idea that the Federation is good and we should want it. Everyone loves Pike because he's sold as basically Federation Ideals: The Guy.

    I think whether or not they'll manage to do the bolded, or have the ultimate message be "this is just how things are, and always will be, and we have to find some way to live with it", is what people are concerned about.

  • Options
    CambiataCambiata Commander Shepard The likes of which even GAWD has never seenRegistered User regular
    Hardtarget wrote: »
    Cambiata wrote: »
    I think bringing kids movies into this is a low blow. I doubt Stewart cared about those characters.

    Nemesis is another animal entirely, of course, so you have a point on that one I guess. I still trust Stewart, though.

    because kids movies can't be good?

    Definitely not true, and not something I've ever advocated for. Some of my favorite films are aimed at kids, or at least are aimed at families.

    However, whether you or I like it or not, kids films are often used as mindless cash grabs under the premise that kids are less discerning than adults. Stewart wanting to be in a film because a grand daughter or whoever wanted to see him in it is fine, even if the film itself is shit. I would however expect a greater level of care from him where a character like Picard, who he cares about, is involved.

    "If you divide the whole world into just enemies and friends, you'll end up destroying everything" --Nausicaa of the Valley of Wind
  • Options
    DanHibikiDanHibiki Registered User regular
    Mancingtom wrote: »
    It could also be incomplete CGI for the trailer.

    The more I think about it, my hesitation with Discovery S3 and Picard is the implication that the Federation is either no more or not benevolent.

    ...

    It's the hack writer's guide to making star trek.

  • Options
    SneaksSneaks Registered User regular
    H. Jon Benjamin… discovered tribbles? I'd say "this is not a drill," but I think we can all admit that we never considered a drill for this.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qh0mrIjW-H0

  • Options
    LanzLanz ...Za?Registered User regular
    edited October 2019
    Data would probably be less uncomfortable looking if they went with the type of contacts Spiner had for the TV run where his pupils weren't tiny dots that feel like they're burrowing lasers into your soul, but still registered more as "human." I think we focus a lot, too much even, on Spiner's face going all "became an old man" but honestly it's just those eyes that feel off the most

    I feel like that's a shift they did for the movies and not a particularly great one.

    maxresdefault.jpg
    vs
    n6thboj29cl5.png

    Lanz on
    waNkm4k.jpg?1
  • Options
    PhillisherePhillishere Registered User regular
    The Federation is the ultimate benevolent utopia. Shame all its admirals keep building death rays and making deals with space monsters.

  • Options
    WinkyWinky rRegistered User regular
    The Federation is the ultimate benevolent utopia. Shame all its admirals keep building death rays and making deals with space monsters.

    Um The Culture is standing right there

  • Options
    PhillisherePhillishere Registered User regular
    edited October 2019
    Winky wrote: »
    The Federation is the ultimate benevolent utopia. Shame all its admirals keep building death rays and making deals with space monsters.

    Um The Culture is standing right there

    The Culture does admit that Special Circumstances kinda sucks, but they still keep them around. And boy, I’d much rather go to war with the Federation than the Culture.

    Federation wants peace and forgiveness. The Culture wants to win and make examples of the enemy as a warning to others.

    Discovery finale spoiler:
    In the same situation, the Culture would not have threatened to blow up the planet. They’d have blown up the Klingon’s sun and kept doing so until they surrendered or were wiped out. After they’d won, they’d have sent assassins to messily murder any Klingon High Command who were left.

    The message the Culture likes to send to enemies is, “Don’t fuck with the Culture.”

    Phillishere on
  • Options
    LanzLanz ...Za?Registered User regular
    Going through TNG, there do seem to be a few... blind spots, very very glaring blind spots, the Federation seems to have by the 24th century.


    The repeating trend of "How do we declare Data and those like him property" seems to be a major one

    waNkm4k.jpg?1
  • Options
    PhillisherePhillishere Registered User regular
    Lanz wrote: »
    Going through TNG, there do seem to be a few... blind spots, very very glaring blind spots, the Federation seems to have by the 24th century.


    The repeating trend of "How do we declare Data and those like him property" seems to be a major one

    There’s a scene in the Picard trailer that looks like they finally figured out how to mass produce him.

    Also, the occasional witch hunt for officers with Romulan ancestry.

  • Options
    LanzLanz ...Za?Registered User regular
    edited October 2019
    Lanz wrote: »
    Going through TNG, there do seem to be a few... blind spots, very very glaring blind spots, the Federation seems to have by the 24th century.


    The repeating trend of "How do we declare Data and those like him property" seems to be a major one

    There’s a scene in the Picard trailer that looks like they finally figured out how to mass produce him.

    Also, the occasional witch hunt for officers with Romulan ancestry.

    The best thing DS9 ever did was look at TNG and go "We gotta remind everyone Utopia is not a place you reach, it is a work you perform, a lifestyle that must be consciously maintained if it is to avoid descending into gilded leaf oppression."

    Lanz on
    waNkm4k.jpg?1
  • Options
    DonnictonDonnicton Registered User regular
    Lanz wrote: »
    Going through TNG, there do seem to be a few... blind spots, very very glaring blind spots, the Federation seems to have by the 24th century.


    The repeating trend of "How do we declare Data and those like him property" seems to be a major one

    There’s a scene in the Picard trailer that looks like they finally figured out how to mass produce him.

    Also, the occasional witch hunt for officers with Romulan ancestry.

    I'd have figured for sure the future of warfare wouldn't be figuring out how to waste resources building more Datas so much as pressing a button and boom you have a fleet of Robert Picardos ready to wash over your enemies in a sarcastic tide.

    There's no way the Federation didn't confiscate that mobile emitter to learn how to make more.

  • Options
    LanzLanz ...Za?Registered User regular
    Donnicton wrote: »
    Lanz wrote: »
    Going through TNG, there do seem to be a few... blind spots, very very glaring blind spots, the Federation seems to have by the 24th century.


    The repeating trend of "How do we declare Data and those like him property" seems to be a major one

    There’s a scene in the Picard trailer that looks like they finally figured out how to mass produce him.

    Also, the occasional witch hunt for officers with Romulan ancestry.

    I'd have figured for sure the future of warfare wouldn't be figuring out how to waste resources building more Datas so much as pressing a button and boom you have a fleet of Robert Picardos ready to wash over your enemies in a sarcastic tide.

    There's no way the Federation didn't confiscate that mobile emitter to learn how to make more.

    The time department guys probably would have a fit over that.

    "WE ARE NOT REVERSE ENGINEERING FUTURE TECH. IT'S BAD ENOUGH IT'S HERE TO BEGIN WITH."

    waNkm4k.jpg?1
  • Options
    HefflingHeffling No Pic EverRegistered User regular
    Mancingtom wrote: »
    That isn’t to say you can’t make good story otherwise—Babylon 5 and the Expanse are fantastic shows that pretty much run on the idea of failed institutions and the people who have to deal with them—but Trek should stay unique.

    I think that a Babylon 5 like series would have made an amazing story for the founding of The Federation.

  • Options
    StrikorStrikor Calibrations? Calibrations! Registered User regular
    Considering the obligatory assholery of Starfleet admirals, Janeway herself may have ordered the confiscation of it.

    "It's nothing personal, Doctor, but I have certain expectations to meet as a Starfleet admiral."

  • Options
    LanzLanz ...Za?Registered User regular
    also speaking of Trek and uncomfortable moments

    the second episode with Leah Brahms, the actual Leah Brahms.


    that is just


    no

    nope


    Noooooooooooooooope.

    waNkm4k.jpg?1
  • Options
    LanzLanz ...Za?Registered User regular
    That is an episode that felt desperately like where someone on staff wanted to make a point about how professional women should learn to not be cold shrews and just goddamn nope.

    waNkm4k.jpg?1
  • Options
    DanHibikiDanHibiki Registered User regular
    Heffling wrote: »
    Mancingtom wrote: »
    That isn’t to say you can’t make good story otherwise—Babylon 5 and the Expanse are fantastic shows that pretty much run on the idea of failed institutions and the people who have to deal with them—but Trek should stay unique.

    I think that a Babylon 5 like series would have made an amazing story for the founding of The Federation.

    I mean, they kind of did by the end of the series.

  • Options
    PreacherPreacher Registered User regular
    Lanz wrote: »
    also speaking of Trek and uncomfortable moments

    the second episode with Leah Brahms, the actual Leah Brahms.


    that is just


    no

    nope


    Noooooooooooooooope.

    Its ok her and Geordi get married and have kids.

    And yet Barclay was the weird one with the holodeck fetish...

    I would like some money because these are artisanal nuggets of wisdom philistine.

    pleasepaypreacher.net
  • Options
    DanHibikiDanHibiki Registered User regular
    Barclay has... other issues besides his holodeck fetish.

  • Options
    PreacherPreacher Registered User regular
    DanHibiki wrote: »
    Barclay has... other issues besides his holodeck fetish.

    The spider thing was fixed!

    I would like some money because these are artisanal nuggets of wisdom philistine.

    pleasepaypreacher.net
  • Options
    WinkyWinky rRegistered User regular
    Winky wrote: »
    The Federation is the ultimate benevolent utopia. Shame all its admirals keep building death rays and making deals with space monsters.

    Um The Culture is standing right there

    The Culture does admit that Special Circumstances kinda sucks, but they still keep them around. And boy, I’d much rather go to war with the Federation than the Culture.

    Federation wants peace and forgiveness. The Culture wants to win and make examples of the enemy as a warning to others.

    Discovery finale spoiler:
    In the same situation, the Culture would not have threatened to blow up the planet. They’d have blown up the Klingon’s sun and kept doing so until they surrendered or were wiped out. After they’d won, they’d have sent assassins to messily murder any Klingon High Command who were left.

    The message the Culture likes to send to enemies is, “Don’t fuck with the Culture.”
    To be fair to the Culture, they'd have sent escape shuttles so that any civilians could get off the planet first, and they be really nice to any Klingons who were left afterwards.

  • Options
    MancingtomMancingtom Registered User regular
    Winky wrote: »
    Winky wrote: »
    The Federation is the ultimate benevolent utopia. Shame all its admirals keep building death rays and making deals with space monsters.

    Um The Culture is standing right there

    The Culture does admit that Special Circumstances kinda sucks, but they still keep them around. And boy, I’d much rather go to war with the Federation than the Culture.

    Federation wants peace and forgiveness. The Culture wants to win and make examples of the enemy as a warning to others.

    Discovery finale spoiler:
    In the same situation, the Culture would not have threatened to blow up the planet. They’d have blown up the Klingon’s sun and kept doing so until they surrendered or were wiped out. After they’d won, they’d have sent assassins to messily murder any Klingon High Command who were left.

    The message the Culture likes to send to enemies is, “Don’t fuck with the Culture.”
    To be fair to the Culture, they'd have sent escape shuttles so that any civilians could get off the planet first, and they be really nice to any Klingons who were left afterwards.
    Beginning with the standard “Sorry we blew up your homeworld and killed your family” condolence card?

    I hear Hallmark is making a killing in the genocide apology sector. The 2019 models sing.

  • Options
    JacobkoshJacobkosh Gamble a stamp. I can show you how to be a real man!Moderator mod
    Lanz wrote: »
    Lanz wrote: »
    Going through TNG, there do seem to be a few... blind spots, very very glaring blind spots, the Federation seems to have by the 24th century.


    The repeating trend of "How do we declare Data and those like him property" seems to be a major one

    There’s a scene in the Picard trailer that looks like they finally figured out how to mass produce him.

    Also, the occasional witch hunt for officers with Romulan ancestry.

    The best thing DS9 ever did was look at TNG and go "We gotta remind everyone Utopia is not a place you reach, it is a work you perform, a lifestyle that must be consciously maintained if it is to avoid descending into gilded leaf oppression."

    I mean that was literally the point of a bunch of TNG episodes too

    I find the idea that DS9 invented this kind of exhausting tbh

  • Options
    PhillisherePhillishere Registered User regular
    edited October 2019
    Mancingtom wrote: »
    Winky wrote: »
    Winky wrote: »
    The Federation is the ultimate benevolent utopia. Shame all its admirals keep building death rays and making deals with space monsters.

    Um The Culture is standing right there

    The Culture does admit that Special Circumstances kinda sucks, but they still keep them around. And boy, I’d much rather go to war with the Federation than the Culture.

    Federation wants peace and forgiveness. The Culture wants to win and make examples of the enemy as a warning to others.

    Discovery finale spoiler:
    In the same situation, the Culture would not have threatened to blow up the planet. They’d have blown up the Klingon’s sun and kept doing so until they surrendered or were wiped out. After they’d won, they’d have sent assassins to messily murder any Klingon High Command who were left.

    The message the Culture likes to send to enemies is, “Don’t fuck with the Culture.”
    To be fair to the Culture, they'd have sent escape shuttles so that any civilians could get off the planet first, and they be really nice to any Klingons who were left afterwards.
    Beginning with the standard “Sorry we blew up your homeworld and killed your family” condolence card?

    I hear Hallmark is making a killing in the genocide apology sector. The 2019 models sing.
    The Special Circumstance ship "They Started It But We Finished It" will do a semi-annual apology flyby.

    Phillishere on
  • Options
    DanHibikiDanHibiki Registered User regular
    Preacher wrote: »
    DanHibiki wrote: »
    Barclay has... other issues besides his holodeck fetish.

    The spider thing was fixed!

    honestly, being turned in to a spider was a bit of an improvement

  • Options
    PhillisherePhillishere Registered User regular
    Jacobkosh wrote: »
    Lanz wrote: »
    Lanz wrote: »
    Going through TNG, there do seem to be a few... blind spots, very very glaring blind spots, the Federation seems to have by the 24th century.


    The repeating trend of "How do we declare Data and those like him property" seems to be a major one

    There’s a scene in the Picard trailer that looks like they finally figured out how to mass produce him.

    Also, the occasional witch hunt for officers with Romulan ancestry.

    The best thing DS9 ever did was look at TNG and go "We gotta remind everyone Utopia is not a place you reach, it is a work you perform, a lifestyle that must be consciously maintained if it is to avoid descending into gilded leaf oppression."

    I mean that was literally the point of a bunch of TNG episodes too

    I find the idea that DS9 invented this kind of exhausting tbh

    A lot of TNG gets viewed through Picard's speeches. They weren't always 100 percent accurate even in the episodes where he was giving them.

  • Options
    Commander ZoomCommander Zoom Registered User regular
    Lanz wrote: »
    also speaking of Trek and uncomfortable moments

    the second episode with Leah Brahms, the actual Leah Brahms.


    that is just


    no

    nope


    Noooooooooooooooope.

    I very much wanted the last lines of that episode to be:

    WORF [OC]: Worf to La Forge. There is an incoming message on subspace for Doctor Brahms.
    LAFORGE: Acknowledged, Worf. La Forge out. ... Your husband?
    BRAHMS: Wife, actually.
    [BRAHMS rises and leaves. GUINAN 'casually' wanders past LAFORGE's table.]
    GUINAN: Told you.

  • Options
    PreacherPreacher Registered User regular
    Jacobkosh wrote: »
    Lanz wrote: »
    Lanz wrote: »
    Going through TNG, there do seem to be a few... blind spots, very very glaring blind spots, the Federation seems to have by the 24th century.


    The repeating trend of "How do we declare Data and those like him property" seems to be a major one

    There’s a scene in the Picard trailer that looks like they finally figured out how to mass produce him.

    Also, the occasional witch hunt for officers with Romulan ancestry.

    The best thing DS9 ever did was look at TNG and go "We gotta remind everyone Utopia is not a place you reach, it is a work you perform, a lifestyle that must be consciously maintained if it is to avoid descending into gilded leaf oppression."

    I mean that was literally the point of a bunch of TNG episodes too

    I find the idea that DS9 invented this kind of exhausting tbh

    Yeah its exhausting to act like TNG had the generation as like a perfect group of nice people, when we had several episodes of admirals and captains who were ok with war crimes and breaking treaties.

    I would like some money because these are artisanal nuggets of wisdom philistine.

    pleasepaypreacher.net
  • Options
    JacobkoshJacobkosh Gamble a stamp. I can show you how to be a real man!Moderator mod
    edited October 2019
    Winky wrote: »
    The Federation is the ultimate benevolent utopia. Shame all its admirals keep building death rays and making deals with space monsters.

    Um The Culture is standing right there

    I don't really feel like the culture and the federation are fungible for each other

    The Culture is essentially an AI society that has collectively made the moral choice to benevolently look after the little human pets that infest the ships. There's something a bit existentially disquieting about it, and it's okay to feel disquieted by it, because Banks absolutely reveled in that tension and took opportunities to kind of rub your the reader's face in it.

    The Federation is about the idea that humans can go out into space and solve our own problems while remaining fundamentally human and not being replaced or put in a little existential cul-de-sac by our own sophisticated tools. Star Trek says that social and technological change can (and maybe should) give people more power over their lives and fates rather than less.

    Jacobkosh on
This discussion has been closed.