Mr_Rose83 Blue Ridge Protects the HolyRegistered Userregular
Stellar lifting, mining a star basically, sounds backwards “we’re going to make our fusion core last longer by removing some of its fuel, refining it, and using the contaminants to build stuff” but it works. In theory.
I thought, until I was like, 15, that I was born with a tail. it was an extremely long con by my parents. They told me it when I was little, and it didn't come up enough that they had to recant.
One of my uncles had a tail. Not like a proper monkey tail, sadly, but a horse-style tail of long flowing butt locks. When he was maybe 10 or 12 they finally dug around because something seemed to be growing there at the bottom of his spine and they discovered a mass with formed teeth inside it. Turned out to be a twin that never was.
I thought, until I was like, 15, that I was born with a tail. it was an extremely long con by my parents. They told me it when I was little, and it didn't come up enough that they had to recant.
One of my uncles had a tail. Not like a proper monkey tail, sadly, but a horse-style tail of long flowing butt locks. When he was maybe 10 or 12 they finally dug around because something seemed to be growing there at the bottom of his spine and they discovered a mass with formed teeth inside it. Turned out to be a twin that never was.
My guess was going to be a teratoma but this makes sense too.
... nature is fucking horrifying and I rescind all my previous posts about preserving it, let us upload to the silicon hivemind and never speak of this again
What is it with nature and having such a default for "yeah I'll put teeth here" it makes NO SENSE to me that teeth are so common in terratomas.
+3
Options
Metzger MeisterIt Gets Worsebefore it gets any better.Registered Userregular
no but his brother Colt could!
+1
Options
3cl1ps3I will build a labyrinth to house the cheeseRegistered Userregular
From a cursory search of literature, teratomas with teeth actually don't seem to be all that common compared to teratomas composed of more basal cell types, I think they're just the ones that get all the press because gaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhh.
... nature is fucking horrifying and I rescind all my previous posts about preserving it, let us upload to the silicon hivemind and never speak of this again
Picture the digital equivalent of a partially absorbed twin though
... nature is fucking horrifying and I rescind all my previous posts about preserving it, let us upload to the silicon hivemind and never speak of this again
Picture the digital equivalent of a partially absorbed twin though
existentially horrifying but physically neutral, 1.5 stars.
... nature is fucking horrifying and I rescind all my previous posts about preserving it, let us upload to the silicon hivemind and never speak of this again
Picture the digital equivalent of a partially absorbed twin though
... nature is fucking horrifying and I rescind all my previous posts about preserving it, let us upload to the silicon hivemind and never speak of this again
Picture the digital equivalent of a partially absorbed twin though
This is basically just nested code isn't it?
0
Options
PiptheFairFrequently not in boats.Registered Userregular
Left to right: a red dwarf, the Sun, a B-type main sequence star, and R136a1
OOO STAR BIG
hydrogen machine go brrrrrrrr
Was gonna grab one of those videos where they take radio radio waves from the sun and convert them into audio, then replace the brrrrrr in your post with it as a joke. But it turns out brrrrr is actually what that sounds like. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-I-zdmg_Dno
That weird bullshit that bounces off Jupiter or whatever featured in a highly disturbing nightmare, like orbiting Jupiter and theres nothing to see but Jupiter and that weird bullshit is blaring
Broke as fuck in the style of the times. Gratitude is all that can return on your generosity.
That weird bullshit that bounces off Jupiter or whatever featured in a highly disturbing nightmare, like orbiting Jupiter and theres nothing to see but Jupiter and that weird bullshit is blaring
Okay, slightly curly question for you, science thread.
Say I have paired values, X and Y, for a couple hundred items. X and Y are both variables with limited ranges, i.e. they can be anywhere between 0.00 and 10.00.
When I plot these paired values on a scatter plot, there's very low correlation between X and Y, but the graph appears to show that X is a very strong inverse predictor of the minimum possible Y value, such that X+Y is always at least 10. So, for example, if X=5.95, then 10.00>=Y>=4.05.
My question is, is there a statistical test can I do to prove (or disprove) that this is a significant pattern?
The story I was told when learning the standard model was that the discoverers of quarks had to be talked out of naming them after ice cream flavours. I've never actually verified that, but I like the idea so much I'm never deviating from it.
If I ever made a discovery and had to name like 100 things I'd give them all very scientific sounding Latin names except for one which I'd name something like the double dildo ass blaster.
Okay, slightly curly question for you, science thread.
Say I have paired values, X and Y, for a couple hundred items. X and Y are both variables with limited ranges, i.e. they can be anywhere between 0.00 and 10.00.
When I plot these paired values on a scatter plot, there's very low correlation between X and Y, but the graph appears to show that X is a very strong inverse predictor of the minimum possible Y value, such that X+Y is always at least 10. So, for example, if X=5.95, then 10.00>=Y>=4.05.
My question is, is there a statistical test can I do to prove (or disprove) that this is a significant pattern?
You could look at the frequency distribution of your X+Y and compare it against the the distribution curve you'd expect from two truly random values.
The only thing on the side of the city I don't understand at a glance is how changing to electric heating is supposed to help much by itself. It's the most ineffective way to produce heat there is. Would have to check further where their power comes from.
0
Options
FishmanPut your goddamned hand in the goddamned Box of Pain.Registered Userregular
Here, have this article about blindsight, a condition best explained as blind people who can see things but are blind.
One day, some psychologists placed Barry in a corridor full of obstacles like boxes and chairs. They took away his walking stick and told him to walk down the corridor. The result of this simple experiment would prove dramatic for our understanding of consciousness. Barry was able to navigate around the obstacles without tripping over a single one.
Barry has blindsight, an extremely rare condition that is as paradoxical as it sounds. People with blindsight consistently deny awareness of items in front of them, but they are capable of amazing feats, which demonstrate that, in some sense, they must be able to see them.
In another case, a man with blindsight (let’s call him Rick) was put in front of a screen and told to guess (from several options) what object was on the screen. Rick insisted that he didn’t know what was there and that he was just guessing, yet he was guessing with over 90% accuracy.
Posts
Nintendo Network ID: AzraelRose
DropBox invite link - get 500MB extra free.
One of my uncles had a tail. Not like a proper monkey tail, sadly, but a horse-style tail of long flowing butt locks. When he was maybe 10 or 12 they finally dug around because something seemed to be growing there at the bottom of his spine and they discovered a mass with formed teeth inside it. Turned out to be a twin that never was.
OOO STAR BIG
https://www.paypal.me/hobnailtaylor
My guess was going to be a teratoma but this makes sense too.
Picture the digital equivalent of a partially absorbed twin though
existentially horrifying but physically neutral, 1.5 stars.
?
Steam: Elvenshae // PSN: Elvenshae // WotC: Elvenshae
Wilds of Aladrion: [https://forums.penny-arcade.com/discussion/comment/43159014/#Comment_43159014]Ellandryn[/url]
This is basically just nested code isn't it?
hydrogen machine go brrrrrrrr
https://www.paypal.me/hobnailtaylor
they play nicely with the constant noise my brain makes.
Jupiter sounds freak the hell out of me
Well, they seem bad at first, but they grow on you.
I’m gonna have to meticulously fondle my balls tonight to make sure I don’t have one
Screenwriters love that interpretation though
What's wrong, you don't want ballteeth?
Say I have paired values, X and Y, for a couple hundred items. X and Y are both variables with limited ranges, i.e. they can be anywhere between 0.00 and 10.00.
When I plot these paired values on a scatter plot, there's very low correlation between X and Y, but the graph appears to show that X is a very strong inverse predictor of the minimum possible Y value, such that X+Y is always at least 10. So, for example, if X=5.95, then 10.00>=Y>=4.05.
My question is, is there a statistical test can I do to prove (or disprove) that this is a significant pattern?
The key word is “meticulously”
Vs “vigorously”
https://www.paypal.me/hobnailtaylor
The story I was told when learning the standard model was that the discoverers of quarks had to be talked out of naming them after ice cream flavours. I've never actually verified that, but I like the idea so much I'm never deviating from it.
http://steamcommunity.com/id/pablocampy
You could look at the frequency distribution of your X+Y and compare it against the the distribution curve you'd expect from two truly random values.
I believe Bad Dragon has already brought that product to market.
~ Buckaroo Banzai
sometimes I am both calebs
The only thing on the side of the city I don't understand at a glance is how changing to electric heating is supposed to help much by itself. It's the most ineffective way to produce heat there is. Would have to check further where their power comes from.