I vaguely remember several Aussie forumers saying that kangaroo is tasty if prepared correctly (thin and seared rare? maybe?), but pretty gnarly if done wrong.
Kangaroo is delicious but yeah it's real lean so if you overcook it it becomes boot leather real fast.
kangaroo is a pretty great meat but tonight I was trying to describe the taste of zebra to people and I eventually settled on a cross between kangaroo and beef (the rich flavour of roo but with the fatty moistness of cow) and that made me wonder
I didn't know that but it will be a helpful thing to keep in my backpocket when inevitably the higher powers try to shift blame re: climate change to countries outside the West (in the classical sense).
Look, the elite aren't just going to take public transportation to Davos to complain about climate change - the private jets and yachts are so they don't have to hobnob with the rest of us.
It's not outlandish considering it only means 1 rich person emits as much CO2 as hundred of the poorest people on earth, in fact I would've considered the difference more crass
I'd still like to see the data. was it in there and I missed it?
Looks like the full report has to be requested. This is the only methods bit included
An embargoed copy of the media brief ‘Confronting Carbon Inequality’ and the full research report and data on which is it based are available upon request.
The poorest 50 percent of humanity comprised approximately 3.1 billion people on average between 1990 and 2015, the richest 10 percent comprised approx. 630 million people, the richest 5 percent approx. 315 million people, and the richest one percent approximately 63 million people.
In 2015, around half the emissions of the richest 10 percent - people with net income over $38,000 - are linked to citizens in the US and the EU and around a fifth with citizens of China and India. Over a third of the emissions of the richest one percent – people with net income over $109,000 - are linked to citizens in the US, with the next biggest contributions from citizens of the Middle East and China. Net incomes are based on income thresholds for 2015 and represented in $ 2011 PPP (purchasing power parity).
The research is based on estimations of consumption emissions from fossil fuels i.e. emissions consumed within a country including emissions embodied in imports and excluding emissions embodied in exports. National consumption emissions were divided between individual households based on the latest income distribution datasets and a functional relationship between emissions and income. This assumes, on the basis of numerous studies, that emissions rise in proportion to income above a minimum emissions floor and until a maximum emissions ceiling. National household consumption emissions estimates - for 117 countries from 1990 to 2015 - are then sorted into a global distribution according to income. More details on the methodology is available in the research report.
But honestly, considering how the poorest half of the world live (and HOW poor most of those are) this really doesn’t sound remotely surprising. Like, most of those people are going to be subsistence farming at best.
I'd still like to see the data. was it in there and I missed it?
Looks like the full report has to be requested. This is the only methods bit included
An embargoed copy of the media brief ‘Confronting Carbon Inequality’ and the full research report and data on which is it based are available upon request.
The poorest 50 percent of humanity comprised approximately 3.1 billion people on average between 1990 and 2015, the richest 10 percent comprised approx. 630 million people, the richest 5 percent approx. 315 million people, and the richest one percent approximately 63 million people.
In 2015, around half the emissions of the richest 10 percent - people with net income over $38,000 - are linked to citizens in the US and the EU and around a fifth with citizens of China and India. Over a third of the emissions of the richest one percent – people with net income over $109,000 - are linked to citizens in the US, with the next biggest contributions from citizens of the Middle East and China. Net incomes are based on income thresholds for 2015 and represented in $ 2011 PPP (purchasing power parity).
The research is based on estimations of consumption emissions from fossil fuels i.e. emissions consumed within a country including emissions embodied in imports and excluding emissions embodied in exports. National consumption emissions were divided between individual households based on the latest income distribution datasets and a functional relationship between emissions and income. This assumes, on the basis of numerous studies, that emissions rise in proportion to income above a minimum emissions floor and until a maximum emissions ceiling. National household consumption emissions estimates - for 117 countries from 1990 to 2015 - are then sorted into a global distribution according to income. More details on the methodology is available in the research report.
But honestly, considering how the poorest half of the world live (and HOW poor most of those are) this really doesn’t sound remotely surprising.
oooohhhhh for some reason my mind blanked and thought this was only the US
kangaroo is a pretty great meat but tonight I was trying to describe the taste of zebra to people and I eventually settled on a cross between kangaroo and beef (the rich flavour of roo but with the fatty moistness of cow) and that made me wonder
... could we kobe kangaroo?
I mean that sounds a lot like zebra, from your description?
I remember it was actually an actual real issue when a year or two ago someone noted that there were multiple social media feeds of anti-ISIS militia Mitsubishi technicals appearing around the same time and the public discourse in the intelligence analysis community was trying to work out if this represented a shift away from Toyota, or if Mitsi had done a deal, or they had used up all the Toyotas, or why they were now running Mitsi technicals.
Posts
Kangaroo is delicious but yeah it's real lean so if you overcook it it becomes boot leather real fast.
... could we kobe kangaroo?
Extreme sacrifices must be made in order to kobe-aussie a roo.
People keep complaining about your puns, but I want you to know that you are far and away the best member of this forum.
This is next level shit
edit: Did you know that the richest 1 percent not only own more wealth than than poorest half but they are also hogging all the carbon emissions, too?
Carbon Emissions Of The Richest 1 Percent More Than Double The Emissions Of The Poorest Half of Humanity
I didn't know that but it will be a helpful thing to keep in my backpocket when inevitably the higher powers try to shift blame re: climate change to countries outside the West (in the classical sense).
Look, the elite aren't just going to take public transportation to Davos to complain about climate change - the private jets and yachts are so they don't have to hobnob with the rest of us.
He hacked the pun simulator
I just got it
goddam
Ecofascist: Humans are the problem! [Strongly imply genocide as the "solution."]
Reality: Eat the fucking rich.
that blurb seems I don't know .... wrong?
are they counting the companies they own, because that's the only way I could see that being correct
...much larger homes, multiple homes that are staffed year round...
I'd still like to see the data. was it in there and I missed it?
Looks like the full report has to be requested. This is the only methods bit included
But honestly, considering how the poorest half of the world live (and HOW poor most of those are) this really doesn’t sound remotely surprising. Like, most of those people are going to be subsistence farming at best.
oooohhhhh for some reason my mind blanked and thought this was only the US
yeah, I absolutely believe that for the world
I mean that sounds a lot like zebra, from your description?
Ômori Hikoshichi carrying an ogress across the water
But she's really after his sword
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LNTpXX43QxY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dduvx-dEySY
Toyota has the best ads.
.....
huh
I remember it was actually an actual real issue when a year or two ago someone noted that there were multiple social media feeds of anti-ISIS militia Mitsubishi technicals appearing around the same time and the public discourse in the intelligence analysis community was trying to work out if this represented a shift away from Toyota, or if Mitsi had done a deal, or they had used up all the Toyotas, or why they were now running Mitsi technicals.
We can thank Yeltsin for rewriting the Russian Constitution removing the power of the Duma For all the fun and games Putian plays
Pfft. Dolphins hate me
find out this one easy trick?
He took their sloths away
-Indiana Solo, runner of blades
There are only so many fish, y'know?