I wanted a concise definition of what moral anti realism was, just a quick one so I can like, parse discourse. These links look great, I thought. Encyclopedias are good, if sometimes reductive.
It might be expected that it would suffice for the entry for “moral anti-realism” to contain only some links to other entries in this encyclopedia. It could contain a link to “moral realism” and stipulate the negation of the view there described. Alternatively, it could have links to the entries “anti-realism” and “morality” and could stipulate the conjunction of the materials contained therein. The fact that neither of these approaches would be adequate—and, more strikingly, that following the two procedures would yield substantively non-equivalent results—reveals the contentious and unsettled nature of the topic.
ok I see philosophy is still insufferable
Thousands of hot, local singles are waiting to play at bubbulon.com.
I wanted a concise definition of what moral anti realism was, just a quick one so I can like, parse discourse. These links look great, I thought. Encyclopedias are good, if sometimes reductive.
It might be expected that it would suffice for the entry for “moral anti-realism” to contain only some links to other entries in this encyclopedia. It could contain a link to “moral realism” and stipulate the negation of the view there described. Alternatively, it could have links to the entries “anti-realism” and “morality” and could stipulate the conjunction of the materials contained therein. The fact that neither of these approaches would be adequate—and, more strikingly, that following the two procedures would yield substantively non-equivalent results—reveals the contentious and unsettled nature of the topic.
ok I see philosophy is still insufferable
Wait what's insufferable about that
It says it's a nuanced topic and they can't just link to 'moral realism' and then write a caption saying "not this"
I wanted a concise definition of what moral anti realism was, just a quick one so I can like, parse discourse. These links look great, I thought. Encyclopedias are good, if sometimes reductive.
It might be expected that it would suffice for the entry for “moral anti-realism” to contain only some links to other entries in this encyclopedia. It could contain a link to “moral realism” and stipulate the negation of the view there described. Alternatively, it could have links to the entries “anti-realism” and “morality” and could stipulate the conjunction of the materials contained therein. The fact that neither of these approaches would be adequate—and, more strikingly, that following the two procedures would yield substantively non-equivalent results—reveals the contentious and unsettled nature of the topic.
ok I see philosophy is still insufferable
Wait what's insufferable about that
It says it's a nuanced topic and they can't just link to 'moral realism' and then write a caption saying "not this"
needlessly verbose, could cut out everything except "the nature of the topic is contentious and unsettled"
Shameful pursuits and utterly stupid opinions
0
Options
Donkey KongPutting Nintendo out of business with AI nipsRegistered Userregular
Mario turning into a super saiyan cat certainly is a new direction
Leading with Furry Mario, very smart marketing
I will say that I generally have seen no porn whatsoever of cat mario in the years since cat mario was created. Furries are simply Not Interested. I have already seen porn of god killer bowser THIS MORNING, retweeted by a bara account on twitter that changed its name to God Killer [Name].
Thousands of hot, local singles are waiting to play at bubbulon.com.
I wanted a concise definition of what moral anti realism was, just a quick one so I can like, parse discourse. These links look great, I thought. Encyclopedias are good, if sometimes reductive.
It might be expected that it would suffice for the entry for “moral anti-realism” to contain only some links to other entries in this encyclopedia. It could contain a link to “moral realism” and stipulate the negation of the view there described. Alternatively, it could have links to the entries “anti-realism” and “morality” and could stipulate the conjunction of the materials contained therein. The fact that neither of these approaches would be adequate—and, more strikingly, that following the two procedures would yield substantively non-equivalent results—reveals the contentious and unsettled nature of the topic.
ok I see philosophy is still insufferable
I was surprised by how bad the writing is! It's not the same kind of obscurantism that you see from continental philosophy or even papers about continental philosophy, but my goodness — it's almost parody with how often it goes for the most bloated and complex words or phrases. This passage is particularly bad but they are all a little hostile to the reader. A lot of style no-nos, too, with so much passive voice.
Like just a quick pass:
You might expect the entry for "moral anti-realism" to simply contain links to other entries — a link to "moral realism" stating that it is the negation of the views on that page, or links to "anti-realism" and "morality" describing it as a combination of the information in those entries. But neither of these approaches would properly explain moral anti-realism, and each approach would actually produce dramatically different results, since the topic remains contentious.
Listen. It's been a while. And the pandemic hasn't been good for my [chat]ing. I decided to check. It was near page 100 so I thought I'd see what anime hijinks may ensue. And low and behold a comment about a show I liked
0
Options
HonkHonk is this poster.Registered User, __BANNED USERSregular
Luckily this Dell comes with a vast, abyssal, eight gigabytes of RAM.
Memory enough to recall every freckle on Methuselah's face and all freckles since.
I wanted a concise definition of what moral anti realism was, just a quick one so I can like, parse discourse. These links look great, I thought. Encyclopedias are good, if sometimes reductive.
It might be expected that it would suffice for the entry for “moral anti-realism” to contain only some links to other entries in this encyclopedia. It could contain a link to “moral realism” and stipulate the negation of the view there described. Alternatively, it could have links to the entries “anti-realism” and “morality” and could stipulate the conjunction of the materials contained therein. The fact that neither of these approaches would be adequate—and, more strikingly, that following the two procedures would yield substantively non-equivalent results—reveals the contentious and unsettled nature of the topic.
ok I see philosophy is still insufferable
Wait what's insufferable about that
It says it's a nuanced topic and they can't just link to 'moral realism' and then write a caption saying "not this"
Compare to "moral anti-realism is an argument that one of three things is true: moral judgments aren't in the business of aiming at truth, or moral judgments systematically fail to secure truth, or moral truth is constituted by mental activity and thus moral properties don't exist mind-independently."
That's my one sentence synthesis of what the article says further down. I think DK is complaining about the communication skills or structural choices of the person who wrote the article."
Posts
Leading with Furry Mario, very smart marketing
I wanted a concise definition of what moral anti realism was, just a quick one so I can like, parse discourse. These links look great, I thought. Encyclopedias are good, if sometimes reductive.
ok I see philosophy is still insufferable
Wait what's insufferable about that
It says it's a nuanced topic and they can't just link to 'moral realism' and then write a caption saying "not this"
I will say that I generally have seen no porn whatsoever of cat mario in the years since cat mario was created. Furries are simply Not Interested. I have already seen porn of god killer bowser THIS MORNING, retweeted by a bara account on twitter that changed its name to God Killer [Name].
I was surprised by how bad the writing is! It's not the same kind of obscurantism that you see from continental philosophy or even papers about continental philosophy, but my goodness — it's almost parody with how often it goes for the most bloated and complex words or phrases. This passage is particularly bad but they are all a little hostile to the reader. A lot of style no-nos, too, with so much passive voice.
Like just a quick pass:
I can tell my simultaneous tabs will go up just because of the presentation.
@Mazzyx
Listen. It's been a while. And the pandemic hasn't been good for my [chat]ing. I decided to check. It was near page 100 so I thought I'd see what anime hijinks may ensue. And low and behold a comment about a show I liked
Memory enough to recall every freckle on Methuselah's face and all freckles since.
The last level is so rad, I cant wait for this expanded version.
Compare to "moral anti-realism is an argument that one of three things is true: moral judgments aren't in the business of aiming at truth, or moral judgments systematically fail to secure truth, or moral truth is constituted by mental activity and thus moral properties don't exist mind-independently."
That's my one sentence synthesis of what the article says further down. I think DK is complaining about the communication skills or structural choices of the person who wrote the article."
On average, this thread was careening by at warp 0.8
@Winky will create the new thread
@Mazzyx is backup