StraightziHere we may reign secure, and in my choice,To reign is worth ambition though in HellRegistered Userregular
I do think there might be a like, narrowness of frame viewpoint in that, like you gotta zoom out, y'know?
In that like, most scrappy young actors are people who have read way too much Stanislavski and are really dedicated to weird art auteur shit. And then they hit it big, they get lucky, and what Pooro says happens, they become more career/money focused. And some of them, from that point, will parlay their success into doing weird art auteur shit (maybe the same stuff they wanted to do all along, maybe newfound weird interests).
If you're looking at podcasts with successful actors/writers/directors, they've already made it past that first step. So you might not see the reason that they got into the business at that point.
everyone wants to have a job that they genuinely enjoy doing and that matters to them
most people won't
so you gotta get as close to that bar as possible
and if that means voicing a talking piece of shit instead of working the register at wendy's, they'll take it
I would, but Patrick Stewart keeps taking all our cushy poop talking jobs away from commoners like me. I was perfect for it too, people are always telling me I sound like a real piece of shit.
thinking about Crispen Glover who in order to fund his art house movies (of which he owns the only print) he was in stuff like Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle
thinking about Crispen Glover who in order to fund his art house movies (of which he owns the only print) he was in stuff like Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle
what
but he died in the first movie
I'll allow a lot of things, but lazy continuity in my 00s Charlie's Angels movies is not one of them
3cl1ps3I will build a labyrinth to house the cheeseRegistered Userregular
Picard's the only Star Trek thing that I have ever at all enjoyed watching aside from that one scene with the Beastie Boys song, so that seems fine to me.
Picard's the only Star Trek thing that I have ever at all enjoyed watching aside from that one scene with the Beastie Boys song, so that seems fine to me.
thinking about Crispen Glover who in order to fund his art house movies (of which he owns the only print) he was in stuff like Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle
what
but he died in the first movie
I'll allow a lot of things, but lazy continuity in my 00s Charlie's Angels movies is not one of them
He's only in the second one, you don't know your Charlie's Angels, you know nowthing!!!!
thinking about Crispen Glover who in order to fund his art house movies (of which he owns the only print) he was in stuff like Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle
what
but he died in the first movie
I'll allow a lot of things, but lazy continuity in my 00s Charlie's Angels movies is not one of them
He's only in the second one, you don't know your Charlie's Angels, you know nowthing!!!!
Uh... no Crispen is in the first one. They fight him in like the first 10 minutes of the first mission, there's laughable Matrix slow mo and everything.
+5
Options
astrobstrdSo full of mercy...Registered Userregular
Patrick Stewart is just trying to fund his script (excuse the Ricky Gervais). It's like X-men, you see...
Picard's the only Star Trek thing that I have ever at all enjoyed watching aside from that one scene with the Beastie Boys song, so that seems fine to me.
You and I are enemies now.
Well, I suppose it was inevitable. Pistols at dawn?
0
Options
PiptheFairFrequently not in boats.Registered Userregular
Picard's the only Star Trek thing that I have ever at all enjoyed watching aside from that one scene with the Beastie Boys song, so that seems fine to me.
ever watched ds9? it feels like it would be right up your alley
Picard's the only Star Trek thing that I have ever at all enjoyed watching aside from that one scene with the Beastie Boys song, so that seems fine to me.
You and I are enemies now.
Well, I suppose it was inevitable. Pistols at dawn?
Only cowards duel with pistols. You will each be given a locked box with a cutlass inside of it, but in order to unlock the box, you must solve a 4x4 sliding grid puzzle. You may attack your opponent with your bare fists, or the box, while they are attempting to unlock their box, or you may simply try to be the first to unlock the box and cleave them in twain with the cutlass. The choice is yours.
Picard's the only Star Trek thing that I have ever at all enjoyed watching aside from that one scene with the Beastie Boys song, so that seems fine to me.
You and I are enemies now.
Well, I suppose it was inevitable. Pistols at dawn?
They're called phasers!
0
Options
Shortytouching the meatIntergalactic Cool CourtRegistered Userregular
thinking about Crispen Glover who in order to fund his art house movies (of which he owns the only print) he was in stuff like Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle
what
but he died in the first movie
I'll allow a lot of things, but lazy continuity in my 00s Charlie's Angels movies is not one of them
He's only in the second one, you don't know your Charlie's Angels, you know nowthing!!!!
Uh... no Crispen is in the first one. They fight him in like the first 10 minutes of the first mission, there's laughable Matrix slow mo and everything.
Wait shit you're right, but he is also in the second.
No Crispen Glover plays the quiet creepy assassin who in the first movie is hired by the bad guys and seemingly defeated then pops up in the second movie seemingly as a bad guy but turns out to be helping against the REAL bad guy and gets stabbed by him (with of course a 'mind if I cut in' quip)
yes I apparently have the plot details of both 90's era charlie's angels movies memorized and I am as happy about this as you are
Patrick Stewart just seems to have a very good sense of humor and is completely unpretentious. You wouldn't think it seeing him in Star Trek until you see in the behind the scenes stuff for Star Trek. He does stuff, it seems, because he thinks it will be fun. Compare that to someone like Rami Malek who ordered Rachel Bilson to take down a photo of them as teens because he wants to be taken seriously as an actor, but still accepted the Oscar for that terrible Queen film.
Apparently when he was first cast in Star Trek, he was still coming off a lot of stage play work, and took the art of acting extremely seriously. Which was a problem, because the entire TNG cast are a load of goofballs. IIRC, took them about a season to completely break Stewart and turn him into a goofball like them.
thinking about Crispen Glover who in order to fund his art house movies (of which he owns the only print) he was in stuff like Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle
what
but he died in the first movie
I'll allow a lot of things, but lazy continuity in my 00s Charlie's Angels movies is not one of them
He's only in the second one, you don't know your Charlie's Angels, you know nowthing!!!!
Uh... no Crispen is in the first one. They fight him in like the first 10 minutes of the first mission, there's laughable Matrix slow mo and everything.
Wait shit you're right, but he is also in the second.
Patrick Stewart just seems to have a very good sense of humor and is completely unpretentious. You wouldn't think it seeing him in Star Trek until you see in the behind the scenes stuff for Star Trek. He does stuff, it seems, because he thinks it will be fun. Compare that to someone like Rami Malek who ordered Rachel Bilson to take down a photo of them as teens because he wants to be taken seriously as an actor, but still accepted the Oscar for that terrible Queen film.
I think it is worth keeping in mind that malek is probably experiencing different pressures as a young Egyptian actor who was looking down the barrel of a life spent delivering pizzas before he found any success than Patrick Stewart
+13
Options
3cl1ps3I will build a labyrinth to house the cheeseRegistered Userregular
Picard's the only Star Trek thing that I have ever at all enjoyed watching aside from that one scene with the Beastie Boys song, so that seems fine to me.
ever watched ds9? it feels like it would be right up your alley
I think that's the only one I haven't seen any of, maybe I should give it a lookieloo in that case!
Picard's the only Star Trek thing that I have ever at all enjoyed watching aside from that one scene with the Beastie Boys song, so that seems fine to me.
ever watched ds9? it feels like it would be right up your alley
I think that's the only one I haven't seen any of, maybe I should give it a lookieloo in that case!
Avery Brooks devours scenery and doesn’t give a single fuck
+9
Options
Olivawgood name, isn't it?the foot of mt fujiRegistered Userregular
Picard's the only Star Trek thing that I have ever at all enjoyed watching aside from that one scene with the Beastie Boys song, so that seems fine to me.
ever watched ds9? it feels like it would be right up your alley
I think that's the only one I haven't seen any of, maybe I should give it a lookieloo in that case!
Avery Brooks devours scenery and doesn’t give a single fuck
Sisko literally punches God, and then just shrugs after.
Yeah, Quark serves actual alcohol from a variety of species, rather than the Synthohol that comes out of he replicators. (IIRC, any food you get at Quark's is replicated).
Also there's places like the Klingon resturant where they need to have live food to serve.
+6
Options
PiptheFairFrequently not in boats.Registered Userregular
Picard's the only Star Trek thing that I have ever at all enjoyed watching aside from that one scene with the Beastie Boys song, so that seems fine to me.
ever watched ds9? it feels like it would be right up your alley
I think that's the only one I haven't seen any of, maybe I should give it a lookieloo in that case!
Avery Brooks devours scenery and doesn’t give a single fuck
Sisko literally punches God, and then just shrugs after.
‘Picard never punched me!”
+9
Options
Munkus BeaverYou don't have to attend every argument you are invited to.Philosophy: Stoicism. Politics: Democratic SocialistRegistered User, ClubPAregular
Picard's the only Star Trek thing that I have ever at all enjoyed watching aside from that one scene with the Beastie Boys song, so that seems fine to me.
ever watched ds9? it feels like it would be right up your alley
I think that's the only one I haven't seen any of, maybe I should give it a lookieloo in that case!
Avery Brooks devours scenery and doesn’t give a single fuck
Sisko literally punches God, and then just shrugs after.
‘Picard never punched me!”
'I'm not Picard.'
Humor can be dissected as a frog can, but dies in the process.
+20
Options
cj iwakuraThe Rhythm RegentBears The Name FreedomRegistered Userregular
Picard's the only Star Trek thing that I have ever at all enjoyed watching aside from that one scene with the Beastie Boys song, so that seems fine to me.
ever watched ds9? it feels like it would be right up your alley
I think that's the only one I haven't seen any of, maybe I should give it a lookieloo in that case!
Avery Brooks devours scenery and doesn’t give a single fuck
Sisko literally punches God, and then just shrugs after.
‘Picard never punched me!”
wait someone punches Q
that's all I needed to hear
Q sucks and needs to be constantly punched
+6
Options
PiptheFairFrequently not in boats.Registered Userregular
Picard's the only Star Trek thing that I have ever at all enjoyed watching aside from that one scene with the Beastie Boys song, so that seems fine to me.
ever watched ds9? it feels like it would be right up your alley
I think that's the only one I haven't seen any of, maybe I should give it a lookieloo in that case!
Avery Brooks devours scenery and doesn’t give a single fuck
Sisko literally punches God, and then just shrugs after.
‘Picard never punched me!”
wait someone punches Q
that's all I needed to hear
Q sucks and needs to be constantly punched
q and sisko get into an organized boxing match and sisko fucking belts him
+3
Options
PiptheFairFrequently not in boats.Registered Userregular
Posts
In that like, most scrappy young actors are people who have read way too much Stanislavski and are really dedicated to weird art auteur shit. And then they hit it big, they get lucky, and what Pooro says happens, they become more career/money focused. And some of them, from that point, will parlay their success into doing weird art auteur shit (maybe the same stuff they wanted to do all along, maybe newfound weird interests).
If you're looking at podcasts with successful actors/writers/directors, they've already made it past that first step. So you might not see the reason that they got into the business at that point.
most people won't
so you gotta get as close to that bar as possible
and if that means voicing a talking piece of shit instead of working the register at wendy's, they'll take it
I would, but Patrick Stewart keeps taking all our cushy poop talking jobs away from commoners like me. I was perfect for it too, people are always telling me I sound like a real piece of shit.
Tumblr | Twitter PSN: misterdapper Av by Satellite_09
what
but he died in the first movie
I'll allow a lot of things, but lazy continuity in my 00s Charlie's Angels movies is not one of them
You and I are enemies now.
He's only in the second one, you don't know your Charlie's Angels, you know nowthing!!!!
Tumblr | Twitter PSN: misterdapper Av by Satellite_09
Uh... no Crispen is in the first one. They fight him in like the first 10 minutes of the first mission, there's laughable Matrix slow mo and everything.
Well, I suppose it was inevitable. Pistols at dawn?
ever watched ds9? it feels like it would be right up your alley
Only cowards duel with pistols. You will each be given a locked box with a cutlass inside of it, but in order to unlock the box, you must solve a 4x4 sliding grid puzzle. You may attack your opponent with your bare fists, or the box, while they are attempting to unlock their box, or you may simply try to be the first to unlock the box and cleave them in twain with the cutlass. The choice is yours.
They're called phasers!
I will not
Wait shit you're right, but he is also in the second.
Tumblr | Twitter PSN: misterdapper Av by Satellite_09
yes I apparently have the plot details of both 90's era charlie's angels movies memorized and I am as happy about this as you are
Patrick Stewart just seems to have a very good sense of humor and is completely unpretentious. You wouldn't think it seeing him in Star Trek until you see in the behind the scenes stuff for Star Trek. He does stuff, it seems, because he thinks it will be fun. Compare that to someone like Rami Malek who ordered Rachel Bilson to take down a photo of them as teens because he wants to be taken seriously as an actor, but still accepted the Oscar for that terrible Queen film.
That's Demi Moore you goose!
I think it is worth keeping in mind that malek is probably experiencing different pressures as a young Egyptian actor who was looking down the barrel of a life spent delivering pizzas before he found any success than Patrick Stewart
I think that's the only one I haven't seen any of, maybe I should give it a lookieloo in that case!
I never quite understood why Quark had a cash bar on a space station with replicators.
Same reason people still wanna go to movie theaters. Also DS9 specifically has rationing of the replicators
Avery Brooks devours scenery and doesn’t give a single fuck
Also they make a point in Star Trek of saying that you can't quite replicate the good stuff
Whether that's food or wine or semi-legal Romulan hooch
PSN ID : DetectiveOlivaw | TWITTER | STEAM ID | NEVER FORGET
That second part must have slipped past young me.
Sisko literally punches God, and then just shrugs after.
Also there's places like the Klingon resturant where they need to have live food to serve.
‘Picard never punched me!”
'I'm not Picard.'
Oh, what a wholesome gay couple.
wait someone punches Q
that's all I needed to hear
Q sucks and needs to be constantly punched
q and sisko get into an organized boxing match and sisko fucking belts him
Same reason for Voyager, they use a lot of power