As you can see, it has three PCI-Standard slots free so does that mean I could see an improvement in graphics (if I did decide to play any older games on it) if I bought a cheap 64MB PCI video card, too? Or is it not worth the effort?
That's a 50-frame increase over Intel's integrated GMA950, which is newer than the GMA900 that's on the 915GV mobo.
PCI versions of the 6200 with 256MB dedicated memory - not Turbo Cache - are $40-50.
That video card has two things going against it. First it's a Quadro, which is pretty bad for games (although anything's better then the integrated video in your motherboard). Second it's a PCI-Express card, which is a newer standard then what your motherboard has.
I'd also keep an eye out for the ATI X1300. It's also available in a 256MB PCI form, and is just as good as the 6200. I suppose technically it's even better since it has hardware support for Shader Model 3.0, but I'm not sure that's a huge concern at this price point.
I'd also keep an eye out for the ATI X1300. It's also available in a 256MB PCI form, and is just as good as the 6200. I suppose technically it's even better since it has hardware support for Shader Model 3.0, but I'm not sure that's a huge concern at this price point.
Posts
http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=2427&p=1
That's a 50-frame increase over Intel's integrated GMA950, which is newer than the GMA900 that's on the 915GV mobo.
PCI versions of the 6200 with 256MB dedicated memory - not Turbo Cache - are $40-50.
But how is it the 32MB card outperformed the 64 MB one?
A quick look on ebay and I found this one. I don't want to get anything too modern since I don't want to stress out the power supply.
Let me try again.
But holy crap! $130!
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814129072
http://cgi.ebay.com/VisionTek-9250-128MB-PCI-Video-Card_W0QQitemZ270229687018QQihZ017QQcategoryZ3762QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
That should acceptably run any game released before 2005.