voice acting sucks, but it always does in these. i was bothered by the arbitrary bobbibg around of the images to remind us that they're animated. however it wasn't as bad as the invincible one. damn, that one was shit.
voice acting sucks, but it always does in these. i was bothered by the arbitrary bobbibg around of the images to remind us that they're animated. however it wasn't as bad as the invincible one. damn, that one was shit.
Oh man, that one was horrible. Then again, these always just remind me of the old 60's Marvel "cartoons".
I'm not comparing it to the original. I barely remember the original. I just know I liked it.
TeaSpoon on
0
Options
NogsCrap, crap, mega crap.Crap, crap, mega crap.Registered Userregular
edited October 2008
i enjoyed it enough for what it was. as far as the motion comics medium it's not too bad. better than the watchmen and invincible attempts. but not as good as stephen king's "N.". Granted "N." probably had a way bigger budget.
Posts
Damn, and I was curious too.
at least its done better than the dvds a few years back.
"We're sorry, this video is no longer available."
Even says it when I go to marvel's youtube page and try to play it from there.
Oh man, that one was horrible. Then again, these always just remind me of the old 60's Marvel "cartoons".
Beast sounds an awful lot like Richard Dreyfus.
PARKER, YOU'RE FIRED! <-- My comic book podcast! Satan look here!