After watching Kime get bandwagoned on Day 1 in the WoW phalla purely because of flavour text, i gotta say guys, let him stay alive for atleast a little bit
(I really can't believe you guys killed him based off of flavour text..)
Man, I wish I was better at witty phalla banter so I had something to talk to someone about.
Anyways, I'm not gonna vote for kime, cause we rocked house in the Fatal Fury phalla. Instead, I'm gonna vote for !Bliss 101, simply because you were the first person to vote before me.
After watching Kime get bandwagoned on Day 1 in the WoW phalla purely because of flavour text, i gotta say guys, let him stay alive for atleast a little bit
(I really can't believe you guys killed him based off of flavour text..)
You REALLY expected otherwise?
How naive of you.
I do kind of feel bad for him though. I mean, people really should know better.
So, do I man up and try to save Kime from another day-one voteoff by retracting my vote and putting it on, oh, I dunno. Warban or something, thus possibly provoking a ME bandwagon for trying to push it off an evildude, or just sit here and say nothing- wait. I've said too much already.
I think Kime deserves a break, if only through day one. I'm tossing my vote out for !ToxicToys. Your avatar of Zero was totally cooler than mine. I'm mad at you, now.
So, I've thought some length on it, and it's somewhat true Kime has never really rolled an evil role for quite some time.
So, under the laws of probability he would have the same chance as anyone right now to be evil, BUT due to his previous streak of good roles, or common village roles, it should be understood that such streaks normally do not last and must inevitably come to an end.
So under the possibility that Kimes' good streak is ended I suggest voting for him, because if it can happen it will happen and thus Kime can most likely be evil this game.
Switching my vote to !Mr. D for abuse of math. Probability does not work that way!
what would happen if the hotel door number were to change in the course of ~16 hours?
I would have to re-evaluate the evidence! That may indeed be the case tomorrow, but for today I'm still in the same awful room.
The hotel I'm currently staying at is under construction. My room was literally "finished" yesterday and is the only room in the entire fifth floor that is completed. The rest of the floor is still very much a construction zone, complete with missing windows, unfinished floors, and loose cables carrying 220v.
But just because I feel like playing with numbers, the numbers in my hotel room subtract to 4. While I still doubt kime, I'll vote warban because subtraction is obviously more evil than addition.
!MacGuffin, I've still got my optical sensor on you - but sorry !Warban you're the victim of circumstance here. I don't want someone to get bandwagon'd twice in a row.
Seriously people, two Kime bandwagons in a row? You could at least leave a gap between them.
I'll second that this would be a bit harsh ;p
Plus there's always day 2
Oh come on, vote for me people! If B:L succeeds, I can get three Day-1 bandwagons in two days! I think I'd be rather proud of that.
Of course, then I'd have to grudge everyone who participated in any of those Phallas. And you would all face my mighty and unspeakable wrath. But it'd be fun nonetheless!
If any of you happen to be mavericks, I would appreciate it if you would get off the Ianator bandwagon. I don't want to be associated with you dirty bastards later on if he turns out to be innocent.
TehSlothHit Or MissI Guess They Never Miss, HuhRegistered Userregular
edited February 2009
Ianator, primarily because I don't want to see Kime suck down another day 1 bandwagon, that's just not cool... even though he did vote for me EVERY DAY in phatal phury.... I deserved it though.
Seriously people, two Kime bandwagons in a row? You could at least leave a gap between them.
I'll second that this would be a bit harsh ;p
Plus there's always day 2
Oh come on, vote for me people! If B:L succeeds, I can get three Day-1 bandwagons in two days! I think I'd be rather proud of that.
Of course, then I'd have to grudge everyone who participated in any of those Phallas. And you would all face my mighty and unspeakable wrath. But it'd be fun nonetheless!
Hey man, I didn't vote for you. At least not directly... 8-)
I was thinking about why I got a vote for me, when it hit me: the village is only considered good because they're the majority.
With conversion mechanics, if you have the same number of people you started with, but have a majority on the Mafia side, then wouldn't the village then be considered evil? I mean, you say one thing now, but who knows how you'll feel in the near future? If you indiscriminately attack people who you view as your enemies, you might end up weakening yourself if you end up having to change sides.
Whether or not the two sides' views can coexist is another matter entirely: perhaps it is necessary to eliminate the few for the benefit of many. But which side could be considered 'the few' or 'the many' can change at any moment. How will we ever know we did the right thing if we're not even in charge of which point of view we adopt?
Hell, when it comes down to it, we could choose to not kill each other at all, and cooperate in getting one side to convert to the other. That way, everyone lives, and we all win. Isn't that the most basic end we all seek? Does anyone else believe this could ever be possible?
I was thinking about why I got a vote for me, when it hit me: the village is only considered good because they're the majority.
With conversion mechanics, if you have the same number of people you started with, but have a majority on the Mafia side, then wouldn't the village then be considered evil? I mean, you say one thing now, but who knows how you'll feel in the near future? If you indiscriminately attack people who you view as your enemies, you might end up weakening yourself if you end up having to change sides.
Whether or not the two sides' views can coexist is another matter entirely: perhaps it is necessary to eliminate the few for the benefit of many. But which side could be considered 'the few' or 'the many' can change at any moment. How will we ever know we did the right thing if we're not even in charge of which point of view we adopt?
Hell, when it comes down to it, we could choose to not kill each other at all, and cooperate in getting one side to convert to the other. That way, everyone lives, and we all win. Isn't that the most basic end we all seek? Does anyone else believe this could ever be possible?
Ignoring the possibility that faction X doesnt have to kill faction Y as part of their win condition, you still have to account for neutrals and truly evil serial killer type roles. Its a lofty goal, but probably too idealistic to be implemented. Plus it would kinda take the fun out of the game a little.
"OK, everyone wait your turn while faction Z converts you to their cause. It should only take another 45 days."
Posts
I disctinctly remember DamnedLibrarian killing me in the past. It's time for punishment!
That's it. I'm evil and you are dying tonight :twisted:! Die die die die!
3DS Friend Code: 3110-5393-4113
Steam profile
You REALLY expected otherwise?
How naive of you.
Anyways, I'm not gonna vote for kime, cause we rocked house in the Fatal Fury phalla. Instead, I'm gonna vote for !Bliss 101, simply because you were the first person to vote before me.
I do kind of feel bad for him though. I mean, people really should know better.
Evil Vigilante?
Or did you steal another one of those weird notebooks?
That doesn't help you much.
This thread is doing a fine job of convincing me that playing Megaman would be a swell idea now.
Besides, I'm trying to start a kime bandwagon in the other phalla. Don't sabotage my chances!
Vote Count:
Ianator - 3 votes
Toxic Toys - 3 votes
warban - 3 votes
abotkin - 2 votes
DamnedLibrarian - 2 votes
Doxa - 2 votes
lonelyahava - 2 votes
Marshmallow - 2 votes
Mr. Defecation - 2 votes
Tommy2Hands - 2 votes
Zandracon - 2 votes
Andrew Ryan - 1 vote
Bliss 101 - 1 vote
crimsoncoyote - 1 vote
Daius - 1 vote
DevoutlyApathetic - 1 vote
Egos - 1 vote
Element Brian - 1 vote
enlightenedbum - 1 vote
Exarch - 1 vote
iamtheaznman - 1 vote
jackisreal - 1 vote
MacGuffin - 1 vote
MrBlarney - 1 vote
Osvik - 1 vote
precisionk - 1 vote
Rend - 1 vote
Savant - 1 vote
Sticks - 1 vote
Tertiee - 1 vote
The_Reflection - 1 vote
Wildcat - 1 vote
WilDPanthA05 - 1 vote
Witch Doctor, DBM - 1 vote
Zellpher - 1 vote
10 players remaining to vote.
Egos has withdrawn from the game
He is replaced by Shamus
Shamus is here
ZING!
Switching my vote to !Mr. D for abuse of math. Probability does not work that way!
I would have to re-evaluate the evidence! That may indeed be the case tomorrow, but for today I'm still in the same awful room.
But just because I feel like playing with numbers, the numbers in my hotel room subtract to 4. While I still doubt kime, I'll vote warban because subtraction is obviously more evil than addition.
I'll second that this would be a bit harsh ;p
Plus there's always day 2
LoL: BunyipAristocrat
Oh come on, vote for me people! If B:L succeeds, I can get three Day-1 bandwagons in two days! I think I'd be rather proud of that.
Of course, then I'd have to grudge everyone who participated in any of those Phallas. And you would all face my mighty and unspeakable wrath. But it'd be fun nonetheless!
3DS Friend Code: 3110-5393-4113
Steam profile
Thank you for your understanding and cooperation.
Because I am ruthless.
This man knows the score.
twitch.tv/tehsloth
"It's just so uncool to vote him out Day 1 like this!"
"If only Zot were here!"
Well, he ain't, so someone's gonna have to do!
Hey man, I didn't vote for you. At least not directly... 8-)
Toxic Toys.
He hates fun as much as Zot ever did.
I like fun. Just in small bite size pieces.
With conversion mechanics, if you have the same number of people you started with, but have a majority on the Mafia side, then wouldn't the village then be considered evil? I mean, you say one thing now, but who knows how you'll feel in the near future? If you indiscriminately attack people who you view as your enemies, you might end up weakening yourself if you end up having to change sides.
Whether or not the two sides' views can coexist is another matter entirely: perhaps it is necessary to eliminate the few for the benefit of many. But which side could be considered 'the few' or 'the many' can change at any moment. How will we ever know we did the right thing if we're not even in charge of which point of view we adopt?
Hell, when it comes down to it, we could choose to not kill each other at all, and cooperate in getting one side to convert to the other. That way, everyone lives, and we all win. Isn't that the most basic end we all seek? Does anyone else believe this could ever be possible?
Ignoring the possibility that faction X doesnt have to kill faction Y as part of their win condition, you still have to account for neutrals and truly evil serial killer type roles. Its a lofty goal, but probably too idealistic to be implemented. Plus it would kinda take the fun out of the game a little.
"OK, everyone wait your turn while faction Z converts you to their cause. It should only take another 45 days."